Double-Ovsynch in high-producing dairy cows: effects on progesterone concentrations and ovulation to GnRH treatments.

Previous studies reported increased fertility using Ovsynch for presynchronization before Ovsynch (Double-Ovsynch), as compared with presynchronization with two prostaglandin F(2α) (PGF(2α)) treatments before Ovsynch (Presynch-Ovsynch). This study compared ovarian follicular dynamics and hormone concentrations during Double-Ovsynch versus Presynch-Ovsynch. Lactating Holstein cows (N = 193) were assigned to one of two treatment groups: (1) Presynch (N = 93), two injections of PGF(2α) 14 days apart, followed by the Ovsynch-timed AI protocol 12 days later; and (2) Double-Ovsynch (N = 100), one injection of GnRH, PGF(2α) 7 days later, and GnRH 3 days later, followed by the Ovsynch-timed AI protocol 7 days later. All cows received the same Ovsynch-timed AI protocol: GnRH (G1) at 68 ± 3 days in milk (mean ± SEM), PGF(2α) 7 days later, and GnRH (G2) 56 hours after PGF(2α). Ultrasonographic evaluations of the ovaries and blood sampling were performed at G1, PGF(2α), G2, and 6 days after the G2 injection of the Ovsynch-timed AI protocol. Double-Ovsynch decreased the percentage of cows with low circulating progesterone (P4) concentrations (<0.50 ng/mL) at G1 (12.0% vs. 30.1%; P = 0.003) and increased the percentage of cows with medium P4 concentrations (0.50 > P4 ≤ 3.0 ng/mL) at G1 (80.0% vs. 57.0%; P < 0.01), and with CL at G1 (94.0% vs. 67.8%; P < 0.01). Double-Ovsynch also increased the percentage of cows with high P4 (>3.0 ng/mL) at PGF(2α) (88.0% vs. 76.3%; P = 0.04) and tended to increase average circulating P4 at PGF(2α) (3.52 ± 0.17 ng/mL vs. 3.09 ± 0.21 ng/mL; P = 0.11). Double-Ovsynch also tended to increase percentage of cows ovulating to G1 (80.0% vs. 69.9%; P = 0.11) and G2 (98.0% vs. 93.5%; P = 0.08). Thus, presynchronization of cows with Double-Ovsynch induced ovulation in noncycling cows and appeared to increase most aspects of synchronization during the Ovsynch protocol.

Ayres H ，Ferreira RM ，Cunha AP ，Araújo RR ，Wiltbank MC ... -  《-》

A new presynchronization system (Double-Ovsynch) increases fertility at first postpartum timed AI in lactating dairy cows.

This study evaluated a novel presynchronization method, using Ovsynch prior to the Ovsynch-timed AI protocol (Double-Ovsynch) compared to Presynch-Ovsynch. Lactating Holstein (n=337) cows, were assigned to two treatment groups: (1) Presynch (n=180), two injections of PGF 14 d apart, followed by the Ovsynch-timed AI protocol 12 d later; (2) Double-Ovsynch (n=157), received GnRH, PGF 7 d later, and GnRH 3 d later, followed by the Ovsynch-timed AI protocol 7 d later. All cows received the same Ovsynch-timed AI protocol: GnRH (G1) at 68+/-3 DIM (mean+/-SEM), PGF 7 d later, GnRH (G2) 56h after PGF, and AI 16 to 20h later. Pregnancy was diagnosed 39-45 d after timed AI. Double-Ovsynch increased the pregnancies per AI (P/AI) compared to Presynch-Ovsynch (49.7% vs 41.7%, P=0.03). Surprisingly, Double-Ovsynch increased P/AI only in primiparous (65.2% vs 45.2%; P=0.02) and not multiparous (37.5% vs 39.3%) cows. In a subset of 87 cows, ovarian ultrasonography and progesterone (P4) measurements were performed at G1 and 7 d later. Double-Ovsynch decreased the percentage of cows with low P4 (<1ng/mL) at G1 (9.4% vs 33.3%) and increased the percentage of cows with high P4 (> or =3ng/mL) at PGF (78.1% vs 52.3%). Thus, presynchronization of cows with Double-Ovsynch increased fertility in primiparous cows compared to a standard Presynch protocol, perhaps due to induction of ovulation in non-cycling cows and improved synchronization of cycling cows. Future studies are needed, with a larger number of cows, to further test the hypothesis of higher fertility with Double-Ovsynch, and to elucidate the physiological mechanisms that underlie apparent changes in fertility with this protocol.

Souza AH ，Ayres H ，Ferreira RM ，Wiltbank MC ... -  《THERIOGENOLOGY》

Increased fertility in lactating dairy cows resynchronized with Double-Ovsynch compared with Ovsynch initiated 32 d after timed artificial insemination.

The objective was to determine if using a Double-Ovsynch protocol [DO; Pre-Resynch: GnRH-7 d-PGF(2α)-3 d-GnRH, 7 d later Breeding-Resynch: GnRH-7 d-PGF(2α)-56 h-GnRH-16 h-timed artificial insemination (TAI)] to resynchronize ovulation after a previous TAI would increase synchrony and pregnancies per AI (P/AI) compared with an Ovsynch protocol initiated 32 d after TAI (D32; GnRH-7 d-PGF(2α)-56 h-GnRH-16 h-TAI). Lactating Holstein cows at various days in milk and prior AI services were blocked by parity and randomly assigned to resynchronization treatments. All DO cows received the first GnRH injection of Pre-Resynch 22 d after TAI, and cows (n=981) diagnosed not pregnant using transrectal ultrasonography 29 d after TAI continued the protocol. Pregnancy status for all D32 cows was evaluated 29 d after TAI so fertility and pregnancy loss could be compared with that of DO cows. All D32 cows received the first GnRH injection of Ovsynch 32 d after TAI, and cows (n=956) diagnosed not pregnant using transrectal palpation 39 d after TAI continued the protocol. In a subgroup of cows from each treatment, ultrasonography (n=751) and serum progesterone (P4) concentrations (n=743) were used to determine the presence of a functional corpus luteum (CL) and ovulation to the first GnRH injection of D32 and Breeding-Resynch of DO (GnRH1), luteal regression after PGF before TAI, and ovulation to the GnRH injection before TAI (GnRH2). Overall, P/AI 29 d after TAI was not affected by parity and was greater for DO compared with D32 cows (39 vs. 30%). Pregnancy loss from 29 to 74 d after TAI was not affected by parity or treatment. The percentage of cows with a functional CL (P4 ≥1.0 ng/mL) at GnRH1 was greater for DO than D32 cows (81 vs. 58%), with most DO cows having medium P4 (60%; 1.0 to 3.49 ng/ml), whereas most D32 cows had either low (42%; <1.0 ng/mL) or high (36%; ≥3.5 ng/mL) P4 at GnRH1. Ovulation to GnRH1 was similar between treatments but was affected by serum P4 at GnRH. Cows with low P4 (<1.0 ng/mL) had the greatest ovulatory response (59%), followed by cows with medium (≥1.0 to 3.49 ng/mL; 38%) and then high (≥3.50 ng/mL; 16%) P4 at GnRH1. A greater percentage of DO cows were synchronized compared with D32 cows (72 vs. 51%) primarily due to a greater percentage of D32 than DO cows without a functional CL at the PGF injection before TAI (35 vs. 17%) or without complete CL regression before GnRH2 (17 vs. 7%). We conclude that DO increased fertility of lactating dairy cows during a resynchronization program primarily by increasing synchronization of cows during the Ovsynch protocol before TAI.

Giordano JO ，Wiltbank MC ，Guenther JN ，Pawlisch R ，Bas S ，Cunha AP ，Fricke PM ... -  《-》

Effect of dose and timing of prostaglandin F(2α) treatments during a 7-d Ovsynch protocol on progesterone concentration at the end of the protocol and pregnancy outcomes in lactating Holstein cows.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of two prostaglandin F2α (PGF) treatments 24 h apart (500 μg of cloprostenol) and treatment with a double PGF dose on d 7 (1000 μg of cloprostenol) during a 7-d Ovsynch protocol on progesterone (P4) concentration and pregnancy per artificial insemination (P/AI) in lactating Holstein cows. We hypothesized that treatment leads to a decreased P4 concentration at the second GnRH treatment (G2) and an increase in P/AI compared to the traditional 7-d Ovsynch protocol. A secondary hypothesis was that the treatment effect is influenced by the presence of a corpus luteum (CL) at the first GnRH treatment (G1). Two experiments were conducted on 8 commercial dairy farms in Germany. Once a week, cows from both experiments were assigned in a consecutive manner to receive: (1) Ovsynch (control: GnRH; 7 d, PGF; 9 d, GnRH), (2) Ovsynch with a double PGF dose (GDPG: GnRH; 7 d, 2xPGF; 9 d, GnRH), or (3) Ovsynch with a second PGF treatment 24 h later (GPPG: GnRH; 7 d, PGF; 8 d, PGF; 32 h, GnRH). All cows received timed AI (TAI) approximately 16 h after G2. Pregnancy diagnosis was performed by transrectal palpation (38 ± 3 d after TAI, experiment 1) or transrectal ultrasonography (35 ± 7 d after TAI, experiment 2). Whereas farms from experiment 1 used a Presynch-Ovsynch protocol (PGF, 14 d later PGF, 12 d later GnRH, 7 d later PGF, 2 d later GnRH, and 16-18 h later TAI) to facilitate first postpartum TAI, no presynchronization protocol was used on farms from experiment 2. In experiment 1, we enrolled 1581 lactating dairy cows (60 experimental units) from 2 dairy farms. At G2, blood samples were collected from a subsample of cows (n = 491; 16 experimental units) to determine P4 concentration at G2. In experiment 2, we enrolled 1979 lactating dairy cows (252 experimental units) from 6 dairy farms. Transrectal ultrasonography was performed to determine the presence or absence of a CL at G1. In experiment 1, treatment affected P/AI (P = 0.01) and P/AI was greater for GDPG (38.2%) and GPPG (38.9%) than for control cows (29.8%). Both, GDPG and GPPG cows had decreased P4 concentration at G2 compared with control cows (P < 0.01). Whereas both treatments increased the percentage of cows with very low P4 concentration (0.00-0.09 ng/mL) at G2, only the GPPG treatment decreased the percentage of cows with high P4 concentration (≥0.6 ng/mL) at G2 compared to the control group. In experiment 2, P/AI was greater for GPPG (37.4%) than for control cows (31.0%; P = 0.03) and tended to be greater than for GDPG cows (31.8%; P = 0.05). Cows from the GDPG group had similar (P = 0.77) P/AI compared to the control group. Pregnancy per AI did not differ between cows with a CL at G1 and cows without a CL at G1 (34.1% vs. 32.6%; P = 0.50). There was no interaction between treatment and presence of a CL at G1 on P/AI (P = 0.61). Combining data from the 2 experiments but excluding cows from experiment 1 receiving presynchronization before first TAI (n = 2573; 312 experimental units), P/AI was greater for GPPG (40.3%; P < 0.01) than for control (31.8%) and GDPG cows (33.4%). Between GDPG and control cows, P/AI did not differ (P = 0.46). We conclude that overall the addition of a second PGF treatment on d 8 during a 7-d Ovsynch protocol increased P/AI compared to the traditional 7-d Ovsynch including a single PGF dose on d 7 and to a double PGF dose on d 7. Doubling the PGF dose on d 7 in a 7-d Ovsynch protocol did not affect P/AI. Use of a presynchronization protocol, however, seems to influence the effect of a dose frequency modification of PGF treatment in an Ovsynch protocol. Presynchronized cows receiving first postpartum TAI had similarly increased P/AI treated with a double PGF dose compared with treatment with a second PGF dose. Future studies need to elucidate whether the treatment effect is modified by presynchronization of the first postpartum TAI.

Tippenhauer CM ，Steinmetz I ，Heuwieser W ，Fricke PM ，Lauber MR ，Cabrera EM ，Borchardt S ... -  《-》

Fertility in dairy cows following presynchronization and administering twice the luteolytic dose of prostaglandin F2α as one or two injections in the 5-day timed artificial insemination protocol.

The objectives were to evaluate pregnancy per AI (P/AI) of dairy cows subjected to the 5-day timed AI protocol under various synchronization and luteolytic treatments. Cows were either presynchronized or received supplemental progesterone during the synchronization protocol, and received a double luteolytic dose of PGF2α, either as one or two injections. In Experiment 1, dairy cows (n=737; Holstein=250, Jersey=80, and crossbred=407) in two seasonal grazing dairy farms were randomly assigned to one of four treatments in a 2×2 factorial arrangement. The day of AI was considered study Day 0. Half of the cows were presynchronized (G6G: PGF2α on Day -16 and GnRH on Day -14) and received the 5-day timed AI protocol using 1 mg of cloprostenol, either as a single injection (G6G-S: GnRH on Day -8, PGF2α on Day -3, and GnRH+AI on Day 0) or divided into two injections of 0.5 mg each (G6G-T: GnRH on Day -8, PGF2α on Day -3 and -2, and GnRH+AI on Day 0). The remaining cows were not presynchronized and received a controlled internal drug-release (CIDR) insert containing progesterone from GnRH to the first PGF2α injection of the 5-day timed AI protocol, and 1 mg of cloprostenol either as a single injection on Day -3 (CIDR-S) or divided into two injections of 0.5 mg each on Days -3 and -2 (CIDR-T). Ovaries were examined by ultrasonography on Days -8 and -3 and plasma progesterone concentrations were determined on Days -3 and 0. In Experiment 2, 655 high-producing Holstein cows had their estrous cycle presynchronized with PGF2α at 46±3 and 60±3 days postpartum and were randomly assigned to receive 50 mg of dinoprost during the 5-day timed AI protocol, either as a single injection or divided into two injections of 25 mg each. Pregnancies per AI were determined on Days 35 and 64 after AI in both experiments. In Experiment 1, presynchronization with G6G increased the proportion of cows with a CL on Day -8 (80.6 vs. 58.8%), ovulation to the first GnRH of the protocol (64.2 vs. 50.2%), and the presence (95.6 vs. 88.4%) and number (1.79 vs. 1.30) of CL at PGF(2α) compared with CIDR cows. Luteolysis was greater for two injections compared to a single PGF2α injection (two PGF2α=95.9 vs. single PGF2α=72.2%), especially in presynchronized cows (G6G-T=96.2 vs. G6G-S=61.7%). For cows not presynchronized, two PGF2α injections had no effect on P/AI (CIDR-S=30.2 vs. CIDR-T=34.3%), whereas for presynchronized cows, it improved P/AI (G6G-S=28.7 vs. G6G-T=45.4%). In Experiment 2, the two-PGF2α injection increased P/AI on Days 35 (two PGF2α=44.5 vs. single PGF2α=36.4%) and 64 (two PGF2α=40.3% vs. single PGF2α=32.6%) after AI. Presynchronization and dividing the dose of PGF2α (either cloprostenol or dinoprost) into two injections increased P/AI in lactating dairy cows subjected to the 5-day timed AI protocol.

Ribeiro ES ，Bisinotto RS ，Favoreto MG ，Martins LT ，Cerri RL ，Silvestre FT ，Greco LF ，Thatcher WW ，Santos JE ... -  《-》