Fertility in dairy cows following presynchronization and administering twice the luteolytic dose of prostaglandin F2α as one or two injections in the 5-day timed artificial insemination protocol.

The objectives were to evaluate pregnancy per AI (P/AI) of dairy cows subjected to the 5-day timed AI protocol under various synchronization and luteolytic treatments. Cows were either presynchronized or received supplemental progesterone during the synchronization protocol, and received a double luteolytic dose of PGF2α, either as one or two injections. In Experiment 1, dairy cows (n=737; Holstein=250, Jersey=80, and crossbred=407) in two seasonal grazing dairy farms were randomly assigned to one of four treatments in a 2×2 factorial arrangement. The day of AI was considered study Day 0. Half of the cows were presynchronized (G6G: PGF2α on Day -16 and GnRH on Day -14) and received the 5-day timed AI protocol using 1 mg of cloprostenol, either as a single injection (G6G-S: GnRH on Day -8, PGF2α on Day -3, and GnRH+AI on Day 0) or divided into two injections of 0.5 mg each (G6G-T: GnRH on Day -8, PGF2α on Day -3 and -2, and GnRH+AI on Day 0). The remaining cows were not presynchronized and received a controlled internal drug-release (CIDR) insert containing progesterone from GnRH to the first PGF2α injection of the 5-day timed AI protocol, and 1 mg of cloprostenol either as a single injection on Day -3 (CIDR-S) or divided into two injections of 0.5 mg each on Days -3 and -2 (CIDR-T). Ovaries were examined by ultrasonography on Days -8 and -3 and plasma progesterone concentrations were determined on Days -3 and 0. In Experiment 2, 655 high-producing Holstein cows had their estrous cycle presynchronized with PGF2α at 46±3 and 60±3 days postpartum and were randomly assigned to receive 50 mg of dinoprost during the 5-day timed AI protocol, either as a single injection or divided into two injections of 25 mg each. Pregnancies per AI were determined on Days 35 and 64 after AI in both experiments. In Experiment 1, presynchronization with G6G increased the proportion of cows with a CL on Day -8 (80.6 vs. 58.8%), ovulation to the first GnRH of the protocol (64.2 vs. 50.2%), and the presence (95.6 vs. 88.4%) and number (1.79 vs. 1.30) of CL at PGF(2α) compared with CIDR cows. Luteolysis was greater for two injections compared to a single PGF2α injection (two PGF2α=95.9 vs. single PGF2α=72.2%), especially in presynchronized cows (G6G-T=96.2 vs. G6G-S=61.7%). For cows not presynchronized, two PGF2α injections had no effect on P/AI (CIDR-S=30.2 vs. CIDR-T=34.3%), whereas for presynchronized cows, it improved P/AI (G6G-S=28.7 vs. G6G-T=45.4%). In Experiment 2, the two-PGF2α injection increased P/AI on Days 35 (two PGF2α=44.5 vs. single PGF2α=36.4%) and 64 (two PGF2α=40.3% vs. single PGF2α=32.6%) after AI. Presynchronization and dividing the dose of PGF2α (either cloprostenol or dinoprost) into two injections increased P/AI in lactating dairy cows subjected to the 5-day timed AI protocol.

Ribeiro ES ，Bisinotto RS ，Favoreto MG ，Martins LT ，Cerri RL ，Silvestre FT ，Greco LF ，Thatcher WW ，Santos JE ... -  《-》

Reproductive performance of grazing dairy cows following presynchronization and resynchronization protocols.

Objectives were to compare the effect of presynchronization and resynchronization methods on fertility responses of grazing dairy cows at first and second artificial insemination (AI) and pregnancy rate during the entire breeding season. Lactating dairy cows (n = 1,263) in 2 seasonal grazing farms were blocked, within farm, by parity, breed and days in milk. Within each block, cows were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatments arranged as a 2 × 2 factorial with 2 presynchronization and 2 resynchronization treatments. Cows had their estrous cycles presynchronized with either a PGF(2α)-based program (Presynch) consisting of 2 injections of PGF(2α) administered 14 d apart and starting the timed AI protocol 11 d later, or with a PGF(2α)-GnRH-based presynchronization program (G6G) consisting of an injection of PGF(2α), followed 3 d later by an injection of GnRH and starting the timed AI protocol 6 d later. All cows received the first insemination on the same day, which was considered study d 0 and also d 0 of the breeding season. All cows received the 5-d timed AI protocol that consisted of GnRH on d -8, PGF(2α) on d -3 and -2, and GnRH+timed AI on d 0. Blood was sampled and analyzed for progesterone on d -8. On d 12, cows in each presynchronization treatment either remained as untreated controls (RCON) or received a controlled internal drug-release (CIDR) insert containing progesterone for 7 d (RCIDR). Estrus was observed daily starting on d 19 and cows in estrus were inseminated on the same day. On d 35, bulls were placed with the cows for an additional 65 d, completing a 100-d breeding season. Holstein cows were less likely to have progesterone ≥ 1 ng/mL on d -8, and had less expression of estrus and pregnancy per AI (P/AI), which resulted in a slower rate of pregnancy and a smaller proportion of pregnancy at the end of the study than did Jersey or crossbred cows. In addition, body condition, days in milk, and plasma progesterone concentration at the first GnRH injection of the timed AI protocol had marked effects on the reproductive performance of lactating grazing dairy cows. A greater proportion of G6G cows had progesterone ≥ 1 ng/mL at the first GnRH injection of the timed AI protocol compared with Presynch cows (82.0 vs. 74.3%). Presynchronization treatment did not influence P/AI, but cows in G6G had increased risk of pregnancy loss between d 30 and 65 after the first AI (12.9 vs. 8.1%). Nevertheless, an interaction between presynchronization and ovarian status was observed, and cows initiating the timed AI with progesterone ≥ 1 ng/mL had greater P/AI when previously treated with Presynch than G6G. On the other hand, G6G benefited P/AI of cows initiating the timed AI with progesterone < 1 ng/mL. Resynchronization with RCIDR altered the pattern of return to estrus, but it did not increase the rate of re-insemination and decreased the proportion of pregnant cows at the end of the 100-d breeding period (80.6 vs. 84.4%).

Ribeiro ES ，Cerri RL ，Bisinotto RS ，Lima FS ，Silvestre FT ，Greco LF ，Thatcher WW ，Santos JE ... -  《-》

Evaluation of presynchronized resynchronization protocols for lactating dairy cows.

The objectives of this experiment were to determine the speed at which cows that had their estrous cycle presynchronized with a GnRH or PGF(2α) injection are reinseminated and become pregnant. Furthermore, this experiment aimed to determine whether treatment with a controlled internal drug-releasing (CIDR) insert during the timed artificial insemination (AI) protocol improves pregnancy per AI (P/AI) of cows that had their estrous cycle presynchronized with GnRH or PGF(2α). Lactating cows from 2 herds were assigned to 1 of 2 presynchronization treatments at 32 ± 4 d after AI: GGPG (n=452)--GnRH injection at enrollment (d 0), 7d before the start of the timed AI protocol, and P11GPG (n=466)--PGF(2α) injection on d 3, 11 d before the start of the timed AI protocol. Cows observed in estrus at any interval after enrollment were reinseminated on the same day. Cows not observed in estrus by d 7 were paired by presynchronization treatment and assigned to receive or not receive a CIDR insert during the timed AI protocol (CIDR = 240, no CIDR = 317). Timed AI protocols were the Ovsynch56 at site A and the Cosynch48 at site B. A subsample of cows from site A had their ovaries scanned by ultrasound at enrollment and on the day of the first GnRH and PGF(2α) injections of the timed AI protocol and had blood sampled at each injection of the timed AI protocol for determination of progesterone concentration. Cows were examined for pregnancy 32 ± 4 and 67 ± 4 d after reinsemination. Cows in the P11GPG treatment had a faster reinsemination rate [adjusted hazard ratio = 1.24 (95% CI = 1.07, 1.45)] and were less likely to be submitted to the timed AI protocol (40.3 vs. 89.8%) and to be reinseminated at a fixed time (38.6 vs. 83.9%). The interval from enrollment to reinsemination was shorter for cows in the P11GPG group (13.0 ± 0.4 vs. 15.0 ± 0.2d). Presynchronization treatment did not affect P/AI 32 ± 4 d (GGPG = 42.3%, P11GPG = 39.3%) and 67 ± 4 d (GGPG = 37.0%, P11GPG = 35.4%) after reinsemination. Pregnancy rate from d 0 to 7 (GGPG = 3.6%, P11GPG = 17.7%) and from d 8 to 14 (GGPG = 1.6%, P11GPG = 5.7%) were greater for cows in the P11GPG treatment. Treatment with the CIDR insert during the timed AI protocol did not affect P/AI 32 ± 4 d (CIDR = 41.7%, no CIDR = 41.4%) and 67 ± 4 d (CIDR = 36.5%, no CIDR = 35.3%) after reinsemination. A greater percentage of cows in the GGPG treatment had progesterone concentration ≥ 1 ng/mL on the day of the first GnRH injection of the timed AI protocol (83.8 vs. 51.5%), but a greater percentage of cows in the P11GPG treatment ovulated in response to the first GnRH injection of the timed AI protocol (66.1 vs. 46.8%). We conclude that the P/AI of cows that had their estrous cycle presynchronized with GnRH or PGF(2α) was not different, but in herds with adequate estrous detection efficiency and accuracy, presynchronization with PGF(2α) may reduce the interval to the establishment of pregnancy.

Chebel RC ，Scanavez AA ，Silva PR ，Moraes JG ，Mendonça LG ，Lopes G Jr ... -  《-》

Effect of interval between induction of ovulation and artificial insemination (AI) and supplemental progesterone for resynchronization on fertility of dairy cows subjected to a 5-d timed AI program.

Objectives were to investigate 2 intervals from induction of ovulation to artificial insemination (AI) and the effect of supplemental progesterone for resynchronization on fertility of lactating dairy cows subjected to a 5-d timed AI program. In experiment 1, 1,227 Holstein cows had their estrous cycles presynchronized with 2 injections of PGF(2α) at 46 and 60 d in milk (DIM). The timed AI protocols were initiated with GnRH at 72 DIM, followed by 2 injections of PGF(2α) at 77 and 78 DIM and a second injection of GnRH at either 56 (OVS56) or 72h (COS72) after the first PGF(2α) of the timed AI protocols. All cows were time-inseminated at 72h after the first PGF(2α) injection. Pregnancy was diagnosed on d 32 and 60 after AI. In experiment 2, 675 nonpregnant Holstein cows had their estrous cycles resynchronized starting at 34 d after the first AI. Cows received the OVS56 with (RCIDR) or without (RCON) supplemental progesterone, as an intravaginal insert, from the first GnRH to the first PGF(2α). Pregnancy diagnoses were performed on d 32 and 60 after AI. During experiment 2, subsets of cows had their ovaries scanned by ultrasonography at the first GnRH, the first PGF(2α), and second GnRH injections of the protocol. Blood was sampled on the day of AI and 7 d later, and concentrations of progesterone were determined in plasma. Cows were considered to have a synchronized ovulation if they had progesterone <1 and >2.26 ng/mL on the day of AI and 7 d later, respectively, and if no ovulation was detected between the first PGF(2α) and second GnRH injections during resynchronization. In experiment 1, the proportion of cows detected in estrus at AI was greater for COS72 than OVS56 (40.6 vs. 32.4%). Pregnancy per AI (P/AI) did not differ between OVS56 (46.4%) and COS72 (45.5%). In experiment 2, cows supplemented with progesterone had greater P/AI compared with unsupplemented cows (51.3 vs. 43.1%). Premature ovulation tended to be greater for RCON than RCIDR cows (7.5 vs. 3.6%), although synchronization of the estrous cycle after timed AI was similar between treatments. Timing of induction of ovulation with GnRH relative to insemination did not affect P/AI of dairy cows enrolled in a 5-d timed AI program. Furthermore, during resynchronization starting on d 34 after the first AI, supplementation with progesterone improved P/AI in cows subjected to the 5-d timed AI protocol.

Bisinotto RS ，Ribeiro ES ，Martins LT ，Marsola RS ，Greco LF ，Favoreto MG ，Risco CA ，Thatcher WW ，Santos JE ... -  《-》

Effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone at initiation of the 5-d timed artificial insemination (AI) program and timing of induction of ovulation relative to AI on ovarian dynamics and fertility of dairy heifers.

Two experiments evaluated the effects of the first GnRH injection of the 5-d timed artificial insemination (AI) program on ovarian responses and pregnancy per AI (P/AI), and the effect of timing of the final GnRH to induce ovulation relative to AI on P/AI. In experiment 1, 605 Holstein heifers were synchronized for their second insemination and assigned randomly to receive GnRH on study d 0 (n = 298) or to remain as untreated controls (n = 307). Ovaries were scanned on study d 0 and 5. All heifers received a controlled internal drug-release (CIDR) insert containing progesterone on d 0, a single injection of PGF(2α) and removal of the CIDR on d 5, and GnRH concurrent with timed AI on d 8. Blood was analyzed for progesterone at AI. Pregnancy was diagnosed on d 32 and 60 after AI. Ovulation on study d 0 was greater for GnRH than control (35.4 vs. 10.6%). Presence of a new corpus luteum (CL) at PGF(2α) injection was greater for GnRH than for control (43.1 vs. 20.8%), although the proportion of heifers with a CL at PGF(2α) did not differ between treatments and averaged 87.1%. Progesterone on the day of AI was greater for GnRH than control (0.50 ± 0.07 vs. 0.28 ± 0.07 ng/mL). The proportion of heifers at AI with progesterone <0.5 ng/mL was less for GnRH than for control (73.8 vs. 88.2%). The proportion of heifers in estrus at AI did not differ between treatments and averaged 66.8%. Pregnancy per AI was not affected by treatment at d 32 or 60 (GnRH = 52.5 and 49.8% vs. control = 54.1 and 50.0%), and pregnancy loss averaged 6.0%. Responses to GnRH were not influenced by ovarian status on study d 0. In experiment 2, 1,295 heifers were synchronized for their first insemination and assigned randomly to receive a CIDR on d 0, PGF(2α) and removal of the CIDR on d 5, and either GnRH 56 h after PGF(2α) and AI 16h later (OVS56, n = 644) or GnRH concurrent with AI 72 h after PGF(2α) (COS72; n = 651). Estrus at AI was greater for COS72 than for OVS56 (61.4 vs. 47.5). Treatment did not affect P/AI on d 32 in heifers displaying signs of estrus at AI, but COS72 improved P/AI compared with OVS56 (55.0 vs. 47.6%) in those not in estrus at AI. Similarly, P/AI on d 60 did not differ between treatments for heifers displaying estrus, but CO S72 improved P/AI compared with OVS56 (53.0 vs. 44.7%) in those not in estrus at AI. Administration of GnRH on the first day of the 5-d timed AI program resulted in low ovulation rate and no improvement in P/AI when heifers received a single PGF(2α) injection 5 d later. Moreover, extending the proestrus by delaying the final GnRH from 56 to 72 h concurrent with AI benefited fertility of dairy heifers that did not display signs of estrus at insemination following the 5-d timed AI protocol.

Lima FS ，Ayres H ，Favoreto MG ，Bisinotto RS ，Greco LF ，Ribeiro ES ，Baruselli PS ，Risco CA ，Thatcher WW ，Santos JE ... -  《-》