A novel anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody IAH0968 in HER2-positive heavily pretreated solid tumors: results from a phase Ia/Ib first-in-human, open-label, single center study.

IAH0968 is an afucosylated anti-epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) monoclonal antibody which improved the activity of antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and superior anti-tumor efficacy. To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), a single institution, phase Ia/Ib study was undertaken, using 3 + 3 design. The primary endpoints were safety, tolerability and preliminary clinical activity. Eighteen patients were evaluable for safety and fifteen patients were suitable for efficacy analysis. Dose escalations were 6 mg/kg (N = 2), 10 mg/kg (N = 7), 15 mg/kg (N = 5), and tolerable up to 20 mg/kg (N = 4). Only one DLT was found at dosage 10 mg/kg, and no MTD was reached. The most common Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were hypokalemia (5.6%), supraventricular tachycardia (5.6%), interval extension of QTC (5.6%), and infusion reaction (5.6%). Grade 4 TRAE was arrhythmia (5.6%). No serious TRAE or Grade 5 was reported. 22.2% of patients had a TRAE leading to dose adjustment and 16.7% of patients had a TRAE resulting in discontinuation of IAH0968. After a median follow-up of 9.7 months (range, 3.7 - 22.0), the objective response rate (ORR) was 13.3% (2/15), the disease control rate (DCR) was 53.3% (8/15), and median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 4.2 months (95% CI: 1.4 - 7.7), and the median duration of disease control (DDC) was 6.3 months (95% CI: 2.9-not reached), with 4/15 responses ongoing. In HER2-positive heavily pretreated metastatic patients, IAH0968 demonstrated promising clinical activity with durable responses and tolerable safety profiles. ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04934514.

Song N ，Teng Y ，Shi J ，Teng Z ，Jin B ，Qu J ，Zhang L ，Yu P ，Zhao L ，Wang J ，Li A ，Tong L ，Jiang S ，Liu Y ，Yin L ，Jiang X ，Xu T ，Cui J ，Qu X ，Liu Y ... -  《Frontiers in Immunology》

Dual inhibition of LAG-3 and PD-1 with IBI110 and sintilimab in advanced solid tumors: the first-in-human phase Ia/Ib study.

Co-inhibition of immune checkpoints lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) and PD-1 is believed to enhance cancer immunotherapy through synergistic effects. Herein, we evaluate the safety and efficacy of IBI110 (anti-LAG-3 antibody) with sintilimab (an anti-PD-1 antibody) in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors. In this open-label phase I study, phase Ia dose escalation of IBI110 monotherapy and phase Ib combination dose escalation of IBI110 plus sintilimab were conducted in patients with advanced solid tumors. Additionally, phase Ib combination dose expansion of IBI110 plus sintilimab and chemotherapy was conducted in previously untreated, advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer (sqNSCLC) and HER-2 negative gastric cancer (GC). In phase Ia dose escalation, patients received IBI110 monotherapy at 0.01/0.1/0.3/1/3/10/20 mg/kg Q3W. In phase Ib dose escalation, patients received IBI110 at 0.3/0.7/1.5/3/5/8/10 mg/kg Q3W plus sintilimab 200 mg Q3W. In phase Ib combination dose expansion, patients received IBI110 at recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) plus sintilimab 200 mg Q3W and chemotherapy. The primary endpoints were safety, tolerability and efficacy including objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by RECIST v1.1 and overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and immunogenicity. In phase Ia dose escalation (n = 28), treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 67.9% patients and grade ≥ 3 TRAEs occurred in 21.4% patients. In phase Ib combination dose escalation (n = 45), TRAEs occurred in 75.6% patients and grade ≥ 3 TRAEs occurred in 22.2% patients. No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed. The most common TRAE was anemia (17.9%, including 3.6% ≥ G3) in phase Ia dose escalation of IBI110 monotherapy (n = 28), aspartate aminotransferase increased (28.9%, all G1-G2) in phase Ib dose escalation of IBI110 plus sintilimab (n = 45), anemia (70.0%, all G1-G2) in phase Ib dose expansion in sqNSCLC (n = 20), and neutrophil count decreased (64.7%, including 17.6%≥ G3) in phase Ib dose expansion in GC (n = 17). The RP2D of IBI110 was determined at 200 mg (3 mg/kg) Q3W. ORR in phase Ia/Ib dose escalation was 3.6% with IBI110 monotherapy and 14% with IBI110 plus sintilimab. In phase Ib combination dose expansion of IBI110 plus sintilimab and chemotherapy, unconfirmed and confirmed ORR in sqNSCLC (n = 20) was 80.0% (95% CI, 56.3-94.3) and 75.0% (95% CI, 50.9-91.3), respectively and in GC (n = 17) was 88.2% (95% CI, 63.6-98.5) and 70.6% (95% CI, 44.0-89.7), respectively. IBI110 monotherapy and in combination with sintilimab were well-tolerated in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors. Encouraging efficacy of IBI110 in combination with sintilimab and chemotherapies was observed in sqNSCLC and GC. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04085185.

Mao C ，Xiong A ，Qian J ，Wang W ，Liu Y ，Zhang T ，Wu Z ，Ni H ，Lu J ，Long S ，Zhao L ，Chen Y ，Zhou C ，Xu N ... -  《Journal of Hematology & Oncology》

Concizumab prophylaxis in people with haemophilia A or haemophilia B without inhibitors (explorer8): a prospective, multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3a trial.

Concizumab is an anti-tissue factor pathway inhibitor monoclonal antibody in development as a once-daily, subcutaneous prophylaxis for patients with haemophilia A or haemophilia B with or without inhibitors. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of concizumab in patients with haemophilia A or B without inhibitors. Here we report the results from the confirmatory analysis cutoff. This prospective, multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3a trial (explorer8) was conducted at 69 investigational sites in 31 countries. Eligible patients were male, aged 12 years or older, and had congenital severe haemophilia A or moderate or severe haemophilia B without inhibitors and with documented treatment with clotting factor concentrate in the 24 weeks before screening. The trial was paused because of non-fatal thromboembolic events in three patients (two from this trial [explorer8] and one from a related trial in haemophilia with inhibitors [explorer7; NCT04083781]) and restarted with mitigation measures, including a revised dosing regimen of subcutaneous concizumab at 1·0 mg/kg loading dose on day 1 and subsequent daily doses of 0·20 mg/kg from day 2, with options to decrease to 0·15 mg/kg, stay on 0·20 mg/kg, or increase to 0·25 mg/kg on the basis of concizumab plasma concentration measured after 4 weeks on concizumab. Patients recruited after treatment restart were randomly assigned 1:2 using an interactive web response system to receive no prophylaxis and continue on-demand clotting factor (group 1) or concizumab prophylaxis (group 2). The primary endpoints were the number of treated spontaneous and traumatic bleeding episodes for patients with haemophilia A and haemophilia B separately, assessed at the confirmatory analysis cutoff in randomly assigned patients. Analyses were by intention-to-treat. There were two additional groups containing non-randomly-assigned patients: group 3 contained patients who entered the trial before the trial pause and were receiving concizumab in the phase 2 trial (explorer5; NCT03196297), and group 4 contained patients who received previous clotting factor concentrate prophylaxis or on-demand treatment in the non-interventional trial (explorer6; NCT03741881), patients randomly assigned to groups 1 or 2 before the treatment pause, and patients from explorer5 enrolled after the treatment pause. The safety analysis set contained all patients who received concizumab. Superiority of concizumab over no prophylaxis was established if the two-sided 95% CI of the treatment ratio was less than 1 for haemophilia A and for haemophilia B. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04082429, and its extension part is ongoing. Patients were recruited between Nov 13, 2019 and Nov 30, 2021; the cutoff date for the analyses presented was July 12, 2022. 173 patients were screened, of whom 148 (86%) were randomly assigned or allocated to the four groups in the study after trial restart on Sept 30, 2020 (nine with haemophilia A and 12 with haemophilia B in group 1; 18 with haemophilia A and 24 with haemophilia B in group 2; nine with haemophilia A in group 3; and 46 with haemophilia A and 30 with haemophilia B in group 4). The estimated mean annualised bleeding rate ratio for treated spontaneous and traumatic bleeding episodes during concizumab prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis was 0·14 (95% CI 0·07-0·29; p<0·0001) for patients with haemophilia A and 0·21 (0·10-0·45; p<0·0001) for patients with haemophilia B. The most frequent adverse events in patients who received concizumab were SARS-CoV-2 infection (19 [13%] of 151 patients), an increase in fibrin D-dimers (12 [8%] patients), and upper respiratory tract infection (ten [7%] patients). There was one fatal adverse event possibly related to treatment (intra-abdominal haemorrhage in a patient from group 4 with haemophilia A with a long-standing history of hypertension). No thromboembolic events were reported between the trial restart and confirmatory analysis cutoff. Concizumab was effective in reducing the bleeding rate compared with no prophylaxis and was considered safe in patients with haemophilia A or B without inhibitors. The results of this trial suggest that concizumab has the potential to be one of the first subcutaneous treatment options for patients with haemophilia B without inhibitors. Novo Nordisk.

Chowdary P ，Angchaisuksiri P ，Apte S ，Astermark J ，Benson G ，Chan AKC ，Jiménez Yuste V ，Matsushita T ，Høgh Nielsen AR ，Sathar J ，Sutton C ，Šaulytė Trakymienė S ，Tran H ，Villarreal Martinez L ，Wheeler AP ，Windyga J ，Young G ，Thaung Zaw JJ ，Eichler H ... -  《Lancet Haematology》

Adavosertib in Combination with Olaparib in Patients with Refractory Solid Tumors: An Open-Label, Dose-Finding, and Dose-Expansion Phase Ib Trial.

Adavosertib is a first-in-class, selective small-molecule inhibitor of Wee1. Olaparib is an inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP). Preclinical data suggest that adavosertib enhances the antitumor effect of PARP inhibitors. The safety, tolerability, and efficacy of adavosertib plus olaparib were evaluated in patients with refractory solid tumors to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Eligible patients in part A (dose finding) had a refractory solid tumor for which there is no established treatment and had received ≥ 1 prior course of systemic therapy; in part B (dose expansion), patients had platinum-sensitive extensive-stage or relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Patients received adavosertib [once (qd) or twice daily (bid)] for 3 consecutive days with 4 days off treatment (3/4), or 5 consecutive days with 2 days off (5/2), plus olaparib (bid) for 14 or 21 days of a 21-day cycle. A total of 130 patients were enrolled in the study, 120 in part A and 10 in part B. The MTD for adavosertib bid was 175 mg (days 1-3, 8-10/21-day cycle) plus continuous olaparib 200 mg bid; the once-daily MTD (and RP2D) was adavosertib 200 mg (days 1-3, 8-10/21-day cycle) plus continuous olaparib 200 mg bid. In the MTD/RP2D cohort, one patient (7%) experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of thrombocytopenia. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in the cohorts in which MTD/RP2D for bid dosing and RP2D for qd dosing were determined were fatigue (64.3% and 15.4%, respectively), diarrhea (42.9% and 30.8%), decreased appetite (35.7% and 23.1%), nausea (35.7% and 15.4%), and anemia (35.7% and 38.5%). In the SCLC dose-expansion cohort, TRAEs occurred in eight patients (88.9%), including thrombocytopenia (66.7%) and anemia (55.6%). In part A, objective response rate (ORR) was 14.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.7-22.9] overall; for the cohorts in which MTD/RP2D for bid dosing and RP2D for qd dosing were determined, ORR was 30.8% (9.1-61.4) and 9.1% (0.2-41.3), respectively. ORR was 11.1% [95% CI 0.3-48.2; one partial response (PR)], disease control rate was 22.2% (2.8-60.0; one PR, one stable disease), and median progression-free survival was 1.5 months (1.3-4.2) in the SCLC dose-expansion cohort. Adverse events and DLTs observed in the bid MTD and once-daily MTD/RP2D dosing schedules were manageable and consistent with known adavosertib and olaparib safety profiles. Limited antitumor activity was observed with adavosertib plus olaparib combination therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02511795 (registration: 28 July 2015).

Hamilton EP ，Falchook GS ，Wang JS ，Fu S ，Oza AM ，Imedio ER ，Kumar S ，Ottesen L ，Mugundu GM ，de Bruin EC ，O'Connor MJ ，Jones SF ，Spigel DR ，Li BT ... -  《-》

Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel as switch maintenance versus continuation of first-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced HER2-negative gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ARMANI): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase

Paclitaxel plus ramucirumab is recommended as a second-line treatment regimen in patients with advanced HER2-negative gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer. We aimed to assess whether switch maintenance or early second-line therapy with paclitaxel plus ramucirumab improved outcomes compared with continuation of oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine doublet chemotherapy as a first-line strategy. ARMANI was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial done in 31 hospitals in Italy. We enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 and locally advanced unresectable or metastatic HER2-negative gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer, who had disease control after 3 months of FOLFOX (leucovorin, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) or CAPOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 plus ramucirumab at 8 mg/kg on days 1 and 15 every 28 days intravenously (switch maintenance group) or continuation of oxaliplatin-based doublet chemotherapy (FOLFOX or CAPOX) for an additional 12 weeks, followed by fluoropyrimidine monotherapy maintenance (control group). Randomisation was stratified by previous gastrectomy (no vs yes), peritoneal carcinomatosis (yes vs no), and primary tumour location (gastro-oesophageal junction vs gastric). Treatment group allocation was done using a web-based system with a minimisation algorithm implementing a random component. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. The safety population included patients who received at least one dose of the study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02934464, and is complete. Between Jan 1, 2017, and Oct 2, 2023, 280 patients were randomly assigned to receive paclitaxel plus ramucirumab (switch maintenance group; n=144) or to continue FOLFOX or CAPOX (control group; n=136). All patients were White. 180 (64%) of 280 patients were male and 100 (36%) were female. At a median follow-up of 43·7 months (IQR 24·0-57·9), 253 (90%) of 280 patients had a progression-free survival event: 131 (91%) of 144 patients in the switch maintenance group and 122 (90%) of 136 patients in the control group. Median progression-free survival was 6·6 months (95% CI 5·9-7·8) in the switch maintenance group and 3·5 months (2·8-4·2) in the control group (HR 0·61, 95% CI 0·48-0·79; p=0·0002). The assumption of proportional hazards was violated; in an analysis of 24-month restricted mean survival time, restricted mean progression-free survival was 8·8 months (95% CI 7·7-9·9) in the switch maintenance group and 6·1 months (5·0-7·2) in the control group (p=0·0010). The most frequent grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (37 [26%] patients in the switch maintenance group vs 13 [10%] patients in the control group), peripheral neuropathy (eight [6%] vs nine [7%]) and arterial hypertension (nine [6%] vs none). Serious adverse events occurred in 28 (20%) of 141 patients in the experimental group and 15 (11%) of 135 patients in the control group; these events were treatment-related in two (1%) patients in the switch maintenance group (pulmonary embolism) and two (1%) patients in the control group (mucositis and anaemia). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Paclitaxel and ramucirumab switch maintenance could be a potential treatment strategy in patients with advanced HER2-negative gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer who are not eligible for immunotherapy or targeted agents. Partly funded by Eli Lilly.

Randon G ，Lonardi S ，Fassan M ，Palermo F ，Tamberi S ，Giommoni E ，Ceccon C ，Di Donato S ，Fornaro L ，Brunetti O ，De Vita F ，Bittoni A ，Chini C ，Spallanzani A ，Nappo F ，Bethaz V ，Strippoli A ，Latiano T ，Cardellino GG ，Giuliani F ，Morano F ，Niger M ，Raimondi A ，Prisciandaro M ，Pircher CC ，Sciortino C ，Marchesi S ，Garattini SK ，Airò G ，Miceli R ，Di Bartolomeo M ，Pietrantonio F ... -  《-》