Adavosertib in Combination with Olaparib in Patients with Refractory Solid Tumors: An Open-Label, Dose-Finding, and Dose-Expansion Phase Ib Trial.

Adavosertib is a first-in-class, selective small-molecule inhibitor of Wee1. Olaparib is an inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP). Preclinical data suggest that adavosertib enhances the antitumor effect of PARP inhibitors. The safety, tolerability, and efficacy of adavosertib plus olaparib were evaluated in patients with refractory solid tumors to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Eligible patients in part A (dose finding) had a refractory solid tumor for which there is no established treatment and had received ≥ 1 prior course of systemic therapy; in part B (dose expansion), patients had platinum-sensitive extensive-stage or relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Patients received adavosertib [once (qd) or twice daily (bid)] for 3 consecutive days with 4 days off treatment (3/4), or 5 consecutive days with 2 days off (5/2), plus olaparib (bid) for 14 or 21 days of a 21-day cycle. A total of 130 patients were enrolled in the study, 120 in part A and 10 in part B. The MTD for adavosertib bid was 175 mg (days 1-3, 8-10/21-day cycle) plus continuous olaparib 200 mg bid; the once-daily MTD (and RP2D) was adavosertib 200 mg (days 1-3, 8-10/21-day cycle) plus continuous olaparib 200 mg bid. In the MTD/RP2D cohort, one patient (7%) experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of thrombocytopenia. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in the cohorts in which MTD/RP2D for bid dosing and RP2D for qd dosing were determined were fatigue (64.3% and 15.4%, respectively), diarrhea (42.9% and 30.8%), decreased appetite (35.7% and 23.1%), nausea (35.7% and 15.4%), and anemia (35.7% and 38.5%). In the SCLC dose-expansion cohort, TRAEs occurred in eight patients (88.9%), including thrombocytopenia (66.7%) and anemia (55.6%). In part A, objective response rate (ORR) was 14.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.7-22.9] overall; for the cohorts in which MTD/RP2D for bid dosing and RP2D for qd dosing were determined, ORR was 30.8% (9.1-61.4) and 9.1% (0.2-41.3), respectively. ORR was 11.1% [95% CI 0.3-48.2; one partial response (PR)], disease control rate was 22.2% (2.8-60.0; one PR, one stable disease), and median progression-free survival was 1.5 months (1.3-4.2) in the SCLC dose-expansion cohort. Adverse events and DLTs observed in the bid MTD and once-daily MTD/RP2D dosing schedules were manageable and consistent with known adavosertib and olaparib safety profiles. Limited antitumor activity was observed with adavosertib plus olaparib combination therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02511795 (registration: 28 July 2015).

Hamilton EP ，Falchook GS ，Wang JS ，Fu S ，Oza AM ，Imedio ER ，Kumar S ，Ottesen L ，Mugundu GM ，de Bruin EC ，O'Connor MJ ，Jones SF ，Spigel DR ，Li BT ... -  《-》

Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase I Study to Assess Safety and Tolerability of Adavosertib Plus Durvalumab in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.

Adavosertib (AZD1775) is a small-molecule Wee1 inhibitor. Durvalumab is a PD-L1 inhibitor. The safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor activity of adavosertib plus durvalumab were evaluated in patients with refractory solid tumors to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D). This phase 1, non-randomized, open-label study determined MTD/RP2D using dose-escalation cohorts. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed tumors refractory to standard therapy or for which no standard of care existed. A total of 55 patients received adavosertib with durvalumab. Overall, 3/52 evaluable patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs; two grade 3 nausea, one grade 3 diarrhea that did not respond to care within 48 h). The most frequent (in > 5% of patients) treatment-emergent grade ≥ 3 toxicities were fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, anemia, and abdominal pain. MTD for twice-daily (bid) adavosertib dosing was oral adavosertib 150 mg bid (3 days on/4 days off; treatment days 15-17 and 22-24 of a 28-day cycle) with intravenous durvalumab 1500 mg four times a week (Q4W), which was also the RP2D. MTD for once-daily (qd) adavosertib dosing was oral adavosertib 300 mg qd (5 days on/2 days off; treatment days 15-19 and 22-26 of a 28-day cycle) with intravenous durvalumab 1500 mg Q4W. This study defined the MTD/RP2D of adavosertib plus durvalumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. The safety profile of adavosertib with durvalumab was consistent with the known safety data of each agent. Findings provide preliminary evidence of limited antitumor activity of adavosertib plus durvalumab. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02617277 (registration: 30 November 2015).

Patel MR ，Falchook GS ，Wang JS ，Imedio ER ，Kumar S ，Miah K ，Mugundu GM ，Jones SF ，Spigel DR ，Hamilton EP ... -  《-》

Cediranib and Olaparib Combination Compared With Cediranib or Olaparib Alone, or Chemotherapy in Platinum-Resistant or Primary Platinum-Refractory Ovarian Cancer: NRG-GY005.

Lee JM ，Brady MF ，Miller A ，Moore RG ，MacKay H ，McNally L ，Lea J ，Street D ，Lheureux S ，McDonald ME ，Duska LR ，Cantuaria G ，Kavecansky J ，Leath CA 3rd ，Powell M ，Cadungog MG ，Rose PG ，Kim YM ，Huang HQ ，Provencher M ，Wenzel LB ，Bookman MA ，Kohn EC ，Secord AA ... -  《-》

Phase Ib study of HSP90 inhibitor, onalespib (AT13387), in combination with paclitaxel in patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer.

Williams NO ，Quiroga D ，Johnson C ，Brufsky A ，Chambers M ，Bhattacharya S ，Patterson M ，Sardesai SD ，Stover D ，Lustberg M ，Noonan AM ，Cherian M ，Bystry DM ，Hill KL ，Chen M ，Phelps MA ，Grever M ，Stephens JA ，Ramaswamy B ，Carson WE 3rd ，Wesolowski R ... -  《-》

Induced pluripotent stem-cell-derived CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor natural killer cells in B-cell lymphoma: a phase 1, first-in-human trial.

FT596 is an induced pluripotent stem-cell (iPSC)-derived chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) natural killer (NK) cell therapy with three antitumour modalities: a CD19 CAR; a high-affinity, non-cleavable CD16 Fc receptor; and interleukin-15-interleukin-15 receptor fusion. In this study, we aimed to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and evaluate the safety and tolerability of FT596 as monotherapy and in combination with rituximab. We also aimed to evaluate the antitumour activity and characterise the pharmacokinetics of FT596 as monotherapy and in combination with rituximab. In this phase 1, first-in-human trial, we evaluated FT596 in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphoma at nine sites in the USA. Patients who had received at least one previous systemic therapy and had no curative treatment options were eligible for inclusion. FT596 was administered after conditioning chemotherapy without rituximab (regimen A) or combined with rituximab (regimen B). The study consisted of a dose-escalation phase using a 3 + 3 design, with dose escalation commencing at 3 × 107 viable cells as a single dose on day 1 and done independently for individual regimens. A treatment cycle consisted of conditioning chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2) and fludarabine (30 mg/m2) intravenously on days -5 to -3, followed by FT596 administered at various doses and schedules, without (regimen A) or with (regimen B) a single dose of rituximab (375 mg/m2) intravenously on day -4. Supportive care was determined by the treating investigator. Patients were observed for dose-limiting adverse events for 28 days. Patients who tolerated therapy and derived clinical benefit could receive subsequent cycles of study treatment, with modification of conditioning chemotherapy dose if clinically indicated. The dose-expansion phase evaluated additional patients at selected doses and dosing schedules that had been found to be tolerable. The primary endpoints of the study were the incidence and nature of dose-limiting toxicities within each dose-escalation cohort to determine the maximum tolerated dose or maximum assessed dose to establish the RP2D and the incidence, nature, and severity of adverse events, with severity determined according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria and Adverse Events version 5·0. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04245722. Between March 19, 2020, and Jan 12, 2023, 86 patients with B-cell lymphoma received FT596 on regimen A (n=18) or regimen B (n=68). 22 (26%) of 86 patients were female and 72 (84%) of 86 patients were White. Patients had received a median of four previous lines of therapy (range 1-11) and 33 (38%) of 86 patients had received previous CAR T-cell therapy. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Cytokine release syndrome was reported in one (6%) of 18 patients (maximum grade 1) on regimen A and nine (13%) of 68 patients on regimen B (six with maximum grade 1 and three with grade 2). Neurotoxicity was not observed. FT596 was well tolerated as monotherapy or with rituximab and induced deep and durable responses in patients with indolent and aggressive lymphomas and the RP2D was preliminarily identified to be 1·8 × 109 cells for three doses per cycle. This study supports that cell therapy using iPSC-derived, gene-modified NK cells is a potent platform for cancer treatment and suggests that such a platform might address limitations of currently available immune cell therapies, including manufacturing time, heterogeneity, access, and cost. Fate Therapeutics.

Ghobadi A ，Bachanova V ，Patel K ，Park JH ，Flinn I ，Riedell PA ，Bachier C ，Diefenbach CS ，Wong C ，Bickers C ，Wong L ，Patel D ，Goodridge J ，Denholt M ，Valamehr B ，Elstrom RL ，Strati P ... -  《-》