Impact of the combination of virtual reality and noninvasive brain stimulation on the upper limb motor function of stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Stroke frequently results in upper limb motor dysfunction, with traditional therapies often failing to yield sufficient improvements. Emerging technologies such as virtual reality (VR) and noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) present promising new rehabilitation possibilities. This study systematically reviews and meta-analyses the effectiveness of VR and NIBS in improving upper limb motor function in stroke patients. Registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023494220) and adhering to the PRISMA guidelines, this study conducted a thorough search of databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, PEDro, REHABDATA, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP from 2000 to December 1, 2023, to identify relevant studies. The inclusion criterion was stroke patients receiving combined VR and NIBS treatment, while exclusion criteria were studies with incomplete articles and data. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata SE 15.0, employing either a fixed-effects model or a random-effects model based on the level of heterogeneity. A total of 11 studies involving 493 participants were included, showing a significant improvement in Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) scores in the combined treatment group compared to the control group (SMD = 0.85, 95% CI [0.40, 1.31], p = 0.017). The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) scores significantly decreased (SMD = - 0.51, 95% CI [- 0.83, - 0.20], p = 0.032), the Modified Barthel Index (MBI) scores significantly increased (SMD = 0.97, 95% CI [0.76, 1.17], p = 0.004), and the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) scores also significantly increased (SMD = 0.36, 95% CI [0.08, 0.64], p = 0.021). Subgroup analysis indicated that the duration of treatment influenced the outcomes in daily living activities. The combination of VR and NIBS demonstrates significant improvements in upper limb motor function in stroke patients. The duration of treatment plays a critical role in influencing the outcomes, particularly in activities of daily living. This systematic review has limitations, including language bias, unclear randomization descriptions, potential study omissions, and insufficient follow-up periods. Future studies should focus on exploring long-term effects and optimizing treatment duration to maximize the benefits of combined VR and NIBS therapy.

Zhang N ，Wang H ，Wang H ，Qie S ... -  《Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation》

Comparative efficacy of different noninvasive brain stimulation protocols on upper-extremity motor function and activities of daily living after stroke: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Li LL ，Wu JJ ，Li KP ，Jin J ，Xiang YT ，Hua XY ，Zheng MX ，Xu JG ... -  《-》

Effectiveness of Using Virtual Reality-Supported Exercise Therapy for Upper Extremity Motor Rehabilitation in Patients With Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

In recent years, efforts have been made to implement virtual reality (VR) to support the delivery of poststroke upper extremity motor rehabilitation exercises. Therefore, it is important to review and analyze the existing research evidence of its effectiveness. Through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, this study examined the effectiveness of using VR-supported exercise therapy for upper extremity motor rehabilitation in patients with stroke. This study followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The CINAHL Plus, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched on December 31, 2021. Changes in outcomes related to impairments in upper extremity functions and structures, activity limitations, and participation restrictions in life situations from baseline to after intervention, after intervention to follow-up assessment, and baseline to follow-up assessment were examined. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed to determine whether the differences in treatment outcomes depended on age, stroke recovery stage, VR program type, therapy delivery format, similarities in intervention duration between study groups, intervention duration in VR groups, and trial length. A total of 42 publications representing 43 trials (aggregated sample size=1893) were analyzed. Compared with the control groups that used either conventional therapy or no therapy, the intervention groups that used VR to support exercise therapy showed significant improvements in upper extremity motor function (Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity; SMD 0.45, 95% CI 0.21-0.68; P<.001), range of motion (goniometer; SMD 1.01, 95% CI 0.50-1.52; P<.001), muscle strength (Manual Muscle Testing; SMD 0.79, 95% CI 0.28-1.30; P=.002), and independence in day-to-day activities (Functional Independence Measure; SMD 0.23, 95% CI 0.06-0.40; P=.01, and modified Rankin Scale; SMD 0.57, 95% CI 0.01-1.12; P=.046). Significant subgroup differences were observed in hand dexterity (Box and Block Test), spasticity (Ashworth Scale or modified Ashworth Scale), arm and hand motor ability (Wolf Motor Function Test and Manual Function Test), hand motor ability (Jebsen Hand Function Test), and quality of life (Stroke Impact Scale). There was no evidence that the benefits of VR-supported exercise therapy were maintained after the intervention ended. VR-supported upper extremity exercise therapy can be effective in improving motor rehabilitation results. Our review showed that of the 12 rehabilitation outcomes examined during the course of VR-based therapy, significant improvements were detected in 2 (upper extremity motor function and range of motion), and both significant and nonsignificant improvements were observed in another 2 (muscle strength and independence in day-to-day activities), depending on the measurement tools or methods used. PROSPERO CRD42021256826; https://tinyurl.com/2uarftbh.

Chen J ，Or CK ，Chen T 《JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH》

Combined noninvasive brain stimulation virtual reality for upper limb rehabilitation poststroke: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Upper limb impairments are common consequences of stroke. Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) and virtual reality (VR) play crucial roles in improving upper limb function poststroke. This review aims to evaluate the effects of combined NIBS and VR interventions on upper limb function post-stroke and to provide recommendations for future studies in the rehabilitation field. PubMed, MEDLINE, PEDro, SCOPUS, REHABDATA, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched from inception to November 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) encompassed patients with a confirmed stroke diagnosis, administrated combined NIBS and VR compared with passive (i.e., rest) or active (conventional therapy), and included at least one outcome assessing upper limb function (i.e., strength, spasticity, function) were selected. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Seven studies met the eligibility criteria. In total, 303 stroke survivors (Mean age: 61.74 years) were included in this review. According to the Cochrane Collaboration tool, five studies were classified as "high quality," while two were categorized as "moderate quality". There are mixed findings for the effects of combined NIBS and VR on upper limb function in stroke survivors. The evidence for the effects of combined transcranial direct current stimulation and VR on upper limb function post-stroke is promising. However, the evidence regarding the effects of combined repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and VR on upper limb function is limited. Further randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up are strongly warranted.

Alashram AR 《-》

Does noninvasive brain stimulation combined with other therapies improve upper extremity motor impairment, functional performance, and participation in activities of daily living after stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled

Ahmed I ，Mustafaoglu R ，Benkhalifa N ，Yakhoub YH ... -  《-》