[The multicenter registry "oropharyngeal cancer" of the German ENT Study Center - First Results].
The number of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC) caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) has increased significantly in recent years. However, no robust data exist on the incidence of HPV-associated OPSCC as well as their treatment in central Europe.
The aim is to establish an epidemiological register of patients with OPSCC in central Europe.
To close the evidence gap on p16-positive OPSCC, a prospective multicenter registry on incidence, risk factors and treatment of OPSCC in certified Head and Neck Tumor Centers according to the German Cancer Society was established. Data collection was pseudonymously performed using the web-based Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap).
In 2022 and 2023, 1312 patients with OPSCC from 34 centers were included. 720 patients (58.2 %) were p16-positive. The most common locations of p16-positive primary tumors were the tonsil (49.9 %) and the base of the tongue (28.7 %). 63.1 % of p16-positive OPSCC received primary surgical treatment, whereas only 48.0 % of p16-negative tumors received primary surgery. Differences are also evident in the adjuvant therapy: 58 % of p16-negative OPSCC did not receive adjuvant therapy after surgery, compared with 37.1 % of p16-positive OPSCC.
The start of the OPSCC registry study was technically smooth. This registry provides an insight into the current care situation of OPSCC in German-speaking countries and will gain importance through the participation of more centers.
Autorinnen/Autoren
,Collaborators
《-》
Human papillomavirus (HPV) load is higher in HPVDNA/p16 positive than in HPVDNA positive/p16 negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma but does not differ significantly between various subsites or correlate to survival.
Patients with human papillomavirus DNA positive (HPVDNA+) and p16ink4a overexpressing (p16+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), especially those with cancer in the tonsillar and base of tongue subsites as compared to other OPSCC subsites have a better outcome than those with only HPVDNA+ or only p16+ cancer. Likewise having a high viral load has been suggested to be a positive prognostic factor. We therefore hypothesized, that HPV viral load could vary depending on OPSCC subsite, as well as with regard to whether the cancer was HPVDNA+ and p16+, or only HPVDNA+, or only p16+ and that this affected outcome.
To address these issues HPV viral load was determined by HPV digital droplet (dd) PCR in tumor biopsies with previously known HPVDNA/p16 status from 270 OPSCC patients diagnosed 2000-2016 in Stockholm, Sweden. More specifically, of these patients 235 had HPVDNA+/p16+, 10 had HPVDNA+/p16-, 13 had HPVDNA-/p16+ and 12 had HPVDNA-/p16- cancer.
We found that HPVDNA+/p16+ OPSCC had a significantly higher viral load than HPVDNA+/p16- OPSCC. Moreover, there was a tendency for a higher viral load in the tonsillar and base of tongue OPSCC subsites compared to the other subsites and for a low viral load to correlate to a better clinical outcome but none of these tendencies reached statistical significance.
To conclude, the mean viral load in HPVDNA+/p16+ OPSCC was higher than in HPVDNA+/p16- OPSCC, but there was no statistically significant difference in viral load depending on OPSCC subsite or on clinical outcome.
Zupancic M
,Kostopoulou ON
,Holzhauser S
,Lukoseviciute M
,Jylhä C
,Marklund L
,Näsman A
,Sivars L
,Dalianis T
... -
《-》
Extracapsular extension of neck nodes and absence of human papillomavirus 16-DNA are predictors of impaired survival in p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
Human papillomavirus (HPV)-driven oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCCs) demonstrate superior outcome compared with HPV-negative OPSCCs. The eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control (AJCC/UICC) tumor, lymph node, metastasis (TNM) classification (TNM 2017) modifies OPSCC staging based on p16 positivity as a surrogate for HPV-driven disease. In p16-negative OPSCCs, lymph node (N) categories include extracapsular/extranodal extension (ECE); and, in p16-positive OPSCCs, N categories are based on the number of positive neck lymph nodes omitting ECE status. The objective of the current study was to assess the prognostic impact of positive ECE status and the detection of HPV16 DNA in patients with p16-positive OPSCC.
In a cohort of 92 patients with p16-positive, lymph node (N)-positive (stage III-IVB) OPSCC who underwent surgery and neck dissection, allowing for a pathologic examination of positive lymph nodes, 66 of 92 patients (71.4%) were p16-positive/HPV16 DNA-positive, 62 of 92 (67%) were ECE-positive, and 45 of 62 (72.6%) were ECE-positive, p16-positive, and HPV16 DNA-positive. Differences in outcome were assessed using Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox proportional hazard regression (CoxR) for tumor-specific survival and overall survival (OS).
The mean numbers of positive lymph nodes in ECE-positive patients (5.0 positive lymph nodes; 95% CI, 3.8-6.4 positive lymph nodes) and ECE-negative patients (2.4 positive lymph nodes; 95% CI, 1.8-2.9 positive lymph nodes) were different (P = .0007). ECE affected OS and tumor-specific survival in p16-positive patients (P = .007 and P = .047, respectively) and in p16-positive/HPV16 DNA-positive patients (P = .013 and P = .026, respectively). Related to the unequal distributions of ECE-positive/HPV16 DNA-negative tumors, the TNM 2017 failed to discriminate OS in patients with UICC stage I, II, and III disease (mean OS, 54.5, 73.4, and 45 months, respectively; median OS, 64.7 months, not reached, and 41.1 months, respectively). According to a univariate CoxR, the presence of ECE predicted impaired OS in patients with p16-positive OPSCC (hazard ratio, 3.40; 95% CI, 1.17-9.89; P = .025) and even greater impaired OS in those with p16-positive/HPV16 DNA-positive OPSCC (HR, 8.64; 95% CI, 1.12-66.40; P = .038). Multivariate CoxR confirmed ECE and HPV16 DNA detection as independent predictors.
ECE and HPV16 DNA status should be included in the prognostic staging of patients with p16-positive OPSCC because several lines of evidence demonstrate their impact on survival.
Freitag J
,Wald T
,Kuhnt T
,Gradistanac T
,Kolb M
,Dietz A
,Wiegand S
,Wichmann G
... -
《-》
Survival of patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC) in relation to TNM 8 - Risk of incorrect downstaging of HPV-mediated non-tonsillar, non-base of tongue carcinomas.
TNM-8 staging separates oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC) into human papillomavirus (HPV)-mediated and -unrelated OPSCC based on p16INK4a overexpression (p16+), as surrogate marker for HPV. However, OPSCC is histologically and clinically heterogenous including tonsillar and base of tongue squamous cell carcinomas (TSCC and BOTSCC respectively), and carcinomas of soft palate and walls (otherOPSCC). The significance of HPV is established in TSCC/BOTSCC, while its role in otherOPSCC is unclear, which is not considered in TNM-8. Here, p16+ was therefore evaluated in relation to overall survival (OS) and tumor stage per OPSCC subsite.
All 932 patients, treated with curative intent in Stockholm 2000-2016 with OPSCC, previously analyzed for p16 expression, were included. Clinical data, including stage and OS, was collected retrospectively.
Patients with p16+ otherOPSCC had significantly poorer OS compared to patients with p16+ TSCC/BOTSCC (p = 0.005) and their survival was similar to that of patients with p16-otherOPSCC/TSCC/BOTSCC. Moreover, patients with TNM-8 stage I-II and p16+ otherOPSCC had a significant poorer OS compared to patients with p16+ TSCC/BOTSCC and similar stage (p = 0.02). Lastly, patients with otherOPSCC and low TNM-7 stage had a significant better OS, as compared to those with a high stage (p = 0.019) while no hazard discrimination was observed with TNM-7 in TSCC/BOTSCC.
Our results indicate a risk of misclassification of patients with otherOPSCC and low TNM-8 stage. We suggest that p16 should only be evaluated in TSCC/BOTSCC and that patients with otherOPSCC should all be staged as patients with HPV-unrelated (p16-) OPSCC.
Marklund L
,Holzhauser S
,de Flon C
,Zupancic M
,Landin D
,Kolev A
,Haeggblom L
,Munck-Wikland E
,Hammarstedt-Nordenvall L
,Dalianis T
,Näsman A
... -
《-》