Survival of patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC) in relation to TNM 8 - Risk of incorrect downstaging of HPV-mediated non-tonsillar, non-base of tongue carcinomas.

TNM-8 staging separates oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC) into human papillomavirus (HPV)-mediated and -unrelated OPSCC based on p16INK4a overexpression (p16+), as surrogate marker for HPV. However, OPSCC is histologically and clinically heterogenous including tonsillar and base of tongue squamous cell carcinomas (TSCC and BOTSCC respectively), and carcinomas of soft palate and walls (otherOPSCC). The significance of HPV is established in TSCC/BOTSCC, while its role in otherOPSCC is unclear, which is not considered in TNM-8. Here, p16+ was therefore evaluated in relation to overall survival (OS) and tumor stage per OPSCC subsite. All 932 patients, treated with curative intent in Stockholm 2000-2016 with OPSCC, previously analyzed for p16 expression, were included. Clinical data, including stage and OS, was collected retrospectively. Patients with p16+ otherOPSCC had significantly poorer OS compared to patients with p16+ TSCC/BOTSCC (p = 0.005) and their survival was similar to that of patients with p16-otherOPSCC/TSCC/BOTSCC. Moreover, patients with TNM-8 stage I-II and p16+ otherOPSCC had a significant poorer OS compared to patients with p16+ TSCC/BOTSCC and similar stage (p = 0.02). Lastly, patients with otherOPSCC and low TNM-7 stage had a significant better OS, as compared to those with a high stage (p = 0.019) while no hazard discrimination was observed with TNM-7 in TSCC/BOTSCC. Our results indicate a risk of misclassification of patients with otherOPSCC and low TNM-8 stage. We suggest that p16 should only be evaluated in TSCC/BOTSCC and that patients with otherOPSCC should all be staged as patients with HPV-unrelated (p16-) OPSCC.

Marklund L ，Holzhauser S ，de Flon C ，Zupancic M ，Landin D ，Kolev A ，Haeggblom L ，Munck-Wikland E ，Hammarstedt-Nordenvall L ，Dalianis T ，Näsman A ... -  《-》

The value of p16 and HPV DNA in non-tonsillar, non-base of tongue oropharyngeal cancer.

Hammarstedt L ，Holzhauser S ，Zupancic M ，Kapoulitsa F ，Ursu RG ，Ramqvist T ，Haeggblom L ，Näsman A ，Dalianis T ，Marklund L ... -  《-》

Extracapsular extension of neck nodes and absence of human papillomavirus 16-DNA are predictors of impaired survival in p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-driven oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCCs) demonstrate superior outcome compared with HPV-negative OPSCCs. The eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control (AJCC/UICC) tumor, lymph node, metastasis (TNM) classification (TNM 2017) modifies OPSCC staging based on p16 positivity as a surrogate for HPV-driven disease. In p16-negative OPSCCs, lymph node (N) categories include extracapsular/extranodal extension (ECE); and, in p16-positive OPSCCs, N categories are based on the number of positive neck lymph nodes omitting ECE status. The objective of the current study was to assess the prognostic impact of positive ECE status and the detection of HPV16 DNA in patients with p16-positive OPSCC. In a cohort of 92 patients with p16-positive, lymph node (N)-positive (stage III-IVB) OPSCC who underwent surgery and neck dissection, allowing for a pathologic examination of positive lymph nodes, 66 of 92 patients (71.4%) were p16-positive/HPV16 DNA-positive, 62 of 92 (67%) were ECE-positive, and 45 of 62 (72.6%) were ECE-positive, p16-positive, and HPV16 DNA-positive. Differences in outcome were assessed using Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox proportional hazard regression (CoxR) for tumor-specific survival and overall survival (OS). The mean numbers of positive lymph nodes in ECE-positive patients (5.0 positive lymph nodes; 95% CI, 3.8-6.4 positive lymph nodes) and ECE-negative patients (2.4 positive lymph nodes; 95% CI, 1.8-2.9 positive lymph nodes) were different (P = .0007). ECE affected OS and tumor-specific survival in p16-positive patients (P = .007 and P = .047, respectively) and in p16-positive/HPV16 DNA-positive patients (P = .013 and P = .026, respectively). Related to the unequal distributions of ECE-positive/HPV16 DNA-negative tumors, the TNM 2017 failed to discriminate OS in patients with UICC stage I, II, and III disease (mean OS, 54.5, 73.4, and 45 months, respectively; median OS, 64.7 months, not reached, and 41.1 months, respectively). According to a univariate CoxR, the presence of ECE predicted impaired OS in patients with p16-positive OPSCC (hazard ratio, 3.40; 95% CI, 1.17-9.89; P = .025) and even greater impaired OS in those with p16-positive/HPV16 DNA-positive OPSCC (HR, 8.64; 95% CI, 1.12-66.40; P = .038). Multivariate CoxR confirmed ECE and HPV16 DNA detection as independent predictors. ECE and HPV16 DNA status should be included in the prognostic staging of patients with p16-positive OPSCC because several lines of evidence demonstrate their impact on survival.

Freitag J ，Wald T ，Kuhnt T ，Gradistanac T ，Kolb M ，Dietz A ，Wiegand S ，Wichmann G ... -  《-》

Evaluation of the eighth TNM classification on p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas in the Netherlands and the importance of additional HPV DNA testing.

Nauta IH ，Rietbergen MM ，van Bokhoven AAJD ，Bloemena E ，Lissenberg-Witte BI ，Heideman DAM ，Baatenburg de Jong RJ ，Brakenhoff RH ，Leemans CR ... -  《-》

TNM 8 staging system beyond p16: Double HPV/p16 status is superior to p16 alone in predicting outcome in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

The assessment of p16INK4a (p16) in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has been incorporated into tumor classification, as p16 has been shown to impact survival probability. However, a recent study demonstrated that human papillomavirus (HPV) status in addition to p16 may have a better discriminatory effect on survival probability. This study aims to determine the impact of combined evaluation of p16 and HPV on prognosis. This was a multicenter, multinational analysis including retrospective and prospective cohorts of patients treated for primary OPSCC with curative intent, based on the data of the HNCIG-EPIC study. The primary outcome was to determine how the combined assessment of HPV and p16 status predicts prognosis of patients with OPSCC compared to p16 assessment alone. We employed multivariable analyses models to compute hazard ratios regarding survival. Analyses were stratified by stage, smoking status, and sub-anatomical region. The study included 7654 patients, with approximately half of the tumors being p16-negative (50.3 %, n = 3849). A total of 9.2 % of patients had discordant p16 and HPV status (n = 704). HPV status significantly impacted overall survival and disease-free survival regardless of p16 status and across both UICC 8th stage I-II and III-IVb cancers. p16-positive/HPV-positive OPSCC patients exhibited the best survival probability. The detection of HPV had a significant impact on survival probability for OPSCC patients with both p16-positive and p16-negative tumors. HPV testing should be integrated in cancer staging, especially in regions of low attributable fraction, alongside p16 evaluation to ensure a comprehensive assessment of prognosis.

von Buchwald C ，Jakobsen KK ，Carlander AF ，Tous S ，Grønhøj C ，Rasmussen JH ，Brooks J ，Taberna M ，Mena M ，Morey F ，Bruni L ，Batis N ，Brakenhoff RH ，René Leemans C ，Jong RJB ，Klussmann JP ，Wuerdemann N ，Wagner S ，Dalianis T ，Marklund L ，Mirghani H ，Schache A ，James JA ，Huang SH ，O'Sullivan B ，Nankivell P ，Broglie MA ，Hoffmann M ，Quabius ES ，Anderson LA ，Craig SG ，Alemany L ，Mehanna H ，HNCIG-EPIC group ... -  《-》