Risk of adverse events in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

The clinical impact of Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease(NAFLD) in patients with atrial fibrillation(AF) is still controversial. To evaluate the 1-year risk of all-cause death, thromboembolic events, and bleeding in AF-NAFLD patients. Retrospective study with a health research network(TriNetX). AF patients on oral anticoagulation(OAC) were categorized according to the presence of NAFLD into two groups. The primary outcomes were the 1-year risks of: i) a composite cardiovascular outcome (all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiac arrest, and pulmonary embolism); and ii) a composite hemorrhagic outcome(intracranial hemorrhage and gastrointestinal bleeding). Cox regression analysis before and after propensity-score-matching(PSM) was used to estimate Hazard Ratio(HR) and 95% confidence intervals(95%CI). Sensitivity analyses investigated the risk associated with cirrhosis, thrombocytopenia, and type of OAC(warfarin vs non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants(NOAC). We identified 22,636 AF-NAFLD patients (69±12 years, 46.7% females) and 391,014 AF patients without liver disease(72±12 years, 42.7% females). NAFLD was associated with a higher risk of composite cardiovascular (HR 1.54,95%CI 1.47-1.61) and hemorrhagic (HR 1.56,95%CI 1.42-1.72) outcomes. This was consistent also for all the single outcomes. Cirrhotic and thrombocytopenic AF-NAFLD patients showed the highest risks. Compared to AF-NAFLD patients on NOAC, those on warfarin were associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular and hemorrhagic outcomes. In AF patients, NAFLD is associated with a higher 1-year risk of adverse events, with the risk of adverse events progressively increasing from non-cirrhotic to cirrhotic and from non-thrombocytopenic to thrombocytopenic patients. NOACs were associated with a better effectiveness and safety profile compared to warfarin.

Bucci T ，Nabrdalik K ，Baratta F ，Pastori D ，Pignatelli P ，Hydes T ，Alam U ，Violi F ，Lip GYH ... -  《-》

Bleeding and Thrombotic Events in Hemodialysis Patients with Atrial Fibrillation on Anticoagulation and Antiplatelet Therapy: A 24-Month Cohort Study.

Dimitrijevic ZM ，Mitic BP ，Tasic DD ，Vrecic T ，Paunovic K ，Salinger S ... -  《-》

Adverse events in clinically complex elderly patients with atrial fibrillation according to oral anticoagulation status.

Few data are available about the impact of oral anticoagulants (OAC) in patients with Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and clinical complexity (CC). We conducted a retrospective study utilising data from the TriNetX network. Based on ICD-10-CM codes entered between 2020 and 2022, AF patients aged ≥75 years on long-term OAC with CC were categorised into two groups based on OAC use in the year before entering the study (maintained vs discontinued). CC was defined as BMI ≤23 kg/m2, and/or history of bleeding, and/or chronic kidney disease. The primary outcomes were the one-year risk of all-cause death, major cardiovascular events (MACE), and major bleeding. Cox regression analyses were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs before and after 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). We identified 6554 AF CC patients who discontinued OAC (mean age 81.5 ± 6.0 years, 46.7% females) and 23,212 AF patients with CC who maintained OAC (81.3 ± 6.0 years, 49.4% females). Before PSM, AF CC patients who discontinued OAC had a higher prevalence of intracranial, gastrointestinal haemorrhages, and antiplatelet use, with no significant differences after PSM. OAC discontinuation was associated with a higher risk of all-cause death (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.11-1.35) and MACE (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.25-1.53). The one-year risk of major bleeding was similar in those who discontinued or maintained OAC (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.94-1.18), although it was significantly higher during the early follow-up (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.24-1.83). The risk of primary outcomes decreased over time, with the risk of bleeding becoming not significant. AF CC patients who discontinued OAC have a high risk of adverse events. New antithrombotic and integrated care approaches to reduce thrombotic risk without increasing bleeding risk are needed in these patients. This study received no funding.

Bucci T ，Romiti GF ，Ishiguchi H ，Gerra L ，Mantovani M ，Huang B ，Proietti M ，Lip GYH ... -  《EClinicalMedicine》

Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Rheumatic Heart Disease-Associated Atrial Fibrillation Post-Bioprosthetic Mitral Valve Replacement.

The efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in preventing ischemic and thromboembolic events may be suboptimal in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis. However, their safety and effectiveness after mitral valve replacement (MVR) using bioprosthetic valves is unclear. This study sought to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of DOACs vs warfarin among patients with rheumatic heart disease (RHD)-associated AF after bioprosthetic MVR. We performed an observational analysis identifying patients with RHD and AF who underwent bioprosthetic MVR. Primary effectiveness and safety outcomes were ischemic events and major bleeding, respectively. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiac thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and all-cause hospitalization. Propensity score matching was performed to account for the differences in baseline characteristics and comorbidities. A total of 3,950 patients were identified; 76% were on warfarin and 24% on DOAC post-MVR. The DOAC group had a higher burden of baseline comorbidities and prior cardiovascular procedures compared with the warfarin group. The propensity score matching balanced baseline characteristics in 1,832 patients (916 in each group), with a mean age of 69 years. At the 5-year follow-up, DOACs were associated with a lower incidence of major bleeding compared with warfarin (HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.62-0.94), with no significant difference in ischemic events, mortality, cardiac thrombosis, myocardial infarction, or hospitalization. Among patients with RHD-associated AF patients post-bioprosthetic MVR, DOACs are associated with lower major bleeding and comparable effectiveness, indicating a potential alternative to warfarin. Further randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate these findings in this population.

Fath AR ，Aglan A ，Altaee O ，Fichardt H ，Mansoor H ，Almomani A ，Hammadah M ，Vinas A ，Nayak H ，Jneid H ，Saad M ，Elgendy IY ... -  《-》

Comparative effectiveness and safety of apixaban and rivaroxaban in older patients with atrial fibrillation: A population-based cohort study.

There are no clinical trials with a head-to-head comparison between the 2 most commonly used oral anticoagulants (apixaban and rivaroxaban) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The comparative efficacy and safety between these drugs remain unclear, especially in older patients who are at the highest risk for stroke and bleeding. The purpose of this study was to compare the risk of major bleeding and thromboembolic events between apixaban and rivaroxaban in older patients with AF. We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of all adult patients (66 years or older) with AF in Ontario, Canada, who were treated with apixaban or rivaroxaban between April 1, 2011, and March 31, 2020. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding, and the primary efficacy outcome was thromboembolic events. Secondary outcomes included any bleeding. Rates and hazard ratios (HRs) were adjusted for baseline comorbidities with inverse probability of treatment weighting. This study included 42,617 patients with AF treated with apixaban and 30,725 patients treated with rivaroxaban. After inverse probability of treatment weighting using the propensity score, patients in the apixaban and rivaroxaban groups were well balanced for baseline values of demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and medications; both groups had a similar mean age of 77.4 years, and 49.9% were female. At 1 year, the apixaban group had a lower risk for both major bleeding with an absolute risk reduction at 1 year of 1.1% (2.1% vs 3.2%; HR 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.71]) and any bleeding (8.1% vs 10.9%; HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.69-0.77), with no difference in the risk for thromboembolic events (2.2% vs 2.2%; HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.92-1.13). In patients with AF, 66 years or older, treatment with apixaban was associated with lower risk for major bleeding, with no difference in the risk for thromboembolic events compared with rivaroxaban.

Shurrab M ，Austin PC ，Jackevicius CA ，Tu K ，Qiu F ，Haldenby O ，Middleton A ，Turakhia MP ，Lopes RD ，Boden WE ，Castellucci LA ，Heidenreich PA ，Healey JS ，Ko DT ... -  《-》