Comparative effectiveness and safety of apixaban and rivaroxaban in older patients with atrial fibrillation: A population-based cohort study.
There are no clinical trials with a head-to-head comparison between the 2 most commonly used oral anticoagulants (apixaban and rivaroxaban) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The comparative efficacy and safety between these drugs remain unclear, especially in older patients who are at the highest risk for stroke and bleeding.
The purpose of this study was to compare the risk of major bleeding and thromboembolic events between apixaban and rivaroxaban in older patients with AF.
We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of all adult patients (66 years or older) with AF in Ontario, Canada, who were treated with apixaban or rivaroxaban between April 1, 2011, and March 31, 2020. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding, and the primary efficacy outcome was thromboembolic events. Secondary outcomes included any bleeding. Rates and hazard ratios (HRs) were adjusted for baseline comorbidities with inverse probability of treatment weighting.
This study included 42,617 patients with AF treated with apixaban and 30,725 patients treated with rivaroxaban. After inverse probability of treatment weighting using the propensity score, patients in the apixaban and rivaroxaban groups were well balanced for baseline values of demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and medications; both groups had a similar mean age of 77.4 years, and 49.9% were female. At 1 year, the apixaban group had a lower risk for both major bleeding with an absolute risk reduction at 1 year of 1.1% (2.1% vs 3.2%; HR 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.71]) and any bleeding (8.1% vs 10.9%; HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.69-0.77), with no difference in the risk for thromboembolic events (2.2% vs 2.2%; HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.92-1.13).
In patients with AF, 66 years or older, treatment with apixaban was associated with lower risk for major bleeding, with no difference in the risk for thromboembolic events compared with rivaroxaban.
Shurrab M
，Austin PC
，Jackevicius CA
，Tu K
，Qiu F
，Haldenby O
，Middleton A
，Turakhia MP
，Lopes RD
，Boden WE
，Castellucci LA
，Heidenreich PA
，Healey JS
，Ko DT
... -
《-》
Comparative safety and effectiveness of oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding: A nationwide French cohort study.
This observational study compared effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs; apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran) or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) at high risk for gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB).
Anticoagulant-naïve adults with NVAF with ≥1 GIB risk factor, initiating anticoagulant treatment January 2016-December 2019, and covered by the French national health data system were eligible. Outcomes included major bleeding (MB) and stroke/systemic embolism (SE). Patient characteristics were balanced using propensity score matching.
A total of 314,184 patients were identified with 162,150 (51.5%) in the apixaban cohort, 88,427 (28.1%) in the rivaroxaban cohort, 16,465 (5.2%) in the dabigatran cohort, and 47,142 (15.0%) in the VKA cohort (mean age 79.0 years, standard deviation 10.5; 51.0% female). A total of 45,124 apixaban-VKAs, 38,737 rivaroxaban-VKAs, 16,415 dabigatran-VKAs, 88,414 apixaban-rivaroxaban, 16,464 apixaban-dabigatran, and 16,459 rivaroxaban-dabigatran pairs were retained after propensity score matching. Apixaban had lower risk of MB versus dabigatran (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-0.83) and rivaroxaban (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.59-0.66). Apixaban had lower risk of GIB versus dabigatran (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.37-0.56) and rivaroxaban (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.49-0.59). Risk of GIB was similar with dabigatran versus rivaroxaban (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.89-1.24). Apixaban had lower risk of stroke/SE versus rivaroxaban (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84-0.96), while risk was similar versus dabigatran (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.9-1.3). All DOACs had lower risk of MB and stroke/SE versus VKAs (p<0.001 for all).
DOACs had improved safety and effectiveness from bleeding and stroke/SE, respectively, versus VKAs among patients with NVAF at high risk for GIB. Apixaban was associated with lower MB and GIB risk versus other DOACs. For stroke/SE, apixaban was associated with reduced risk versus rivaroxaban and similar risk versus dabigatran.
Lip GYH
，Benamouzig R
，Martin AC
，Pesce G
，Gusto G
，Quignot N
，Khachatryan A
，Dai F
，Sedjelmaci F
，Chaves J
，Subash R
，Mokgokong R
... -
《PLoS One》
Treatment of atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism with factor Xa inhibitors in severely obese patients.
A paucity of data exists to support the use of factor (F)Xa inhibitors in severely obese patients with a weight of ≥150 kg or body mass index (BMI) of ≥50 kg/m2.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether FXa inhibitors are as safe and effective as warfarin for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) and/or venous thromboembolism (VTE) in individuals with a BMI of ≥50 kg/m2 and/or weight of ≥150 kg.
This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of severely obese adult patients with AF and/or VTE treated with a FXa inhibitor or warfarin. The primary effectiveness outcome was composite odds of stroke, systemic embolism, or VTE; the primary safety outcome was odds of major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included incidence of stroke or systemic embolism, VTE, major bleeding, clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, all-cause mortality, change in anticoagulation, and total number of hospital encounters. Outcomes were assessed for 12 months following initiation of study drug.
A total of 1736 patients were included. The mean weight and BMI of the overall cohort were 164.4 kg and 54.6 kg/m2, respectively. There was no difference in odds of stroke, systemic embolism or VTE (odds ratio, 1.005; 95% CI, 0.6-1.68), or major bleeding (odds ratio, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.47-1.7) between groups.
These data suggest that apixaban and rivaroxaban are safe and effective alternatives to warfarin for the treatment of AF and/or VTE in individuals with a BMI of ≥50 kg/m2 and/or weight of ≥150 kg.
Dobry P
，Edwin SB
，Haymart B
，Barnes GD
，Kaatz S
，Ali MA
，Giuliano C
... -
《-》
Comparison of perioperative bleeding risk between direct oral anticoagulants in transurethral resection of prostate.
To evaluate the perioperative morbidity and mortality associated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin for patients receiving transurethral resection of prostate (TURP).
This was a single-centre, retrospective cohort analysis of patients who underwent TURP for benign prostate hyperplasia from April 2019 to December 2023. The primary objective was to evaluate the perioperative bleeding and thromboembolic risk between anticoagulated (AC) vs no-AC patients. The secondary objective was to evaluate perioperative bleeding and thromboembolic risk between different formulations of DOACs. Patient demographics, prior treatment, prostate size, baseline bleeding risk, and operative details were collected. Bleeding and thromboembolic-related morbidity were captured within a 3-month postoperative period. Perioperative management of AC therapy was recorded, and all patients had their AC therapy withheld. Cohort characteristic between the AC vs no-AC, and DOAC groups were analysed with two-sided t-test, and chi-square test. Further logistic regression analyses were carried out to identified significant variables between the groups. These significant variables were used for adjustment in inverse probability-weighted treatment effect analysis to evaluate bleeding risk.
There were 629 patients in the cohort, and 113 (18%) patients were receiving AC therapy. The AC patients were at 1.6 times statistically significant increased risk of acute bleeding, and 11 times increased risk of prolonged haematuria for >14 days. When compared to apixaban, patients on rivaroxaban conferred a statistically significant increased risk of acute bleeding by 2.21 times. Patients receiving AC therapy had a statistically significant increased risk of stroke in the perioperative setting (no-AC vs AC: 0.4% vs 2.7%, P = 0.01).
This is the first study to evaluate risk of bleeding for TURP patients receiving DOACs. The AC patients are more likely to experience haematuria and stroke in the perioperative period despite withholding therapy. Apixaban appears to cause less bleeding-related complications than rivaroxaban.
Kuo LY
，Kuo J
，Silverman J
，Kim JJY
，Letch C
，McClintock S
... -
《-》
ResearchGate
(全网免费下载)
钛学术
(全网免费下载)
