Intervertebral Disk Degeneration and Bone Mineral Density: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study.

This study aimed to investigate the causal relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) and intervertebral disk degeneration (IVDD) using a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis. Summary-level data from the Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) were used. Instrumental variables (IVs) for IVDD were selected from the large-scale Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) (20,001 cases and 164,682 controls). Bone mineral density (BMD) at five different sites (heel (n = 426,824), total body (TB) (n = 56,284), forearm (FA) (n = 8143), femoral neck (FN) (n = 32,735), and lumbar spine (LS) (n = 28,498)) was used as a phenotype for OP. Bidirectional causality between IVDD and BMD was assessed using inverse variance weighting (IVW) and other methods. Related sensitivity analyses were performed. Myopia was also analyzed as a negative control result to ensure the validity of IVs. Heel bone mineral density (heel BMD), total body bone mineral density (TB-BMD), femoral neck bone mineral density (FN-BMD), and lumbar spine bone mineral density (LS-BMD) have a direct causal relationship on intervertebral disk degeneration (IVDD) [heel BMD-related analysis: beta = 0.06, p = 0.03; TB-BMD-related analysis: beta = 0.18, p = 8.72E-08; FN-BMD-related analysis: beta = 0.15, p = 4.89E-03; LS-BMD-related analysis: beta = 0.16, p = 1.43E-04]. There was no evidence of a significant causal effect of IVDD on BMD. In conclusion, our study found a significant positive causal effect of lower BMD on IVDD, and we identified significant causal effects of heel, TB-, FN-, and LS-BMD on IVDD, but there was no evidence of a significant causal effect of IVDD on BMD.

Zhao J ，Wang J ，Xu H ，Hu W ，Shi F ，Fan Z ，Zhou C ，Mu H ... -  《-》

Causal relationship between intervertebral disc degeneration and osteoporosis: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study.

Liu G ，Zhang H ，Chen M ，Chen W ... -  《Frontiers in Endocrinology》

Causal relationship between bone mineral density and intervertebral disc degeneration: a univariate and multivariable mendelian randomization study.

Although previous studies have suggested a possible association between bone mineral density (BMD) and intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD), the causal relationship between them remains unclear. Evidence from accumulating studies indicates that they might mutually influence one another. However, observational studies may be affected by potential confounders. Meanwhile, Mendelian randomization (MR) study can overcome these confounders to assess causality. This Mendelian randomization (MR) study aimed to explore the causal effect of bone mineral density (BMD) on intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD). Summary data from genome-wide association studies of bone mineral density (BMD) and IDD (the FinnGen biobank) have been acquired. The inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was utilized as the primary MR analysis approach. Weighted median, MR-Egger regression, weighted mode, and simple mode were used as supplements. The Mendelian randomization pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO) and MR-Egger regression were performed to assess horizontal pleiotropy. Cochran's Q test evaluated heterogeneity. Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was further conducted to determine the reliability of the causal relationship. Multivariate MR (MVMR) analyses used multivariable inverse variance-weighted methods to individually and jointly adjust for four potential confounders, body mass index (BMI), Type2 diabetes, hyperthyroidism and smoking. A reverse MR analysis was conducted to assess potential reverse causation. In the univariate MR analysis, femoral neck bone mineral density (FNBMD), heel bone mineral density (eBMD), lumbar spine bone mineral density (LSBMD), and total body bone mineral density (TB BMD) had a direct causal effect on intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) [FNBMD-related analysis: OR(95%CI) = 1.17 (1.04 to 1.31), p = 0.008, eBMD-related analysis: OR(95%CI) = 1.06 (1.01 to 1.12), p = 0.028, LSBMD-related analysis: OR(95%CI) = 1.20 (1.10 to 1.31), p = 3.38E-7,TB BMD-related analysis: OR(95%CI) = 1.20 (1.12 to 1.29), p = 1.0E-8]. In the MVMR analysis, it was revealed that, even after controlling for confounding factors, heel bone mineral density (eBMD), lumbar spine bone mineral density (LSBMD), and total body bone mineral density (TB BMD) still maintained an independent and significant causal association with IDD(Adjusting for heel bone mineral density: beta = 0.073, OR95% CI = 1.08(1.02 to 1.14), P = 0.013; Adjusting for lumbar spine bone mineral density: beta = 0.11, OR(95%CI) = 1.12(1.02 to 1.23), P = 0.03; Adjusting for total body bone mineral density: beta = 0.139, OR95% CI = 1.15(1.06 to 1.24), P = 5.53E - 5). In the reverse analysis, no evidence was found to suggest that IDD has an impact on BMD. The findings from our univariate and multivariable Mendelian randomization analysis establish a substantial positive causal association between BMD and IDD, indicating that higher bone mineral density may be a significant risk factor for intervertebral disc degeneration. Notably, no causal effect of IDD on these four measures of bone mineral density was observed. Further research is required to elucidate the underlying mechanisms governing this causal relationship.

Li L ，Li D ，Geng Z ，Huo Z ，Kang Y ，Guo X ，Yuan B ，Xu B ，Wang T ... -  《BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS》

Causal relationship between circulating levels of cytokines and bone mineral density: A mendelian randomization study.

Xu T ，Li C ，Liao Y ，Zhang X ... -  《-》

Causal effects of specific gut microbiota on bone mineral density: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.

Recent studies have reported that the gut microbiota is essential for preventing and delaying the progression of osteoporosis. Nonetheless, the causal relationship between the gut microbiota and the risk of osteoporosis has not been fully revealed. A two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis based on a large-scale genome-wide association study (GWAS) was conducted to investigate the causal relationship between the gut microbiota and bone mineral density (BMD). Instrumental variables for 211 gut microbiota taxa were obtained from the available GWAS meta-analysis (n = 18,340) conducted by the MiBioGen consortium. The summary-level data for BMD were from the Genetic Factors for Osteoporosis (GEFOS) Consortium, which involved a total of 32,735 individuals of European ancestry. The inverse variance-weighted (IVW) method was performed as a primary analysis to estimate the causal effect, and the robustness of the results was tested via sensitivity analyses by using multiple methods. Finally, a reverse MR analysis was applied to evaluate reverse causality. According to the IVW method, we found that nine, six, and eight genetically predicted gut microbiota were associated with lumbar spine (LS) BMD, forearm (FA) BMD, and femoral neck (FN) BMD, respectively. Among them, the higher genetically predicted Genus Prevotella9 level was correlated with increased LS-BMD [β = 0.125, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.050-0.200, P = 0.001] and FA-BMD (β = 0.129, 95% CI: 0.007-0.251, P = 0.039). The higher level of genetically predicted Family Prevotellaceae was associated with increased FA-BMD (β = 0.154, 95% CI: 0.020-0.288, P = 0.025) and FN-BMD (β = 0.080, 95% CI: 0.015-0.145, P = 0.016). Consistent directional effects for all analyses were observed in both the MR-Egger and weighted median methods. Subsequently, sensitivity analyses revealed no heterogeneity, directional pleiotropy, or outliers for the causal effect of specific gut microbiota on BMD (P > 0.05). In reverse MR analysis, there was no evidence of reverse causality between LS-BMD, FA-BMD, and FN-BMD and gut microbiota (P > 0.05). Genetic evidence suggested a causal relationship between the gut microbiota and BMD and identified specific bacterial taxa that regulate bone mass variation. Further exploration of the potential microbiota-related mechanisms of bone metabolism might provide new approaches for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.

Chen S ，Zhou G ，Han H ，Jin J ，Li Z ... -  《Frontiers in Endocrinology》