Chromosomal polymorphisms in assisted reproduction: an analysis of 942 cycles.
The use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has recently increased worldwide. The live birth rate per ICSI cycle is low, and over half of infertile couples remain childless. Chromosomal polymorphisms are up to five times more common in couples with infertility compared to the general population. We aimed to investigate the association between chromosomal polymorphisms and reproductive outcomes in couples undergoing ICSI treatment. We analysed 942 ICSI fresh and frozen embryo transfer cycles in 697 women who underwent karyotyping analysis using Giemsa-Trypsin-Leishman banding prior to assisted conception at the Fertility Centre of Lanka Hospitals, Sri Lanka, between 2016 and 2018. The primary outcomes were pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates. We compared outcomes according to the presence or absence of chromosomal polymorphism in females, males and couples. There were 294 pregnancies (31.2%) recorded in the study; 130 suffered a miscarriage (13.8%), 13 were ectopic pregnancies (1.3%) and 151 resulted in a live birth (16.0%). The evidence from univariable and multivariable analyses (adjusted for age, BMI, ovarian reserve and treatment type) did not confidently identify a difference in pregnancy, miscarriage or live birth rates between couples with no chromosomal polymorphisms compared to couples where the female, male or both partners were carriers of a chromosomal polymorphism. Further, we did not identify a clear association between the presence of chromosomal polymorphisms and reproductive outcomes compared to participants without chromosomal polymorphisms. Wide CIs precluded the identification of clinically meaningful associations.
Infertility affects approximately one in eight couples worldwide. The use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), where the sperm is directly injected into an egg using a micromanipulator outside the body, has become particularly popular in recent years. However, the success rate remains low. In human cells, the genetic material is arranged in structures called chromosomes. Chromosomal polymorphism is a normal variation where the genetic material is arranged differently to the average individual and is more common in infertile couples compared to the general population. We analysed data from 942 ICSI cycles in 697 couples who underwent karyotyping analysis to assess the changes in chromosomes between 2016 and 2018. The pregnancy rate was 31.2%, with 16.0% of participants experiencing a live birth, while 13.8% of pregnancies resulted in a miscarriage and 1.3% were outside the womb cavity (ectopic). The evidence did not identify a clear association between the chromosomal polymorphism and the outcome of treatment.
Ralapanawe MSB
,Gajaweera SL
,Karunaratne N
,Price MJ
,Melo P
,Coomarasamy A
,Gallos I
... -
《-》
Chromosomal polymorphisms have no negative effect on reproductive outcomes after IVF/ICSI-ET/FET.
The present study aimed to explore whether chromosomal polymorphisms (CPs) have negative effects on reproductive outcomes of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-ET)/frozen-thawing embryo transfer (FET)? We conducted a retrospective study consisting of 21,867 assisted reproductive technology treatment cycles, among which, fresh embryo transfer cycles accounted for 10,400, and the rest were FET cycles. According to karyotype of CPs, the former was grouped as: group 1 (male carrier, n = 425), group 2 (female carrier, n = 262), and group 3 (couple without CPs, n = 9713). Accordingly, FET cycles were divided into 3 groups: group 4 (male carrier, n = 298), group 5 (female carrier, n = 311), and group 6 (couple without CPs, n = 10,858). The embryo implantation rate (IR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), live birth rate (LBR), and early miscarriage rate (EMR) were compared among the groups. In fresh embryo transfer cycles after IVF/ICSI, there were no significant differences in the infertility duration, BMI, basal FSH, no. of oocyte, no. of 2PN, endometrial thickness on trigger day, serum E2, P, and LH level on trigger day (P > 0.05). The female age, no. of 2PN embryo cleavage, top-quality embryo, and no. of embryo transferred were significantly different among groups (P < 0.05). The IR was 38.8%, 36.2%, and 34.0% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The CPR was 55.1%, 52.3%, and 49.7%, respectively. The LBR was 36.9%, 37.4%, and 36.4%, respectively. The CPR and LBR showed no significant differences among groups. The IR was lower and the EMR was higher in group 3 than those of groups 1 and 2. Binary logistic regression analysis indicated that female age, no. of embryo transferred, EMT, LH, and P on the trigger day were independently factors associated with CPR. Besides, no. of embryo transferred, and EMT on trigger day were associated with LBR, while the CPs was not related with CPR and LBR after IVF/ICSI-ET. In FET cycles, the infertility duration was similar (P > 0.05), but the female age, BMI, no. of embryo transferred were significantly different among groups (P > 0.05). The IR was 24.3%, 23.6% and 22.3% in group 4, 5, and 6, receptivity. The CPR was 31.8%, 30.9%, and 30.0%, the LBR was 23.8%,26.3%, and 23.8%, while the EMR was 12.6%, 13.1%, 14.4%, respectively. The IR, CPR, EMR, and LBR showed no significant differences among groups (P > 0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis indicated that female age, infertility duration, and no. of embryo transferred were independently factors affecting CPR and LBR after FET. The CPs were not associated with CPR and LBR after FET. The results suggested that uniparental carrying of CPs have no effects on the reproductive outcomes after IVF/ICSI-ET/FET. However, it is not clear whether both parents carrying CPs would affect pregnancy outcome.
Zhao J
,Huang B
,Hao J
,Xu B
,Li Y
... -
《Scientific Reports》
Uterine niche is associated with adverse in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.
To investigate the relationship between uterine niche and reproductive outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).
A retrospective cohort study.
A reproductive medicine center.
A total of 2,449 women with cesarean section history who underwent 2,874 IVF/ICSI cycles between January 2015 and December 2019.
A defect deeper than 2 mm visible under three-dimensional transvaginal sonography or hysteroscopy was defined as uterine niche. The IVF/ICSI outcomes of the first embryo transfer were obtained by telephone interview 1 year after embryo transfer regardless of fresh embryos or frozen-thawed embryos. Generalized estimating equations, logistic regression analyses, and propensity score matching were applied to clarify the relationship between uterine niche and IVF/ICSI outcomes.
Primary outcome was live birth rate. Secondary outcomes were positive human chorionic gonadotropin test results, clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, miscarriage rate, and ectopic pregnancy rate.
After excluding 48 cycles for uterine malformation; 18 cycles for chromosome abnormality; 281 cycles for no available embryo or no embryo transfer; 5 cycles for oocyte donation; and 7 cycles for loss of follow-up, we finally included 2,231 women with 2,515 cycles in our study. Compared with women without niche, women with niche had reduced live birth rate (18.99% vs. 31.51%, : 0.51, 95% CI: 0.34-0.77), positive human chorionic gonadotropin test rate (34.08% vs. 46.40%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43-0.87), clinical pregnancy rate (29.05% vs. 42.25%, aOR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.39-0.82) and implantation rate (25.87% vs. 36.95%, aOR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.38-0.76). In all the sensitivity analyses, the niche group had a 7.28% to 18.22% increase in miscarriage rate even not all of them were statistically significant.
Uterine niche may have a detrimental effect on subsequent fertility of women with cesarean section history undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment. Practitioners should be noted that women with uterine niches may be associated with adverse IVF/ICSI outcomes.
Yao W
,Chen Y
,Yao H
,Yao Q
,Wang L
,Wang M
,Yue J
... -
《-》