Multicenter experience: early outcome of mitral valve repair in patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation.

Hussein MA ，Abdelrehim AR ，Mubarak YSM 《-》

Outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting and reduction annuloplasty for functional ischemic mitral regurgitation: a prospective multicenter study (Randomized Evaluation of a Surgical Treatment for Off-Pump Repair of the Mitral Valve).

Functional ischemic mitral regurgitation is a complication of ventricular remodeling; standard therapy is reduction annuloplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting. Unfortunately, outcomes are retrospective and contradictory. We report a multicenter study that documents the outcomes of reduction annuloplasty for functional ischemic mitral regurgitation. Twenty-one centers randomized 75 patients to the coronary artery bypass grafting + reduction annuloplasty subgroup that was the control arm of the Randomized Evaluation of a Surgical Treatment for Off-pump Repair of the Mitral Valve trial. Entry criteria included patients requiring revascularization, patients with severe or symptomatic moderate functional ischemic mitral regurgitation, an ejection fraction 25% or greater, a left ventricular end-diastolic dimension 7.0 cm or less, and more than 30 days since acute myocardial infarction. All echocardiograms were independently scored by a core laboratory. Reduction annuloplasty was achieved by device annuloplasty. Two patients underwent immediate intraoperative conversion to a valve replacement because reduction annuloplasty was unable to correct mitral regurgitation; as-treated results are presented. Thirty-day mortality was 4.1% (3/73). Patients received an average of 2.8 bypass grafts. Mean follow-up was 24.6 months. Mitral regurgitation was reduced from 2.6 ± 0.8 preoperatively to 0.3 ± 0.6 at 2 years. Freedom from death or valve reoperation was 78% ± 5% at 2 years. There was significant improvement in ejection fraction and New York Heart Association class with reduction of left ventricular end-diastolic dimension. Cox regression analyses suggested that increasing age (P = .001; hazard ratio, 1.16 per year; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.26) and renal disease (P = .018; hazard ratio, 3.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-9.72) were associated with decreased survival. Coronary artery bypass grafting + reduction annuloplasty for functional ischemic mitral regurgitation predictably reduces mitral regurgitation and relieves symptoms. This treatment of moderate to severe mitral regurgitation is associated with improved indices of ventricular function, improved New York Heart Association class, and excellent freedom from recurrent mitral insufficiency. Although long-term prognosis remains guarded, this multicenter study delineates the intermediate-term benefits of such an approach.

Grossi EA ，Woo YJ ，Patel N ，Goldberg JD ，Schwartz CF ，Subramanian VA ，Genco C ，Goldman SM ，Zenati MA ，Wolfe JA ，Mishra YK ，Trehan N ... -  《-》

Mitral valve repair versus replacement in patients with ischaemic mitral regurgitation and depressed ejection fraction: risk factors for early and mid-term mortality†.

Mitral valve (MV) surgery for ischaemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) in patients with depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is associated with poor outcomes. The optimal surgical strategy for IMR in these patients remains controversial. The objective of this study was to compare the early mortality and mid-term survival of MV repair versus MV replacement in patients with IMR and depressed LVEF undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). A retrospective, observational, cohort study was undertaken of prospectively collected data on 126 consecutive CABG patients with IMR and LVEF <40% undergoing either MV repair (n = 98, 78%) or MV replacement (n = 28, 22%) between July 2002 and February 2011. The overall mortality rate was 7.9% (n = 10). MV replacement was associated with a 4-fold increase in the risk of death compared with MV repair [17.9%, n = 5 vs 5.1%, n = 5; odds ratio (OR) 4.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-15.1, P = 0.04]. However, after adjusting for preoperative risk factors, the type of surgical procedure was not an independent risk factor for early mortality (OR 0.1, 95% CI 0.01-31, P = 0.7). Multivariable analysis showed that preoperative LVEF (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.6-0.9, P = 0.018), preoperative B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1-1.02, P = 0.025), preoperative left ventricle end-systolic diameter (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.7-1.0, P = 0.05) and preoperative left atrial diameter (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.0-1.6, P = 0.015) were independent risk factors of early mortality. At the median follow-up of 45 months (interquartile range 20-68 months), the mid-term survival rate was 74% in the MV repair group and 70% in the MV replacement group (P = 0.08). At follow-up, predictors of worse survival were BNP levels [hazard ratio (HR) 1.0, 95% CI 1.0-1.01, P = 0.047], preoperative renal failure (HR 4.6, 95% CI 1.1-20.3, P = 0.039) and preoperative atrial fibrillation (HR 3.3, 95% CI 1.1-10, P = 0.032). MV repair in CABG patients with IMR and depressed LVEF is not superior to MV replacement with regard to operative early mortality and mid-term survival.

Lio A ，Miceli A ，Varone E ，Canarutto D ，Di Stefano G ，Della Pina F ，Gilmanov D ，Murzi M ，Solinas M ，Glauber M ... -  《-》

Mitral regurgitation surgery in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and ischemic mitral regurgitation: factors that influence survival.

The treatment of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and concomitant mitral regurgitation can be challenging and is associated with reduced long-term survival. It is unclear how mitral valve repair versus replacement affects subsequent outcome. Therefore, we conducted this study to understand the predictors of mortality and to delineate the role of mitral valve repair versus replacement in this high-risk population. From 1993 to 2007, 431 patients (mean age, 70 ± 9 years) with ischemic cardiomyopathy (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 45%) and significant ischemic mitral regurgitation (>2) were identified. Patients (44) with concomitant mitral stenosis were excluded from the analysis. A homogeneous group of 387 patients underwent combined coronary artery bypass grafting and mitral valve surgery, mitral valve repair in 302 (78%) and mitral valve replacement in 85 (22%). Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed on the entire cohort, and the predictors of mortality were identified in 2 distinct risk phases. Furthermore, we specifically examined the impact of mitral valve repair versus replacement by comparing 2 propensity-matched subgroups. Follow-up was 100% complete (median, 3.6 years; range, 0-15 years). Overall 1-, 5-, and 10-year survivals were 82.7%, 55.2%, and 24.3%, respectively, for the entire group. The risk factors for an increased mortality within the first year of surgery included previous coronary artery bypass grafting (hazard ratio = 3.39; P < .001), emergency/urgent status (hazard ratio = 2.08; P = .007), age (hazard ratio = 1.5; P = .03), and low left ventricular ejection fraction (hazard ratio = 1.31; P = .026). Thereafter, only age (hazard ratio = 1.58; P < .001), diabetes (hazard ratio = 2.5; P = .001), and preoperative renal insufficiency (hazard ratio = 1.72; P = .025) were predictive. The status of mitral valve repair versus replacement did not influence survival, and this was confirmed by comparable survival in propensity-matched analyses. Survival after combined coronary artery bypass grafting and mitral valve surgery in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 45%) and mitral regurgitation is compromised and mostly influenced by factors related to the patient's condition at the time of surgery. The specifics of mitral valve repair versus replacement did not seem to affect survival.

Maltais S ，Schaff HV ，Daly RC ，Suri RM ，Dearani JA ，Sundt TM 3rd ，Enriquez-Sarano M ，Topilsky Y ，Park SJ ... -  《-》

Surgical Repair of Moderate Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Introduction Moderate mitral regurgitation (MR) of ischemic etiology has been associated with worse outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Studies comparing concomitant mitral valve replacement/repair (MVR/Re) with CABG and standalone CABG have reported conflicting results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature. Patients and Methods We searched using PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Google scholar databases from January 1960 to June 2016 for clinical trials comparing CABG to CABG + MVR/Re for moderate MR. Pooled risk ratio or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for individual outcomes were calculated using random effects model and heterogeneity was assessed using Cochrane's Q-statistic. Results A total of 11 studies were included. Mean follow-up was 35.3 months. All-cause mortality (Mantel-Haenszel [MH] risk ratio [RR]: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.75-1.24, p = 0.775), early mortality (MH RR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.39-1.07, p = 0.092), and stroke rates (MH RR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.21-2.03, p = 0.464) were similar between CABG and CABG + MVR/Re groups. Adverse event at follow-up was lower with CABG (MH RR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.61-1.32, p = 0.584). MD of change from baseline in left ventricular (LV) end-systolic dimension (MD: - 2.50, 95% CI: - 5.21 to - 0.21, p = 0.071) and LV ejection fraction (MD: 0.48, 95% CI: - 2.48 to 3.44, p = 0.750) were not significantly different between the groups. Incidence of moderate MR (MH RR: 3.24, 95% CI: 1.79-5.89, p < 0.001) was higher in the CABG only group. Conclusion Addition of MVR/Re to CABG in patients with moderate ischemic MR did not result in improvement in early or overall mortality, stroke risk, or intermediate markers of LV function when compared with CABG alone.

Anantha Narayanan M ，Aggarwal S ，Reddy YNV ，Alla VM ，Baskaran J ，Kanmanthareddy A ，Suri RM ... -  《-》