The role of balloon pulmonary angioplasty and pulmonary endarterectomy: Is chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension still a life-threatening disease?

The management of non-operable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) has evolved with the availability of balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) and pulmonary vasodilators. We launched the BPA program in 2011. The aim was to analyze the survival and treatment efficacy of our CTEPH treatment program in the modern management era. We retrospectively reviewed data from 143 consecutive CTEPH patients diagnosed from January 2011 (i.e. after the availability of BPA) to December 2019. Of forty-one patients who underwent pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), 25 underwent additional BPA (Combination group) and the others were treated with only PEA (PEA group). Ninety patients underwent BPA (BPA group). The remaining 12 patients did not undergo any interventional treatments. The 1- and 5-year survival rates of operated patients (n = 41) were 97.4% and 90.0%, compared to 96.9% and 86.9% in not-operated patients (n = 102), respectively (p = 0.579). There was no mortality in the Combination group. Mean pulmonary artery pressure after treatments in the PEA only, Combination, and BPA only groups was 20.5 ± 6.7, 17.9 ± 4.9, and 20.7 ± 4.6 mmHg, respectively (p = 0.067, one-way ANOVA). Percent decrease of pulmonary vascular resistance in each treatment groups was -73.7 ± 11.3%, -74.3 ± 11.8%, and - 54.9 ± 22.5%, respectively (p < 0.01, one-way ANOVA). There was no significant difference in long-term survival between operated and not-operated CTEPH. Moreover, the Combination approach might have the potential to introduce notable improvements in the prognosis of CTEPH. BPA and PEA appear to be mutually complementary therapies in the modern management era.

Taniguchi Y ，Matsuoka Y ，Onishi H ，Yanaka K ，Emoto N ，Nakai H ，Okada K ，Hirata K ... -  《-》

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty: an additional treatment option to improve the prognosis of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

Taniguchi Y ，Miyagawa K ，Nakayama K ，Kinutani H ，Shinke T ，Okada K ，Okita Y ，Hirata KI ，Emoto N ... -  《-》

Long-term outcomes of combined pulmonary endarterectomy and additional balloon pulmonary angioplasty for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

The early and long-term outcomes after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) have been established by several high-volume centers, but the impact of postoperative residual pulmonary hypertension affecting postoperative clinical parameters remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the institutional surgical results of PEA and to evaluate the efficacy of additional balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) for residual pulmonary hypertension. We retrospectively reviewed 222 patients (57.7 ± 12.9 years old, 141 female) who underwent PEA for CTEPH at the National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center between 2000 and 2020. The preoperative mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) was 45.6 ± 9.7 mmHg and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) was 1062 ± 451 dyne*sec/cm-5. Postoperative mPAP (23.4 ± 11 mmHg, 204 patients, P < 0.001) and PVR (419 ± 291 dyne*sec/cm-5, 199 patients, P < 0.001) significantly improved after PEA. Since 2011, 62 patients (28%) underwent BPA after PEA for "catecholamine dependent" residual PH 1 month after PEA in 14, "scheduled" BPA with residual PH 1 year after PEA in 32, and 16 "symptomatic" patients without residual PH. Their mPAP had significantly improved by PEA (48.1 ± 7.7 to 32.0 ± 10.2 mmHg, P < 0.001), and further improved (33.8 ± 11.1 to 26.5 ± 9.1 mmHg, P < 0.001) after BPA. PEA provided immediate and substantial improvements in pulmonary hemodynamics and favorable long-term survival. In addition, postoperative BPA improved postoperative clinical parameters for eligible patients regardless of the presence of residual PH.

Nishiyama M ，Inoue Y ，Sasaki H ，Seike Y ，Aoki T ，Ueda J ，Tsuji A ，Ogo T ，Matsuda H ，Sakaguchi T ... -  《-》

Efficacy and safety of balloon pulmonary angioplasty for residual pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary endarterectomy.

Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is the standard treatment for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), although some patients may experience residual pulmonary hypertension (PH). It is unclear whether balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) is effective for residual PH after PEA. This study aimed to compare the BPA outcomes between patients with residual PH after PEA and those with inoperable CTEPH. This retrospective study compared BPA for residual PH after PEA (25 patients, 101 BPA sessions) and BPA alone for inoperable CTEPH (21 patients, 89 BPA sessions). All patients underwent right heart catheterisation and functional and laboratory tests before PEA or before and after BPA. There was no difference in the number of BPA sessions per patient (4.0 ± 1.9 vs. 4.2 ± 1.9, p = 0.671). No significant differences were observed with respect to the mean pulmonary artery pressure (23.6 ± 9.1 vs. 21.9 ± 5.7 mmHg, p = 0.44), pulmonary vascular resistance (3.7 ± 0.5 vs. 2.8 ± 1.2 Wood units, p = 0.14), 6-min walking distance (392.1 ± 117.7 vs. 452.4 ± 90.1 m, p = 0.096), and World Health Organization functional class (I/II/III/IV: 14/11/0/0 vs. 9/12/0/0, p = 0.375). Severe haemoptysis requiring embolisation was more common in the PH after PEA group (16.0% vs. 5.4%, p = 0.018). However, no patients required mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and there were no procedural deaths. Although BPA might be effective for residual PH after PEA, it was associated with a high rate of haemoptysis.

Ito R ，Yamashita J ，Sasaki Y ，Ikeda S ，Suzuki S ，Murata N ，Ogino H ，Chikamori T ... -  《-》

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty vs. pulmonary endarterectomy in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhang L ，Bai Y ，Yan P ，He T ，Liu B ，Wu S ，Qian Z ，Li C ，Cao Y ，Zhang M ... -  《-》