Long-term outcomes of combined pulmonary endarterectomy and additional balloon pulmonary angioplasty for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

The early and long-term outcomes after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) have been established by several high-volume centers, but the impact of postoperative residual pulmonary hypertension affecting postoperative clinical parameters remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the institutional surgical results of PEA and to evaluate the efficacy of additional balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) for residual pulmonary hypertension. We retrospectively reviewed 222 patients (57.7 ± 12.9 years old, 141 female) who underwent PEA for CTEPH at the National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center between 2000 and 2020. The preoperative mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) was 45.6 ± 9.7 mmHg and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) was 1062 ± 451 dyne*sec/cm-5. Postoperative mPAP (23.4 ± 11 mmHg, 204 patients, P < 0.001) and PVR (419 ± 291 dyne*sec/cm-5, 199 patients, P < 0.001) significantly improved after PEA. Since 2011, 62 patients (28%) underwent BPA after PEA for "catecholamine dependent" residual PH 1 month after PEA in 14, "scheduled" BPA with residual PH 1 year after PEA in 32, and 16 "symptomatic" patients without residual PH. Their mPAP had significantly improved by PEA (48.1 ± 7.7 to 32.0 ± 10.2 mmHg, P < 0.001), and further improved (33.8 ± 11.1 to 26.5 ± 9.1 mmHg, P < 0.001) after BPA. PEA provided immediate and substantial improvements in pulmonary hemodynamics and favorable long-term survival. In addition, postoperative BPA improved postoperative clinical parameters for eligible patients regardless of the presence of residual PH.

Nishiyama M ，Inoue Y ，Sasaki H ，Seike Y ，Aoki T ，Ueda J ，Tsuji A ，Ogo T ，Matsuda H ，Sakaguchi T ... -  《-》

Efficacy and safety of balloon pulmonary angioplasty for residual pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary endarterectomy.

Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is the standard treatment for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), although some patients may experience residual pulmonary hypertension (PH). It is unclear whether balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) is effective for residual PH after PEA. This study aimed to compare the BPA outcomes between patients with residual PH after PEA and those with inoperable CTEPH. This retrospective study compared BPA for residual PH after PEA (25 patients, 101 BPA sessions) and BPA alone for inoperable CTEPH (21 patients, 89 BPA sessions). All patients underwent right heart catheterisation and functional and laboratory tests before PEA or before and after BPA. There was no difference in the number of BPA sessions per patient (4.0 ± 1.9 vs. 4.2 ± 1.9, p = 0.671). No significant differences were observed with respect to the mean pulmonary artery pressure (23.6 ± 9.1 vs. 21.9 ± 5.7 mmHg, p = 0.44), pulmonary vascular resistance (3.7 ± 0.5 vs. 2.8 ± 1.2 Wood units, p = 0.14), 6-min walking distance (392.1 ± 117.7 vs. 452.4 ± 90.1 m, p = 0.096), and World Health Organization functional class (I/II/III/IV: 14/11/0/0 vs. 9/12/0/0, p = 0.375). Severe haemoptysis requiring embolisation was more common in the PH after PEA group (16.0% vs. 5.4%, p = 0.018). However, no patients required mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and there were no procedural deaths. Although BPA might be effective for residual PH after PEA, it was associated with a high rate of haemoptysis.

Ito R ，Yamashita J ，Sasaki Y ，Ikeda S ，Suzuki S ，Murata N ，Ogino H ，Chikamori T ... -  《-》

Impact of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty on Hemodynamics and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: the Initial Korean Experience.

The treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). However, not all patients are eligible for PEA, and some patients experience recurrence of pulmonary hypertension even after PEA. Patients who underwent balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) between December 2015 and April 2017 were enrolled from the Samsung Medical Center CTEPH registry. Enrolled patients underwent right heart catheterization, echocardiography, and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) at baseline, 4 and 24 weeks after their first BPA session. We compared clinical and hemodynamic parameters at the baseline and last BPA session. Fifty-two BPA sessions were performed in 15 patients, six of whom had a history of PEA. BPA resulted in improvements in World Health Organization (WHO) functional class (2.9 ± 0.8 to 1.7 ± 0.6, P = 0.002), 6MWD (387.0 ± 86.4 to 453.4 ± 64.8 m, P = 0.01), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (14.1 ± 3.6 to 15.6 ± 4.3 mm, P = 0.03) and hemodynamics, including a decline in mean pulmonary artery pressure (41.1 ± 13.1 to 32.1 ± 9.5 mmHg, P < 0.001) and in pulmonary vascular resistance (607.4 ± 452.3 to 406.7 ± 265.4 dyne.sec.cm⁻⁵, P = 0.01) but not in cardiac index (2.94 ± 0.79 to 2.96 ± 0.93 L/min/m², P = 0.92). Six cases of complications were recorded, including two cases of reperfusion injury. BPA might be a safe and effective treatment strategy for both inoperable CTEPH patients and patients with residual pulmonary hypertension after PEA.

Kwon W ，Yang JH ，Park TK ，Chang SA ，Jung DS ，Cho YS ，Kim SM ，Kim TJ ，Park HY ，Choi SH ，Kim DK ... -  《-》

Sequential Hybrid Therapy With Pulmonary Endarterectomy and Additional Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension.

Residual symptoms after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) remain as the clinical issues to be solved. Additional balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) after PEA showed its efficacy with symptoms in a case series, although long-term spontaneous recovery of exercise ability after PEA was also reported. However, no studies have validated the clinical efficacy of additional BPA by directly comparing PEA with and without BPA. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy of additional BPA as a sequential hybrid therapy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after PEA. Among 44 patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, 20 patients had residual symptoms after PEA. Of those, 10 patients underwent additional BPA (hybrid group) and were compared with the other 10 patients, who were followed up without BPA (PEA group). The period from PEA to additional BPA was 7.3±2.3 months. In hybrid group, mean pulmonary arterial pressure was significantly improved by PEA (40.6±1.8 to 26.9±3.1 mm Hg, P=0.001) and improved further (to 16.7±1.8 mm Hg, P=0.002) with additional BPA, which resulted in remarkable improvement in World Health Organization (WHO) functional class (pre- to post-BPA: class I/II/III/IV, 0/5/4/1 to 7/3/0/0; P<0.001). Compared with the PEA group at follow-up, the hybrid group achieved better mean pulmonary arterial pressure (18.7±1.7 versus 30.2±3.2 mm Hg, P=0.008), WHO functional class (class I/II/III/IV, 7/3/0/0 versus 0/8/2/0; P=0.001), and 6-minute walking distance (429±38 versus 319±22 m, P=0.028). A sequential hybrid strategy improved residual symptoms and exercise capacity compared with single-PEA therapy.

Yanaka K ，Nakayama K ，Shinke T ，Shinkura Y ，Taniguchi Y ，Kinutani H ，Tamada N ，Onishi H ，Tsuboi Y ，Satomi-Kobayashi S ，Otake H ，Tanaka H ，Okita Y ，Emoto N ，Hirata KI ... -  《Journal of the American Heart Association》

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty vs. pulmonary endarterectomy in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhang L ，Bai Y ，Yan P ，He T ，Liu B ，Wu S ，Qian Z ，Li C ，Cao Y ，Zhang M ... -  《-》