Improving treatment efficiency via photon optimizer (PO) MLC algorithm for synchronous single-isocenter/multiple-lesions VMAT lung SBRT.

Elderly patients with multiple primary or oligometastases (<5 lesions) lesions with associated co-morbidities may not retain their treatment position for the traditional long SBRT treatment time with individual isocenters for each lesion. Treating multiple lesions synchronously using a single-isocenter volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) plan would be more efficient with the use of the most recently adopted photon optimizer (PO) MLC algorithm and improve the patient comfort. Herein, we quantified the clinical performance of PO versus its predecessor progressive resolution optimizer (PRO) algorithm for single-isocenter/multiple-lesions VMAT lung SBRT. Fourteen patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer lesions (two to five, both uni- and bilateral lungs) received a highly conformal single-isocenter co/non-coplanar VMAT (2-6 arcs) SBRT treatment plan. Patients were treated with a 6X-FFF beam and Acuros algorithm with a single-isocenter placed between/among the lesions, using PO for MLC optimization. Average isocenter to tumor distance was 5.5 ± 1.9 cm. Mean combined PTV derived from 4D-CT scans was 38.7 ± 22.7 cc. Doses were 54 Gy/50 Gy in 3/5 fractions prescribed to 70%-80% isodose line so that at least 95% of the PTV receives 100% of prescribed dose. Plans were re-optimized using PRO algorithm. Plans were compared via ROTG-0915 protocol criteria for target conformity, heterogeneity and gradient indices, and dose to organs-at-risk (OAR). Additionally, total number of monitor units (MU), modulation factor (MF) and beam-on time were compared. All plans met SBRT protocol requirements for target coverage and OAR doses. Comparison of target coverage and dose to the OAR showed no statistical significance between the two plans. PO had 1042 ± 753 (P < 0.001) less MU than PRO resulting in a beam-on time of about 0.75 ± 0.5 min (P < 0.001) less, on average. For similar dose distribution, a significant reduction of beam delivery complexity was observed with PO (average MF = 3.7 ± 0.7) vs PRO MLC algorithm (average MF = 4.4 ± 1.3) (P < 0.001). PO MLC algorithm improved treatment efficiency without compromising plan quality when compared to PRO algorithm for single-isocenter/multi-lesions VMAT lung SBRT. Shorter beam-on time can potentially reduce intrafraction motion errors and improve patient compliance. PO MLC algorithm is recommended for future clinical lung SBRT plan optimization.

Sanford L ，Pokhrel D 《Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics》

Clinical evaluation of photon optimizer (PO) MLC algorithm for stereotactic, single-dose of VMAT lung SBRT.

Recently implemented photon optimizer (PO) MLC optimization algorithm is mandatory for RapidPlan modeling in Eclipse. This report quantifies and compares the dosimetry and treatment delivery parameters of PO vs its predecessor progressive resolution optimizer (PRO) algorithm for a single-dose of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Clinical SBRT treatment plans for 12 early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer patients receiving 30 Gy in 1 fraction using PRO-VMAT were re-optimized using the PO-VMAT MLC algorithm with identical planning parameters and objectives. Average planning target volume derived from the 4D CT scans was 13.6 ± 12.0 cc (range: 4.3 to 41.1 cc) Patients were treated with 6 MV flattening filter free beam using Acuros-based calculations and 2.5 mm calculation grid-size (CGS). Both treatment plans were normalized to receive same target coverage and identical CGS to isolate effects of MLC positioning optimizers. Original PRO and re-optimized PO plans were compared via RTOG-0915 protocol compliance criteria for target conformity, gradient indices, dose to organs at risks and delivery efficiency. Additionally, PO-VMAT plans with a 1.25 mm CGS were evaluated. Both plans met RTOG protocol requirements. Conformity indices showed no statistical difference between PO 2.5 mm CGS and PRO 2.5 mm CGS plans. Gradient index (p = 0.03), maximum dose to 2 cm away from planning target volume in any direction (D2cm) (p < 0.05), and gradient distance (p < 0.05) presented statistically significant differences for both plans with 2.5 mm CGS. Some organs at risks showed statistically significant differences for both plans calculated with 2.5 mm CGS; however, no clinically significant dose differences were observed between the plans. Beam modulation factor was statistically significant for both PO 1.25 mm CGS (p = 0.001) and PO 2.5 mm CGS (p < 0.001) compared to clinical PRO 2.5 mm CGS plans. PO-VMAT plans provided decreased beam-on time by an average of 0.2 ± 0.1 minutes (up to 1.0 minutes) with PO 2.5 mm and 1.2 ± 0.39 minutes (maximum up to 3.22 minutes) with PO 1.25 mm plans compared to PRO 2.5 mm plans. PO-VMAT single-dose of VMAT lung SBRT plans showed slightly increased intermediate-dose spillage but boasted overall similar plan quality with less beam modulation and hence shorter beam-on time. However, PO 1.25 mm CGS had less intermediate-dose spillage and analogous plan quality compared to clinical PRO-VMAT plans with no additional cost of plan optimization. Further investigation into peripheral targets with PO-MLC algorithm is warranted. This study indicates that PO 1.25 mm CGS plans can be used for RapidPlan modeling for a single dose of lung SBRT patients. PO-MLC 1.25 mm algorithm is recommended for future clinical single-dose lung SBRT plan optimization.

Visak J ，McGarry RC ，Pokhrel D 《-》

Potential reduction of lung dose via VMAT with jaw tracking in the treatment of single-isocenter/two-lesion lung SBRT.

Due to higher radiosensitivity, non-target normal tissue dose is a major concern in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatment. The aim of this report was to estimate the dosimetric impact, specifically the reduction of normal lung dose in the treatment of single-isocenter/two-lesion lung SBRT via volumetric modulated arc therapy with jaw tracking (JT-VMAT). Twelve patients with two peripherally located early-stage non-small-cell-lung cancer (NSCLC) lung lesions underwent single-isocenter highly conformal non-coplanar JT-VMAT SBRT treatment in our institution. The mean isocenter to tumors distance was 5.6 ± 1.9 (range 4.3-9.5) cm. The mean combined planning target volume (PTV) was 38.7 ± 22.7 (range 5.0-80.9) cc. A single isocenter was placed between the two lesions. Doses were 54 and 50 Gy in three and five fractions, respectively. Plans were optimized in Eclipse with AcurosXB algorithm utilizing jaw tracking options for the Truebeam with a 6 MV-FFF beam and standard 120 leaf millennium multi-leaf collimators. For comparison, the JT-VMAT plans were retrospectively re-computed utilizing identical beam geometry, objectives, and planning parameters, but without jaw tracking (no JT-VMAT). Both plans were normalized to receive the same target coverage. The conformity and heterogeneity indices, intermediate-dose spillage [D2cm , R50, Gradient Index (GI), Gradient Distance (GD)], organs at risks (OAR) doses including normal lung as well as modulation factor (MF) were compared for both plans. For similar target coverage, GI, R50, GD, as well as the normal lung V5, V10, V20, mean lung dose (MLD), and maximum dose received by 1000 cc of lungs were statistically significant. Normal lung doses were reduced by 8%-11% with JT-VMAT. Normal lung dose increased as a function of tumor distance from isocenter. For the other OAR, up to 1%-16% reduction of non-target doses were observed with JT-VMAT. The MF and beam-on time were similar for both plans, however, MF increased as a function of tumors distance, consequently, delivering higher dose to normal lungs. Utilizing jaw tracking options during optimization for single-isocenter/two-lesion lung SBRT VMAT plans reduced doses to the normal lung and other OAR, reduced intermediate-dose spillage and provided superior/similar target coverage. Application of jaw tracking did not affect delivery efficiency and provided excellent plan quality with similar MF and beam-on time. Jaw tracking is recommended for future clinical SBRT plan optimization.

Pokhrel D ，Sanford L ，Halfman M ，Molloy J ... -  《Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics》

Evaluation of plan quality and treatment efficiency for single-isocenter/two-lesion lung stereotactic body radiation therapy.

To evaluate the plan quality and treatment delivery efficiency of single-isocenter/two-lesions volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Eight consecutive patients with two peripherally located early stage nonsmall-cell-lung cancer (NSCLC) lung lesions underwent single-isocenter highly conformal noncoplanar VMAT SBRT treatment in our institution. A single-isocenter was placed between the two lesions. Doses were 54 or 50 Gy in 3 and 5 fractions respectively. Patients were treated every other day. Plans were calculated in Eclipse with AcurosXB algorithm and normalized to at least 95% of the planning target volume (PTV) receiving 100% of the prescribed dose. For comparison, two-isocenter plans (isocenter placed centrally in each target) were retrospectively created. Conformity indices (CIs), heterogeneity index (HI), gradient index (GI), gradient distance (GD), and D2cm were calculated. The normal lung V5, V10, V20, mean lung dose (MLD) and other organs at risk (OARs) doses were evaluated. Total number of monitor units (MUs), beam-on time, and patient-specific quality assurance (QA) results were recorded. The mean isocenter to tumor distance was 6.7 ± 2.3 cm. The mean combined PTV was 44.0 ± 23.4 cc. There was no clinically significant difference in CI, HI, GD, GI, D2cm , and V20 including most of the OARs between single-isocenter and two-isocenter lung SBRT plans, evaluated per RTOG guidelines. However, for single-isocenter plans as the distance between the lesions increased, the V5, V10, and MLD increased, marginally. The total number of MUs and beam-on time was reduced by a factor of 1.5 for a single-isocenter plan compared to a two-isocenter plan. The single-isocenter/two-lesions VMAT lung SBRT QA plans demonstrated an accurate dose delivery of 98.1 ± 3.2% for clinical gamma passing rate of 3%/3 mm. The SBRT treatment of two peripherally located lung lesions with a centrally placed single-isocenter was dosimetrically equivalent to two-isocenter plans. Faster treatment delivery for single-isocenter treatment can improve patient compliance and reduce the amount of intrafraction motion errors for well-suited patients.

Sanford L ，Molloy J ，Kumar S ，Randall M ，McGarry R ，Pokhrel D ... -  《Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics》

FFF-VMAT for SBRT of lung lesions: Improves dose coverage at tumor-lung interface compared to flattened beams.

To quantify the differences in dosimetry as a function of ipsilateral lung density and treatment delivery parameters for stereotactic, single dose of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) delivered with 6X flattening filter free (6X-FFF) beams compared to traditional flattened 6X (6X-FF) beams. Thirteen consecutive early stage I-II non-small-cell-lung cancer (NSCLC) patients were treated with highly conformal noncoplanar VMAT SBRT plans (3-6 partial arcs) using 6X-FFF beam and advanced Acuros-based dose calculations to a prescription dose of 30 Gy in one fraction to the tumor margin. These clinical cases included relatively smaller tumor (island tumors) sizes (2.0-4.2 cm diameters) and varying average ipsilateral lung densities between 0.14 g/cc and 0.34 g/cc. Treatment plans were reoptimized with 6X-FF beams for identical beam/arc geometries and planning objectives. For same target coverage, the organs-at-risk (OAR) dose metrics as a function of ipsilateral lung density were compared between 6X-FFF and 6X-FF plans. Moreover, monitor units (MU), beam modulation factor (MF) and beam-on time (BOT) were evaluated. Both plans met the RTOG-0915 protocol compliance. The ipsilateral lung density and the tumor location heavily influenced the treatment plans with 6X-FFF and 6X-FF beams, showing differences up to 12% for the gradient indices. For similar target coverage, 6X-FFF beams showed better target conformity, lower intermediate dose-spillage, and lower dose to the OAR. Additionally, BOT was reduced by a factor of 2.3 with 6X-FFF beams compared to 6X-FF beams. While prescribing dose to the tumor periphery, 6X-FFF VMAT plans for stereotactic single-dose lung SBRT provided similar target coverage with better dose conformity, superior intermediate dose-spillage (improved dose coverage at tumor interface), and improved OAR sparing compared to traditional 6X-FF beams and significantly reduced treatment time. The ipsilateral lung density and tumor location considerably affected dose distributions requiring special attention for clinical SBRT plan optimization on a per-patient basis. Clinical follow up of these patients for tumor local-control rate and treatment-related toxicities is in progress.

Pokhrel D ，Halfman M ，Sanford L 《Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics》