Comparison of forearm versus upper arm basilic transposition arteriovenous fistulas demonstrates equivalent satisfactory patency.

In accordance with the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative recommendations, attaining autogenous hemodialysis access, specifically via creation of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas (AVF), brachial-basilic (BB)-AVF, or brachial-cephalic AVFs, is preferred for mortality and morbidity benefits over catheter access in patients with end-stage renal disease. The aim of this study is to determine the suitability of forearm basilic vein transposition (FBVT) fistulas as an alternative access option by comparing outcomes with those of BB-AVFs. All patients who underwent creation of FBVT between 2007 and 2015 were identified retrospectively in the electronic medical record and compared with a sample of patients undergoing BB-AVF placement during this time. Access patency was examined using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regression. We included 34 patients with FBVT (median age, 54 years; 67.6% male) and 49 with BB-AVF (median age, 57 years; 42.9% male) in this study. There were no significant differences in comorbid conditions between the two groups, with the exception of hyperlipidemia (29.4% FBVT vs 53.1% BB-AVF; P = .03). Although those with FBVT were more likely to have had previous permanent access attempts (70.6% vs 38.7%; P = .002), and access attempts on the same extremity (44.1% vs 24.4%; P = .04), there were no significant differences in primary patency (46.9% vs 53.3%; P = .6), primary-assisted patency (65.6% vs 73.3%; P = .5), or secondary patency (68.8% vs 82.2%; P = .2) at 1 year when compared with BB-AVF. The risk of loss of patency was not statistically different for FBVT as compared with BB-AVF (hazard ratio, 1.37; 95% confidence interval 0.65-2.88; P = .4). This risk did not vary for those who had previous access on the same arm (interaction P = .8). Four fistulas in each group failed to mature. Only one infectious complication was identified in the FBVT group. No prior studies have directly compared outcomes of FBVTs with BB-AVFs at 1 year or longer. Despite the increased difficulty of harvesting the forearm basilic vein, particularly in patients who have had prior access attempts, there was no significant difference in patency between FBVTs and BB-AVFs. FBVTs are a reasonable option for hemodialysis access, particularly in patients without adequate cephalic veins or who previously failed radiocephalic fistula attempts.

Weaver ML ，Holscher CM ，Sorber R ，Arnold MW ，Lum YW ，Reifsnyder T ... -  《-》

The forearm arteriovenous graft between the brachial artery and the brachial vein as a reliable dialysis vascular access for patients with inadequate superficial veins.

The arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is recommended as the preferred hemodialysis access. However, placing an AVF in all patients may result in poor access outcomes and increased central venous catheter (CVC) use because of increased comorbid conditions, age, and suboptimal vessels. In patients with inadequate superficial veins for AVFs, the use of the brachial veins for creation of forearm arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) has received limited attention. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate outcomes of forearm brachial-brachial AVGs (BB-AVGs) placed in patients with poor superficial veins. We identified 111 BB-AVGs created in 111 consecutive patients, using standard-walled polytetrafluoroethylene grafts, between January 2010 and December 2015. After excluding 6 patients (non-dialysis initiation, missing information, and death within 1 month), we included 105 patients from 21 dialysis centers. We analyzed primary failures, time to cannulation, patency, complications, and revisions. Patency rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The incidence of complications and revisions was expressed as number of events per person-year. A total of 105 patients (median age, 69 years) were followed up for a median time of 21.2 months (interquartile range, 9.2-36.5 months). Of the patients, 72.4% were on chronic hemodialysis and had previously undergone one or more access procedures. At the time of BB-AVG placement, prior accesses were 39 AVFs, 20 tunneled CVCs, and 17 AVGs. BB-AVG rates of primary failure and revision before cannulation were 7.6% and 5.7%, respectively. BB-AVGs were cannulated after a median time of 3.4 weeks (interquartile range, 2.8-4.1 weeks). Primary patency rates at 12, 24, and 36 months were 49.5%, 29.5%, and 19.5%. Secondary patency rates at 12, 24, and 36 months were 76.3%, 62.7%, and 54.6%. After cannulation, the incidence of complications and revisions was 1.054 and 0.649 per person-year, respectively. Most complications and interventions were due to thrombosis (0.527 per person-year) or stenosis (0.381 per person-year) and related interventions (0.490 per person-year). A minority of patients experienced AVG infections (0.052 per person-year), with only two requiring access removal. In patients with poor superficial veins, the forearm BB-AVG is a reliable access because of low access-related morbidity and considerable long-term access survival. BB-AVG placement has the advantage of preserving proximal vessels. In these patients, such an approach can delay both rapid exhaustion of vascular sites and early recourse to CVC permanent use.

Fumagalli G ，Trovato F ，Migliori M ，Panichi V ，De Pietro S ... -  《-》

Evaluation of the efficacy of the forearm basilic vein transposition arteriovenous fistula.

Son HJ ，Min SK ，Min SI ，Park YJ ，Ha J ，Kim SJ ... -  《-》

Distal ulnar-basilic fistula as the first hemodialysis access.

Shintaku S ，Kawanishi H ，Moriishi M ，Bansyodani M ，Tsuchiya S ... -  《-》

Promising Results of the Forearm Basilic Fistula Reveal a Worthwhile Option between Radial Cephalic and Brachial Fistula.

Use of the forearm basilic vein for the creation of an arteriovenous fistula has been codified as second-choice vascular access for hemodialysis in the last clinical guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery in 2008. Poor literature data on this technical option and on its evaluation and outcomes led us to initiate a retrospective single-center study. We analyzed the outcomes of every arteriovenous fistula using the forearm basilic vein created in our department. It is a retrospective study in which we collected data prospectively by contacting dialysis centers, nephrologists, and patients. Primary end point was primary patency rate at 1 year. Secondary end points were secondary patency rate at 1 year, time of maturation, and Doppler flow measurement before the first puncture. From February 2004 to June 2014, 49 forearm basilic arteriovenous fistulas were created: 33 ulnar-basilic and 16 radial basilic arteriovenous fistulas. Initial technical success rate was 98%. Functional success rate was 60%. Primary and secondary patency rates at 1 year were respectively 21% and 48%. Median time of maturation was 81 days, and mean Doppler flow measurement was 678 mL/min. Ulnar-basilic fistulas had a statistically significant shorter time of maturation than radial basilic fistulas (P ≤ 0.05). Despite poor primary patency rate and a long time of maturation, forearm basilic arteriovenous fistula has satisfactory secondary patency rate and keeps all the advantages of a distal-located vascular access concerning complications. It is worth its second-choice place in the current algorithm of creation of vascular access for hemodialysis.

Schwein A ，Georg Y ，Lejay A ，Roussin M ，Gaertner S ，Bazin-Kara D ，Thaveau F ，Chakfe N ... -  《-》