Comparison of forearm versus upper arm basilic transposition arteriovenous fistulas demonstrates equivalent satisfactory patency.
In accordance with the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative recommendations, attaining autogenous hemodialysis access, specifically via creation of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas (AVF), brachial-basilic (BB)-AVF, or brachial-cephalic AVFs, is preferred for mortality and morbidity benefits over catheter access in patients with end-stage renal disease. The aim of this study is to determine the suitability of forearm basilic vein transposition (FBVT) fistulas as an alternative access option by comparing outcomes with those of BB-AVFs.
All patients who underwent creation of FBVT between 2007 and 2015 were identified retrospectively in the electronic medical record and compared with a sample of patients undergoing BB-AVF placement during this time. Access patency was examined using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regression.
We included 34 patients with FBVT (median age, 54 years; 67.6% male) and 49 with BB-AVF (median age, 57 years; 42.9% male) in this study. There were no significant differences in comorbid conditions between the two groups, with the exception of hyperlipidemia (29.4% FBVT vs 53.1% BB-AVF; P = .03). Although those with FBVT were more likely to have had previous permanent access attempts (70.6% vs 38.7%; P = .002), and access attempts on the same extremity (44.1% vs 24.4%; P = .04), there were no significant differences in primary patency (46.9% vs 53.3%; P = .6), primary-assisted patency (65.6% vs 73.3%; P = .5), or secondary patency (68.8% vs 82.2%; P = .2) at 1 year when compared with BB-AVF. The risk of loss of patency was not statistically different for FBVT as compared with BB-AVF (hazard ratio, 1.37; 95% confidence interval 0.65-2.88; P = .4). This risk did not vary for those who had previous access on the same arm (interaction P = .8). Four fistulas in each group failed to mature. Only one infectious complication was identified in the FBVT group.
No prior studies have directly compared outcomes of FBVTs with BB-AVFs at 1 year or longer. Despite the increased difficulty of harvesting the forearm basilic vein, particularly in patients who have had prior access attempts, there was no significant difference in patency between FBVTs and BB-AVFs. FBVTs are a reasonable option for hemodialysis access, particularly in patients without adequate cephalic veins or who previously failed radiocephalic fistula attempts.
Weaver ML
，Holscher CM
，Sorber R
，Arnold MW
，Lum YW
，Reifsnyder T
... -
《-》
Comparison of Ellipsys Percutaneous and Proximal Forearm Gracz-Type Surgical Arteriovenous Fistulas.
Percutaneous arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) are created by establishing a proximal forearm anastomosis and offer a safe and reliable vascular access. This study compares the Ellipsys percutaneous AVF with a proximal forearm Gracz-type surgical AVF, chosen for comparison as it is constructed at the same anatomical site.
Retrospective study of prospectively collected clinical data.
All vascular access procedures conducted during a 34-month period were reviewed. The study groups comprised 89 percutaneous AVFs and 69 surgical AVFs.
Percutaneous or surgical AVF placement.
AVF patency, function, and complications.
Patency rates for each AVF group were evaluated by competing risk survival analysis using a cumulative incidence function. Association of primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency with the AVF groups was examined by Cox proportional hazard models.
Technical success was 100% for both groups. Average procedure times were 14 minutes for percutaneous AVFs and 74 minutes for surgical AVFs (P < 0.001). Proximal radial artery (PRA) was used in all percutaneous AVF cases. Inflow for surgical AVFs included radial (30%), ulnar (12%), and brachial (58%) arteries. Outflow veins for both groups were the cephalic and/or basilic veins. Access flow volumes, times to maturation, and overall numbers of interventions per patient-year were not significantly different. Cumulative incidence of primary patency failure at 12 months was lower for surgical AVF (47% vs 64%, P = 0.1), but secondary patency failure was not different between groups (20% vs 12%, P = 0.3). PRA surgical AVFs had similar primary patency (65% vs 64%, P = 0.8) but higher secondary patency failure rates than percutaneous AVFs at 12 months (34% vs 12%, P = 0.04).
Retrospective study with a relatively short follow-up period, and not all patients required hemodialysis at the end of study.
Both percutaneous and surgical AVFs demonstrated high rates of technical success and secondary patency. Percutaneous AVFs required shorter procedure times. The rate of intervention was similar. When a distal radial artery AVF is not feasible, percutaneous AVF might offer an appropriate procedure for creating a safe and functional access, maintaining further proximal forearm surgical AVF creation options.
Shahverdyan R
，Beathard G
，Mushtaq N
，Litchfield TF
，Vartanian S
，Konner K
，Jennings WC
... -
《-》
Clinical Utility of a New Predicting Score for Radiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistula Survival.
Radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (RC-AVF) is the recommended first choice for vascular access (VA). The CAVeA2T2 scoring system was recently published (ipsilateral central venous catheter access, age >73 years, vein <2.2 mm, lower limb angioplasty, and absent intraoperative thrill). The aim of the present study was to assess the clinical utility of the CAVeA2T2 scoring system for predicting RC-AVFs survival in our center and its subsequent application in VA management.
In this single-center retrospective study, all RC-AVFs performed from January 2010 to July 2014 were included. The CAVeA2T2 was applied. Primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates were measured.
Sixty RC-AVFs were analyzed. Mean age was 64.3 ± 14.7 years. Mean CAVeA2T2 score was 1.23 ± 1.2. The median fistula secondary patency was 13.7 ± 1.6 months. Secondary patency was at 6 weeks and at 6, 12, and 24 months: 88.3%, 66.7%, 55%, and 31.7%, respectively. Increasing score (≥2) was associated with a decrease in primary (log-rank, χ2 = 16.7, dif = 1, P = 0.0001) and secondary patency rate survival (log-rank, χ2 = 5.4, dif = 1, P = 0.0001). In addition, stratification of the CAVeA2T2 score into 3 groups (scores 0-1, 2, and 3+) retained its significance for primary (log-rank, χ2 = 19.4, dif = 2, P = 0.0001) and secondary patency rate survival (log-rank, χ2 = 5.5, dif = 2, P = 0.046) at the end of the study.
In the present study, the CAVeA2T2 scoring system has proved to be a useful, easy to apply tool that is highly predictive of RC-AVF survival. Based on our results, we should avoid perform RC-AVFs, in those patients with CAVeA2T2 score ≥2 and late nephrology referral. Prospective studies should be designed to establish the management of patients with a higher CAVeA2T2 score.
Martinez LI
，Esteve V
，Yeste M
，Artigas V
，Llagostera S
... -
《-》
ResearchGate
(全网免费下载)
钛学术
(全网免费下载)
