Blood and Anticoagulation Management in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Surgical and Nonsurgical Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Review.

To describe blood management and anticoagulation practice for cardiac and respiratory extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) with consideration of major surgery at the time of its initiation. A single-center retrospective review over 18 months of blood product usage and anticoagulation in patients treated with veno-venous (VV) ECMO versus veno-arterial (VA) ECMO and after major surgery (Sx) versus no surgery (Nsx). Tertiary metropolitan hospital and state ECMO referral and heart and lung transplantation center. The study comprised 42 patients representing 48 consecutive ECMO runs (16 VV, 32 VA, 26 Sx, 22 Nsx). None. Thirty-three percent of the total run time of 362 days was with no continuous infusion of heparin. The mean (standard deviation) daily dose of heparin was lower for Sx versus Nsx patients (11,397 [9,297] v 17,324 [10,387] U, p = 0.047). Sx patients also received more fresh frozen plasma (1.1 [1.93] v 0.2 [0.59] U per day, p = 0.049) and platelets (0.5 [0.51] v 0.1 [0.25] U per day, p = 0.003). VV patients received fewer packed red cells (0.7 [0.45] v 2.0 [2.04] U per day, p = 0.016) and platelets (0.1 [0.18] v 0.4 [0.49] U per day, p = 0.008) compared with VA patients. Survival to hospital discharge was 69%. Heparin doses were low, with frequent interruption of anticoagulation. This was more pronounced in patients with a high bleeding risk recovering from major surgery. The overall usage of blood products was low in VV and Nsx patients, with an overall excellent survival rate.

Buscher H ，Vukomanovic A ，Benzimra M ，Okada K ，Nair P ... -  《-》

Bleeding, Thrombosis, and Transfusion With Two Heparin Anticoagulation Protocols in Venoarterial ECMO Patients.

To compare the incidence of bleeding and thrombosis between adult venoarterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients managed with an activated clotting time (ACT)-guided heparin anticoagulation protocol and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) protocol. Retrospective cohort study. Tertiary care, academic medical center. Consecutive adult VA ECMO patients during a 6-year period. None. Demographic, medical, transfusion, and ECMO data were collected for all patients. Primary study outcomes were bleeding and thrombosis. Secondary outcomes were stroke and in-hospital mortality. One hundred twenty-one patients were included in the cohort. Fifty patients had ACT monitoring, and 71 had aPTT monitoring. There was no difference in the incidence of bleeding or thrombosis between the 2 groups (78.0% v 67.6% for bleeding [p = 0.21] and 16.0% v 19.7% for thrombosis [p = 1.0]). After adjusting for age and total ECMO days, patients managed with ACT received approximately 30% more red blood cell, fresh frozen plasma, and platelet transfusion (all p < 0.05). There is no apparent difference in the incidence rate of bleeding or thrombosis between VA ECMO patients managed with an ACT- or aPTT-guided heparin anticoagulation protocol. Patients managed with an ACT-guided protocol received more blood transfusion, which could reflect greater total bleeding. Future randomized controlled trials would help to elucidate optimal anticoagulation strategies for VA ECMO patients.

Mazzeffi MA ，Tanaka K ，Roberts A ，Rector R ，Menaker J ，Kon Z ，Deatrick KB ，Kaczorowski D ，Griffith B ，Herr D ... -  《-》

Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation With Prophylactic Subcutaneous Anticoagulation Only: An Observational Study in More Than 60 Patients.

Extracorporeal lung support and therapeutic anticoagulation are dogmatically linked for most clinicians in fear of clotting of the extracorporeal circuit. In the last decade, however, we have learned that bleeding complications in the course of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy are common and not occasionally limiting or fatal. Even though international guidelines lowered the PTT-target values, ECMO therapy without anticoagulation has only been reported sporadically in case reports heretofore. This monocentric, observational study was designed to evaluate a protocol for venovenous ECMO therapy without additional anticoagulation. Patients without former thrombotic events solely received thrombosis prophylaxis with 40 mg subcutaneous enoxaparin per day like every critical care patient. After approval by the local ethics committee (Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg ethics committee, EK 513/14) all consecutive patients treated with venovenous ECMO therapy since introduction of the protocol have been identified. Digital charts of the patients have been evaluated with special regard to bleeding and thrombotic or embolic events or breakdown of the extracorporeal circuit. Sixty-one patients received venovenous ECMO therapy with prophylactic subcutaneous enoxaparin only. Median duration of ECMO therapy was 7 days (2-32). Overall 560 ECMO days have been observed. No system exchange because of thrombotic occlusion was necessary within the permitted 5 days run time of the centrifugal pump. Overall we identified thrombotic complications in four patients. In three of them centrifugal pump after a runtime of more than 5 days unexpectedly stopped completely because of thrombotic occlusion. In all cases pump exchange was performed promptly and patients did not incur hypoxic deficit. One other patient received substitution of blood products and coagulation factor concentrates because of severe bleeding and sustained myocardial infarction the day after. Only 18% of patients presented with essential clinical bleeding after 7 days of therapy. No fatal bleeding event and no intracranial hemorrhage was observed. Patients required only a third of blood product transfusion compared to published data. Venovenous ECMO therapy with prophylactic anticoagulation only was feasible in this study. It was not associated with an increased rate of system exchanges compared to regimes with therapeutic anticoagulation in registry data. It provides the potential to relevantly decrease the incidence of severe bleeding events and blood transfusion requirements. The apodictic adherence to anticoagulation in therapeutic dosage should be critically scrutinized in every patient.

Krueger K ，Schmutz A ，Zieger B ，Kalbhenn J ... -  《-》

The impact of early perioperative heparin-free anticoagulation for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on bleeding and thrombotic events in lung transplantation: a retrospective cohort study.

Qi Z ，Gu S ，Yu X ，Zhang Z ，Cui X ，Li C ，Li M ，Zhan Q ... -  《-》

Heparin-Sparing Anticoagulation Strategies Are Viable Options for Patients on Veno-Venous ECMO.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), a rescue therapy for pulmonary failure, has traditionally been limited by anticoagulation requirements. Recent practice has challenged the absolute need for anticoagulation, expanding the role of ECMO to patients with higher bleeding risk. We hypothesize that mortality, bleeding, thrombotic events, and transfusions do not differ between heparin-sparing and full therapeutic anticoagulation strategies in veno-venous (VV) ECMO management. Adult VV ECMO patients between October 2011 and May 2018 at a single center were reviewed. A heparin-sparing strategy was implemented in October 2014; we compared outcomes in an as-treated fashion. The primary end point was survival. Secondary end points included bleeding, thrombotic complications, and transfusion requirements. Forty VV ECMO patients were included: 17 (147 circuit-days) before and 23 (214 circuit-days) after implementation of a heparin-sparing protocol. Patients treated with heparin-sparing anticoagulation had a lower body mass index (28.5 ± 7.1 versus 38.1 ± 12.4, P = 0.01), more often required inotropic support before ECMO (82 versus 50%, P = 0.05), and had a lower mean activated clotting time (167 ± 15 versus 189 ± 15 s, P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in survival to decannulation (59 versus 83%, P = 0.16) or discharge (50 versus 72%, P = 0.20), bleeding (32 versus 33%, P = 1.0), thromboembolic events (18 versus 39%, P = 0.17), or transfusion requirements (median 1.1 versus 0.9 unit per circuit-day, P = 0.48). Survival, bleeding, thrombotic complications, and transfusion requirements did not differ between heparin-sparing and full therapeutic heparin strategies for management of VV ECMO. VV ECMO can be a safe option in patients with traditional contraindications to anticoagulation.

Carter KT ，Kutcher ME ，Shake JG ，Panos AL ，Cochran RP ，Creswell LL ，Copeland H ... -  《-》