Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation With Prophylactic Subcutaneous Anticoagulation Only: An Observational Study in More Than 60 Patients.

Extracorporeal lung support and therapeutic anticoagulation are dogmatically linked for most clinicians in fear of clotting of the extracorporeal circuit. In the last decade, however, we have learned that bleeding complications in the course of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy are common and not occasionally limiting or fatal. Even though international guidelines lowered the PTT-target values, ECMO therapy without anticoagulation has only been reported sporadically in case reports heretofore. This monocentric, observational study was designed to evaluate a protocol for venovenous ECMO therapy without additional anticoagulation. Patients without former thrombotic events solely received thrombosis prophylaxis with 40 mg subcutaneous enoxaparin per day like every critical care patient. After approval by the local ethics committee (Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg ethics committee, EK 513/14) all consecutive patients treated with venovenous ECMO therapy since introduction of the protocol have been identified. Digital charts of the patients have been evaluated with special regard to bleeding and thrombotic or embolic events or breakdown of the extracorporeal circuit. Sixty-one patients received venovenous ECMO therapy with prophylactic subcutaneous enoxaparin only. Median duration of ECMO therapy was 7 days (2-32). Overall 560 ECMO days have been observed. No system exchange because of thrombotic occlusion was necessary within the permitted 5 days run time of the centrifugal pump. Overall we identified thrombotic complications in four patients. In three of them centrifugal pump after a runtime of more than 5 days unexpectedly stopped completely because of thrombotic occlusion. In all cases pump exchange was performed promptly and patients did not incur hypoxic deficit. One other patient received substitution of blood products and coagulation factor concentrates because of severe bleeding and sustained myocardial infarction the day after. Only 18% of patients presented with essential clinical bleeding after 7 days of therapy. No fatal bleeding event and no intracranial hemorrhage was observed. Patients required only a third of blood product transfusion compared to published data. Venovenous ECMO therapy with prophylactic anticoagulation only was feasible in this study. It was not associated with an increased rate of system exchanges compared to regimes with therapeutic anticoagulation in registry data. It provides the potential to relevantly decrease the incidence of severe bleeding events and blood transfusion requirements. The apodictic adherence to anticoagulation in therapeutic dosage should be critically scrutinized in every patient.

Krueger K ，Schmutz A ，Zieger B ，Kalbhenn J ... -  《-》

The impact of early perioperative heparin-free anticoagulation for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on bleeding and thrombotic events in lung transplantation: a retrospective cohort study.

Qi Z ，Gu S ，Yu X ，Zhang Z ，Cui X ，Li C ，Li M ，Zhan Q ... -  《-》

Comparison of Anticoagulation Strategies in Patients Requiring Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Heparin Versus Bivalirudin.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a life-sustaining therapy for severe respiratory failure. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuits require systemic anticoagulation that creates a delicate balance between circuit-related thrombosis and bleeding-related complications. Although unfractionated heparin is most widely used anticoagulant, alternative agents such as bivalirudin have been used. We sought to compare extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit thrombosis and bleeding-related outcomes in respiratory failure patients receiving either unfractionated heparin or bivalirudin for anticoagulation on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Retrospective cohort study. Single-center, cardiothoracic ICU. Consecutive patients requiring venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation who were maintained on anticoagulation between 2013 and 2020. IV bivalirudin or IV unfractionated heparin. Primary outcomes were the presence of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in-circuit-related thrombotic complications and volume of blood products administered during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation duration. One hundred sixty-two patients receiving unfractionated heparin were compared with 133 patients receiving bivalirudin for anticoagulation on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. In patients receiving bivalirudin, there was an overall decrease in the number of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit thrombotic complications (p < 0.005) and a significant increase in time to circuit thrombosis (p = 0.007). Multivariable Cox regression found that heparin was associated with a significant increase in risk of clots (Exp[B] = 2.31, p = 0.001). Patients who received bivalirudin received significantly less volume of packed RBCs, fresh frozen plasma, and platelet transfusion (p < 0.001 for each). There was a significant decrease in the number major bleeding events in patients receiving bivalirudin, 40.7% versus 11.7%, p < 0.001. Patients receiving bivalirudin for systemic anticoagulation on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation experienced a decrease in the number of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit-related thrombotic events as well as a significant decrease in volume of blood products administered.

Rivosecchi RM ，Arakelians AR ，Ryan J ，Murray H ，Ramanan R ，Gomez H ，Phillips D ，Sciortino C ，Arlia P ，Freeman D ，Sappington PL ，Sanchez PG ... -  《-》

Anticoagulation Practices during Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Respiratory Failure. A Systematic Review.

Sklar MC ，Sy E ，Lequier L ，Fan E ，Kanji HD ... -  《-》

Heparin-Sparing Anticoagulation Strategies Are Viable Options for Patients on Veno-Venous ECMO.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), a rescue therapy for pulmonary failure, has traditionally been limited by anticoagulation requirements. Recent practice has challenged the absolute need for anticoagulation, expanding the role of ECMO to patients with higher bleeding risk. We hypothesize that mortality, bleeding, thrombotic events, and transfusions do not differ between heparin-sparing and full therapeutic anticoagulation strategies in veno-venous (VV) ECMO management. Adult VV ECMO patients between October 2011 and May 2018 at a single center were reviewed. A heparin-sparing strategy was implemented in October 2014; we compared outcomes in an as-treated fashion. The primary end point was survival. Secondary end points included bleeding, thrombotic complications, and transfusion requirements. Forty VV ECMO patients were included: 17 (147 circuit-days) before and 23 (214 circuit-days) after implementation of a heparin-sparing protocol. Patients treated with heparin-sparing anticoagulation had a lower body mass index (28.5 ± 7.1 versus 38.1 ± 12.4, P = 0.01), more often required inotropic support before ECMO (82 versus 50%, P = 0.05), and had a lower mean activated clotting time (167 ± 15 versus 189 ± 15 s, P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in survival to decannulation (59 versus 83%, P = 0.16) or discharge (50 versus 72%, P = 0.20), bleeding (32 versus 33%, P = 1.0), thromboembolic events (18 versus 39%, P = 0.17), or transfusion requirements (median 1.1 versus 0.9 unit per circuit-day, P = 0.48). Survival, bleeding, thrombotic complications, and transfusion requirements did not differ between heparin-sparing and full therapeutic heparin strategies for management of VV ECMO. VV ECMO can be a safe option in patients with traditional contraindications to anticoagulation.

Carter KT ，Kutcher ME ，Shake JG ，Panos AL ，Cochran RP ，Creswell LL ，Copeland H ... -  《-》