Quantitative determination of zopiclone and zolpidem in whole blood by liquid-liquid extraction and UHPLC-MS/MS.

An ultra high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) method was developed and validated for the determination of zopiclone and zolpidem in whole blood, for use in cases with suspected driving under influence of drugs (DUID) and autopsy cases. Sample preparation was performed with liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) using ethyl acetate/n-heptane (80:20, v/v) and 0.1mL whole blood. Deuterated analogues were used as internal standards (IS) for both compounds. The compounds were separated using a reversed phase C18-column (2.1mm×100mm, 1.7μm), with a flow rate of 0.5mL/min, 1μL injected and gradient elution with 5mM ammonium formate pH 10.2 and acetonitrile. Quantification was done by MS/MS using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) in positive mode. The run time of the method was 4.5min including equilibration time. The calibration curves of extracted whole blood standards were fitted by linear-order calibration curves weighted 1/x, with R(2) values above 0.999 for both compounds. Intermediate precision and accuracies (bias) were 2.4-12.9% RSD and from -5.9 to 6.8%, respectively. Recoveries of the compounds were ≥70%. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) for zopiclone was 0.50nmol/L (0.19ng/mL) or 0.05pg injected on column, and 3.5nmol/mL (1.10ng/mL) for zolpidem, or 0.27pg injected on column. The limit of detection (LOD) was 0.2nmol/L (0.08ng/mL) for zopiclone and 0.3nmol/L (0.09ng/mL) for zolpidem. Matrix effects (ME) were between 108 and 115% when calculated against IS. A comparison with former confirmation LC-MS method at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Division of Forensic Medicine (NIPH) was performed during method validation. Good correlation was seen for both compounds. The method has been running on a routine basis for two years, and has proven to be very robust and reliable with satisfactory long term precision and bias and with results for external quality samples corresponding well to consensus mean or median. Zopiclone and zolpidem concentrations in post mortem and ante mortem cases were reported. The method also meets the requirements of the legislative limits for driving under the influence of non-alcohol drugs introduced in the Norwegian Road Traffic Act Law from 2012.

Eliassen E ，Kristoffersen L 《-》

Quantitative determination of fifteen basic pharmaceuticals in ante- and post-mortem whole blood by high pH mobile phase reversed phase ultra high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

An ultra high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) method was developed and validated for the determination of fifteen basic pharmaceuticals, for analysis of post- and ante-mortem whole blood samples. The following compounds were included: amitriptyline and its metabolite nortriptyline, trimipramine, mianserin, mirtazapine, citalopram, paroxetine, sertraline, and venlafaxine (all antidepressants), levomepromazine and quetiapine (antipsychotics), ketobemidone and tramadol (analgesics), alimemazine (sedative antihistamine), and metoprolol (beta-blocker). The sample pretreatment consisted of liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) using ethylacetate:n-heptane (80:20, v/v). Six deuterated analogues were used as internal standards (IS). The compounds were separated using a reversed phase C18-column (2.1mm×100mm, 1.7μm), a flow rate of 0.5mL/min, and gradient elution with 5mM ammonium formate pH 10.2 and acetonitrile. Quantification was done by MS/MS using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) in positive mode, using two transitions for the compounds and one transition for the IS. The run time of the method was 8min including equilibration time. The calibration curves had R(2) values above 0.995 for all the compounds. The intermediate precision had a relative standard deviation (RSD, %) ranging between 2.0 and 16%. Recoveries of the compounds were ≥81%. The lower limits of quantifications (LLOQs) for the compounds varied from 5.0nmol/L to 0.10μmol/L (1.3-26ng/mL) and the limits of detections (LODs) from 1.0 to 20nmol/L (0.24-5.3ng/mL). LLOQ corresponds to 0.28-5.5pg injected on column. Matrix effects (ME) were between 91 and 113% when calculated against an IS. A comparison with former confirmation LC-MS methods at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Division of Forensic Medicine and Drug Abuse Research (NIPH) was performed during method validation. Good correlation was seen for all compounds except sertraline, where the old LC-MS method was showing 33% higher results. The method has been running on a routine basis for more than a year, and has proven to be very robust and reliable with results for external quality samples, including sertaline, corresponding well to consensus mean or median.

Amundsen I ，Oiestad ÅM ，Ekeberg D ，Kristoffersen L ... -  《-》

Determination of benzodiazepines in ante-mortem and post-mortem whole blood by solid-supported liquid-liquid extraction and UPLC-MS/MS.

A solid-supported liquid-liquid extraction ultra performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method was developed and validated for the determination of benzodiazepines commonly found in Norway, for use in cases with suspected driving impairment and autopsy cases by analysis of human whole blood samples. The following compounds were included: alprazolam, bromazepam, clonazepam, diazepam, flunitrazepam, lorazepam, midazolam, nitrazepam, nordiazepam (metabolite of diazepam), oxazepam and phenazepam. Aliquots of 500 μL whole blood were added 500 μL of borate buffer pH 11 and extracted by solid-supported liquid-liquid extraction on ChemElut(®) columns using three times 2.5 mL of methyl tert-butyl ether. Deuterated analogues were used as internal standards (IS) for all analytes, except for midazolam, phenazepam and bromazepam which had no commercially available deuterated analogues at the time the method was developed, and therefore used diazepam-d(5), flunitrazepam-d(7) and nitrazepam-d(5), respectively. The analytes were separated using UPLC with a 2.1×100 mm BEH C(18)-column, 1.7 μm particle size, and quantified by MS/MS using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) in positive mode. Two transitions were used for the analytes and one transition for the IS. The run time of the method was 8 min including equilibration time. The concentrations of the benzodiazepines in the method span a broad range varying from the lowest concentration of 0.005 μM for flunitrazepam to the highest of 20 μM for oxazepam. The calibration curves of extracted whole blood standards were fitted by second-order calibration curves weighted 1/x, with R(2) values ranging from 0.9981 to 0.9998. The intermediate precision had a CV (%) ranging between 2 and 19%. Recoveries of the analytes were from 71 to 96%. The LLOQs for the analytes varied from 0.0006 to 0.075 μM and the LODs from 0.005 to 3.0 nM. Matrix effects were studied by post extraction addition and found to be between 95 and 104% when calculated against an internal standard. A comparison with two other LC-MS methods was performed during method validation. Good correlation was seen for all analytes. The method has been running on a routine basis for several years, and has proven to be very robust and reliable with good results for external quality samples. The method also meets the requirements of the legislative limits for driving under the influence of non-alcohol drugs to be introduced in the Norwegian legislative system from 2012.

Sauve EN ，Langødegård M ，Ekeberg D ，Øiestad AM ... -  《-》

Determination of 12 commonly found compounds in DUID cases in whole blood using fully automated supported liquid extraction and UHPLC-MS/MS.

A high-throughput UHPLC-MS/MS method for the most frequently found compounds; tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), amphetamine, methamphetamine, MDMA, clonazepam, diazepam, nordiazepam, oxazepam, alprazolam, nitrazepam, morphine, and codeine, in driving under the influence of drugs (DUID) cases in whole blood, is presented. Automated sample preparation by 96-well supported liquid extraction (SLE) plates with ethyl acetate + heptane (80 + 20, v/v) as organic solvent was carried out on a Freedom Evo 200 platform from Tecan. An aliquot of 100 μL whole blood was used. Sample preparation time for 96 samples was 1.5 h. Compounds were separated with gradient elution on a C18 column (50 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm) with a mobile phase consisting of 5 mM pH 10.2 ammonium formate and methanol. The run time was 4.5 min and 1 μL was injected on an Acquity UPLC I-Class system with a Xevo TQS tandem-quadrupole mass spectrometer in multiple-reaction monitoring mode (MRM) from Waters. Isotope labelled, 13C, internal standards (ISs) were used for all compounds except for alprazolam and morphine, which had deuterated analogs. Quantification was carried out with calibrators without whole blood matrix. Full validation was carried out according to international guidelines, and a new approach for evaluation of process efficiency (PE) has been presented. Linear or quadratic weighted (1/x) calibration curves were used with R2 ≥ 0.999. The method showed satisfactory deviations ±16% when compared to the existing methods, and satisfactory agreement with proficiency testing control samples (z-score -1.6 to 1.8, n = 16 samples). The precision, estimated as the relative standard deviation (RSD) of the concentration difference between results from two independent analyses of authentic whole blood samples, was ≤7.2% in antemortem and ≤9.3% in postmortem samples. Recovery was ≥85% for all the compounds, except morphine ≥62% and THC ≥ 50%. PE was satisfactory for all the compounds with low variation in IS response, RSD ≤ 16% (THC 27%) in antemortem samples and ≤34% (THC 66%) in postmortem samples. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first automated 96-well SLE UHPLC-MS/MS method developed for the simultaneous determination of these 12 compounds in whole blood covering the concentration ranges found in forensic samples. The method has been used in routine work during the last ten months, analysing about 9900 antemortem and 1000 postmortem whole blood samples, and has proven to be robust and reliable.

Kristoffersen L ，Langødegård M ，Gaare KI ，Amundsen I ，Terland MN ，Strand DH ... -  《-》

UHPLC-MS/MS and UHPLC-HRMS identification of zolpidem and zopiclone main urinary metabolites and method development for their toxicological determination.

Zolpidem and zopiclone (Z-compounds) are non-benzodiazepine hypnotics of new generation that can be used in drug-facilitated sexual assault (DFSA). Their determination in biological fluids, mainly urine, is of primary importance; nevertheless, although they are excreted almost entirely as metabolites, available methods deal mainly with the determination of the unmetabolized drug. This paper describes a method for the determination in urine of Z-compounds and their metabolites by ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) and UHPLC coupled with high resolution/high accuracy Orbitrap® mass spectrometry (UHPLC-HRMS). The metabolic profile was studied on real samples collected from subjects in therapy with zolpidem or zopiclone; the main urinary metabolites were identified and their MS behaviour studied by MS/MS and HRMS. Two carboxy- and three hydroxy- metabolites, that could be also detected by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC-MS) as trimethylsylyl derivatives, have been identified for zolpidem. Also, at least one dihydroxilated metabolite was detected. As for zopiclone, the two main metabolites detected were N-demethyl and N-oxide zopiclone. For both substances, the unmetabolized compounds were excreted in low amounts in urine. In consideration of these data, a UHPLC-MS/MS method for the determination of Z-compounds and their main metabolites after isotopic dilution with deuterated analogues of zolpidem and zopiclone and direct injection of urine samples was set up. The proposed UHPLC-MS/MS method appears to be practically applicable for the analysis of urine samples in analytical and forensic toxicology cases, as well as in cases of suspected DFSA.

Strano Rossi S ，Anzillotti L ，Castrignanò E ，Frison G ，Zancanaro F ，Chiarotti M ... -  《-》