Comparison of the Airtraq and McCoy laryngoscopes using a rigid neck collar in patients with simulated difficult laryngoscopy.
摘要:
To determine the efficacy of the Airtraq versus the McCoy laryngoscope as intubation devices with the neck stabilized by a rigid cervical collar. Prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College. 60 ASA physical status 1, 2, and 3 patients, aged 18-70 years, scheduled for various surgical procedures requiring tracheal intubation for surgical anesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated to undergo intubation with the McCoy (n = 30) or Airtraq (n = 30) laryngoscope. Differences in intubation times between the Airtraq and the McCoy laryngoscope, modified Cormack-Lehane score, percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score, and airway trauma were compared. Overall intubation success rates were 100% with both devices and a similar number of intubation attempts were required. However, the mean (SD) time required for successful intubation was shorter with the Airtraq (28.73 ± 6.39 sec) than the McCoy laryngoscope (39.11 ± 14.01 sec; P < 0.0001). The frequencies of intubation complications were similar. Esophageal intubation occurred in 4 cases but only with the McCoy laryngoscope. Intubation time was shorter with the Airtraq than the McCoy laryngoscope, even though the overall success rates between the two devices were similar.
收起
展开
DOI:
10.1016/j.jclinane.2013.10.012
被引量:
年份:
1970


通过 文献互助 平台发起求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。
求助方法1:
知识发现用户
每天可免费求助50篇
求助方法1:
关注微信公众号
每天可免费求助2篇
求助方法2:
完成求助需要支付5财富值
您目前有 1000 财富值
相似文献(709)
参考文献(0)
引证文献(3)
来源期刊
影响因子:暂无数据
JCR分区: 暂无
中科院分区:暂无