Effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone at initiation of the 5-d timed artificial insemination (AI) program and timing of induction of ovulation relative to AI on ovarian dynamics and fertility of dairy heifers.

Two experiments evaluated the effects of the first GnRH injection of the 5-d timed artificial insemination (AI) program on ovarian responses and pregnancy per AI (P/AI), and the effect of timing of the final GnRH to induce ovulation relative to AI on P/AI. In experiment 1, 605 Holstein heifers were synchronized for their second insemination and assigned randomly to receive GnRH on study d 0 (n = 298) or to remain as untreated controls (n = 307). Ovaries were scanned on study d 0 and 5. All heifers received a controlled internal drug-release (CIDR) insert containing progesterone on d 0, a single injection of PGF(2α) and removal of the CIDR on d 5, and GnRH concurrent with timed AI on d 8. Blood was analyzed for progesterone at AI. Pregnancy was diagnosed on d 32 and 60 after AI. Ovulation on study d 0 was greater for GnRH than control (35.4 vs. 10.6%). Presence of a new corpus luteum (CL) at PGF(2α) injection was greater for GnRH than for control (43.1 vs. 20.8%), although the proportion of heifers with a CL at PGF(2α) did not differ between treatments and averaged 87.1%. Progesterone on the day of AI was greater for GnRH than control (0.50 ± 0.07 vs. 0.28 ± 0.07 ng/mL). The proportion of heifers at AI with progesterone <0.5 ng/mL was less for GnRH than for control (73.8 vs. 88.2%). The proportion of heifers in estrus at AI did not differ between treatments and averaged 66.8%. Pregnancy per AI was not affected by treatment at d 32 or 60 (GnRH = 52.5 and 49.8% vs. control = 54.1 and 50.0%), and pregnancy loss averaged 6.0%. Responses to GnRH were not influenced by ovarian status on study d 0. In experiment 2, 1,295 heifers were synchronized for their first insemination and assigned randomly to receive a CIDR on d 0, PGF(2α) and removal of the CIDR on d 5, and either GnRH 56 h after PGF(2α) and AI 16h later (OVS56, n = 644) or GnRH concurrent with AI 72 h after PGF(2α) (COS72; n = 651). Estrus at AI was greater for COS72 than for OVS56 (61.4 vs. 47.5). Treatment did not affect P/AI on d 32 in heifers displaying signs of estrus at AI, but COS72 improved P/AI compared with OVS56 (55.0 vs. 47.6%) in those not in estrus at AI. Similarly, P/AI on d 60 did not differ between treatments for heifers displaying estrus, but CO S72 improved P/AI compared with OVS56 (53.0 vs. 44.7%) in those not in estrus at AI. Administration of GnRH on the first day of the 5-d timed AI program resulted in low ovulation rate and no improvement in P/AI when heifers received a single PGF(2α) injection 5 d later. Moreover, extending the proestrus by delaying the final GnRH from 56 to 72 h concurrent with AI benefited fertility of dairy heifers that did not display signs of estrus at insemination following the 5-d timed AI protocol.

Lima FS ，Ayres H ，Favoreto MG ，Bisinotto RS ，Greco LF ，Ribeiro ES ，Baruselli PS ，Risco CA ，Thatcher WW ，Santos JE ... -  《-》

Effect of interval between induction of ovulation and artificial insemination (AI) and supplemental progesterone for resynchronization on fertility of dairy cows subjected to a 5-d timed AI program.

Objectives were to investigate 2 intervals from induction of ovulation to artificial insemination (AI) and the effect of supplemental progesterone for resynchronization on fertility of lactating dairy cows subjected to a 5-d timed AI program. In experiment 1, 1,227 Holstein cows had their estrous cycles presynchronized with 2 injections of PGF(2α) at 46 and 60 d in milk (DIM). The timed AI protocols were initiated with GnRH at 72 DIM, followed by 2 injections of PGF(2α) at 77 and 78 DIM and a second injection of GnRH at either 56 (OVS56) or 72h (COS72) after the first PGF(2α) of the timed AI protocols. All cows were time-inseminated at 72h after the first PGF(2α) injection. Pregnancy was diagnosed on d 32 and 60 after AI. In experiment 2, 675 nonpregnant Holstein cows had their estrous cycles resynchronized starting at 34 d after the first AI. Cows received the OVS56 with (RCIDR) or without (RCON) supplemental progesterone, as an intravaginal insert, from the first GnRH to the first PGF(2α). Pregnancy diagnoses were performed on d 32 and 60 after AI. During experiment 2, subsets of cows had their ovaries scanned by ultrasonography at the first GnRH, the first PGF(2α), and second GnRH injections of the protocol. Blood was sampled on the day of AI and 7 d later, and concentrations of progesterone were determined in plasma. Cows were considered to have a synchronized ovulation if they had progesterone <1 and >2.26 ng/mL on the day of AI and 7 d later, respectively, and if no ovulation was detected between the first PGF(2α) and second GnRH injections during resynchronization. In experiment 1, the proportion of cows detected in estrus at AI was greater for COS72 than OVS56 (40.6 vs. 32.4%). Pregnancy per AI (P/AI) did not differ between OVS56 (46.4%) and COS72 (45.5%). In experiment 2, cows supplemented with progesterone had greater P/AI compared with unsupplemented cows (51.3 vs. 43.1%). Premature ovulation tended to be greater for RCON than RCIDR cows (7.5 vs. 3.6%), although synchronization of the estrous cycle after timed AI was similar between treatments. Timing of induction of ovulation with GnRH relative to insemination did not affect P/AI of dairy cows enrolled in a 5-d timed AI program. Furthermore, during resynchronization starting on d 34 after the first AI, supplementation with progesterone improved P/AI in cows subjected to the 5-d timed AI protocol.

Bisinotto RS ，Ribeiro ES ，Martins LT ，Marsola RS ，Greco LF ，Favoreto MG ，Risco CA ，Thatcher WW ，Santos JE ... -  《-》

Reproductive performance of grazing dairy cows following presynchronization and resynchronization protocols.

Objectives were to compare the effect of presynchronization and resynchronization methods on fertility responses of grazing dairy cows at first and second artificial insemination (AI) and pregnancy rate during the entire breeding season. Lactating dairy cows (n = 1,263) in 2 seasonal grazing farms were blocked, within farm, by parity, breed and days in milk. Within each block, cows were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatments arranged as a 2 × 2 factorial with 2 presynchronization and 2 resynchronization treatments. Cows had their estrous cycles presynchronized with either a PGF(2α)-based program (Presynch) consisting of 2 injections of PGF(2α) administered 14 d apart and starting the timed AI protocol 11 d later, or with a PGF(2α)-GnRH-based presynchronization program (G6G) consisting of an injection of PGF(2α), followed 3 d later by an injection of GnRH and starting the timed AI protocol 6 d later. All cows received the first insemination on the same day, which was considered study d 0 and also d 0 of the breeding season. All cows received the 5-d timed AI protocol that consisted of GnRH on d -8, PGF(2α) on d -3 and -2, and GnRH+timed AI on d 0. Blood was sampled and analyzed for progesterone on d -8. On d 12, cows in each presynchronization treatment either remained as untreated controls (RCON) or received a controlled internal drug-release (CIDR) insert containing progesterone for 7 d (RCIDR). Estrus was observed daily starting on d 19 and cows in estrus were inseminated on the same day. On d 35, bulls were placed with the cows for an additional 65 d, completing a 100-d breeding season. Holstein cows were less likely to have progesterone ≥ 1 ng/mL on d -8, and had less expression of estrus and pregnancy per AI (P/AI), which resulted in a slower rate of pregnancy and a smaller proportion of pregnancy at the end of the study than did Jersey or crossbred cows. In addition, body condition, days in milk, and plasma progesterone concentration at the first GnRH injection of the timed AI protocol had marked effects on the reproductive performance of lactating grazing dairy cows. A greater proportion of G6G cows had progesterone ≥ 1 ng/mL at the first GnRH injection of the timed AI protocol compared with Presynch cows (82.0 vs. 74.3%). Presynchronization treatment did not influence P/AI, but cows in G6G had increased risk of pregnancy loss between d 30 and 65 after the first AI (12.9 vs. 8.1%). Nevertheless, an interaction between presynchronization and ovarian status was observed, and cows initiating the timed AI with progesterone ≥ 1 ng/mL had greater P/AI when previously treated with Presynch than G6G. On the other hand, G6G benefited P/AI of cows initiating the timed AI with progesterone < 1 ng/mL. Resynchronization with RCIDR altered the pattern of return to estrus, but it did not increase the rate of re-insemination and decreased the proportion of pregnant cows at the end of the 100-d breeding period (80.6 vs. 84.4%).

Ribeiro ES ，Cerri RL ，Bisinotto RS ，Lima FS ，Silvestre FT ，Greco LF ，Thatcher WW ，Santos JE ... -  《-》

Progesterone, follicular, and estrual responses to progesterone-based estrus and ovulation synchronization protocols at five stages of the estrous cycle.

The objective was to monitor changes in ovarian status in heifers exposed to a progesterone insert with or without concurrent GnRH injection. Estrus was manipulated in 283 heifers (31 breeding clusters) by administering GnRH, progesterone, and PGF(2alpha) at 5 stages of the estrous cycle. Estrus was presynchronized with a progesterone insert (CIDR) for 7 d before PGF(2alpha) was administered 24 h before insert removal. Successive clusters of heifers were assigned to treatments (2 heifers per treatment) on cycle d 2, 5, 10, 15, and 18. Treatments consisted of a progesterone insert (d 0) for 7 d plus: 1) PGF(2alpha) on d 6, 24 h before insert removal (early PGF); 2) GnRH on d 0 + early PGF(2alpha) (GnRH + early PGF); 3) PGF(2alpha) at insert removal (late PGF); and 4) GnRH on d 0 + late PGF (GnRH + late PGF). Controls received GnRH on d 0 and PGF(2alpha) on d 7. Ovaries were scanned by transrectal ultrasonography on d 0, 2, 7, 9, and 11 to assess follicle diameters and ovulation. Blood was collected on d 0, 2, 6, 7, 8, and 9 to quantify serum concentrations of progesterone. Insemination occurred after detected estrus or by timed artificial insemination (TAI) at 64 h after insert removal. Only 25% of 141 GnRH-treated heifers ovulated by d 2; twice as many ovulated when treatment was initiated on d 5 (46.4%) than on other cycle days (20.3%). Diameters of the largest follicle exposed to GnRH on d 0, 2, 7, or 9 did not differ regardless of whether ovulation occurred. Small treatment and stage of cycle differences in diameter of the largest follicle were detected on d 2, 7, and 9. Compared with controls, progesterone concentration was greater in all progesterone-treated heifers on d 2 and 6. Early- vs. late-PGF treatment resulted in less progesterone on d 7 and 8. Pregnancies per AI were less after TAI (44%) than after detected estrus (56%) and were less in controls than in all progesterone treatments. Heifers in which treatments were initiated on d 10 of the cycle had the most consistent (estrus vs. TAI) pregnancies per AI (65.4%) compared with other cycle days. Compared with controls, more progesterone-treated heifers ovulated by 96 h after insert removal. Application of the progesterone insert reduced variance of the interval to estrus after insert removal (or PGF(2alpha) injection in controls) by 1.6-fold compared with controls. These results do not support the use of GnRH in a progesterone-based synchronization protocol.

Stevenson JS 《-》

Evaluation of the 5-day versus a modified 7-day CIDR breeding program in dairy heifers.

Dairy heifers were used to compared the effects of two timed AI + controlled internal drug release (CIDR) protocols (5-day vs. a modified 7-day) on: (1) luteal regression to initiate a new ovarian follicular wave; (2) ovarian response to the initial GnRH injection; and (3) pregnancy outcomes. Holstein heifers (N = 543) were assigned randomly to two treatments: (1) 25 mg PGF(2α) (im) and a CIDR insert on Day -7 followed by 100 μg of GnRH (GnRH-1) on Day -5 and 25 mg PGF(2α) (im) at CIDR insert removal (7-day [7D]) on Day 0; or (2) 100 μg GnRH (GnRH-1) and insertion of a CIDR on Day -5 and 25 mg PGF(2α) (im) at CIDR removal (5-day [5D]) on Day 0. Insemination with frozen-thawed conventional or gender-biased semen occurred after detected estrus from Days 0 to 2 or by appointment at 72 h after PGF(2α) when a second 100-μg dose of GnRH was given. Blood was collected on Days -7, -5, 0, and 3 to determine concentrations of progesterone and incidence of luteolysis. Ovaries were scanned on Days -5 and 0. Luteolysis in the 7D treatment by 48 h after the initial PGF(2α) was greater (P < 0.01) than what occurred spontaneously in the 5D treatment (36.2% vs. 19.7%, respectively). Incidence of ovulation after GnRH-1 on Day -5 was greater (P < 0.05) for 7D than for 5D heifers, but the proportion of heifers with an induced CL on Day 0 did not differ between treatments. Heifers inseminated after detected estrus (166/543, 30.6%) on Days 0, 1, and 2 had greater (P < 0.05) pregnancy per AI (P/AI) at 32 days post AI than after timed AI (38.2% vs. 28.3%) on Day 3. Pregnancy P/AI, however, was greater (P < 0.05) for 7D heifers inseminated at estrus (46.5%) than for 7D heifers receiving the timed AI (26.8%) and differed (P < 0.05) from all 5D heifers regardless of insemination time at estrus (30.5%) or at timed AI at 72 h (29.9%). At the Florida location in which conventional and sexed semen were used during two breeding clusters, P/AI using sexed semen (43.9%, N = 56) did not differ from that of conventional semen (21.2%, N = 50). Remaining replicates of sexed semen produced similar P/AI at the other two locations (sexed = 27.6%, N = 71; and sexed = 31.9%, N = 215). We concluded that the modified 7-day CO-Synch + CIDR program produced more P/AI in heifers inseminated at estrus than a standard 5-day CO-Synch + CIDR program, but when timed AI occurred at 72 h after PGF(2α) and CIDR insert removal, P/AI did not differ between programs.

Mellieon HI Jr ，Pulley SL ，Lamb GC ，Larson JE ，Stevenson JS ... -  《-》