Frequency of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a clinic-based series of breast and ovarian cancer families.

Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 account for a significant proportion of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer cases. In this study, we sought to determine the frequency of BRCA1- and BRCA2-mutation carrier families in a hospital-based cancer family registry. The frequency of families with germline truncating mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 was 17.3% (18/104) and 1.9% (2/104), respectively. Two novel truncating mutations, BRCA1 1848delGA and BRCA2 5694insT, were identified. We also sought to determine the carrier frequency of other affected family members for which the mutation lineage could be established within these families. Not including the probands, 72% (18/25) of the affected family members within the BRCA1 mutation-associated families were carriers, and all four affected members of the BRCA2 families were carriers. These data imply that risk evaluation based on cancer family history alone may result in inaccurate estimates, and where possible, mutation testing should be considered in other affected family members to verify carrier status.

Vaziri SA ，Krumroy LM ，Rostai M ，Casey G ... -  《-》

A high occurrence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among Czech hereditary breast and breast-ovarian cancer families.

Machácková E ，Foretová L ，Navrátilová M ，Valík D ，Claes K ，Messiaen L ... -  《-》

Histology of prophylactically removed ovaries from BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers compared with noncarriers in hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome kindreds.

The literature reports conflicting studies claiming premalignant histological features in benign ovaries from women who may have hereditary predilections for ovarian carcinoma. To test the veracity of these claims, this investigation studied ovaries prophylactically removed from members of hereditary breast ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome families who carry BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and compared these with the ovaries of mutation-negative women from the same HBOC syndrome kindred. Sixty cases of women from HBOC syndrome families who had undergone prophylactic oophorectomies and whose BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status had been tested were selected from our database. Thirty had tested positive for BRCA1 mutations, 3 carried BRCA2 mutations, and 27 were negative for both BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations. Histologic material from each case was examined by light microscopy blinded to the mutation status. Histologic features, previously reported to be possible precursor lesions for ovarian cancer, were quantified. Data from BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers were compared with those from mutation-negative cases in the direct line of genetic inheritance from the same HBOC syndrome families. Statistical analysis found that a more frequent occurrence of ovarian surface micropapillae in 87% of mutation carriers compared with just 55% of mutation-negative cases was the only histologic feature which was significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.39). Cortical clefts tended to be deeper in the ovaries of mutation carriers, but this did not reach significance (P = 0.051). There were no other significant histologic differences between the ovaries removed from mutation carriers and those from noncarriers. The results of our large and prospectively controlled, blinded study contrast with those reported from smaller, unblinded investigations. Except for the possible biological significance of surface micropapillae on ovaries from BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, we found no histologic evidence for a genetically determined ovarian carcinoma precursor lesion.

Casey MJ ，Bewtra C ，Hoehne LL ，Tatpati AD ，Lynch HT ，Watson P ... -  《GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY》

Ten novel BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in breast and/or ovarian cancer families from northern Germany.

Germline mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene account for the majority of high-risk breast/ovarian cancer families. We have screened such families from Northern Germany by using DHPLC analysis and subsequent direct sequencing techniques. In ten families we identified six novel BRCA1 and 4 novel BRCA2 mutations comprising four frame shift mutations, one nonsense and one splice site mutation in the BRCA1 gene as well as three frameshift mutations and one nonsense mutation in the BRCA2 gene. Our analysis contributes to the further characterisation of the mutational spectrum of BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Kiechle M ，Gross E ，Schwarz-Boeger U ，Pfisterer J ，Jonat W ，Gerber WD ，Albacht B ，Fischer B ，Schlegelberger B ，Arnold N ... -  《-》

High frequency of recurrent mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in Polish families with breast and ovarian cancer.

Germ-line mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes result in a significantly increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Other genes involved in an increased predisposition to breast cancer include the TP53 gene, mutated in Li-Fraumeni syndrome. To estimate the frequency of germ-line mutations in these three genes in Upper Silesia, we have analyzed 47 breast/ovarian cancer families from that region. We found five different disease predisposing mutations in 17 (36%) families. Twelve families (25.5%) carried known BRCA1 mutations (5382insC and C61G), four families (8.5%) carried novel BRCA2 mutations (9631delC and 6886delGAAAA), and one family (2%) harbored novel mutation 1095del8 in the TP53 gene, which is the largest germline deletion in coding sequence of this gene identified thus far. The 5382insC mutation in BRCA1 was found in 11 families and the 9631delC mutation in BRCA2 occurred in three families. These two mutations taken together contribute to 82% of all mutations found in this study, and 30% of the families investigated harbor one of these mutations. The very high frequency of common mutations observed in these families can only be compared to that reported for Ashkenazi Jewish, Icelandic, and Russian high-risk families. This frequency, however, may not be representative for the entire Polish population. The observed distribution of mutations will favor routine pre-screening of predisposed families using a simple and cost-effective test.

Grzybowska E ，Zientek H ，Jasinska A ，Rusin M ，Kozlowski P ，Sobczak K ，Sikorska A ，Kwiatkowska E ，Gorniak L ，Kalinowska E ，Utracka-Hutka B ，Wloch J ，Chmielik E ，Krzyzosiak WJ ... -  《-》