Longitudinal immunogenicity cohort study of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines across individuals with different immunocompromising conditions: heterogeneity in the immune response and crucial role of Omicron-adapted booster doses.

Individuals with primary and secondary immunodeficiencies, being more susceptible to infections, are a priority for vaccination. Here, we determined and compared in a longitudinal study the immune response elicited by SARS-CoV-2 vaccination across different groups of individuals who are immunocompromised. In the PatoVac_COV longitudinal prospective single-centre study, the spike-specific B cell and antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination were compared across 5 different groups of individuals with haematological malignancies, hematopoietic stem cell (HCT) or solid organ transplantation (SOT), undergoing haemodialysis, and people living with HIV (PLWH), for a total of 585 participants. Data from participants who were immunocompromised were compared to a group of 123 participants who were immunocompetent. Blood samples were collected before and after each vaccine administration, up to 2 years. A different immune responsiveness was observed after the first two vaccine doses, with haematological, haemodialysis, and SOT participants showing reduced responsiveness compared to HCT and PLWH, and relative to the comparison group. Spike-specific B cell response was both slower and lower in all groups except in PLWH when compared to participants who were immunocompetent. However, the first booster dose enhanced both the B and the antibody responses in all groups, that persisted up to 2 years after the first vaccine administration. The administration of Omicron-adapted booster vaccines promoted a primary BA.2 RBD-specific B cell response, especially in participants who were immunocompromised. Despite repeated vaccinations, a subset of persistent low-responders, especially among SOT, was identified. Our study highlights the heterogeneous immune response across individuals with different pathologies, the pivotal role of the first booster dose, the primary activation of Omicron-specific B cells elicited by updated variant-adapted vaccines and the persistence of low-responders despite multiple vaccine administrations. These aspects have a clinical relevance for planning vaccination schedules tailored for individuals with different immunocompromising conditions. This work was supported by funds from the Department of Medical Biotechnologies of the University of Siena, and from EU within the NextGenerationEU-MUR PNRR Tuscany Health Ecosystem (Project no ECS00000017-THE).

Ciabattini A ，Pettini E ，Fiorino F ，Polvere J ，Lucchesi S ，Coppola C ，Costagli S ，Pastore G ，Sicuranza A ，Tozzi M ，Lippi A ，Panza F ，Bocchia M ，Bucalossi A ，Garosi G ，Bennett D ，Bernazzali S ，Fabbiani M ，Montagnani F ，Medaglini D ... -  《EBioMedicine》

Immunogenicity of a booster dose of a bivalent (Asp614Gly and omicron BA.4/5 variant) self-amplifying mRNA SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccine versus the BNT162b2 omicron BA.4/5 mRNA vaccine: a randomised phase 3 trial.

We previously showed that ARCT-154, a self-amplifying mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, had improved immunogenicity and antibody persistence compared with conventional mRNA or adenovirus vector vaccines. In this study, we compared ARCT-2301, a bivalent self-amplifying mRNA vaccine (Asp614Gly and omicron BA.4/5 variant), with the bivalent Comirnaty omicron BA.4-5 vaccine, to determine whether this improved response persisted in bivalent formulations against different SARS-CoV-2 variants. This randomised, multicentre, phase 3, observer-masked, active-controlled comparative study was done at nine hospitals in Japan. Eligible participants were healthy Japanese adults, aged at least 18 years, who had previously received a full immunisation series of three to five doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (Comirnaty or Spikevax [Moderna]), with the last dose received at least 3 months before screening for this trial. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either ARCT-2301 or Comirnaty BA.4-5 mRNA vaccine using interactive computer-generated randomisation with a block size of four. Randomisation was stratified by gender (men vs women), age group (<65 years vs ≥65 years), type of vaccine used for last vaccination (bivalent omicron BA.1 vs bivalent omicron BA.4/5), and time since last COVID-19 vaccination (<5 months vs ≥5 months). ARCT-2301 was supplied in vials containing 100 μg lyophilised mRNA, 50 μg mRNA each coding for the full-length spike proteins of the ancestral Asp614Gly SARS-CoV-2 strain and omicron BA.4/5 variant. Immediately before use, each vial was reconstituted with 10 mL saline. The comparator original omicron BA.4/5 mRNA vaccine (Comirnaty BA.4-5) was supplied in ready-to-use vials containing a single dose of 30 μg mRNA in 0·3 mL volume. Both vaccines were administered by intramuscular injection in the deltoid of the non-dominant arm. The primary outcome of the study was to show non-inferiority of immunogenicity of ARCT-2301 versus Comirnaty BA.4-5 at day 29 as neutralising antibody geometric mean titres (GMT) and seroresponse rates against omicron BA.4/5. Primary analyses were done in a per-protocol manner. The trial is registered with the Japan Registry for Clinical Trials, jRCT2031230340. Between Sept 29 and Nov 18, 2023, we enrolled 930 participants (451 men and 479 women) to receive a booster dose of ARCT-2301 (n=465) or Comirnaty BA.4-5 (n=465). The primary immunogenicity outcome to show that the antibody response at day 29 against omicron BA.4/5 elicited by ARCT-2301 was non-inferior to that elicited with Comirnaty BA.4-5 was achieved, both by GMT ratio (1·49, 95% CI 1·26-1·76) and difference in seroresponse rate (7·2%, 95% CI 0·6-13·7). Furthermore, the differences in antibody response between the groups showed superiority for ARCT-2301 against Wuhan-Hu-1 using both criteria, with a GMT ratio of 1·45 (95% CI 1·28-1·63) and a difference in seroresponse rate of 12·5% (95% CI 5·9-19·0), and omicron XBB.1.5, with a GMT ratio of 1·63 (95% CI 1·36-1·94) and a seroresponse rate difference of 16·7% (95% CI 10·1-23·2). Both vaccines were well-tolerated with mainly mild, transient solicited adverse events and no causally related severe or serious adverse events. Boosting mRNA-immunised adults with ARCT-2301 induced superior immunogenicity compared with Comirnaty BA.4-5 against both Wuhan-Hu-1 and omicron BA.4/5 variant COVID-19, and elicited a higher response against omicron XBB.1.5. Both vaccines had similar tolerability profiles. Self-amplifying mRNA vaccines could provide a substantial contribution to pandemic preparedness and response, inducing robust immune responses with a lower dose of mRNA to allow wider and more equitable distribution. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare and Meiji Seika Pharma.

Okada Y ，Kumagai Y ，Okura I ，Otsuki M ，Ishida N ，Iwama Y ，Minamida T ，Yagi Y ，Kurosawa T ，van Boxmeer J ，Zhang Y ，Smolenov I ，Walson JL ... -  《-》

Safety and immunogenicity of a modified mRNA-lipid nanoparticle vaccine candidate against COVID-19: Results from a phase 1, dose-escalation study.

Essink BJ ，Shapiro C ，Isidro MGD ，Bradley P ，Pragalos A ，Bloch M ，Santiaguel J ，Frias MV ，Miyakis S ，Alves de Mesquita M ，Berrè S ，Servais C ，Waugh N ，Hoffmann C ，Baba E ，Schönborn-Kellenberger O ，Wolz OO ，Koch SD ，Ganyani T ，Boutet P ，Mann P ，Mueller SO ，Ramanathan R ，Gaudinski MR ，Vanhoutte N ... -  《-》

Safety and immunogenicity of an AS03-adjuvanted SARS-CoV-2 recombinant protein vaccine (CoV2 preS dTM) in healthy adults: interim findings from a phase 2, randomised, dose-finding, multicentre study.

We evaluated our SARS-CoV-2 prefusion spike recombinant protein vaccine (CoV2 preS dTM) with different adjuvants, unadjuvanted, and in a one-injection and two-injection dosing schedule in a previous phase 1-2 study. Based on interim results from that study, we selected a two-injection schedule and the AS03 adjuvant for further clinical development. However, lower than expected antibody responses, particularly in older adults, and higher than expected reactogenicity after the second vaccination were observed. In the current study, we evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of an optimised formulation of CoV2 preS dTM adjuvanted with AS03 to inform progression to phase 3 clinical trial. This phase 2, randomised, parallel-group, dose-ranging study was done in adults (≥18 years old), including those with pre-existing medical conditions, those who were immunocompromised (except those with recent organ transplant or chemotherapy) and those with a potentially increased risk for severe COVID-19, at 20 clinical research centres in the USA and Honduras. Women who were pregnant or lactating or, for those of childbearing potential, not using an effective method of contraception or abstinence, and those who had received a COVID-19 vaccine, were excluded. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) using an interactive response technology system, with stratification by age (18-59 years and ≥60 years), rapid serodiagnostic test result (positive or negative), and high-risk medical conditions (yes or no), to receive two injections (day 1 and day 22) of 5 7mu;g (low dose), 10 7mu;g (medium dose), or 15 7mu;g (high dose) CoV2 preS dTM antigen with fixed AS03 content. All participants and outcome assessors were masked to group assignment; unmasked study staff involved in vaccine preparation were not involved in safety outcome assessments. All laboratory staff performing the assays were masked to treatment. The primary safety objective was to describe the safety profile in all participants, for each candidate vaccine formulation. Safety endpoints were evaluated for all randomised participants who received at least one dose of the study vaccine (safety analysis set), and are presented here for the interim study period (up to day 43). The primary immunogenicity objective was to describe the neutralising antibody titres to the D614G variant 14 days after the second vaccination (day 36) in participants who were SARS-CoV-2 naive who received both injections, provided samples at day 1 and day 36, did not have protocol deviations, and did not receive an authorised COVID-19 vaccine before day 36. Neutralising antibodies were measured using a pseudovirus neutralisation assay and are presented here up to 14 days after the second dose. As a secondary immunogenicity objective, we assessed neutralising antibodies in non-naive participants. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04762680) and is closed to new participants for the cohort reported here. Of 722 participants enrolled and randomly assigned between Feb 24, 2021, and March 8, 2021, 721 received at least one injection (low dose=240, medium dose=239, and high dose=242). The proportion of participants reporting at least one solicited adverse reaction (injection site or systemic) in the first 7 days after any vaccination was similar between treatment groups (217 [91%] of 238 in the low-dose group, 213 [90%] of 237 in the medium-dose group, and 218 [91%] of 239 in the high-dose group); these adverse reactions were transient, were mostly mild to moderate in intensity, and occurred at a higher frequency and intensity after the second vaccination. Four participants reported immediate unsolicited adverse events; two (one each in the low-dose group and medium-dose group) were considered by the investigators to be vaccine related and two (one each in the low-dose and high-dose groups) were considered unrelated. Five participants reported seven vaccine-related medically attended adverse events (two in the low-dose group, one in the medium-dose group, and four in the high-dose group). No vaccine-related serious adverse events and no adverse events of special interest were reported. Among participants naive to SARS-CoV-2 at day 36, 158 (98%) of 162 in the low-dose group, 166 (99%) of 168 in the medium-dose group, and 163 (98%) of 166 in the high-dose group had at least a two-fold increase in neutralising antibody titres to the D614G variant from baseline. Neutralising antibody geometric mean titres (GMTs) at day 36 for participants who were naive were 2189 (95% CI 1744-2746) for the low-dose group, 2269 (1792-2873) for the medium-dose group, and 2895 (2294-3654) for the high-dose group. GMT ratios (day 36: day 1) were 107 (95% CI 85-135) in the low-dose group, 110 (87-140) in the medium-dose group, and 141 (111-179) in the high-dose group. Neutralising antibody titres in non-naive adults 21 days after one injection tended to be higher than titres after two injections in adults who were naive, with GMTs 21 days after one injection for participants who were non-naive being 3143 (95% CI 836-11 815) in the low-dose group, 2338 (593-9226) in the medium-dose group, and 7069 (1361-36 725) in the high-dose group. Two injections of CoV2 preS dTM-AS03 showed acceptable safety and reactogenicity, and robust immunogenicity in adults who were SARS-CoV-2 naive and non-naive. These results supported progression to phase 3 evaluation of the 10 7mu;g antigen dose for primary vaccination and a 5 7mu;g antigen dose for booster vaccination. Sanofi Pasteur and Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority.

Sridhar S ，Joaquin A ，Bonaparte MI ，Bueso A ，Chabanon AL ，Chen A ，Chicz RM ，Diemert D ，Essink BJ ，Fu B ，Grunenberg NA ，Janosczyk H ，Keefer MC ，Rivera M DM ，Meng Y ，Michael NL ，Munsiff SS ，Ogbuagu O ，Raabe VN ，Severance R ，Rivas E ，Romanyak N ，Rouphael NG ，Schuerman L ，Sher LD ，Walsh SR ，White J ，von Barbier D ，de Bruyn G ，Canter R ，Grillet MH ，Keshtkar-Jahromi M ，Koutsoukos M ，Lopez D ，Masotti R ，Mendoza S ，Moreau C ，Ceregido MA ，Ramirez S ，Said A ，Tavares-Da-Silva F ，Shi J ，Tong T ，Treanor J ，Diazgranados CA ，Savarino S ... -  《-》

Effect of timing of casirivimab and imdevimab administration relative to mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccination on vaccine-induced SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibody responses: a prospective, open-label, phase 2, randomised controlled trial.

Deeper insight is needed on how monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) affect vaccine-mediated immune responses when targeting the same protein. We describe the first prospective randomised trial designed to understand mAb-mediated alterations in vaccine-induced immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein epitopes. This randomised, open-label, parallel-group study assessed the potential interaction of a mAb combination, casirivimab and imdevimab, with a vaccine, Moderna's mRNA-1273, in healthy SARS-CoV-2 immunologically naive, seronegative adults at six centres in the USA. Participants were randomly assigned (per prespecified randomisation ratios within enrolment waves) according to a computer-generated randomisation scheme, stratified by age (<65 years and ≥65 years), to various intravenous or subcutaneous doses of casirivimab and imdevimab before, after, or at the same time as mRNA-1273 or to mRNA-1273 only. The doses of casirivimab and imdevimab were chosen to mimic various time intervals between receipt of 1200 mg of the mAb and the first dose of a primary series with mRNA-1273. The primary endpoint was vaccine-induced 50% inhibitory dilution neutralising antibody titres to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, 56 days after the first vaccination. Secondary endpoints included vaccine-induced total antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 antigens and incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events. Exploratory endpoints included blood-derived T-cell and B-cell responses. The per-protocol set was used for the analysis of the primary endpoint and included all randomly assigned participants who received both doses of the vaccine and completed the injection or infusion of casirivimab and imdevimab per protocol, had no evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the past or in the 56 days after the first dose of vaccine, and did not receive any intervention outside of the study that could alter the immune response. Safety was assessed in the safety analysis set, which included all randomly assigned participants who had received one or more doses of mRNA-1273 or any study drug, and analysed based on treatment received. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04852978, and is complete. Between April 29, 2021, and Nov 21, 2022, 807 participants were assessed for eligibility and 295 were randomly assigned. 293 participants were included in the safety analysis set and 260 were included in the per-protocol set. All vaccinated participants developed neutralising antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, with median titres above the published protective threshold (100 IU/mL) against the SARS-CoV-2 D614G variant (considered a reference strain at the time the initial COVID-19 vaccines were developed). Titres were decreased up to 4-fold (median titres 280-450 IU/mL for casirivimab and imdevimab vs 1160 IU/mL for vaccine only on day 56) when casirivimab and imdevimab was given 85 days or less before vaccination (150-1200 mg intravenously) or co-administered subcutaneously (600 mg or 1200 mg) with vaccination. Minimal reduction in neutralisation titres was observed in the 48 mg and 12 mg intravenous groups, corresponding to receipt of casirivimab and imdevimab 113 days and 169 days, respectively, before vaccination, and when administering the vaccine 6 days before the mAb. Across all groups, mAbs had a minimal effect on vaccine-induced total antibodies and T-cell responses to the spike protein. Casirivimab and imdevimab plus mRNA-1273 was generally well tolerated; a slight increase in treatment-emergent adverse events was observed in the casirivimab and imdevimab plus vaccine groups versus the vaccine-only group. Casirivimab and imdevimab administration before or at the time of COVID-19 vaccination reduced the elicitation of SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibodies, but minimal effect was observed when vaccination occurred before mAb administration. Although the clinical significance of this decrease in neutralisation is unclear, this evidence suggests that further investigation of potential interactions could be warranted before concurrent clinical use of mAbs and vaccines targeting the same viral proteins as their main modes of action for the prevention or treatment of infectious diseases. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Isa F ，Gonzalez Ortiz AM ，Meyer J ，Hamilton JD ，Olenchock BA ，Brackin T ，Ganguly S ，Forleo-Neto E ，Faria L ，Heirman I ，Marovich M ，Hutter J ，Polakowski L ，Irvin SC ，Thakur M ，Hooper AT ，Baum A ，Petro CD ，Fakih FA ，McElrath MJ ，De Rosa SC ，Cohen KW ，Williams LD ，Hellman CA ，Odeh AJ ，Patel AH ，Tomaras GD ，Geba GP ，Kyratsous CA ，Musser B ，Yancopoulos GD ，Herman GA ，Trial Working Group ... -  《-》