Advancements in immunotherapy for colorectal cancer treatment: a comprehensive review of strategies, challenges, and future prospective.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) continues to present significant challenges, particularly in patients with proficient mismatch repair/microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) tumors. This narrative review aims to provide recent developments in immunotherapy for CRC treatment, focusing on its efficacy and challenges. This review discussed the various immunotherapeutic strategies for CRC treatment, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting PD-1 and PD-L1, combination therapies involving ICIs with other modalities, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) cell therapy, and cancer vaccines. The role of the tumor microenvironment and immune evasion mechanisms was also explored to understand their impact on the effectiveness of these therapies. This review provides a comprehensive update of recent advancements in immunotherapy for CRC, highlighting the potential of various immunotherapeutic approaches, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, combination therapies, CAR-T therapy, and vaccination strategies. The results of checkpoint inhibitors, particularly in patients with MSI-H/dMMR tumors, which have significant improvements in survival rates have been observed. Furthermore, this review also addresses the challenges faced in treating pMMR/MSS CRC, which remains resistant to immunotherapy. Immunotherapy plays a significant role in the treatment of CRC, particularly in patients with MSI-H/dMMR tumors. However, many challenges remain, especially in treating pMMR/MSS CRC. This review discussed the need for further research into combination therapies, biomarker development, CAR-T cell therapy, and a deeper understanding of immune evasion mechanisms for CRC treatment.

Kaviyarasan V ，Das A ，Deka D ，Saha B ，Banerjee A ，Sharma NR ，Duttaroy AK ，Pathak S ... -  《-》

Progress of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Therapy for pMMR/MSS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Immunotherapy is one of the research hotspots in colorectal cancer field in recent years. The colorectal cancer patients with mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) or high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) are the primary beneficiaries of immunotherapy. However, the vast majority of colorectal cancers are mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) or microsatellite stability (MSS), and their immune microenvironment is characterized by "cold tumors" that are generally insensitive to single immunotherapy based on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Studies have shown that some pMMR/MSS colorectal cancer patients regulate the immune microenvironment by combining other treatments, such as multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitors, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibodies, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, anti-epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies, and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway inhibitors and oncolytic viruses, etc. to transform "cold tumor" into "hot tumor", thereby improving the response to immunotherapy. In addition, screening for potential prognostic biomarkers can also enrich the population benefiting from immunotherapy for microsatellite stable colorectal cancer. Therefore, in pMMR or MSS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the optimization of immunotherapy regimens and the search for effective efficacy prediction biomarkers are currently important research directions. In this paper, we review the progress of efficacy of immunotherapy (mainly ICIs) in pMMR /MSS mCRC, challenges and potential markers, in order to provide research ideas for the development of immunotherapy for mCRC.

Qu F ，Wu S ，Yu W 《OncoTargets and Therapy》

Overview of a comparative analysis of microsatellite instability and standard mismatch repair protein-deficiency tests in a large cancer cohort.

Mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) with microsatellite instability (MSI) is frequent in cancer, particularly in gastrointestinal and endometrial malignancies. The increased tumor mutational burden renders dMMR/MSI tumors suitable targets for immune checkpoint inhibitors-provided the regulatory genetic defect can be detected. dMMR and MSI are considered equally effective predictors of the efficacy of ICIs; however, while dMMR testing is based on detection of missing MMR proteins in immunohistochemistry (IHC), MSI polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing focuses on the consequences of dMMR at the genomic level. A retrospective analysis was carried out in a large cancer cohort (n = 1306). dMMR was tested by four IHC reactions (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, MSH6), and MSI was assessed by pentaplex PCR (BAT-25, BAT-26, MONO-27, NR-21, NR-24) in 703 cases. In 64 cases (5%), technical failures (mostly poor preanalytical fixation) prevented dMMR/MSI testing. Tumors were colorectal (CRC; n: 978), cancer of unknown primary (n: 126), endometrial (n: 39), pancreatic (n: 36), and gastric (n: 33). dMMR was diagnosed as classical, nonclassical, or unusual, depending on IHC. The MSI-high incidence was 12.1% overall and similar in the CRC subcohort. Interestingly, the dMMR incidence was higher in the total cohort (20.3%) and similar in the CRC subcohort. The incidences of proficient MMR (pMMR) and microsatellite stability (MSS) were similar in the total cohort and in the CRC subcohort. A 19.3% discrepancy was found between MMR IHC and MSI PCR for the entire cohort, independent of tumor types. In the case of pMMR, the discrepancy rate for MSS/MSI-low was low (2.0%; entire cohort and the CRC subcohort). However, the discrepancy between dMMR and MSI-high was high within the entire cohort (60.9%) and in the CRC (58.6%) and non-CRC subcohorts (68%). This high discrepancy was not due to tumors with a low T/N ratio. Regarding dMMR phenotypes, classical dMMR had a ~ 60% correlation with MSI-high status, while non-classical dMMR had a much lower and unusual dMMR a very low (< 10%) correlation with MSI-high in the entire cohort and in the CRC subcohort. Overall, the MSI PCR sensitivity for MMR IHC status was very low. dMMR and MSI-high likely result in an increased rate of structurally altered proteins, i.e., neoantigens, and the efficacy of cancer immunotherapies is thus expected to be higher. We compared MMR IHC to MSI PCR in a large cohort of cancer patients to study how PCR test results correlate to MMR IHC. Our data imply that preanalytical factors strongly influence the results of MMR IHC and MSI PCR and may question the current dogma that dMMR phenotype and genetic MSI status are equivalent predictive markers for immunotherapies.

Kiss A ，Nádorvári ML ，Kulka J ，Barbai T ，Rásó E ，Kenessey I ，Lotz G ，Tímár J ... -  《-》

The Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Microsatellite Stable Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review.

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized cancer care, particularly in immune-inflamed tumors and tumors with a high mutational burden, like microsatellite instable colorectal cancer (CRC). However, their effectiveness in microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC is limited. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy of ICIs in MSS CRC and explore promising combination strategies. A comprehensive search from the Web of Science, Medline, and Embase databases, for studies published until 14 November 2022, identified 53 clinical trials included in the review. ICI monotherapy or ICI-ICI combinations demonstrated limited clinical activity for patients with MSS CRC, with overall response rates below (ORR) 10% in most studies. The ICI and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) garnered ORRs ranging from 10% to 40% and indicated a higher benefit for patients, particularly those without active liver metastases. The combination of ICIs with anti-VEGF agents showed modest ORRs, especially in the earlier treatment lines and in combination with chemotherapy. While these combinations could lead to modest improvements, well-defined biomarkers for long-term benefit are yet to be delineated. Combinations involving BRAF inhibitors with ICIs were studied, showing promising responses with combination approaches in molecularly defined subgroups. In conclusion, while ICI monotherapy has limited efficacy in MSS CRC, combination strategies hold promise to enhance survival outcomes. Further research is necessary to identify optimal combination approaches, predictive biomarkers for treatment response, as well as enrollment according to tumor molecular characteristics.

Guven DC ，Kavgaci G ，Erul E ，Syed MP ，Magge T ，Saeed A ，Yalcin S ，Sahin IH ... -  《-》

Traditional Chinese medicine enhances the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors in tumor treatment: A mechanism discussion.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have altered the landscape of tumor immunotherapy, offering novel therapeutic approaches alongside surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy and significantly improving survival benefits. However, their clinical efficacy is limited in some patients, and their use may cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Integrating traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) with ICIs has demonstrated the potential to boost sensitization and reduce toxicity. Clinical trials and experimental explorations have confirmed that TCM and its active components synergistically enhance the effectiveness of ICIs. This narrative review summarizes the TCM practices that enhance the clinical efficacy and reduce irAEs of ICIs. This paper also summarizes the mechanism of experimental studies on the synergies of Chinese herbal decoctions, Chinese herbal preparation, and Chinese herbal active ingredients. Most of the studies on TCM combined with ICIs are basic experiments. We discussed the mechanism of TCM enhanced ICIs to provide reference for the research and development of TCM adjuvant immunotherapy. We conducted a literature search using PubMed and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases, with a focus on herbal decoction, Chinese medicine preparations, and active ingredients that boost the effectiveness of ICIs and reduce irAEs. The search keywords were "ICIs and traditional Chinese medicine", "PD-1 and traditional Chinese medicine", "PD-L1 and traditional Chinese medicine", "CTLA-4 and traditional Chinese medicine", "IDO1 and traditional Chinese medicine", "Tim-3 and traditional Chinese medicine", "TIGIT and traditional Chinese medicine", "irAEs and traditional Chinese medicine". The search period was from May 2014 to May 2024. Articles involving the use of TCM or its components in combination with ICIs and investigating the underlying mechanisms were screened. Finally, 30 Chinese medicines used in combination with ICIs were obtained to explore the mechanism. In the part of immune checkpoint molecules other than PD-1, there were few studies on the combined application of TCM, so studies involving the regulation of immune checkpoint molecules by TCM were included. TCM has been shown to boost the effectiveness of ICIs and reduce irAEs. Researchers indicate that TCM and its active components can work synergistically with ICIs by regulating immune checkpoints PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA-4, and IDO1, regulating intestinal flora, improving tumor microenvironment and more. Combining TCM with ICIs can play a better anti-tumor role, but larger samples and high-quality clinical trials are necessary to confirm this. Many Chinese medicines and their ingredients have been shown to sensitize ICIs in experimental studies, which provides a rich choice for the subsequent development of ICI enhancers.

Wang M ，Yang F ，Kong J ，Zong Y ，Li Q ，Shao B ，Wang J ... -  《-》