Weight-adjusted-waist index: an innovative indicator of breast cancer hazard.

Central obesity and breast cancer (BC) have been identified as relevant by empirical research. The weight-adjusted-waist index (WWI) is a novel methodology for quantifying central obesity. Inspection of the association between WWI and BC in American adult women was the primary goal of the current investigation. Cross-sectional assessments were conducted on information gathered from 10,193 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) participants from 2011 to 2018. The waist circumference was divided by the square root of the body's mass to compute WWI. Data were assessed via descriptive statistics to present data distributions according to BC grouping and WWI grouping, receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) to evaluate the obesity indicators' applied value, logistic regression to reflect associations between WWI and BC prevalence, and restricted cubic splines (RCSs) and subgroup analysis forest plots to visualise and complement the relationships. This study enrolled 10,193 participants whose WWI ranged from 8.38 to 14.41, 259 of whom were diagnosed with BC, and the results revealed significant differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. With an area under the curve (AUC) value (95% confidence interval) (CI)of 0.611 (0.577-0.644), WWI was a promising indicator of BC with good application value rather than waist circumference (WC), body mass index (BMI), or waist-height ratio (WHtR). WWI and BC laid out a substantial relationship, yielding an odds ratio (OR) of 1.54 and a 95% CI of (1.34, 1.79), which remained at 1.19 (1.00, 1.42) after considerable adjustments were made, according to the logistic regression analysis. Compared with the lowest quartile of WWI, the highest quartile had a 62% greater in the probability of suffering from BC. With the RCS's inverted U-shape highlighting the importance of considering the nonlinear nature of the relationship and subgroup analyses reflecting variations among populations, all the results demonstrated that WWI was a well-suggestive indicator of BC hazard. The current investigation revealed a meaningful association between the prevalence of BC and WWI, which was superior to other obesity indicators, albeit one that was more complex than the positive relationship initially derived. There existed a turning point for BC prevalence at WWI of approximately 12 cm/√kg. Nevertheless, maintaining WWI in the lower range is critical for preventing and administering BC and minimizing disease risk.

Huang X ，Cheng H ，Deng L ，Wang S ，Li J ，Qin A ，Chu C ，Du W ，Liu X ... -  《BMC Womens Health》

Association between weight-adjusted waist circumference index and myocardial infarction: results from the national health and nutrition examination survey, 1999-2014.

Weight-adjusted waist circumference index (WWI) is a novel index related to obesity and has been associated with the risk and prognosis of several diseases. The aim of the study was to determine the association between WWI and myocardial infarction. The study analyzed cross-sectional data from 31,535 participants derived from the 1999-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) dataset. Multiple logistic regression and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses were conducted to assess both linear and nonlinear associations between WWI and myocardial infarction. Subgroup analyses and interaction tests were also performed. Among the 31,535 participants analyzed, 1,449 (4.82%) had experienced a myocardial infarction. The fully adjusted models demonstrated a positive association between WWI and myocardial infarction [odds ratio (OR) = 1.34, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13-1.58]. Individuals in the highest quartile of WWI were 81% more likely to suffer from a myocardial infarction compared to those in the lowest quartile (OR = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.24-2.63). The analysis employing restricted cubic spline modeling indicated a nonlinear positive correlation between WWI and myocardial infarction. The risk of myocardial infarction was 1.29 times higher when WWI was below 10.97 cm/√kg (OR = 2.29, 95% CI: 1.37-3.84). When WWI exceeded 10.97 cm/√kg, the upward trend in the risk of myocardial infarction significantly slowed with increasing WWI (OR = 1.26, 95%CI:1.03-1.56). A threshold WWI value of greater than 11.15 cm/√kg was identified for predicting myocardial infarction, outperforming waist circumference and body mass index (BMI). Subgroup analyses revealed that the impact of WWI on myocardial infarction varied across different populations. Interaction analyses demonstrated significant interactions between myocardial infarction incidence and WWI with age, hypertension, coronary heart disease, angina pectoris, and stroke (P for interaction <0.05), but not with gender, race, obesity, diabetes, or prediabetes and heart failure (P for interaction >0.05). The findings suggest that there is a positive and non-linear association between WWI and the incidence of myocardial infarction. We recommend incorporating WWI into routine physical examinations and cardiovascular risk screening as an early warning mechanism. This may facilitate early identification of high-risk individuals and promote earlier preventive interventions.

Yu JH ，Yin MG 《Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine》

Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.

Survival estimation for patients with symptomatic skeletal metastases ideally should be made before a type of local treatment has already been determined. Currently available survival prediction tools, however, were generated using data from patients treated either operatively or with local radiation alone, raising concerns about whether they would generalize well to all patients presenting for assessment. The Skeletal Oncology Research Group machine-learning algorithm (SORG-MLA), trained with institution-based data of surgically treated patients, and the Metastases location, Elderly, Tumor primary, Sex, Sickness/comorbidity, and Site of radiotherapy model (METSSS), trained with registry-based data of patients treated with radiotherapy alone, are two of the most recently developed survival prediction models, but they have not been tested on patients whose local treatment strategy is not yet decided. (1) Which of these two survival prediction models performed better in a mixed cohort made up both of patients who received local treatment with surgery followed by radiotherapy and who had radiation alone for symptomatic bone metastases? (2) Which model performed better among patients whose local treatment consisted of only palliative radiotherapy? (3) Are laboratory values used by SORG-MLA, which are not included in METSSS, independently associated with survival after controlling for predictions made by METSSS? Between 2010 and 2018, we provided local treatment for 2113 adult patients with skeletal metastases in the extremities at an urban tertiary referral academic medical center using one of two strategies: (1) surgery followed by postoperative radiotherapy or (2) palliative radiotherapy alone. Every patient's survivorship status was ascertained either by their medical records or the national death registry from the Taiwanese National Health Insurance Administration. After applying a priori designated exclusion criteria, 91% (1920) were analyzed here. Among them, 48% (920) of the patients were female, and the median (IQR) age was 62 years (53 to 70 years). Lung was the most common primary tumor site (41% [782]), and 59% (1128) of patients had other skeletal metastases in addition to the treated lesion(s). In general, the indications for surgery were the presence of a complete pathologic fracture or an impending pathologic fracture, defined as having a Mirels score of ≥ 9, in patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification of less than or equal to IV and who were considered fit for surgery. The indications for radiotherapy were relief of pain, local tumor control, prevention of skeletal-related events, and any combination of the above. In all, 84% (1610) of the patients received palliative radiotherapy alone as local treatment for the target lesion(s), and 16% (310) underwent surgery followed by postoperative radiotherapy. Neither METSSS nor SORG-MLA was used at the point of care to aid clinical decision-making during the treatment period. Survival was retrospectively estimated by these two models to test their potential for providing survival probabilities. We first compared SORG to METSSS in the entire population. Then, we repeated the comparison in patients who received local treatment with palliative radiation alone. We assessed model performance by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), calibration analysis, Brier score, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The AUROC measures discrimination, which is the ability to distinguish patients with the event of interest (such as death at a particular time point) from those without. AUROC typically ranges from 0.5 to 1.0, with 0.5 indicating random guessing and 1.0 a perfect prediction, and in general, an AUROC of ≥ 0.7 indicates adequate discrimination for clinical use. Calibration refers to the agreement between the predicted outcomes (in this case, survival probabilities) and the actual outcomes, with a perfect calibration curve having an intercept of 0 and a slope of 1. A positive intercept indicates that the actual survival is generally underestimated by the prediction model, and a negative intercept suggests the opposite (overestimation). When comparing models, an intercept closer to 0 typically indicates better calibration. Calibration can also be summarized as log(O:E), the logarithm scale of the ratio of observed (O) to expected (E) survivors. A log(O:E) > 0 signals an underestimation (the observed survival is greater than the predicted survival); and a log(O:E) < 0 indicates the opposite (the observed survival is lower than the predicted survival). A model with a log(O:E) closer to 0 is generally considered better calibrated. The Brier score is the mean squared difference between the model predictions and the observed outcomes, and it ranges from 0 (best prediction) to 1 (worst prediction). The Brier score captures both discrimination and calibration, and it is considered a measure of overall model performance. In Brier score analysis, the "null model" assigns a predicted probability equal to the prevalence of the outcome and represents a model that adds no new information. A prediction model should achieve a Brier score at least lower than the null-model Brier score to be considered as useful. The DCA was developed as a method to determine whether using a model to inform treatment decisions would do more good than harm. It plots the net benefit of making decisions based on the model's predictions across all possible risk thresholds (or cost-to-benefit ratios) in relation to the two default strategies of treating all or no patients. The care provider can decide on an acceptable risk threshold for the proposed treatment in an individual and assess the corresponding net benefit to determine whether consulting with the model is superior to adopting the default strategies. Finally, we examined whether laboratory data, which were not included in the METSSS model, would have been independently associated with survival after controlling for the METSSS model's predictions by using the multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. Between the two models, only SORG-MLA achieved adequate discrimination (an AUROC of > 0.7) in the entire cohort (of patients treated operatively or with radiation alone) and in the subgroup of patients treated with palliative radiotherapy alone. SORG-MLA outperformed METSSS by a wide margin on discrimination, calibration, and Brier score analyses in not only the entire cohort but also the subgroup of patients whose local treatment consisted of radiotherapy alone. In both the entire cohort and the subgroup, DCA demonstrated that SORG-MLA provided more net benefit compared with the two default strategies (of treating all or no patients) and compared with METSSS when risk thresholds ranged from 0.2 to 0.9 at both 90 days and 1 year, indicating that using SORG-MLA as a decision-making aid was beneficial when a patient's individualized risk threshold for opting for treatment was 0.2 to 0.9. Higher albumin, lower alkaline phosphatase, lower calcium, higher hemoglobin, lower international normalized ratio, higher lymphocytes, lower neutrophils, lower neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, lower platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, higher sodium, and lower white blood cells were independently associated with better 1-year and overall survival after adjusting for the predictions made by METSSS. Based on these discoveries, clinicians might choose to consult SORG-MLA instead of METSSS for survival estimation in patients with long-bone metastases presenting for evaluation of local treatment. Basing a treatment decision on the predictions of SORG-MLA could be beneficial when a patient's individualized risk threshold for opting to undergo a particular treatment strategy ranged from 0.2 to 0.9. Future studies might investigate relevant laboratory items when constructing or refining a survival estimation model because these data demonstrated prognostic value independent of the predictions of the METSSS model, and future studies might also seek to keep these models up to date using data from diverse, contemporary patients undergoing both modern operative and nonoperative treatments. Level III, diagnostic study.

Lee CC ，Chen CW ，Yen HK ，Lin YP ，Lai CY ，Wang JL ，Groot OQ ，Janssen SJ ，Schwab JH ，Hsu FM ，Lin WH ... -  《-》

Defining the optimum strategy for identifying adults and children with coeliac disease: systematic review and economic modelling.

Elwenspoek MM ，Thom H ，Sheppard AL ，Keeney E ，O'Donnell R ，Jackson J ，Roadevin C ，Dawson S ，Lane D ，Stubbs J ，Everitt H ，Watson JC ，Hay AD ，Gillett P ，Robins G ，Jones HE ，Mallett S ，Whiting PF ... -  《-》

U-shaped Association Between Weight-Adjusted-Waist Index and Arterial Stiffness Among Adult Hypertensive Patients: A Population-Based Study in the United States.

The weight-adjusted-waist index (WWI) is an innovative measure of obesity that appears to surpass body mass index (BMI) in assessing lean body mass and fat mass. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between WWI and AS in hypertensive adults in the United States. The study included 9753 adults diagnosed with hypertension from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), which spanned the years 2007-2016. WWI was calculated by dividing waist circumference (in cm) by the square root of body weight (in kg), and arterial stiffness (represented by estimated pulse wave velocity [ePWV]) was analyzed as the outcome. Weighted multiple linear regression and smooth curve fitting were used to test for linear and nonlinear associations. Threshold effects were determined using a two-part linear regression model. Additionally, subgroup analyses and interaction tests were conducted to gain a more in-depth understanding of the observed associations. The mean WWI of the participants was 11.32 ± 0.76. After multivariable adjustment, WWI showed a significant nonlinear association with ePWV, with a U-shaped association observed between the two. Specifically, WWI below the threshold of 10.23 was negatively associated with arterial stiffness (β = -0.39, 95% CI: -0.54 to -0.25), while WWI above the threshold of 10.23 was positively associated with arterial stiffness (β = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.01-0.07). To conclude, the present findings imply that maintaining WWI within an optimal range could reduce AS in hypertensive individuals and potentially decrease cardiovascular risk. However, this observation needs to be confirmed in large clinical trials.

Wei T ，Lin X ，Ma J ，Wang L ，Su J ，Yu J ... -  《-》