The load of hepatitis B virus reduces the immune checkpoint inhibitors efficiency in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Chronic viral infection may lead to an immunosuppressive microenvironment, whereas the association between virus-related indicators and treatment response in hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs) therapy remains a topic of debate. We aim to investigate the influence of hepatitis virus on the ICI efficiency in HCC patients through a meta-analysis. We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science until 14 July 2024 to identify cohort studies involving ICIs treatments in HCC patients. We extracted data from the literature related to hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, baseline HBV load, and antiviral therapy. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were considered as the primary endpoints, while objective response rate (ORR) was regarded as a secondary endpoint. We included 55 cohort studies published between 2019 and 2024, involving a patient population of 7180 individuals. Summarized hazard ratio (HR) comparing HBV infection with non-HBV infection in the context of ICIs therapy revealed no significant association between HBV infection and either mortality risk or progression risk with the pooled HR for OS of 1.04(95%CI: 0.93-1.16, P=0.483) and the pooled HR for PFS of 1.07(95%CI:0.96-1.20, P=0.342). HBV infected patients with HCC may have better tumor response than non-HBV infected patients receiving ICIs with the combined relative risk(RR) for ORR was 1.94 (95%CI: 1.12-3.38, P=0.002). High baseline HBV load is associated with poor survival outcomes in patients with HCC who receive ICIs with the pooled HR for OS was 1.74 (95%CI: 1.27-2.37, P=0.001), thereby antiviral therapy has the potential to significantly enhance prognostic outcomes with the pooled HR for OS was 0.24 (95% CI: 0.14-0.42 P<0.001) and the pooled HR for PFS was 0.54 (95% CI: 0.33-0.89 P=0.014). In individuals with HCC who received ICIs, there was no notable link found between HBV or HCV infection and prognosis. However, HBV infection showed a connection with improved tumor response. A higher initial HBV load is linked to worse survival results in HCC patients undergoing ICIs treatment and antiviral therapy can significantly improve its prognosis.

Ji Z ，Li J ，Zhang S ，Jia Y ，Zhang J ，Guo Z ... -  《Frontiers in Immunology》

Functional cure of hepatitis B in patients with cancer undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can restore exhausted T-cell immunity not only for cancer treatment but also potentially to cure chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Thus, we aimed to determine the previously unclear impact of ICIs on hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance in patients with cancer. Consecutive patients with cancer from 2016 to 2020 (cohort 1, n = 118), and hepatocellular carcinoma from 2020 to 2022 (cohort 2, n = 44, as validation) receiving ICIs and positive for HBsAg were retrospectively recruited. An additional HBV-HCC cohort (cohort 3, n = 85) not receiving ICIs served as a control group. Factors associated with HBsAg loss or a HBsAg decline >1 log were analyzed. With median follow-up of 17.5 months, 8 (6.8%) patients in cohort 1 and 4 (9.1%) in cohort 2 achieved HBsAg seroclearance, and an additional four in cohort 1 and one in cohort 2 had a HBsAg decline >1 log. In multivariate analysis, HBsAg <100 IU/ml was associated with HBsAg seroclearance (hazard ratio 6.274, p = 0.028). In the validation cohort, the cumulative incidences of HBsAg loss at months 12 and 24 were 13.0% and 38.4%, respectively, for baseline HBsAg <100 IU/ml, which were significantly higher than those in the control group (p = 0.0267). No case in cohort 3 achieved HBsAg loss within 24 months. Of the 17 cases who achieved HBsAg loss or a decline >1 log, 16 (94.1%) received nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment. The median time to HBsAg loss or HBsAg decline was 16.5 (range 9.6 to 27.5) months. ICIs may accelerate HBsAg seroclearance in patients with cancer and baseline HBsAg <100 IU/ml. This finding provides important information for the design of future trials evaluating the ability of ICIs to induce functional cure in patients with CHB. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can restore exhausted T-cell immunity not only for cancer treatment but also potentially to cure chronic hepatitis B. Functional cure of hepatitis B was observed in patients with cancer or HCC undergoing ICI treatment, and the cumulative incidence of HBsAg loss was higher compared with controls without ICIs. ICIs may accelerate the HBsAg loss in patients with baseline HBsAg levels <100 IU/ml. This finding provides important information for the design of future ICI trials evaluating the ability of ICIs to induce functional cure in patients with CHB.

Mon HC ，Lee PC ，Hung YP ，Hung YW ，Wu CJ ，Lee CJ ，Chi CT ，Lee IC ，Hou MC ，Huang YH ... -  《-》

Immune checkpoint inhibitors plus platinum-based chemotherapy compared to platinum-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for first-line treatment of older people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Lung cancer is a cancer of the elderly, with a median age at diagnosis of 71. More than one-third of people diagnosed with lung cancer are over 75 years old. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are special antibodies that target a pathway in the immune system called the programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) pathway. These antibodies help the immune system fight cancer cells by blocking signals that cancer cells use to avoid being attacked by the immune system. ICIs have changed the treatment of people with lung cancer. In particular, for people with previously-untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), current first-line treatment now comprises ICIs plus platinum-based chemotherapy, rather than platinum-based chemotherapy alone, regardless of their PD-L1 expression status. However, as people age, their immune system changes, becoming less effective in its T cell responses. This raises questions about how well ICIs work in older adults. To assess the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy compared to platinum-based chemotherapy (with or without bevacizumab) in treatment-naïve adults aged 65 years and older with advanced NSCLC. We searched the Cochrane Lung Cancer Group Trial Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, two other trial registers, and the websites of drug regulators. The latest search date was 23 August 2023. We also checked references and searched abstracts from the meetings of seven cancer organisations from 2019 to August 2023. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that reported on the efficacy and safety of adding ICIs to platinum-based chemotherapy compared to platinum-based chemotherapy alone for people 65 years and older who had not previously been treated. All data emanated from international multicentre studies involving adults with histologically-confirmed advanced NSCLC who had not received any previous systemic anticancer therapy for their advanced disease. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Our primary outcomes were overall survival and treatment-related adverse events (grade 3 or higher). Our secondary outcomes were progression-free survival, objective response rate, time to response, duration of response, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We included 17 primary studies, with a total of 4276 participants, in the review synthesis. We identified nine ongoing studies, and listed one study as 'awaiting classification'. Twelve of the 17 studies included people older than 75 years, accounting for 9% to 13% of their participants. We rated some studies as having 'some concerns' for risk of bias arising from the randomisation process, deviations from the intended interventions, or measurement of the outcome. The overall GRADE rating for the certainty of the evidence ranged from moderate to low because of the risk of bias, imprecision, or inconsistency. People aged 65 years and older The addition of ICIs to platinum-based chemotherapy probably increased overall survival compared to platinum-based chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio (HR) 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70 to 0.88; 8 studies, 2093 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Only one study reported data for treatment-related adverse events (grade 3 or higher). The frequency of treatment-related adverse events may not differ between the two treatment groups (risk ratio (RR) 1.09, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.32; 1 study, 127 participants; low-certainty evidence). The addition of ICIs to platinum-based chemotherapy probably improves progression-free survival (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.68; 7 studies, 1885 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). People aged 65 to 75 years, inclusive The addition of ICIs to platinum-based chemotherapy probably improved overall survival compared to platinum-based chemotherapy alone (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.87; 6 studies, 1406 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Only one study reported data for treatment-related adverse events (grade 3 or higher). The frequency of treatment-related adverse events probably increased in people treated with ICIs plus platinum-based chemotherapy compared to those treated with platinum-based chemotherapy alone (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.13; 1 study, 97 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The addition of ICIs to platinum-based chemotherapy probably improved progression-free survival (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.73; 8 studies, 1466 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). People aged 75 years and older There may be no difference in overall survival in people treated with ICIs combined with platinum-based chemotherapy compared to platinum-based chemotherapy alone (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.16; 4 studies, 297 participants; low-certainty evidence). No data on treatment-related adverse events were available in this age group. The effect of combination ICI and platinum-based chemotherapy on progression-free survival is uncertain (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.36; 3 studies, 226 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Only three studies assessed the objective response rate. For time to response, duration of response, and health-related quality of life, we do not have any evidence yet. Compared to platinum-based chemotherapy alone, adding ICIs to platinum-based chemotherapy probably leads to higher overall survival and progression-free survival, without an increase in treatment-related adverse events (grade 3 or higher), in people 65 years and older with advanced NSCLC. These data are based on results from studies dominated by participants between 65 and 75 years old. However, the analysis also suggests that the improvements reported in overall survival and progression-free survival may not be seen in people older than 75 years.

Orillard E ，Adhikari A ，Malouf RS ，Calais F ，Marchal C ，Westeel V ... -  《Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews》

Association of hepatitis B virus DNA levels with overall survival for advanced hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma under immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

High hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level is an independent risk factor for postoperative HBV-associated liver cancer recurrence. We sought to examine whether HBV DNA level and antiviral therapy are associated with survival outcomes in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)based immunotherapy. This single-institution retrospective analysis included 217 patients with advanced HBV-related HCC treated from 1 June 2018, through 30 December 2020. Baseline information was compared between patients with low and high HBV DNA levels. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared, and univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to identify potential risk factors for oncologic outcomes. The 217 patients included in the analysis had a median survival time of 20.6 months. Of these HBV-associated HCC patients, 165 had known baseline HBV DNA levels. Baseline HBV DNA level was not significantly associated with OS (P = 0.59) or PFS (P = 0.098). Compared to patients who did not receive antiviral therapy, patients who received antiviral therapy had significantly better OS (20.6 vs 11.1 months, P = 0.020), regardless of HBV DNA levels. Moreover, antiviral status (adjusted HR = 0.24, 95% CI 0.094-0.63, P = 0.004) was an independent protective factor for OS in a multivariate analysis of patients with HBV-related HCC. HBV viral load does not compromise the clinical outcome of patients with HBV-related HCC treated with anti-PD-1-based immunotherapy. The use of antiviral therapy significantly improves survival time of HBV-related HCC patients.

An M ，Wang W ，Zhang J ，Till BG ，Zhao L ，Huang H ，Yang Y ，Li T ，Han L ，Zhang X ，Qin P ，Wang Y ，Zhang M ，Cui H ，Gao Q ，Wang Z ... -  《-》

Sequencing of systemic therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

For patients with advanced or unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), safe and effective therapies are urgently needed to improve their long-term prognosis. Although the guidelines recommend first-line treatments such as sorafenib, lenvatinib, and atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab (T+A) and second-line treatments such as regorafenib, the efficacy comparison between drugs is lacking, that is, a treatment is not recommended as the optimal or alternative choice for a specific patient population. Therefore, we will conduct a high-quality network meta-analysis based on Phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to systematically evaluate and compare overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and serious adverse events (SAE) of different treatment protocols in the context of first-line and second-line therapies, which are critical for clinical decision making and prognostic improvement in advanced HCC patients. The studies of interest were Phase III RCTs evaluating the efficacy or safety of first- or second-line therapies in patients with unresectable or advanced HCC. Literature published in English from the four databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was comprehensively searched from the inception to May 23, 2022. Outcomes of interest included OS, PFS, ORR, and SAE. A league table was developed to show the results of the comparison between different treatments. A histogram of cumulative probability was drawn to discuss the ranking probability of treatments based on different outcomes. The effectiveness and safety of various treatments were comprehensively considered and the two-dimensional diagram was plotted to guide clinical practice. The Gemtc package in R Studio was used for network meta-analysis in a Bayesian framework. The results showed that HAIC-FO was superior to T+A regimen, regardless of OS, PFS or ORR. TACE combined with lenvatinib performed better than T+A in PFS, and ORR. In addition to the T+A regimen, Sintilimab combined with IBI305 and camrelizumab combined with apatinib were also associated with longer OS, PFS, and ORR, and their SAE incidence was not higher than that of T+A, especially for camrelizumab combined with apatinib, its safety was better than that of T+A regimen. There were no new treatments or combinations that were more effective than regorafenib. It was important to note that for PFS, the efficacy of apatinib and cabozantinib was not statistically different from that of regorafenib, so these two treatments could be used as alternative treatment options in cases where regorafenib was not tolerated or treatment failed. We conducted a network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of multiple treatment modalities by integrating the results of direct and indirect comparisons. This study included high-quality multicenter Phase III RCTs, collated and summarized all treatments involved in advanced or unresectable HCC in first-line and second-line settings, and compared with T+A and regorafenib, respectively, and ranked based on efficacy and safety to support clinical decision making.

Wang Q ，Yu J ，Sun X ，Li J ，Cao S ，Han Y ，Wang H ，Yang Z ，Li J ，Hu C ，Zhang Y ，Jin L ... -  《-》