Association Between PD-L1 Expression and Efficacy of Chemoimmunotherapy in Extensive-stage Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Few studies have examined the association between programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in small cell lung cancer and the effect of chemoimmunotherapy. Patients diagnosed with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer at our hospital between September 2019 and August 2023, who were treated with atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide and had pathological tissue immunostained with SP142, were retrospectively examined to determine whether treatment efficacy differed depending on the expression of PD-L1. Twenty-nine patients were analyzed. SP142 immunostaining revealed that the tumor cell (TC) score was 3, 2, 1, and 0 in 1, 0, 0, and 28 cases, respectively. The tumor-infiltrating cell (IC) score was 3, 2, 1, and 0 in 1, 0, 5, and 23 cases, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients who tested positive and negative for TC was 13 and 5 months, respectively [hazard ratio (HR)=0.041; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.000-36.225; p=0.109]; and the median overall survival (OS) was 13 and 7.5 months (HR=0.046; 95%CI=0.000-948.833; p=0.338), respectively. The median PFS of the patients who tested positive and negative for IC was 8 and 4 months, respectively (HR=0.216; 95%CI=0.061-0.765; p=0.004); the median OS was 15 and 8 months, respectively (HR=0.573; 95%CI=0.168-1.955; p=0.346). Patients who tested positive for IC had a significantly longer PFS than those who tested negative. Thus, PD-L1 expression may be a predictive factor of efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

Tsuruoka K ，Tamura Y ，Shimazu Y ，Arai M ，Mitsuya S ，Funamoto T ，Tsuji H ，Matsunaga N ，Nakamura T ，Ikeda S ，Kawabata S ，Imagawa A ，Fujisaka Y ... -  《-》

Comparison of efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 combination therapy in first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC: an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis.

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors has led to an increase in randomized controlled trials exploring various first-line combination treatment regimens. With the introduction of new PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, there are now more clinical options available. For the first time, the AK105 monoclonal antibody Penpulimab, developed in China, was included. The AK105-302 Phase III trial studied the efficacy and safety of Penpulimab combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic squamous NSCLC. To determine the optimal treatment options, we conducted an updated network meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness and safety of these regimens. The system retrieves data from Chinese and English electronic databases, Clinical Trials, and the gov Clinical Trial Registration website up to September 6, 2023. The study indirectly compared the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 combination regimens, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), all-grade adverse events, and above-grade III adverse events. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) level, histological type, ECOG score, sex, and smoking history. Nineteen RCTS were included, with a total of ten thousand eight hundred patients. Penpulimab plus chemotherapy (Pen + CT) provided the best OS (HR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.38-0.81) for PD-L1 patients with non-selective advanced NSCLC. Except Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab (Niv + Ipi), other PD-1/PD-L1 combination therapies significantly extended PFS compared with CT, and Nivolumab plus Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy (Niv + Bev + CT) (HR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.26-0.74) provided the best PFS benefit and was comparable to Pen + CT (HR = 1.0) for PFS prolongation. For ORR, except Niv + Ipi, all the other regimens significantly improved ORR compared with CT. In terms of safety, except Tor + CT, the incidence of any-grade AEs or grade ≥ 3 adverse events may be higher than those of chemotherapy. The subgroup analysis revealed that for patients with PD-L1 levels below 1%, treatment with Tor + CT resulted in the best progression-free survival (HR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.25-0.86). For patients with PD-L1 levels of 1% or higher, Sintilimab plus chemotherapy (Sin + CT) (HR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.31-0.99) and Camrelizumab plus chemotherapy (Cam + CT) (HR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.28-0.64) were associated with the best overall survival and progression-free survival, respectively. For patients with SqNSCLC, combined immunotherapy may provide greater survival benefits. For patients with Non-sqNSCLC, Niv + Bev + CT and Tor + CT were associated with optimal PFS and OS, respectively. Cam + CT provided the best PFS in male patients with a history of smoking and an ECOG score of 0. In both female and non-smoking patient subgroups, Pem + CT was associated with the best PFS and OS benefits. For patients with advanced non-selective PD-L1 NSCLC, two effective regimens are Pen + CT and Niv + Bev + CT, which rank first in OS and PFS among all patients. Cam + CT and Tor + CT have advantages for OS in patients with SqNSCLC and Non-sqNSCLC, respectively. Niv + Ipi + CT provided the best OS benefit for patients with an ECOG score of 0, while Pem + CT may be the most effective treatment for patients with an ECOG score of 1. Pem + CT has a better effect on female patients and non-smokers. Sin + CT was found to be the most effective treatment for male patients and the smoking subgroup, while Cam + CT was found to be the most effective for PFS. In addition, Tor + CT was associated with the best PFS for patients with negative PD-L1 expression. Pem + CT was found to significantly improve both PFS and OS compared to CT alone. For patients with positive PD-L1 expression, Sin + CT and Cam + CT were found to be optimal for OS and PFS, respectively. It is important to note that, with the exception of Tor + CT, the toxicity of the other combinations was higher than that of CT alone.

Yang Y ，Chen W ，Dong L ，Duan L ，Gao P ... -  《-》

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors according to programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and brain metastasis: A real-world prospective observational study.

Studies have shown the antitumor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases (BM). However, it is unclear whether the efficacy of ICI is similar between patients with and without BM. It is yet unclear whether the efficacy of ICI in patients with BM increases with higher levels of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, as observed in patients without BM. We compared the outcomes of ICI treatment between patients with and without BM using a cohort containing 1741 prospectively enrolled patients with lung cancer. We investigated whether there were differences in the outcomes of ICI based on PD-L1 expression levels between these patients. We enrolled 240 patients with NSCLC with or without BM who were treated with ICI or both chemotherapy and ICI. There were no significant differences in overall survival (OS) between all patients with or without BM (p = 0.489). However, OS was significantly shorter in patients with BM than in those without in the PD-L1 ≥ 50% group (16.5 M vs. 30.6 M, p = 0.003) but not in the PD-L1 ≥ 1% or negative group. BM was an independent poor prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio: [95% confidence interval], 2.045; [1.058-3.953], p = 0.033) in the PD-L1 ≥ 50% group. Our study indicated that the outcomes of patients with or without BM treated with ICI were not significantly different. The efficacy of ICI in patients with PD-L1 expression ≥50% would be lower in patients with BM than in those without.

Masuda T ，Tsubata Y ，Hata K ，Horie M ，Kiura K ，Kanaji N ，Inoue T ，Kodani M ，Yanai M ，Yamaguchi K ，Matsumoto N ，Yamasaki M ，Ishikawa N ，Masuda K ，Takigawa N ，Kuyama S ，Kubota T ，Nishii K ，Hotta K ，Hattori N ... -  《-》

Exploration of efficacy of the first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with primary MET-amplification: Retrospective evaluation of 36 cases.

There are few clinical data on targeted therapy for primary mesenchymal-epidermal transforming factor amplification (METamp), unlike METamp secondary to epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). First-line treatment options for patients with primary METamp NSCLC remain unclear, and in particular, the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in these patients is controversial. We retrospectively included primary METamp patients who had received at least one line of systemic anticancer therapy, diagnosed at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital from June 2018 to June 2023, and analyzed the efficacies of different treatment patterns for these patients. We also evaluated the potential relationship between the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and the programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) axis in primary METamp NSCLC patients. High-level METamp was defined as gene copy number (GCN) ≥ 10 [1]. The clinical outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), median overall survival (mOS). We screened 2016 NSCLC patients and detected 36 primary METamp, resulting in a prevalence of 1.79 %. Among the patients, the average MET GCN was 4.6, the overall ORR was 50.0 %, DCR was 77.8 %, mPFS was 5.8 months and mOS was 11.7 months. We categorized the first-line treatments that patients received as: immuno-chemotherapy (CI-group), antiangio-chemotherapy (CA-group), chemotherapy (C-group) and MET-TKIs therapy (TKI-group). The ORR of CI-group, CA-group, C-group and TKI-group was 64.3 %, 16.7 %, 33.4 % and 71.4 %, respectively. And the DCR of this four groups was 100 %, 50 %, 66.7 % and 71.4 %, respectively. CI-group achieved longer mPFS and mOS than other groups, respectively (mPFS: 8.63 vs 3.73 vs 3.53 vs 5.50 months, P = 0.021; mOS: 15.10 vs 11.73 vs 9.93 vs 13.93 months, P = 0.023). The mPFS was longer in the PD-L1-positive group than in the PD-L1 negative group (P = 0.046) and PD-L1 positivity was an independent prognostic indicator for PFS (P = 0.005). In addition, the disease remission effect was significantly lower in Foxp3-positive expressors than in negative expressors (ORR: 33.3 % vs 75.0 %, P = 0.024). Immuno-chemotherapy is a first-line optional treatment strategy in addition to targeted therapy for NSCLC patients with primary METamp. Foxp3-negative expression better predicts the near-term efficacy of immunotherapy.

Ding K ，Liu D ，Jin X ，Xu Y ... -  《-》

Comparison of immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy or ipilimumab plus nivolumab-based therapy for NSCLC patients with PD-L1 TPS (1-49 %): TOPGAN2023-01.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy is now a standard treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Whether ICI plus chemotherapy (ICI-chemo) or ipilimumab plus nivolumab (I-N)-based therapy is superior for patients with NSCLC with a programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) of 1-49 % has not been evaluated. This multicenter retrospective study included NSCLC patients with a TPS score of 1-49 %, who began first-line chemotherapy. Propensity score matching analysis was used to adjust for various confounders and evaluate treatment efficacy. A total of 401 patients were enrolled, of whom 308 received ICI-chemo and 93 received I-N-based therapy. The median OS was 21.0 months in the ICI-chemo group and 20.0 months in the I-N-based therapy group. After propensity score matching, there was no difference in OS or PFS between the ICI-chemo group and the I-N-based therapy group (OS: hazard ratios (HR), 0.83; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.54-1.26, PFS: HR, 0.72; 95 % CI, 0.52-1.00). Among PD-L1 TPS 25-49 %, there was a tendency for OS to be favorable for the ICI-chemo group (OS: HR, 0.30; 95 % CI, 0.09-0.85). Treatment discontinuation occurred for 26.2 % of the patients in the ICI-chemo group and 41.9 % in the I-N-based therapy group. Among PD-L1 TPS 1-49 %, there was no significant difference in survival outcomes between the ICI-chemo group and the I-N-based therapy group. Based on the results of a subgroup analysis, ICI-chemo may be superior for treating NSCLC with a TPS of 25-49 %.

Tanaka H ，Makiguchi T ，Tozuka T ，Kawashima Y ，Oba T ，Tsugitomi R ，Koyama J ，Tambo Y ，Ogusu S ，Saiki M ，Gyotoku H ，Hasegawa T ，Miyauchi E ，Sonoda T ，Saito R ，Nakatomi K ，Sakatani T ，Kudo K ，Tsuchiya-Kawano Y ，Nishio M ... -  《-》