Effect of optimisation to contemporary HFrEF medical therapy with sacubitril/valsartan (Entresto) and dapaglifloziN on left Ventricular reverse remodelling as demonstrated by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) Imaging: the ENVI study.

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) guidelines recommend 'four pillars' of medical therapy and device therapy if left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remains ≤35% after 3 months optimum medical therapy.We conducted the first study to examine the effects of optimisation to contemporary medical therapy on cardiac reverse remodelling, as demonstrated by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR).We hypothesised a proportion of patients would undergo beneficial remodelling and LVEF improvement above the threshold for complex device prescription after 6 months. HFrEF patients with symptomatic LVEF≤35% despite ACE inhibitor/beta blocker/mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist therapy, and qualified for sacubitril/valsartan switchover were recruited to this single centre prospective study.CMR was performed at baseline and at follow-up. Clinical, volumetric and outcome data were collected and compared. Between June 2021 and August 2022, 49 patients were recruited. The majority (80%) were male, mean age 63±14 years. 35 (71%) had non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy. 2 (4%) patients died and 47 were followed up for a median of 7.4 months. There were no heart failure hospitalisations.Significant reductions were seen in median indexed left atrial volume: 54 mL/m2 (41-72) to 39 mL/m2 (30-60) (p<0.001); indexed left ventricular end-diastolic volume: 109 mL/m2 (74-125) to 76 mL/m2 (58-102) (p<0.001); indexed left ventricular end-systolic volume: 74mL/m2 (50-92) to 43 mL/m2 (27-58) (p<0.001) and mean indexed left ventricular mass: 72±13 g/m2 to 62±13 g/m2 (p<0.001).Median LVEF increased by 12 points from 31% to 43% (p<0.001). 29 (59%) patients improved to LVEF>35%. 13 (27%) patients improved to LVEF≥50%.Median N-terminal pro B type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) reduced from 883 ng/L (293-2043) to 429 ng/L (171-1421) (p<0.001). Optimisation to contemporary HFrEF medical therapy results in beneficial cardiac reverse remodelling and significant improvements in LVEF and NTproBNP at 6 months as demonstrated by CMR. 59% of our cohort no longer met complex device indications. Guidelines suggest re-assessment of LVEF at 3 months, but our data suggests a longer period is required. NCT05348226.

Zheng A ，Adam R ，Peebles C ，Harden S ，Shambrook J ，Abbas A ，Vedwan K ，Adam G ，Haydock P ，Cowburn P ，Young C ，Long J ，Walkden M ，Smith S ，Greenwood E ，Olden P ，Flett A ... -  《Open Heart》

Sacubitril/valsartan improves left ventricular longitudinal deformation in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction.

De Vecchis R ，Paccone A ，Di Maio M 《-》

Effects of sacubitril/valsartan on renal function and outcome in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: an Italian cohort study.

Palazzuoli A ，Pirrotta F ，Cartocci A ，Delcuratolo E ，Dini FL ，Correale M ，Dattilo G ，Masarone D ，Scelsi L ，Ghio S ，Tocchetti CG ，Mercurio V ，Brunetti ND ，Nodari S ，Barillà F ，Ambrosio G ，Carluccio E ... -  《-》

Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibition and improved ventricular-arterial coupling in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Stegmann T ，Parentin L ，Schirmer SH ，Lavall P ，Hagendorff A ，Laufs U ，Lavall D ... -  《-》

Impact of SGLT2 inhibition on markers of reverse cardiac remodelling in heart failure: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Several landmark randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated the efficacy of sodium-glucose co-transport 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in reducing all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalizations. Much interest surrounds their mechanism of action and whether they have direct effects on reverse cardiac remodelling. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of placebo controlled RCTs evaluating the impact of SGLT2 inhibition on imaging derived markers of reverse cardiac remodelling in patients with HF. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement and Cochrane Collaboration. Data interrogation of each major database including PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library was performed. RCTs evaluating HF patients >18 years comparing SGLT2 inhibitor versus placebo-control were included. Outcome measures included left ventricular end-diastolic volume and volume index (LVEDV/LVEDVi), left ventricular end-systolic volume and volume index (LVSDV/LVSDVi), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular mass index (LVMi), left atrial volume index (LAVi) and left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV GLS). Studies with an HF with preserved ejection fraction population were excluded from analysis of parameters, which would be significantly affected by baseline LVEF, such as volumes and LVEF. The mean difference and standard error were extracted from each study and a random effects model used pool the mean difference and standard error across studies. A pre-specified sub-group analysis was performed to stratify results according to imaging modality used (cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography). This study is registered on PROSPERO: CRD42023482722. Seven randomized, placebo-controlled trials in patients with HF comprising a total population of 657 patients were included. Overall LVEF of included studies ranged from 29 ± 8.0% to 55.5 ± 4.2%. In studies included in analysis of HFrEF parameters, baseline LVEF ranged from 29 ± 8% to 45.5 ± 12%. Pooled data demonstrated SGLT2 inhibition, compared with placebo control, resulted in significant improvements in mean difference of LVEDV [-11.62 ml (95% confidence interval, CI -17.90 to -5.25; z = 3.67, P = 0.0004)], LVEDVi [-6.08 ml (95% CI -9.96 to -2.20; z = 3.07; P = 0.002)], LVESV [-12.47 ml (95% CI -19.12 to -5.82; z = 3.68; P = 0.0002)], LVESVi [-6.02 ml (95% CI -10.34 to -1.70; z = 2.73; P = 0.006)], LVM [-9.77 g (95% CI -17.65 to -1.89; z = 2.43; P = 0.02)], LVMi (-3.52 g [95% CI -7.04 to 0.01; z = 1.96; P = 0.05)] and LVEF [+2.54 mL (95% CI 1.10 to 3.98; z = 3.62; P = 0.0005)]. No significant difference in GLS (n = 327) [+0.42% (95%CI -0.19 to 1.02; P = 0.18)] or LAVi [-3.25 ml (95% CI -8.20 to 1.69; z = 1.29; P = 0.20)] was noted. This meta-analysis provides additional data and insight into the effects of SGLT2 inhibition on reverse cardiac remodelling in patients with HF. Compared with placebo control, we found that treatment with a SGLT2 inhibitor produced significant improvements in several markers of reverse cardiac remodelling.

Savage P ，Watson C ，Coburn J ，Cox B ，Shahmohammadi M ，Grieve D ，Dixon L ... -  《ESC Heart Failure》