Safety and efficacy of intravenous recombinant human prourokinase for acute ischaemic stroke within 4·5 h after stroke onset (PROST-2): a phase 3, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial.

Intra-arterial prourokinase has been shown to be a promising thrombolytic agent in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Given the global shortage of thrombolytics, we aimed to assess the non-inferiority of intravenous recombinant human prourokinase compared with alteplase in patients with acute ischaemic stroke who were ineligible for or who refused endovascular thrombectomy. PROST-2 was a phase 3, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial conducted at 61 hospitals in China. Patients older than 18 years with acute ischaemic stroke, who were ineligible for or who refused endovascular thrombectomy, were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio within 4·5 h of stroke onset to receive intravenous recombinant human prourokinase (15 mg bolus followed by 20 mg infusion within 30 min) or intravenous alteplase (0·9 mg per kg, maximum dose 90 mg; 10% bolus followed by remainder as infusion over 60 min). The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of patients with a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 or 1 at 90 days, assessed via masked review in the intention-to-treat population, with a non-inferiority margin for the risk ratio of 0·93. The primary safety outcome was the incidence of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage within 36 h. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05700591) and is now completed. Between Jan 29, 2023, and March 14, 2024, 1552 patients were randomly assigned: 775 received recombinant human prourokinase and 777 received alteplase. The primary outcome of a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 or 1 at 90 days was reached by 558 (72·0%) of 775 patients in the recombinant human prourokinase group versus 534 (68·7%) of 777 in the alteplase group (risk ratio 1·04 [95% CI 0·98 to 1·10]; p<0·0001 for non-inferiority). The frequency of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage within 36 h was lower in the recombinant human prourokinase group than in the alteplase group (two [0·3%] of 770 patients vs ten [1·3%] of 775, risk difference -1·0 percentage points [95% CI -2·1 to -0·1]; p=0·021), as was the incidence of major bleeding at 7 days (four [0·5%] vs 16 [2·1%]; -1·5 percentage points (-2·8 to -0·4); p=0·0072). All-cause mortality within 7 days did not differ between groups (five [0·6%] deaths in the recombinant human prourokinase group vs 13 [1·7%] in the alteplase group; risk difference -1·0 percentage points; 95% CI -2·3 to 0·1]; p=0·060). In our trial, recombinant human prourokinase was shown to be non-inferior to alteplase for achieving excellent functional outcome, with no difference between groups in safety endpoints. These findings support the use of recombinant human prourokinase as a viable alternative to alteplase for patients with ischaemic stroke who are eligible for intravenous thrombolysis therapy but ineligible for or who have refused endovascular thrombectomy. Tasly Biopharmaceuticals, National Key R&D Program of China, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences, and Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission. For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Li S ，Gu HQ ，Feng B ，Li H ，Wang X ，Dong Q ，Fan D ，Xu Y ，Zhu S ，Dai H ，Wei Y ，Wang Z ，Lu G ，Ma Y ，Li Z ，Wang Y ，Meng X ，Zhao X ，Liu L ，Wang Y ，PROST-2 investigators ... -  《-》

Tenecteplase versus alteplase for thrombolysis in patients selected by use of perfusion imaging within 4·5 h of onset of ischaemic stroke (TASTE): a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 non-inferiority trial.

Intravenous tenecteplase increases reperfusion in patients with salvageable brain tissue on perfusion imaging and might have advantages over alteplase as a thrombolytic for ischaemic stroke. We aimed to assess the non-inferiority of tenecteplase versus alteplase on clinical outcomes in patients selected by use of perfusion imaging. This international, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised, clinical non-inferiority trial enrolled patients from 35 hospitals in eight countries. Participants were aged 18 years or older, within 4·5 h of ischaemic stroke onset or last known well, were not being considered for endovascular thrombectomy, and met target mismatch criteria on brain perfusion imaging. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by use of a centralised web server with randomly permuted blocks to intravenous tenecteplase (0·25 mg/kg) or alteplase (0·90 mg/kg). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients without disability (modified Rankin Scale 0-1) at 3 months, assessed via masked review in both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. We aimed to recruit 832 participants to yield 90% power (one-sided alpha=0·025) to detect a risk difference of 0·08, with an absolute non-inferiority margin of -0·03. The trial was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12613000243718, and the European Union Clinical Trials Register, EudraCT Number 2015-002657-36, and it is completed. Recruitment ceased early following the announcement of other trial results showing non-inferiority of tenecteplase versus alteplase. Between March 21, 2014, and Oct 20, 2023, 680 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to tenecteplase (n=339) and alteplase (n=341), all of whom were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (multiple imputation was used to account for missing primary outcome data for five patients). Protocol violations occurred in 74 participants, thus the per-protocol population comprised 601 people (295 in the tenecteplase group and 306 in the alteplase group). Participants had a median age of 74 years (IQR 63-82), baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 7 (4-11), and 260 (38%) were female. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the primary outcome occurred in 191 (57%) of 335 participants allocated to tenecteplase and 188 (55%) of 340 participants allocated to alteplase (standardised risk difference [SRD]=0·03 [95% CI -0·033 to 0·10], one-tailed pnon-inferiority=0·031). In the per-protocol analysis, the primary outcome occurred in 173 (59%) of 295 participants allocated to tenecteplase and 171 (56%) of 306 participants allocated to alteplase (SRD 0·05 [-0·02 to 0·12], one-tailed pnon-inferiority=0·01). Nine (3%) of 337 patients in the tenecteplase group and six (2%) of 340 in the alteplase group had symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (unadjusted risk difference=0·01 [95% CI -0·01 to 0·03]) and 23 (7%) of 335 and 15 (4%) of 340 died within 90 days of starting treatment (SRD 0·02 [95% CI -0·02 to 0·05]). The findings in our study provide further evidence to strengthen the assertion of the non-inferiority of tenecteplase to alteplase, specifically when perfusion imaging has been used to identify reperfusion-eligible stroke patients. Although non-inferiority was achieved in the per-protocol population, it was not reached in the intention-to-treat analysis, possibly due to sample size limtations. Nonetheless, large-scale implementation of perfusion CT to assist in patient selection for intravenous thrombolysis in the early time window was shown to be feasible. Australian National Health Medical Research Council; Boehringer Ingelheim.

Parsons MW ，Yogendrakumar V ，Churilov L ，Garcia-Esperon C ，Campbell BCV ，Russell ML ，Sharma G ，Chen C ，Lin L ，Chew BL ，Ng FC ，Deepak A ，Choi PMC ，Kleinig TJ ，Cordato DJ ，Wu TY ，Fink JN ，Ma H ，Phan TG ，Markus HS ，Molina CA ，Tsai CH ，Lee JT ，Jeng JS ，Strbian D ，Meretoja A ，Arenillas JF ，Buck BH ，Devlin MJ ，Brown H ，Butcher KS ，O'Brien B ，Sabet A ，Wijeratne T ，Bivard A ，Grimley RS ，Agarwal S ，Munshi SK ，Donnan GA ，Davis SM ，Miteff F ，Spratt NJ ，Levi CR ，TASTE investigators ... -  《-》

RhPro-UK in acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 h of stroke onset trial-2 (the PROST-2 study): Rationale and design of a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint, controlled phase 3 non-inferiority trial.

Li S ，Gu HQ ，Feng B ，Dong Q ，Fan D ，Xu Y ，Zhu S ，Wang Y ... -  《-》

Bailout intracranial angioplasty or stenting following thrombectomy for acute large vessel occlusion in China (ANGEL-REBOOT): a multicentre, open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomised controlled trial.

Unsuccessful recanalisation or reocclusion after thrombectomy is associated with poor outcomes in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) acute ischaemic stroke (LVO-AIS). Bailout angioplasty or stenting (BAOS) could represent a promising treatment for these patients. We conducted a randomised controlled trial with the aim to investigate the safety and efficacy of BAOS following thrombectomy in patients with LVO. ANGEL-REBOOT was an investigator-initiated, multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, open-label, blinded-endpoint clinical trial conducted at 36 tertiary hospitals in 19 provinces in China. Participants with LVO-AIS 24 h after symptom onset were eligible if they had unsuccessful recanalisation (expanded Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction score of 0-2a) or risk of reocclusion (residual stenosis >70%) after thrombectomy. Eligible patients were randomly assigned by the minimisation method in a 1:1 ratio to undergo BAOS as the intervention treatment, or to receive standard therapy (continue or terminate the thrombectomy procedure) as a control group, both open-label. In both treatment groups, tirofiban could be recommended for use during and after the procedure. The primary outcome was the change in modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety outcomes were compared between groups. This trial was completed and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05122286). From Dec 19, 2021, to March 17, 2023, 706 patients were screened, and 348 were enrolled, with 176 assigned to the intervention group and 172 to the control group. No patients withdrew from the trial or were lost to follow-up for the primary outcome. The median age of patients was 63 years (IQR 55-69), 258 patients (74%) were male, and 90 patients (26%) were female; all participants were Chinese. After random allocation, tirofiban was administered either intra-arterially, intravenously, or both in 334 [96%] of 348 participants. No between-group differences were observed in the primary outcome (common odds ratio 0·86 [95% CI 0·59-1·24], p=0·41). Mortality was similar between the two groups (19 [11%] of 176 vs 17 [10%] of 172), but the intervention group showed a higher risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (eight [5%] of 175 vs one [1%] of 169), parenchymal haemorrhage type 2 (six [3%] of 175 vs none in the control group), and procedure-related arterial dissection (24 [14%] of 176 vs five [3%] of 172). Among Chinese patients with unsuccessful recanalisation or who are at risk of reocclusion after thrombectomy, BAOS did not improve clinical outcome at 90 days, and incurred more complications compared with standard therapy. The off-label use of tirofiban might have affected our results and their generalisability, but our findings do not support the addition of BAOS for such patients with LVO-AIS. Beijing Natural Science Foundation, National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key R&D Program Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Incubating Program, Shanghai HeartCare Medical Technology, HeMo (China) Bioengineering, Sino Medical Sciences Technology.

Gao F ，Tong X ，Jia B ，Wei M ，Pan Y ，Yang M ，Sun D ，Nguyen TN ，Ren Z ，Demiraj F ，Yao X ，Xu C ，Yuan G ，Wan Y ，Tang J ，Wang J ，Jiang Y ，Wang C ，Luo X ，Yang H ，Shen R ，Wu Z ，Yuan Z ，Wan D ，Hu W ，Liu Y ，Jing P ，Wei L ，Zheng T ，Wu Y ，Yang X ，Sun Y ，Wen C ，Chang M ，Yin B ，Li D ，Duan J ，Sun D ，Guo Z ，Xu G ，Wang G ，Wang L ，Wang Y ，Jia W ，Ma G ，Huo X ，Mo D ，Ma N ，Liu L ，Zhao X ，Wang Y ，Fiehler J ，Wang Y ，Miao Z ... -  《-》

Balloon guide catheters for endovascular thrombectomy in patients with acute ischaemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion in China (PROTECT-MT): a multicentre, open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomised controlled trial.

The effectiveness of using a balloon guide catheter during endovascular thrombectomy in patients with acute ischaemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion of the anterior circulation remains uncertain. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of using a balloon guide catheter during endovascular thrombectomy, compared with using a conventional guide catheter, in this patient population. We conducted a multicentre, open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomised controlled trial at 28 hospitals in China. Adults aged 18 years or older with acute ischaemic stroke who were able to receive endovascular thrombectomy within 24 h after symptom onset, according to local guidelines, were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to the balloon guide catheter group or the conventional guide catheter group using a central internet-based system with a minimisation algorithm. The treating physicians and patients were aware of treatment allocation, but clinical outcomes were collected by local trained physicians who were masked. Neurological assessments were performed at baseline, 24 h after randomisation, and at 7 days or hospital discharge (whichever occurred first). The primary outcome was functional recovery, assessed by change in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores (ranging from 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]) at 90 days in the intention-to-treat population and obtained from structured interviews. Treatment effect was estimated using ordinal logistic regression with adjustment for site and baseline prognostic factors (time from symptom onset to randomisation, the preferred thrombectomy strategy, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, prestroke function [estimated mRS score], and age). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05592054 (terminated). Between Feb 7 and Nov 13, 2023, 1698 patients were assessed for eligibility and 329 were randomly assigned to the balloon guide catheter group (n=164) or conventional guide catheter group (n=165) when the trial was paused and subsequently terminated on April 18, 2024, due to safety concerns. The median age was 69 years (IQR 59-76). Of 329 patients, 201 (61%) were male and 128 (39%) were female. Participants in the balloon guide catheter group had significantly worse scores on the mRS at 90 days than those in the conventional guide catheter group (adjusted common odds ratio 0·66 [95% CI 0·45-0·98]; p=0·037). All-cause mortality at 90 days was numerically higher in the balloon guide catheter group than in the conventional guide catheter group (39 [24%] vs 26 [16%]). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in intracranial haemorrhage, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, or other serious adverse events. Compared with conventional guide catheters, the use of balloon guide catheters led to worse functional recovery in patients receiving endovascular thrombectomy for intracranial large vessel occlusion. Future studies are needed to confirm these results. National Natural Science Foundation of China, Shanghai Hospital Development Center, Biopharma Industry Promotion Center Shanghai, and Ton-bridge Medical Technology. For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Liu J ，Zhou Y ，Zhang L ，Li Z ，Chen W ，Zhu Y ，Yao X ，Zhang L ，Liu S ，Peng Y ，Wei M ，Zhang Q ，Shu H ，Wang S ，Liu W ，Wan S ，Li T ，Fang Y ，Han H ，Zhang G ，Huang L ，Wang F ，Cheng G ，Gao L ，Shi H ，Han J ，Luo Y ，Li S ，Cai C ，Yin R ，Jin Z ，Shao C ，Tian B ，Zhang Y ，Li Q ，Zhang Y ，Zhang P ，Li B ，Xing P ，Shen H ，Zhu X ，Zhang X ，Hua W ，Shen F ，Huyan M ，Chen R ，Zuo Q ，Li Q ，Huang Q ，Xu Y ，Deng B ，Zhao R ，Goyal M ，Zhang Y ，Yang P ，PROTECT-MT Investigators ... -  《-》