Difference in efficacy of osimertinib between patients with EGFR-positive NSCLC with postoperative recurrence and those with de novo unresectable disease: A prospective, observational study.

Although clinical trials of systemic chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have included both postoperative recurrence and de novo unresectable cases, postoperative recurrence is reported to have a better efficacy and prognosis. However, there are no efficacy data of first-line osimertinib for postoperative recurrence. We conducted a post hoc analysis of a multicenter, prospective, observational study that evaluated the efficacy of first-line osimertinib in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive NSCLC. The patients were divided into two groups: those with postoperative recurrence (recurrence group, n = 167) and those with de novo unresectable disease (de novo group, n = 385). The recurrence group had a significantly better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS, p < 0.001) and fewer bone metastases (p < 0.001), brain metastases (p < 0.001), cancer pleurisy (p = 0.006), pleural dissemination (p = 0.003), liver metastases (p = 0.017), and adrenal metastases (p = 0.009) at the start of osimertinib than the de novo group. The recurrence group had a significantly better progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than the de novo group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.62, 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.49-0.81, p < 0.001; and HR = 0.58, 95 % CI, 0.43-0.79, p < 0.001, respectively). In a 1:1 propensity score-matching analysis, the matched recurrence group had significantly better PFS and OS than the matched de novo group (HR = 0.72, 95 % CI, 0.52-0.99, p = 0.034; and HR = 0.65, 95 % CI, 0.44-0.95, p < 0.001, respectively). Patients with EGFR-positive NSCLC and postoperative recurrence have a better ECOG-PS and fewer distant metastases at the start of first-line osimertinib, and better PFS and OS than those with de novo unresectable disease. Postoperative recurrence should be considered as a stratification factor in future clinical trials for advanced EGFR-positive NSCLC.

Karayama M ，Suda T ，Yoh K ，Usui K ，Hosomi Y ，Kishi K ，Naka G ，Watanabe K ，Tamano S ，Uemura K ，Kunitoh H ... -  《-》

Osimertinib after definitive chemoradiotherapy in unresectable stage III epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer: analyses of central nervous system efficacy and distant progression from the phase III LAURA study.

Distant metastases in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are a poor prognostic factor that negatively impact quality of life. The central nervous system (CNS) is a common site of distant progression in epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated (EGFRm) NSCLC. Osimertinib is a third-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor recommended for advanced EGFRm NSCLC and as adjuvant treatment for resected EGFRm NSCLC. In LAURA (NCT03521154), osimertinib demonstrated statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in unresectable stage III EGFRm NSCLC without progression during/following chemoradiotherapy (CRT). CNS efficacy and time to death or distant metastases (TTDM) analyses are reported here. Patients without progression during/following definitive platinum-based CRT were randomised 2 : 1 to receive osimertinib (80 mg daily) or placebo until progression [by blinded independent central review (BICR)] or discontinuation. The primary endpoint was PFS by BICR. CNS PFS by neuroradiologist BICR and TTDM by BICR were secondary endpoints. Overall, 216 patients were randomised (143 osimertinib, 73 placebo). Median CNS PFS by neuroradiologist BICR was not reached [95% confidence interval (CI) not calculable (NC)-NC] with osimertinib versus 14.9 months (95% CI 7.4 months-NC) with placebo; hazard ratio (HR) for CNS PFS: 0.17 (95% CI 0.09-0.32). CNS PFS analysis by investigator assessment was consistent with BICR assessment. The cumulative incidence of CNS progression at 12 months was 9% (95% CI 5% to 14%) with osimertinib and 36% (95% CI 24% to 47%) with placebo. There was clinically meaningful improvement in TTDM with osimertinib versus placebo; HR for TTDM: 0.21 (95% CI 0.11-0.38). The cumulative incidence of distant metastases at 12 months was 11% (95% CI 6% to 17%) with osimertinib and 37% (95% CI 26% to 48%) with placebo. Osimertinib demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in CNS PFS and TTDM versus placebo, supporting osimertinib post-CRT as the standard of care in unresectable stage III EGFRm NSCLC.

Lu S ，Ahn MJ ，Reungwetwattana T ，Özgüroğlu M ，Kato T ，Yang JC ，Huang M ，Fujiki F ，Inoue T ，Quang LV ，Sriuranpong V ，Vicente D ，Fuentes C ，Chaudhry AA ，Poole L ，Armenteros Monterroso E ，Rukazenkov Y ，van der Gronde T ，Ramalingam SS ... -  《-》

Efficacy and safety of osimertinib plus bevacizumab versus osimertinib alone for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with EGFR mutations: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of osimertinib plus bevacizumab in treating advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Up to May 26, 2024, the databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature, China Science and Technology Journal, and Wanfang were searched, and the randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) of osimertinib plus bevacizumab in the treatment of advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC were included. Two researchers independently screened the literature, assessed the quality of the included literature, and extracted the literature data. Revman5.4 software was used for meta-analysis. A total of 824 patients were included in 10 RCTs. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with the control group (osimertinib alone), the experimental group (osimertinib plus bevacizumab) had a higher objective response rate (ORR) (relative risk [RR] = 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-1.47, P = .02), and the experimental group could significantly reduce the expression levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (mean difference [SMD] = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.30-1.35, P = .002), vascular endothelial growth factor (SMD = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.13-0.73, P = .005), neuron-specific enolase (SMD = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.60-1.17, P < .00001), cytokeratin 19 fragments (SMD = 1.33, 95% CI = 0.34-2.33, P = .009), and carbohydrate antigen 125 (SMD = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.15-0.77, P = .004) in serum. However, the experimental group did not significantly improve the disease control rate (DCR) (RR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.00-1.36, P = .05), 1- and 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates (RR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.00-1.33, P = .05; RR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.74-1.40, P = .92), 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates (RR = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.92-1.36, P = .28; RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.84-1.18, P = .95). Interestingly, the results of subgroup analysis showed that the experimental group significantly improved ORR, DCR, 1-year PFS, and OS rates in the Chinese population and patients under 65 years old (P < .05). In addition, when the dose of bevacizumab was 7.5 mg/kg q3w in the experimental group, ORR, DCR, 1-year PFS, and OS rates were significantly better than those in the control group (P < .05). In terms of adverse events of drugs, the incidence of proteinuria, hypertension, oral mucositis, bleeding, nausea, and vomiting in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group (P < .05). For patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC, osimertinib plus bevacizumab has some clinical benefit compared with osimertinib alone. Still, it does not provide additional long-term survival benefits and has higher toxicity. More well-designed, multicenter RCTs are needed to identify the subgroups of patients most likely to benefit from this combination regimen and to validate the optimal dose of this combination regimen.

Yao L ，Zhang C ，Li D ，Xu L ，Yang X ... -  《-》

Cardiac Events and Survival in Patients With EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Osimertinib.

Lin CY ，Chang WT ，Su PL ，Kuo CW ，Yang J ，Lin CC ，Lin SH ... -  《JAMA Network Open》

Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With EGFR-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer After Progression on Osimertinib.

For patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who progress on first-line osimertinib, the optimal second-line treatment regimen after progression is not known. We sought to assess practice patterns and evaluate the association between different therapies and survival in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC following progression on first-line osimertinib. Retrospective cohort study of patients who received first-line treatment with osimertinib using a population-based, multicenter nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database. We identified 2373 patients who received first-line osimertinib. The majority (n = 2279) received osimertinib monotherapy. A total of 538 patients received first-line osimertinib and had second-line treatment data available. Second-line treatment regimens were varied: 65% (n = 348) included chemotherapy, 37% (n = 197) included an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), and 44% (n = 234) included an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). We then analyzed the 333 patients with performance status 0-2 who received chemotherapy with osimertinib (n = 107, 32%) versus chemotherapy without osimertinib (n = 226, 68%). The continuation of osimertinib with chemotherapy was associated with superior progression-free survival (PFS; median: 10.1 versus 5.9 months, Hazard Ratio [HR]: 0.48, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: [0.34, 0.68], P < .001) and overall survival (OS; median: 17.0 versus 12.8 months, HR: 0.64, 95% CI: [0.44, 0.93], P = .018) compared to other chemotherapy approaches without osimertinib. This effect was most pronounced in patients with an EGFR exon 19 deletion. Following progression on osimertinib, a wide variety of treatment regimens were used. The continuation of osimertinib with chemotherapy in the second line was associated with increased PFS and OS.

Robinson ND ，Canavan ME ，Zhan PL ，Udelsman BV ，Pathak R ，Boffa DJ ，Goldberg SB ... -  《-》