Toripalimab Plus Chemotherapy as a First-Line Therapy for Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Phase 3 EXTENTORCH Randomized Clinical Trial.

Cheng Y ，Zhang W ，Wu L ，Zhou C ，Wang D ，Xia B ，Bi M ，Fu X ，Li C ，Lv D ，Zhao Y ，Chen G ，Yi T ，Huang J ，Li M ，Yang R ，Huang X ，Wang Y ，Zhang M ，Pan Y ，Sun Y ，Hu S ，Zhang X ，Zhou M ，Fang J ，Jin F ，Liu Y ，Li Y ，Zhang Z ，Hu J ，Liu L ，Wang R ，Li Y ，Gu K ，Ding C ，Fan Q ，Zhang G ，Chen Y ，Jiang L ，Zheng WE ，Chen S ，Huang C ，Han Z ，Yang H ，Wang J ，Wang B ，Wu H ，Bao Y ，Li M ，Luo X ，Gu S ，Yu W ，Xu K ，Zhang S ，Yu J ... -  《-》

Neoadjuvant and adjuvant toripalimab for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a randomised, single-centre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

Patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma with a high pretreatment plasma concentration of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA remain at high risk for recurrence after concurrent chemoradiotherapy. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant-adjuvant treatment with the PD-1 inhibitor toripalimab and concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus placebo and concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. This randomised, single-centre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial was conducted at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre in Guangzhou, China. Adult patients (aged 18-65 years) with newly diagnosed high-risk stage III-IVa locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, with a pretreatment plasma EBV DNA concentration of at least 1500 copies per mL and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 0-1, were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) using an interactive web response system (block size of six), stratified by TNM stage (III vs IVa), to neoadjuvant toripalimab (240 mg intravenously) or placebo once every 2 weeks for two cycles, followed by concurrent cisplatin (100 mg/m2 intravenously) on days 1, 22, and 43 during intensity-modulated radiotherapy and adjuvant toripalimab (240 mg intravenously) or placebo once every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles. The primary endpoint was 2-year progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03925090, and is closed to enrolment; follow-up is ongoing. Between Dec 6, 2019, and Dec 9, 2021, 150 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the toripalimab group (n=100) or placebo group (n=50). 115 (77%) patients were male and 35 (23%) were female. As of data cutoff (May 31, 2024), median follow-up for progression-free survival was 37·8 months (IQR 34·2-46·5) for the intention-to-treat population analyses. 2-year progression-free survival was higher in the toripalimab group (92·0% [95% CI 86·7-97·3]) than in the placebo group (74·0% [61·8-86·2]; stratified hazard ratio 0·40 [95% CI 0·18-0·89]; log-rank p=0·019). The most common grade 3 or worse acute adverse events (occurring within 1 year of randomisation) were leukopenia (40 [40%] of 99 patients in the toripalimab group vs 22 [44%] of 50 patients in the placebo group), mucositis (28 [28%] vs ten [20%]), neutropenia (17 [17%] vs nine [18%]), anaemia (16 [16%] vs five [10%]), and weight loss (12 [12%] vs six [12%]). The most common grade 3 or worse late adverse events (occurring >1 year after randomisation) was auditory or hearing loss (eight [8%] vs four [8%]). Immune-mediated adverse events of grade 3 or worse occurred in ten (10%) patients only in the toripalimab group. One (2%) of 50 patients in the placebo group died due to septic shock caused by bacteraemia considered not treatment related. There were no treatment-related deaths in the toripalimab group. Our findings suggested that a so-called sandwich approach involving toripalimab (in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant phases) combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy could be a highly promising therapy for the treatment of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Phase 3 non-inferiority trials are warranted comparing neoadjuvant and adjuvant toripalimab versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. National Key Research and Development Program of China, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation, Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, Sun Yat-sen University Clinical Research 5010 Program, Innovative Research Team of High-level Local Universities in Shanghai, Postdoctoral Innovative Talent Support Program, Planned Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province, Key Youth Teacher Cultivating Program of Sun Yat-sen University, and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Liu SL ，Li XY ，Yang JH ，Wen DX ，Guo SS ，Liu LT ，Li YF ，Luo MJ ，Xie SY ，Liang YJ ，Sun XS ，Yang ZC ，Lv XF ，Luo DH ，Li JB ，Liu Q ，Wang P ，Guo L ，Mo HY ，Sun R ，Yang Q ，Lan KQ ，Jia GD ，Li R ，Zhao C ，Xu RH ，Chen QY ，Tang LQ ，Mai HQ ... -  《-》

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study of Socazolimab or placebo combined with carboplatin and etoposide in the first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04878016) conducted in 54 hospitals in China. Adults who were histologically diagnosed and never treated for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) were enrolled. Eligible Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive four cycles (21 days as one cycle) of intravenous carboplatin (area under the curve of 5 mg/mL per min, day 1 of each cycle) and etoposide (100 mg/m² of body-surface area, on days 1-3 of each cycle) with either socazolimab (5 mg/kg, day 1 of each cycle) or matching placebo, following maintenance therapy with socazolimab or placebo. From July 15, 2021, to May 12, 2022, 498 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive socazolimab (250 patients) or placebo (248 patients) combined with chemotherapy. As of October 13, 2023, patients treated with socazolimab presented significant overall survival (OS) benefit (13.90 months) compared with the placebo plus EC group (11.58 months) (hazard ratio for death, 0.799; 95% CI, 0.652-0.979; p = 0.0158). The median progression free survival (PFS) was 5.55 months in the socazolimab plus EC group, prolonging disease progression or death by nearly 1.2 months (5.55 months vs 4.37 months, hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.569; 95% CI, 0.457-0.708; p < 0.0001). 200 (80.3%) patients in the socazolimab plus EC group experienced ≥ grade 3 treatment-related adverse events and 187 (75.7%) patients occurred in the placebo plus EC group. Socazolimab combined with standard EC regimen chemotherapy for first-line treatment of ES-SCLC significantly prolonged overall survival and did not increase the safety risk of treatment.

Chen Z ，Chen J ，Huang D ，Zhang W ，Wu L ，Yi T ，Wang Q ，Han L ，Tan L ，Li Y ，Zhang Z ，Li N ，Li J ，Zhang T ，Hu Y ，Sun H ，Wu Y ，He Z ，Yang R ，Cheng P ，Li X ，Shi J ，Yu G ，Ma D ，Li BX ，Dai X ，Wong M ，Li Y ，Yu X ，Lu S ，Socazolimab Study Group ... -  《-》

Durvalumab after Chemoradiotherapy in Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Adjuvant therapy with durvalumab, with or without tremelimumab, may have efficacy in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer who do not have disease progression after standard concurrent platinum-based chemoradiotherapy. In a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we assigned patients to receive durvalumab at a dose of 1500 mg, durvalumab (1500 mg) plus tremelimumab at a dose of 75 mg (four doses only), or placebo every 4 weeks for up to 24 months. Randomization was stratified according to disease stage (I or II vs. III) and receipt of prophylactic cranial irradiation (yes vs. no). Results of the first planned interim analysis of the two primary end points of overall survival and progression-free survival (assessed on the basis of blinded independent central review according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1) with durvalumab as compared with placebo (data cutoff date, January 15, 2024) are reported; results in the durvalumab-tremelimumab group remain blinded. A total of 264 patients were assigned to the durvalumab group, 200 to the durvalumab-tremelimumab group, and 266 to the placebo group. Durvalumab therapy led to significantly longer overall survival than placebo (median, 55.9 months [95% confidence interval {CI}, 37.3 to not reached] vs. 33.4 months [95% CI, 25.5 to 39.9]; hazard ratio for death, 0.73; 98.321% CI, 0.54 to 0.98; P = 0.01), as well as to significantly longer progression-free survival (median 16.6 months [95% CI, 10.2 to 28.2] vs. 9.2 months [95% CI, 7.4 to 12.9]; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.76; 97.195% CI, 0.59 to 0.98; P = 0.02). The incidence of adverse events with a maximum grade of 3 or 4 was 24.4% among patients receiving durvalumab and 24.2% among patients receiving placebo; adverse events led to discontinuation in 16.4% and 10.6% of the patients, respectively, and led to death in 2.7% and 1.9%. Pneumonitis or radiation pneumonitis with a maximum grade of 3 or 4 occurred in 3.1% of the patients in the durvalumab group and in 2.6% of those in the placebo group. Adjuvant therapy with durvalumab led to significantly longer overall survival and progression-free survival than placebo among patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer. (Funded by AstraZeneca; ADRIATIC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03703297.).

Cheng Y ，Spigel DR ，Cho BC ，Laktionov KK ，Fang J ，Chen Y ，Zenke Y ，Lee KH ，Wang Q ，Navarro A ，Bernabe R ，Buchmeier EL ，Chang JW ，Shiraishi Y ，Sezgin Goksu S ，Badzio A ，Shi A ，Daniel DB ，Hoa NTT ，Zemanova M ，Mann H ，Gowda H ，Jiang H ，Senan S ，ADRIATIC Investigators ... -  《-》

Immune checkpoint inhibitors plus platinum-based chemotherapy compared to platinum-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for first-line treatment of older people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Lung cancer is a cancer of the elderly, with a median age at diagnosis of 71. More than one-third of people diagnosed with lung cancer are over 75 years old. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are special antibodies that target a pathway in the immune system called the programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) pathway. These antibodies help the immune system fight cancer cells by blocking signals that cancer cells use to avoid being attacked by the immune system. ICIs have changed the treatment of people with lung cancer. In particular, for people with previously-untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), current first-line treatment now comprises ICIs plus platinum-based chemotherapy, rather than platinum-based chemotherapy alone, regardless of their PD-L1 expression status. However, as people age, their immune system changes, becoming less effective in its T cell responses. This raises questions about how well ICIs work in older adults. To assess the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy compared to platinum-based chemotherapy (with or without bevacizumab) in treatment-naïve adults aged 65 years and older with advanced NSCLC. We searched the Cochrane Lung Cancer Group Trial Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, two other trial registers, and the websites of drug regulators. The latest search date was 23 August 2023. We also checked references and searched abstracts from the meetings of seven cancer organisations from 2019 to August 2023. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that reported on the efficacy and safety of adding ICIs to platinum-based chemotherapy compared to platinum-based chemotherapy alone for people 65 years and older who had not previously been treated. All data emanated from international multicentre studies involving adults with histologically-confirmed advanced NSCLC who had not received any previous systemic anticancer therapy for their advanced disease. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Our primary outcomes were overall survival and treatment-related adverse events (grade 3 or higher). Our secondary outcomes were progression-free survival, objective response rate, time to response, duration of response, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We included 17 primary studies, with a total of 4276 participants, in the review synthesis. We identified nine ongoing studies, and listed one study as 'awaiting classification'. Twelve of the 17 studies included people older than 75 years, accounting for 9% to 13% of their participants. We rated some studies as having 'some concerns' for risk of bias arising from the randomisation process, deviations from the intended interventions, or measurement of the outcome. The overall GRADE rating for the certainty of the evidence ranged from moderate to low because of the risk of bias, imprecision, or inconsistency. People aged 65 years and older The addition of ICIs to platinum-based chemotherapy probably increased overall survival compared to platinum-based chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio (HR) 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70 to 0.88; 8 studies, 2093 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Only one study reported data for treatment-related adverse events (grade 3 or higher). The frequency of treatment-related adverse events may not differ between the two treatment groups (risk ratio (RR) 1.09, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.32; 1 study, 127 participants; low-certainty evidence). The addition of ICIs to platinum-based chemotherapy probably improves progression-free survival (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.68; 7 studies, 1885 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). People aged 65 to 75 years, inclusive The addition of ICIs to platinum-based chemotherapy probably improved overall survival compared to platinum-based chemotherapy alone (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.87; 6 studies, 1406 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Only one study reported data for treatment-related adverse events (grade 3 or higher). The frequency of treatment-related adverse events probably increased in people treated with ICIs plus platinum-based chemotherapy compared to those treated with platinum-based chemotherapy alone (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.13; 1 study, 97 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The addition of ICIs to platinum-based chemotherapy probably improved progression-free survival (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.73; 8 studies, 1466 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). People aged 75 years and older There may be no difference in overall survival in people treated with ICIs combined with platinum-based chemotherapy compared to platinum-based chemotherapy alone (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.16; 4 studies, 297 participants; low-certainty evidence). No data on treatment-related adverse events were available in this age group. The effect of combination ICI and platinum-based chemotherapy on progression-free survival is uncertain (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.36; 3 studies, 226 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Only three studies assessed the objective response rate. For time to response, duration of response, and health-related quality of life, we do not have any evidence yet. Compared to platinum-based chemotherapy alone, adding ICIs to platinum-based chemotherapy probably leads to higher overall survival and progression-free survival, without an increase in treatment-related adverse events (grade 3 or higher), in people 65 years and older with advanced NSCLC. These data are based on results from studies dominated by participants between 65 and 75 years old. However, the analysis also suggests that the improvements reported in overall survival and progression-free survival may not be seen in people older than 75 years.

Orillard E ，Adhikari A ，Malouf RS ，Calais F ，Marchal C ，Westeel V ... -  《Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews》