Effects of pericapsular nerve group block on early postoperative cognitive function in older people undergoing hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block has emerged as a reliable analgesia technique for hip arthroplasty (HA). However, the effects of PENG block on perioperative neurocognitive disorder (PND) after HA has not yet been assessed. The present study aimed to investigate the effects of PENG block on early postoperative cognitive function in older people undergoing hip arthroplasty. Sixty older patients undergoing HA under spinal anesthesia were randomly assigned to group P (n = 30) receiving PENG block with ropivacaine and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) pump with sufentanil after surgery or group C (n = 30) only receiving PCIA pump with sufentanil after surgery. The primary outcome was the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score at 7 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes consisted of the incidence of PND 7 days postoperatively, the static VAS pain scores at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively; cumulative sufentanil consumption and the requirement of rescue analgesia during the 0-24 h period after surgery; quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) scale scores at 24 h postoperatively; and the plasma levels of high mobility group box protein 1 (HMGB1) preoperatively and 1 day after surgery, and adverse events. After surgery, the PENG block group had higher MMSE score than the control group at 7 days postoperatively (27.0 ± 1.8 vs. 26.1 ± 1.7, P = 0.048), with a mean difference of 0.9 (95%CI, 0.1-0.9). The incidence of PND at 7 days postoperatively was 6.7% in group P, lower than that of 30% in group C (P = 0.044). In group P, the static VAS scores at 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively were significantly lower than those in group C (all P < 0.05). Compared with group C, the cumulative sufentanil consumption and the number of patients required rescue analgesia during the 0-24 h period after surgery were significantly lower in group P (all P < 0.05). The scores of QoR-15 scale were higher in group P at 24 h postoperatively than those in group C (P < 0.05). Patients in group P showed lower plasma levels of HMGB1 than group C at 1 day after surgery (P < 0.05), and the rate of complications didn't differ between both groups. Older people undergoing HA receiving a PENG block for perioperative analgesia experience improved early postoperative cognitive function, reduced postoperative pain, higher quality of recovery, and less postoperative inflammatory response. Chictr.org.cn identifier ChiCTR2200061055 (Date of registry: 15/06/2022, prospectively registered).

Zhu M ，Ying Q ，Wang L ，Zhou R ，Mei Y ... -  《BMC Geriatrics》

The effect of esketamine combined with sufentanil based patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for postoperative pain in patients undergoing third molar surgery and maxillofacial trauma: a randomized clinical trial.

This study aims to investigate the effects of combining esketamine with sufentanil for postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) in patients undergoing elective impacted tooth surgery or open reduction and internal fixation. In this single-center, prospective, double-blinded, randomized, parallel-controlled trial, 91 patients were randomly divided into two groups. The experimental group (group ES, n = 46) received a combination of sufentanil 1.5 µg/kg and esketamine 1.0 mg/kg, while the control group (group S, n = 45) received sufentanil 2 µg/kg alone for PCIA after surgery. Primary outcome was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for patients at rest and during mouth opening at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included the Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) scores, the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores, patient satisfaction with analgesia, and the occurrence of adverse events within 48 h post-surgery. The frequency of PCIA button presses and the number of patients requiring rescue analgesia were also recorded. The resting VAS scores and the mouth-opening VAS scores at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h post-surgery were significantly lower in Group ES than in Group S (P < 0.05). Additionally, the RSS scores were significantly higher at 6 h (P = 0.032) and 12 h (P = 0.021) post-surgery in Group ES. The frequency of PCIA postoperative use within 48 h post-surgery decreased (P = 0.021) in Group ES, while satisfaction with analgesia and QoR-15 scores increased (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). The incidences of postoperative dizziness and nausea/vomiting reduced (P = 0.045 and P = 0.036, respectively) in Group ES, but one adverse event of nightmare was observed. There was no significant difference in rescue analgesia between the two groups. The use of esketamine combined with sufentanil in patients undergoing third molar surgery and maxillofacial trauma can alleviate short-term postoperative pain, and improve the quality of postoperative recovery. Esketamine is worth promoting in the clinical application of oral and maxillofacial surgery. The study was retrospectively registered in chictr.org.cn with the identifier: ChiCTR2400086662 on 08/07/2024.

Li X ，He X ，Li M ，Gu X ，Wang P ，Wu Y ，Chen Y ... -  《BMC Oral Health》

The effect of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on postoperative analgesia in elderly patients who underwent proximal femoral nail anti-rotation surgery: a prospective, randomized-controlled trial.

As a fascial plane block technique, further exploration is needed to determine the safety and efficacy of a peri-capsular nerve group (PENG) block in elderly patients with intertrochanteric femur fractures. We aimed to evaluate whether opioid consumption during a PENG block is better than a conventional opioid-based program for postoperative pain management after proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA). We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing the efficacy of the PENG block with the control group for elderly patients undergoing primary PFNA under general anesthesia. The primary outcome was the cumulative administration of sufentanil during the first 48 h after surgery. 110 participants (55 in each group) were included in the analysis. Cumulative Sufentanil consumption between the PENG group and the control group at 48 h was 132.6 ± 12.3 vs. 141.0 ± 15.3, with a difference of -8.4; 95% CI, -13.6 to -3.1, P = 0.002. Sufentanil consumption at 24 h was 78.3 ± 6.1 vs. 94.0 ± 10.2, with a difference of -15.7; 95% CI, -18.9 to -12.5, P < 0.001. There were statistical differences in the visual analogue scale score trajectories between the two groups at 48 h postoperatively (P < 0.001). The median time to first remedial analgesia was lower in the PENG block group than in the control group (P < 0.001). However, there was no difference in the time to first standing. Incorporating the PENG block into a multimodal analgesia regimen can decrease opioid consumption among elderly patients undergoing PFNA under general anesthesia. The study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100054290, principal investigator: Xiao-dan, Wu, 13/12/2021).

Wu H ，Yang RZ ，Chen Y ，Chen T ，Qiu LC ，Wu XD ... -  《-》

Comparison of erector spinae plane block and transverse abdominis plane block in postoperative recovery after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.

Patients experience significant postoperative pain after laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer. Transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) provides effective analgesia, and recent studies have also shown that erector spinae plane block (ESPB) can be used for postoperative analgesia in abdominal surgery. However, there is a lack of comparison between the two methods regarding recovery quality following laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Sixty patients scheduled for laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive either a ESPB with TAPB (n = 30). Both groups received a single injection of 20 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine bilaterally. The primary outcome was the quality of recovery (QoR) at 24 h postoperatively, using the quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) scale. Secondary outcomes included the QoR at 48 h postoperatively, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores during the first 48 h postoperatively in both resting and active states, requirements for rescue analgesia, cumulative postoperative opioid consumption, patient satisfaction, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), time to first flatus and ambulation, the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) score, and postoperative hospital stay. At 24 h postoperatively, the QoR-15 score (mean ± standard deviation) was significantly higher in the ESPB group (109.2 ± 8.7) compared to the TAPB group (101 ± 10.1) (p = 0.001). Similarly, at 48 h postoperatively, the QoR-15 score remained higher in the ESPB group (118.5 ± 8.8) than in the TAPB group (113.8 ± 8.1) (p = 0.035). Patients in the ESPB group reported lower visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores during the first 24 h postoperatively (all p < 0.05) compared to those in the TAPB group. The sufentanil consumption median (interquartile range) in the ESPB group at 24 h postoperatively was lower (62, 61-65 μg) compared to the TAPB group (66, 63-70 μg) (p < 0.001). Hospital stay median was 7 (6-9) days for the ESPB group and 8 (7-10) days for the TAPB group (p = 0.037). Patients who received ESPB showed better recovery quality, improved analgesic effects, and higher postoperative satisfaction compared to those who underwent preoperative TAPB. https://www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2400081157); date of registration: February 24, 2024. The first participant was enrolled on February 27, 2024.

Hou P ，Liu W ，Chen R ，Mi H ，Jia S ，Lin J ... -  《Perioperative Medicine》

Supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block versus peri-capsular nerve group (PNEG) block for pain management in patients with hip fracture: A double-blind randomised comparative trial.

Regional analgesia has been recommended to alleviate pain caused by hip fractures. Both the supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block (S-FIB) and the peri‑capsular nerve group (PENG) block provide better analgesia than conventional fascia iliaca block for patients with hip fractures, but which one is superior remains equivocal. This study aimed to determine the superiority of S-FIB or PENG block for patients awaiting hip surgery. In this prospective, double-blind, randomised comparative trial, patients with hip fractures awaiting operation were randomly allocated to receive either S-FIB with 30 ml 0.35 % ropivacaine or PENG block with 20 ml 0.35 % ropivacaine. Primary outcomes were pain scores (numeric rating scale, NRS, 0-10) at rest and during passive movement 30 min after nerve block. Secondary outcomes included pain scores at rest and during movement 10 and 20 min after nerve block and during positioning for spinal anaesthesia, time spent for performing nerve block and spinal anaesthesia, and the quality of positioning for spinal anaesthesia. One-hundred patients were enrolled and 91 patients completed the trial (S-FIB group n = 46, PENG group n = 45). No significant difference was noted between these two groups in the pain scores (median [interquartile range]) either at rest (0 [0-0] vs 0 [0-0], P = 0.151) or during passive movement (3 [1-6] vs 3 [2-5], P = 0.99) at 30 min after nerve block. However, within-group analysis revealed that a significant reduction in pain score at rest was noted as early as 20 min after PENG block while that was noted only at 30 min after S-FIB. In addition, less time was required to perform PENG than S-FIB the block (3.1 [2.3-3.9] vs. 4.6 [3.1-5.6] minutes, P < 0.001). Our result suggests that with a lower dose of local anaesthetic, a shorter procedure time and earlier analgesic effect, PENG block may be preferred to S-FIB for patients with hip fracture awaiting surgery.

Huang KT ，Tsai HI ，Kao SC 《-》