Recaticimab as Add-On Therapy to Statins for Nonfamilial Hypercholesterolemia: The Randomized, Phase 3 REMAIN-2 Trial.

Currently available antiproprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 monoclonal antibodies can effectively decrease low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, but require frequent dosing. Recaticimab is a novel humanized monoclonal antibody against proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9. In a phase 1b/2 trial, recaticimab as add-on to stable statins showed robust LDL-C reduction with a dosing interval up to every 12 weeks (Q12W) in patients with hypercholesterolemia. REMAIN-2 (REcaticiMab Add-on therapy In patients with Nonfamilial hypercholesterolemia) aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of 48-week treatment with recaticimab as add-on therapy to statins in nonfamilial hypercholesterolemia. REMAIN-2 was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. During the run-in period, patients received stable moderate or high-intensity statin, with or without cholesterol absorption inhibitors (ezetimibe) or fenofibrate, for ≥4 weeks. Patients with an LDL-C of ≥1.8 mmol/L (if with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease [ASCVD]) or ≥2.6 mmol/L (if without ASCVD) were then randomized (2:2:2:1:1:1) to receive recaticimab 150 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W), 300 mg every 8 weeks (Q8W), or 450 mg Q12W, or matching placebo injections (Q4W, Q8W, or Q12W) for 48 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was percentage change from baseline to week 24 in LDL-C level. A total of 689 randomly assigned patients received treatment (mean age, 55.8 years; male, 64.4%; ASCVD history, 69.5%; concomitant ezetimibe, 11.2%; mean baseline LDL-C, 2.8 mmol/L). Percentage change in LDL-C from baseline to week 24 was significantly more pronounced with recaticimab vs placebo (P < 0.0001), with least-squares mean differences of -62.2% (95% CI: -67.0% to -57.4%), -59.7% (95% CI: -65.0% to -54.4%), and -53.4% (95% CI: -58.7% to -48.2%) for the 150 mg Q4W, 300 mg Q8W, and 450 mg Q12W regimens, respectively. The decreases in LDL-C with recaticimab were maintained through week 48. Secondary lipid variables, including non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and lipoprotein(a) also favored the recaticimab groups. During the treatment period, the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (28.5% vs 26.6%) and serious treatment-related adverse events (0.4% vs 0.4%) was similarly low in both the recaticimab and placebo groups. Recaticimab as add-on to stable statin therapy significantly decreased LDL-C levels at week 24 and sustained the decreases through week 48, providing a novel therapeutic alternative with a dosing interval of up to every 12 weeks in patients with nonfamilial hypercholesterolemia.

Sun Y ，Lv Q ，Guo Y ，Wang Z ，Huang R ，Gao X ，Han Y ，Yao Z ，Zheng M ，Luo S ，Li Y ，Gu X ，Zhang Y ，Wang J ，Hong L ，Ma X ，Su G ，Sheng J ，Lai C ，Shen A ，Wang M ，Zhang W ，Wu S ，Zheng Z ，Li J ，Zhong T ，Wang Y ，He L ，Du X ，Ma CS ... -  《-》

Recaticimab Monotherapy for Nonfamilial Hypercholesterolemia and Mixed Hyperlipemia: The Phase 3 REMAIN-1 Randomized Trial.

Monoclonal antibodies against proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) have been used to reduce the level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), but require either biweekly or monthly dosing frequency. Recaticimab is a new humanized monoclonal antibody selectively targeting PCSK9, with long-acting characteristic. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of recaticimab monotherapy in patients with nonfamilial hypercholesterolemia and mixed hyperlipemia at low-to-moderate atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk, and to explore different dosing strategies to provide patients with flexible administration options. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study conducted at 59 sites in China. Patients with fasting LDL-C ≥2.6 to <4.9 mmol/L, fasting triglyceride ≤5.6 mmol/L, and 10-year ASCVD risk score <10% were randomly assigned (2:2:2:1:1:1) to receive subcutaneous injections of recaticimab at 150 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W), 300 mg every 8 weeks (Q8W), or 450 mg every 12 weeks (Q12W), or matching placebo, on background lipid-lowering diet. Primary endpoint was percentage change in LDL-C from baseline to week 12 for 150 mg Q4W and 450 mg Q12W and to week 16 for 300 mg Q8W. A total of 703 patients underwent randomization and received recaticimab (n = 157, 156, and 155 for 150 mg Q4W, 300 mg Q8W, and 450 mg Q12W, respectively) or placebo (n = 78, 79, and 78, respectively). Compared with placebo, recaticimab further reduced LDL-C by 49.6% (95% CI: 44.2%-54.9%) at 150 mg Q4W, 52.8% (95% CI: 48.3%-57.2%) at 300 mg Q8W, and 45.0% (95% CI: 41.0%-49.0%) at 450 mg Q12W (P < 0.0001 for all comparisons). Safety with recaticimab was comparable to placebo. After 12 or 16 weeks of treatment, patients who received recaticimab continued treatment until week 24, whereas those allocated to placebo were switched to recaticimab treatment with the same dosing strategy. Both 24-week recaticimab and 12- or 8-week recaticimab switched from placebo were effective. With 24 weeks of recaticimab treatment, the most common treatment-related adverse event was injection site reaction (n = 23 [4.9%]). Recaticimab monotherapy yielded significant LDL-C reductions and showed comparable safety vs placebo in patients with nonfamilial hypercholesterolemia and mixed hyperlipemia at low-to-moderate ASCVD risk, even with an infrequent dosing interval up to Q12W.

Xu M ，Wang Z ，Zhang Y ，Liu Y ，Huang R ，Han X ，Yao Z ，Sun J ，Tian F ，Hu X ，Ma L ，Lai C ，Zhang X ，Sheng J ，Han Q ，Jin C ，Luo L ，Zhao R ，Li L ，Xu B ，Yin D ，Luo S ，Ge X ，Liu Z ，Yang P ，Huang Z ，Li T ，Feng W ，Wu Y ，Ling Z ，Ma L ，Lv C ，Deng C ，Wei W ，Wang Y ，Yan L ，Ge J ，REMAIN-1 Investigators ... -  《-》

Lomitapide for the treatment of paediatric patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (APH-19): results from the efficacy phase of an open-label, multicentre, phase 3 study.

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH) is a rare inherited disorder characterised by extremely high concentrations of LDL cholesterol, leading to early-onset atherosclerosis. Lomitapide is an orally administered microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP) inhibitor that effectively lowers LDL cholesterol and is approved for adults with HoFH. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of lomitapide in paediatric patients with HoFH receiving standard-of-care lipid-lowering therapy. APH-19 is an open-label, single-arm, phase 3 trial performed at 12 study centres in Germany, Israel, Italy, Saudi Arabia, Spain, and Tunisia. A 6-week run-in period was followed by a 24-week efficacy phase and an 80-week safety phase. Patients aged 5-17 years, on stable lipid-lowering therapy, with HoFH diagnosed using the criteria from the 2014 European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel on HoFH were titrated to maximum tolerated doses of oral lomitapide, starting at 2 mg (patients aged 5-15 years) or 5 mg (patients aged 16-17 years). The primary endpoint was the percentage change from baseline to week 24 in LDL cholesterol, which was assessed in patients who had received at least one dose of lomitapide, and who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline measurement. The secondary outcomes were the percentage change from baseline at week 24 in total cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, VLDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, triglycerides, and lipoprotein(a). Safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04681170. Between Dec 20, 2020, and Oct 16, 2022, 43 patients were included and treated (24 [56%] were female and 19 [44%] were male, and median age was 10·7 years [7·0-14·0]). Mean change from baseline in LDL cholesterol at week 24 was -53·5% (95% CI -61·6 to -45·4, p<0·0001). Mean percentage reductions were observed at week 24 for non-HDL cholesterol (-53·9%, 95% CI -61·7 to -46·1, p<0·0001), total cholesterol (-50·0%, 95% CI -57·6 to -42·4, p<0·0001), VLDL cholesterol (-50·2%, -59·1 to -41·2, p<0·0001), apolipoprotein B (-52·4%, -60·3 to -44·5, p<0·0001), triglycerides was -49·9% (-58·8 to -41·0, p<0·0001), and lipoprotein(a) (-11·3%, -32·9 to 10·3 [in 21 patients with measurements in mg/dL]; -23·6%, -38·2 to -9·0 [in 22 patients with measurements in nmol/L]; p=0·0070 combined). Adverse events were mostly mild, and gastrointestinal and hepatic in nature. Adverse events of special interest were reported for five (12%) patients (gastrointestinal in two patients and hepatic in three). One serious treatment-emergent adverse event was reported (also classed as an adverse event of special interest): an increase in hepatic enzymes, resulting in two dose interruptions, two dose reductions, and a repeated dose escalation. Lomitapide provided a significant, clinically meaningful LDL cholesterol reduction and has the potential to be an efficient, LDL receptor-independent option for paediatric patients with HoFH. Amryt Pharmaceuticals.

Masana L ，Zambon A ，Schmitt CP ，Taylan C ，Driemeyer J ，Cohen H ，Buonuomo PS ，Alashwal A ，Al-Dubayee M ，Kholaif N ，Diaz-Diaz JL ，Maatouk F ，Martinez-Hervas S ，Mangal B ，Löwe S ，Cunningham T ... -  《-》

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of LBP-EC01, a CRISPR-Cas3-enhanced bacteriophage cocktail, in uncomplicated urinary tract infections due to Escherichia coli (ELIMINATE): the randomised, open-label, first part of a two-part phase 2 trial.

The rate of antibiotic resistance continues to grow, outpacing small-molecule-drug development efforts. Novel therapies are needed to combat this growing threat, particularly for the treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs), which are one of the largest contributors to antibiotic use and associated antibiotic resistance. LBP-EC01 is a novel, genetically enhanced, six-bacteriophage cocktail developed by Locus Biosciences (Morrisville, NC, USA) to address UTIs caused by Escherichia coli, regardless of antibiotic resistance status. In this first part of the two-part phase 2 ELIMINATE trial, we aimed to define a dosing regimen of LBP-EC01 for the treatment of uncomplicated UTIs that could advance to the second, randomised, controlled, double-blinded portion of the study. This first part of ELIMINATE is a randomised, uncontrolled, open-label, phase 2 trial that took place in six private clinical sites in the USA. Eligible participants were female by self-identification, aged between 18 years and 70 years, and had an uncomplicated UTI at the time of enrolment, as well as a history of at least one drug-resistant UTI caused by E coli within the 12 months before enrolment. Participants were initially randomised in a 1:1:1 ratio into three treatment groups, but this part of the trial was terminated on the recommendation of the safety review committee after a non-serious tolerability signal was observed based on systemic drug exposure. A protocol update was then implemented, comprised of three new treatment groups. Groups A to C were dosed with intraurethral 2 × 1012 plaque-forming units (PFU) of LBP-EC01 on days 1 and 2 by catheter, plus one of three intravenous doses daily on days 1-3 of LBP-EC01 (1 mL of 1 × 1010 PFU intravenous bolus in group A, 1 mL of 1 × 109 PFU intravenous bolus in group B, and a 2 h 1 × 1011 PFU intravenous infusion in 100 mL of sodium lactate solution in group C). In all groups, oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX; 160 mg and 800 mg) was given twice daily on days 1-3. The primary outcome was the level of LBP-EC01 in urine and blood across the treatment period and over 48 h after the last dose and was assessed in patients in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population who received at least one dose of LBP-EC01 and had concentration-time data available throughout the days 1-3 dosing period (pharmacokinetic population). Safety, a secondary endpoint, was assessed in enrolled patients who received at least one dose of study drug (safety population). As exploratory pharmacodynamic endpoints, we assessed E coli levels in urine and clinical symptoms of UTI in patients with at least 1·0 × 105 colony-forming units per mL E coli in urine at baseline who took at least one dose of study drug and completed their day 10 test-of-cure assessment (pharmacodynamic-evaluable population). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05488340, and is ongoing. Between Aug 22, 2022, and Aug 28, 2023, 44 patients were screened for eligibility, and 39 were randomly assigned (ITT population). Initially, eight participants were assigned to the first three groups. After the protocol was updated, 31 participants were allocated into groups A (11 patients), B (ten patients), and C (ten patients). One patient in group C withdrew consent on day 2 for personal reasons, but as she had received the first dose of the study drug was included in the modified ITT population. Maximum urine drug concentrations were consistent across intraurethral dosing, with a maximum mean concentration of 6·3 × 108 PFU per mL (geometric mean 8·8 log10 PFU per mL and geometric SD [gSD] 0·3). Blood plasma level of bacteriophages was intravenous dose-dependent, with maximum mean concentrations of 4·0 × 103 (geometric mean 3·6 log10 PFU per mL [gSD 1·5]) in group A, 2·5 × 103 (3·4 log10 PFU per mL [1·7]) in group B, and 8·0 × 105 (5·9 log10 PFU per mL [1·4]) in group C. No serious adverse events were observed. 44 adverse events were reported across 18 (46%) of the 39 participants in the safety population, with more adverse events seen with higher intravenous doses. Three patients in groups 1 to 3 and one patient in group C, all of whom received 1 × 1011 LBP-EC01 intravenously, had non-serious tachycardia and afebrile chills after the second intravenous dose. A rapid reduction of E coli in urine was observed by 4 h after the first treatment and maintained at day 10 in all 16 evaluable patients; these individuals had complete resolution of UTI symptoms by day 10. A regimen consisting of 2 days of intraurethral LBP-EC01 and 3 days of concurrent intravenous LBP-EC01 (1 × 1010 PFU) and oral TMP-SMX twice a day was well tolerated, with consistent pharmacokinetic profiles in urine and blood. LBP-EC01 and TMP-SMX dosing resulted in a rapid and durable reduction of E coli, with corresponding elimination of clinical symptoms in evaluable patients. LBP-EC01 holds promise in providing an alternative therapy for uncomplicated UTIs, with further testing of the group A dosing regimen planned in the controlled, double-blind, second part of ELIMINATE. Federal funds from the US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response, and Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA).

Kim P ，Sanchez AM ，Penke TJR ，Tuson HH ，Kime JC ，McKee RW ，Slone WL ，Conley NR ，McMillan LJ ，Prybol CJ ，Garofolo PM ... -  《-》

Safety and efficacy of PfSPZ Vaccine against malaria in healthy adults and women anticipating pregnancy in Mali: two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 and 2 trials.

Plasmodium falciparum parasitaemia during pregnancy causes maternal, fetal, and infant mortality. Poor pregnancy outcomes are related to blood-stage parasite sequestration and the ensuing inflammatory response in the placenta, which decreases over successive pregnancies. A radiation-attenuated, non-replicating, whole-organism vaccine based on P falciparum sporozoites (PfSPZ Vaccine) has shown efficacy at preventing infection in African adults. Here, we aimed to examine vaccine safety and efficacy of the PfSPZ Vaccine in adults and women who anticipated conception. Two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (phase 1 MLSPZV3 and phase 2 MLSPZV4) were conducted at a clinical research centre in Mali. MLSPZV3 included adults aged 18-35 years and MLSPZV4 included non-pregnant women aged 18-38 years who anticipated conception within a year of enrolment. In MLSPZV3, participants were stratified by village and randomly assigned (2:1) using block randomisation to receive three doses of 9 × 105 PfSPZ Vaccine or saline placebo at weeks 0, 1, and 4 (4-week schedule) or at weeks 0, 8, and 16 (16-week schedule) and a booster dose around 1 year later. In MLSPZV4, women received presumptive artemether-lumefantrine twice per day for 3 days 2 weeks before dose one and were randomly assigned (1:1:1) using block randomisation to receive three doses of 9 × 105 or 1·8 × 106 PfSPZ Vaccine or saline placebo all administered at weeks 0, 1, and 4 (4-week schedule). Participants in both studies received artemether-lumefantrine 2 weeks before dose three and additionally 2 weeks before dose four (booster dose) in MLSPZV3. Investigators and participants were masked to group assignment. The primary outcome, assessed in the as-treated population, was PfSPZ Vaccine safety and tolerability within 7 days after each dose. The secondary outcome, assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population, was vaccine efficacy against P falciparum parasitaemia (defined as the time-to-first positive blood smear) from dose three until the end of transmission season. In exploratory analyses, MLSPZV4 evaluated incidence of maternal obstetric and neonatal outcomes as safety outcomes, and vaccine efficacy against P falciparum parasitaemia during pregnancy (defined as time-to-first positive blood smear post-conception). In MLSPZV4, women were followed at least once a month with human chorionic gonadotropin testing, and those who became pregnant received standard of care (including intermittent presumptive sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine antimalarial drugs after the first trimester) during routine antenatal visits. These studies are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03510481 and NCT03989102. Participants were enrolled for vaccination during the onset of malaria seasons for two sequential studies conducted from 2018 to 2019 for MLSPZV3 and from 2019 to 2021 for MLSPZV4, with follow-up during malaria seasons across 2 years. In MLSPZV3, 478 adults were assessed for eligibility, of whom 220 were enrolled between May 30 and June 12, 2018, and then between Aug 13 and Aug 18, 2018, and 210 received dose one. 66 (96%) of 69 participants who received the 16-week schedule and 68 (97%) of 70 who received the 4-week schedule of the 9 × 105 PfSPZ Vaccine and 70 (99%) of 71 who received saline completed all three doses in year 1. In MLSPZV4, 407 women were assessed for eligibility, of whom 324 were enrolled from July 3 to July 27, 2019, and 320 received dose one of presumptive artemether-lumefantrine. 300 women were randomly assigned with 100 per group (PfSPZ Vaccine 9 × 105, 1·8 × 106, or saline) receiving dose one. First trimester miscarriages were the most commonly reported serious adverse event but occurred at a similar rate across study groups (eight [15%] of 54 with 9 × 105 PfSPZ Vaccine, 12 [21%] of 58 with 1·8 × 106 PfSPZ Vaccine, and five [12%] of 43 with saline). One unrelated maternal death occurred 425 days after the last vaccine dose in the 1·8 × 106 PfSPZ Vaccine group due to peritonitis shortly after childbirth. Most related adverse events reported in MLSPZV3 and MLSPZV4 were mild (grade 1) and frequency of adverse events in the PfSPZ Vaccine groups did not differ from that in the saline group. Two unrelated serious adverse events occurred in MLSPZV3 (one participant had appendicitis in the 9 × 105 PfSPZ Vaccine group and the other in the saline group died due to a road traffic accident). In MLSPZV3, the 9 × 105 PfSPZ Vaccine did not show vaccine efficacy against parasitaemia with the 4-week (27% [95% CI -18 to 55] in year 1 and 42% [-5 to 68] in year 2) and 16-week schedules (16% [-34 to 48] in year 1 and -14% [-95 to 33] in year 2); efficacies were similar or worse against clinical malaria compared with saline. In MLSPZV4, the PfSPZ Vaccine showed significant efficacy against parasitaemia at doses 9 × 105 (41% [15 to 59]; p=0·0069 in year 1 and 61% [36 to 77]; p=0·0011 in year 2) and 1·8 × 106 (54% [34 to 69]; p<0·0001 in year 1 and 45% [13 to 65]; p=0·029 in year 2); and against clinical malaria at doses 9 × 105 (47% [20 to 65]; p=0·0045 in year 1 and 56% [22 to 75]; p=0·0081 in year 2) and 1·8 × 106 (48% [22 to 65]; p=0·0013 in year 1 and 40% [2 to 64]; p=0·069 in year 2). Vaccine efficacy against post-conception P falciparum parasitaemia during first pregnancies that arose in the 2-year follow-up was 57% (14 to 78; p=0·017) in the 9 × 105 PfSPZ Vaccine group versus 49% (3 to 73; p=0·042) in the 1·8 × 106 PfSPZ Vaccine group. Among 55 women who became pregnant within 24 weeks after dose three, vaccine efficacy against parasitaemia was 65% (23 to 84; p=0·0088) with the 9 × 105 PfSPZ Vaccine and 86% (64 to 94; p<0·0001) with the 1·8 × 106 PfSPZ Vaccine. When combined in a post-hoc analysis, women in the PfSPZ Vaccine groups had a non-significantly reduced time-to-first pregnancy after dose one compared with those in the saline group (log-rank test p=0·056). Exploratory maternal obstetric and neonatal outcomes did not differ significantly between vaccine groups and saline. PfSPZ Vaccine was safe and well tolerated in adults in Mali. The 9 × 105 and 1·8 × 106 doses of PfSPZ Vaccine administered as per the 4-week schedule, which incorporated presumptive antimalarial treatment before the first vaccine dose, showed significant efficacy against P falciparum parasitaemia and clinical malaria for two malaria transmission seasons in women of childbearing age and against pregnancy malaria. PfSPZ Vaccine without presumptive antimalarial treatment before the first vaccine dose did not show efficacy. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, and Sanaria.

Diawara H ，Healy SA ，Mwakingwe-Omari A ，Issiaka D ，Diallo A ，Traore S ，Soumbounou IH ，Gaoussou S ，Zaidi I ，Mahamar A ，Attaher O ，Fried M ，Wylie BJ ，Mohan R ，Doan V ，Doritchamou JYA ，Dolo A ，Morrison RD ，Wang J ，Hu Z ，Rausch KM ，Zeguime A ，Murshedkar T ，Kc N ，Sim BKL ，Billingsley PF ，Richie TL ，Hoffman SL ，Dicko A ，Duffy PE ，PfSPZ Vaccine Study Team ... -  《-》