Venous Thromboembolism Incidence and Risk Factors in Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Malignancy is a well-known risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE), and the Khorana risk score is effective for screening patients with solid tumors. However, there is a lack of validated screening tools and established risk factors for patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). Current literature reports a 2.5% to 8.5% incidence of VTE in HCT recipients. Anticoagulation is difficult to manage post-transplantation, given prolonged thrombocytopenia and the likelihood of bleeding. By identifying risk factors, a predictive model may be developed to prospectively test prophylaxis strategies in patients at the highest risk of a thromboembolic event (TE). This retrospective single-center study evaluated the cumulative incidence of TE at 6 months following allogeneic or autologous HCT in adult subjects undergoing transplantation between March 2014 and December 2019. The study also aimed to identify risk factors for developing a TE, evaluate the time from HCT to TE, and compare 1-year survival following HCT between patients with a TE and those without a TE. In evaluating the incidence of TE, ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes were used to determine cancer diagnosis, TE events occurring up 180 days after HCT, and comorbidities of interest. Each subject was reviewed for data accuracy by a manual retrospective chart review. Statistical tests including the cumulative incidence method with competing risks, Gray's test, and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze the time to first TE, evaluate risk factors, and assess 1-year survival post-HCT in relation to TEs occurring within 180 days of HCT. Variables examined included age, sex, body mass index, transplant type, hospital length of stay (LOS), history of TE prior to transplantation, active infections, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), veno-occlusive disorder, cytomegalovirus serostatus, and other factors. The study included 636 evaluable patients; the majority were male (57.9%) and white (68.7%) and had undergone autologous HCT (68.4%). Twenty-nine patients (4.6%) experienced a TE within 180 days post-transplantation. TEs were more common in the allogeneic HCT recipients (n = 13/201; 6.5%) compared to the autologous HCT recipients (n = 16/435; 3.7%; P = .122). The cumulative incidence of TE was higher in patients who developed an active infection compared to those who did not (7.6% versus 3.1%; P = .011). Hospital LOS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0 to 1.06; P = .036) and active infection (HR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.1 to 4.95; P = .027) were significantly associated with TE in univariate analysis but were not retained in the final multivariate model. There was no difference in 1-year survival between all patients who experienced a TE and those who did not; however, in the autologous HCT group, 1-year survival rate was significantly lower in patients with a TE compared to those without TE (80.4% versus 95.3%; P = .01) (Figure 3C). None of the examined variables, including a history of TE and GVHD, were associated with TE risk. Although the overall incidence of TE in our study was low, many patients received pharmacologic or mechanical prophylaxis, suggesting that such strategies may be effective in mitigating TE risk. Such factors as infection and hospital LOS may further increase TE risk. Providers should continuously monitor for risk factors and signs and symptoms of TE post-transplantation. It is also imperative to consider chemical prophylaxis if counts are recovered during hospitalization.

Benfield M ，He J ，Arnall J ，Kaizen W ，Jandrisevits E ，Eboli-Lopes K ，Dodd B ，Grunwald MR ，Avalos B ，Copelan E ，Patel JN ... -  《-》

Erratum: Eyestalk Ablation to Increase Ovarian Maturation in Mud Crabs.

《Jove-Journal of Visualized Experiments》

Defining the optimum strategy for identifying adults and children with coeliac disease: systematic review and economic modelling.

Elwenspoek MM ，Thom H ，Sheppard AL ，Keeney E ，O'Donnell R ，Jackson J ，Roadevin C ，Dawson S ，Lane D ，Stubbs J ，Everitt H ，Watson JC ，Hay AD ，Gillett P ，Robins G ，Jones HE ，Mallett S ，Whiting PF ... -  《-》

Epidemiology of Diffuse Alveolar Hemorrhage in Pediatric Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Recipients.

Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH) is a life-threatening pulmonary toxicity that can arise after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Risk factors and outcomes are not well understood owing to a sparsity of cases spread across multiple centers. The objectives of this epidemiologic study were to characterize the incidence, outcomes, transplantation-related risk factors and comorbid critical care diagnoses associated with post-HCT DAH. Retrospective analysis was performed in a multicenter cohort of 6995 patients age ≤21 years who underwent allogeneic HCT between 2008 and 2014 identified through the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research registry and cross-matched with the Virtual Pediatric Systems database to obtain critical care characteristics. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was used to determine risk factors for DAH. Logistic regression models were used to determine critical care diagnoses associated with DAH. Survival outcomes were analyzed using both a landmark approach and Cox regression, with DAH as a time-varying covariate. DAH occurred in 81 patients at a median of 54 days post-HCT (interquartile range, 23 to 160 days), with a 1-year post-transplantation cumulative incidence probability of 1.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], .81% to 1.3%) and was noted in 7.6% of all pediatric intensive care unit patients. Risk factors included receipt of transplantation for nonmalignant hematologic disease (reference: malignant hematologic disease; hazard ratio [HR], 1.98; 95% CI, 1.22 to 3.22; P = .006), use of a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis (referent: CNI plus methotrexate; HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.07 to 3.34; P = .029), and grade III-IV acute GVHD (HR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.53-4.66; P < .001). Critical care admitted patients with DAH had significantly higher rates of systemic hypertension, pulmonary hypertension, pericardial disease, renal failure, and bacterial/viral/fungal infections (P < .05) than those without DAH. From the time of DAH, median survival was 2.2 months, and 1-year overall survival was 26% (95% CI, 17% to 36%). Among all HCT recipients, the development of DAH when considered was associated with a 7-fold increase in unadjusted all-cause post-HCT mortality (HR, 6.96; 95% CI, 5.42 to 8.94; P < .001). In a landmark analysis of patients alive at 2 months post-HCT, patients who developed DAH had a 1-year overall survival of 33% (95% CI, 18% to 49%), compared to 82% (95% CI, 81% to 83%) for patients without DAH (P < .001). Although DAH is rare, it is associated with high mortality in the post-HCT setting. Our data suggest that clinicians should have a heightened index of suspicion of DAH in patients with pulmonary symptoms in the context of nonmalignant hematologic indication for HCT, use of CNI + MMF as GVHD prophylaxis, and severe acute GVHD. Further investigations and validation of modifiable risk factors are warranted given poor outcomes.

Cheng G ，Smith MA ，Phelan R ，Brazauskas R ，Strom J ，Ahn KW ，Hamilton B ，Peterson A ，Savani B ，Schoemans H ，Schoettler M ，Sorror M ，Higham C ，Kharbanda S ，Dvorak CC ，Zinter MS ... -  《-》

Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.

Ovarian cancer is the seventh most common cancer among women and a leading cause of death from gynaecological malignancies. Epithelial ovarian cancer is the most common type, accounting for around 90% of all ovarian cancers. This specific type of ovarian cancer starts in the surface layer covering the ovary or lining of the fallopian tube. Surgery is performed either before chemotherapy (upfront or primary debulking surgery (PDS)) or in the middle of a course of treatment with chemotherapy (neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval debulking surgery (IDS)), with the aim of removing all visible tumour and achieving no macroscopic residual disease (NMRD). The aim of this review is to investigate the prognostic impact of size of residual disease nodules (RD) in women who received upfront or interval cytoreductive surgery for advanced (stage III and IV) epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). To assess the prognostic impact of residual disease after primary surgery on survival outcomes for advanced (stage III and IV) epithelial ovarian cancer. In separate analyses, primary surgery included both upfront primary debulking surgery (PDS) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS). Each residual disease threshold is considered as a separate prognostic factor. We searched CENTRAL (2021, Issue 8), MEDLINE via Ovid (to 30 August 2021) and Embase via Ovid (to 30 August 2021). We included survival data from studies of at least 100 women with advanced EOC after primary surgery. Residual disease was assessed as a prognostic factor in multivariate prognostic models. We excluded studies that reported fewer than 100 women, women with concurrent malignancies or studies that only reported unadjusted results. Women were included into two distinct groups: those who received PDS followed by platinum-based chemotherapy and those who received IDS, analysed separately. We included studies that reported all RD thresholds after surgery, but the main thresholds of interest were microscopic RD (labelled NMRD), RD 0.1 cm to 1 cm (small-volume residual disease (SVRD)) and RD > 1 cm (large-volume residual disease (LVRD)). Two review authors independently abstracted data and assessed risk of bias. Where possible, we synthesised the data in meta-analysis. To assess the adequacy of adjustment factors used in multivariate Cox models, we used the 'adjustment for other prognostic factors' and 'statistical analysis and reporting' domains of the quality in prognosis studies (QUIPS) tool. We also made judgements about the certainty of the evidence for each outcome in the main comparisons, using GRADE. We examined differences between FIGO stages III and IV for different thresholds of RD after primary surgery. We considered factors such as age, grade, length of follow-up, type and experience of surgeon, and type of surgery in the interpretation of any heterogeneity. We also performed sensitivity analyses that distinguished between studies that included NMRD in RD categories of < 1 cm and those that did not. This was applicable to comparisons involving RD < 1 cm with the exception of RD < 1 cm versus NMRD. We evaluated women undergoing PDS and IDS in separate analyses. We found 46 studies reporting multivariate prognostic analyses, including RD as a prognostic factor, which met our inclusion criteria: 22,376 women who underwent PDS and 3697 who underwent IDS, all with varying levels of RD. While we identified a range of different RD thresholds, we mainly report on comparisons that are the focus of a key area of clinical uncertainty (involving NMRD, SVRD and LVRD). The comparison involving any visible disease (RD > 0 cm) and NMRD was also important. SVRD versus NMRD in a PDS setting In PDS studies, most showed an increased risk of death in all RD groups when those with macroscopic RD (MRD) were compared to NMRD. Women who had SVRD after PDS had more than twice the risk of death compared to women with NMRD (hazard ratio (HR) 2.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.80 to 2.29; I2 = 50%; 17 studies; 9404 participants; moderate-certainty). The analysis of progression-free survival found that women who had SVRD after PDS had nearly twice the risk of death compared to women with NMRD (HR 1.88, 95% CI 1.63 to 2.16; I2 = 63%; 10 studies; 6596 participants; moderate-certainty). LVRD versus SVRD in a PDS setting When we compared LVRD versus SVRD following surgery, the estimates were attenuated compared to NMRD comparisons. All analyses showed an overall survival benefit in women who had RD < 1 cm after surgery (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.32; I2 = 0%; 5 studies; 6000 participants; moderate-certainty). The results were robust to analyses of progression-free survival. SVRD and LVRD versus NMRD in an IDS setting The one study that defined the categories as NMRD, SVRD and LVRD showed that women who had SVRD and LVRD after IDS had more than twice the risk of death compared to women who had NMRD (HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.20 to 3.66; 310 participants; I2 = 56%, and HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.49 to 3.34; 343 participants; I2 = 35%; very low-certainty, for SVRD versus NMRD and LVRD versus NMRD, respectively). LVRD versus SVRD + NMRD in an IDS setting Meta-analysis found that women who had LVRD had a greater risk of death and disease progression compared to women who had either SVRD or NMRD (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.11; 6 studies; 1572 participants; I2 = 58% for overall survival and HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.52; 1145 participants; I2 = 60% for progression-free survival; very low-certainty). However, this result is biased as in all but one study it was not possible to distinguish NMRD within the < 1 cm thresholds. Only one study separated NMRD from SVRD; all others included NMRD in the SVRD group, which may create bias when comparing with LVRD, making interpretation challenging. MRD versus NMRD in an IDS setting Women who had any amount of MRD after IDS had more than twice the risk of death compared to women with NMRD (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.35 to 3.29, I2 = 81%; 906 participants; very low-certainty). In a PDS setting, there is moderate-certainty evidence that the amount of RD after primary surgery is a prognostic factor for overall and progression-free survival in women with advanced ovarian cancer. We separated our analysis into three distinct categories for the survival outcome including NMRD, SVRD and LVRD. After IDS, there may be only two categories required, although this is based on very low-certainty evidence, as all but one study included NMRD in the SVRD category. The one study that separated NMRD from SVRD showed no improved survival outcome in the SVRD category, compared to LVRD. Further low-certainty evidence also supported restricting to two categories, where women who had any amount of MRD after IDS had a significantly greater risk of death compared to women with NMRD. Therefore, the evidence presented in this review cannot conclude that using three categories applies in an IDS setting (very low-certainty evidence), as was supported for PDS (which has convincing moderate-certainty evidence).

Bryant A ，Hiu S ，Kunonga PT ，Gajjar K ，Craig D ，Vale L ，Winter-Roach BA ，Elattar A ，Naik R ... -  《Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews》