Valemetostat monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a first-in-human, multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 1 study.

Few treatment options exist for patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and outcomes remain poor for relapsed or refractory disease. We evaluated the safety and preliminary clinical activity of valemetostat, a novel inhibitor of EZH2 and EZH1, in patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphomas. This first-in-human, multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 1, dose-escalation and dose-expansion trial was done in 19 hospitals across Japan and the USA. Patients were included if they were aged 18 years or older in the USA or 20 years or older in Japan with a primary diagnosis of relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. In the dose-escalation part, patients received oral valemetostat at doses of 150 mg per day, 200 mg per day, 250 mg per day, and 300 mg per day continuously in 28-day cycles until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicities. All patients received 200 mg per day in the dose-expansion part. The primary endpoints were safety, pharmacokinetics, and the recommended phase 2 dose; the secondary endpoints were the maximum tolerated dose and the antitumour activity of valemetostat. Responses were assessed in patients who received at least one dose, with measurable lesions at baseline according to the International Working Group 2007 revised criteria for malignant lymphoma (peripheral T-cell lymphoma and B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma) and the modified 2009 criteria for adult T-cell leukaemia/lymphoma. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02732275, and is currently active, but not recruiting. Between April 7, 2016, and June 10, 2021, 90 patients (53 [59%] males and 37 [41%] females; 49 [54%] Asian, 33 [37%] White, and eight [9%] Black) were enrolled and treated with valemetostat and included in the safety analysis set. 57 (63%) patients had peripheral T-cell lymphoma, 14 (16%) had adult T-cell leukaemia/lymphoma, and 19 (21%) had B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Seven (8%) patients received valemetostat 150 mg per day, 74 (82%) received 200 mg per day, seven received 250 mg per day, and two received 300 mg per day. Median follow-up was 7·4 months (IQR 3·4-17·6). All patients had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event; the most common treatment-emergent adverse events of any grade were decreased platelet count (52 [58%] of 90 patients), dysgeusia (45 [50%]), and anaemia (38 [42%]). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were decreased neutrophil count (21 [23%]), decreased platelet count (18 [20%]), and decreased lymphocyte count (17 [19%]). The most common serious adverse event of any grade was Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (four [4%]). No treatment-related deaths occurred. The overall response rate was 54·5% (48 of 88; 95% CI 43·6-65·2) for patients in the efficacy analysis set. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached; the recommended phase 2 dose of 200 mg per day was determined. Valemetostat exposure was variable between patients and was overlapped over the dose range of 150-250 mg per day. The safety profile of valemetostat monotherapy was acceptable in these patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Favourable clinical activity was observed. These findings support a new indication for valemetostat in this setting. Daiichi Sankyo.

Maruyama D ，Jacobsen E ，Porcu P ，Allen P ，Ishitsuka K ，Kusumoto S ，Narita T ，Tobinai K ，Foss F ，Tsukasaki K ，Feldman T ，Imaizumi Y ，Izutsu K ，Morishima S ，Yamauchi N ，Yuda J ，Brammer JE ，Kawamata T ，Ruan J ，Nosaka K ，Utsunomiya A ，Wang J ，Zain J ，Kakurai Y ，Yamauchi H ，Hizukuri Y ，Biserna N ，Tachibana M ，Inoue A ，Horwitz SM ... -  《-》

Valemetostat for patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma (VALENTINE-PTCL01): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study.

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas are aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas with few treatment options for relapsed or refractory disease. Valemetostat tosylate (valemetostat) is a potent, novel, dual inhibitor of EZH2 and EZH1. We investigated the clinical activity and safety of valemetostat in patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma, and its safety in patients with relapsed or refractory adult T-cell leukaemia/lymphoma. VALENTINE-PTCL01 was a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial performed at 47 hospitals in 12 countries across Asia, Europe, North America, and Oceania. Patients with either peripheral T-cell lymphoma or adult T-cell leukaemia/lymphoma, aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 received oral valemetostat at 200 mg per day in continuous 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint for patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma was the CT-based objective response rate by blinded independent central review (BICR) using 2014 Lugano response criteria. Patients who received valemetostat and had a confirmed eligible peripheral T-cell lymphoma subtype on central review were included in the efficacy analysis. The primary endpoint for patients with adult T-cell leukaemia/lymphoma was the safety and tolerability of valemetostat. Safety in both cohorts was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of valemetostat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04703192, and EudraCT, 2020-004954-31, and is closed to enrolment. Between June 16, 2021, and Aug 10, 2022, 133 patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma (median age 69·0 years [IQR 58·0-74·0]; 91 [68%] were male, and 42 [32%] were female) and 22 patients with adult T-cell leukaemia/lymphoma (66·5 years [54·0-73·0]; 15 [68%] were male, and seven [32%] were female) were enrolled. The median follow-up time was 12·3 months (95% CI 11·8-13·8). 52 (44%; 95% CI 35-53) of 119 efficacy-evaluable patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma had an objective response. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (31 [23%] of 133 patients in the peripheral T-cell lymphoma group and 11 [50%] of 22 patients in the adult T-cell leukaemia/lymphoma group), anaemia (25 [19%] and ten [46%]), and neutropenia (23 [17%] and four [18%]). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 53 (40%) patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma and 15 (68%) patients with adult T-cell leukaemia/lymphoma; nine (7%) patients and one (5%) patient had a serious treatment-emergent adverse event considered to be treatment related, respectively. No treatment-related deaths were reported. These data show that treatment with valemetostat leads to durable responses in patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma, with a manageable safety profile. Daiichi Sankyo.

Zinzani PL ，Izutsu K ，Mehta-Shah N ，Barta SK ，Ishitsuka K ，Córdoba R ，Kusumoto S ，Bachy E ，Cwynarski K ，Gritti G ，Prica A ，Jacobsen E ，Feldman T ，Guillermin Y ，Ennishi D ，Yoon DH ，Domenech ED ，Zain J ，Wang J ，Kim JS ，Poel MV ，Jin J ，Wu S ，Chen Y ，Moriyama T ，Inoue A ，Nakajima K ，Horwitz SM ... -  《-》

Safety and activity of CTX130, a CD70-targeted allogeneic CRISPR-Cas9-engineered CAR T-cell therapy, in patients with relapsed or refractory T-cell malignancies (COBALT-LYM): a single-arm, open-label, phase 1, dose-escalation study.

Effective treatment options are scarce for relapsed or refractory T-cell lymphoma. This study assesses the safety and activity of CTX130 (volamcabtagene durzigedleucel), a CD70-directed, allogeneic chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) immunotherapy manufactured from healthy donor T cells, in patients with relapsed or refractory T-cell lymphoma. This single-arm, open-label, phase 1 study was done at ten medical centres across the USA, Australia, and Canada in patients (aged ≥18 years) with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma or cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, who had received at least one or at least two previous systemic therapy lines, respectively, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1. Patients underwent lymphodepletion with fludarabine 30 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 (intravenously daily for 3 days), followed by intravenous CTX130 infusion at dose levels ranging from 3 × 107 CAR+ T cells (dose level 1) to 9 × 108 CAR+ T cells (dose level 4). The primary endpoint was the incidence of adverse events, defined as dose-limiting toxicities occurring within 28 days post-infusion. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate. Safety and activity analyses were performed on data from all patients who received CTX130. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04502446) and EudraCT (2019-004526-25) and is closed to enrolment. Between Aug 28, 2020, and May 30, 2023, 41 patients were enrolled and 39 (95%) received CTX130. The median patient follow-up was 7·4 months (IQR 3·1-12·2). 21 (54%) of 39 patients were female and 18 (46%) were male. 24 (62%) patients were White, eight (21%) were Black, three (8%) were Asian, three (8%) were from other racial or ethnic groups, and one (3%) was not reported. The median number of previous lines of anticancer therapy was 2·5 (IQR 1·3-4·0) for patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma and 5·0 (IQR 5·0-7·0) for patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Cytokine release syndrome was the most common adverse event, occurring in 26 (67%) of 39 patients (23 were grade 1-2, two were grade 3, and one was a grade 4 dose-limiting toxicity at dose level 4). Grade 1-2 neurotoxic events were observed in four (10%) of 39 patients. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (14 [36%]), anaemia (11 [28%]), and thrombocytopenia (six [15%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 25 (64%) patients, with CTX130-related serious adverse events in 14 (36%) patients, the most common related serious adverse event being cytokine release syndrome in 11 (28%) patients. 21 patients died, 16 from progressive disease and five from adverse events considered unrelated to CTX130 treatment. 18 of 39 patients (46·2% [95% CI 30·1-62·8) had an objective response. Of those treated at dose level 3 and higher, 16 of 31 patients (51·6% [33·1-69·8]) had objective responses, including six (19·4% [7·5-37·5]) with complete response and ten (32·3% [16·7-51·4]) with a partial response. In patients with heavily pretreated T-cell lymphoma, CTX130 showed manageable safety and a promising objective response rate. This study shows that allogeneic, readily available CAR T cells can be safely given to patients with relapsed or refractory T-cell lymphoma. A next-generation CAR T-cell therapy containing additional potency gene edits (CTX131) is in clinical development. CRISPR Therapeutics.

Iyer SP ，Sica RA ，Ho PJ ，Prica A ，Zain J ，Foss FM ，Hu B ，Beitinjaneh A ，Weng WK ，Kim YH ，Khodadoust MS ，Huen AO ，Williams LM ，Ma A ，Huang E ，Ganpule A ，Nagar SD ，Sripakdeevong P ，Cullingford EL ，Karnik S ，Dequeant ML ，Patel JN ，He XS ，Li Z ，He QA ，Mendonez JH ，Keegan A ，Horwitz SM ... -  《-》

Safety and activity of lenalidomide in combination with obinutuzumab in patients with relapsed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a single group, open-label, phase 1/2 trial.

Gurumurthi A ，Chin CK ，Feng L ，Fowler NH ，Strati P ，Hagemeister FB ，Fayad LE ，Westin JR ，Obi C ，Arafat J ，Nair R ，Steiner RE ，Neelapu SS ，Flowers CR ，Nastoupil LJ ... -  《EClinicalMedicine》

Primary lung tumour stereotactic body radiotherapy followed by concurrent mediastinal chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant immunotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial.

Patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who undergo concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy often experience synergistic toxicity, and local regional control rates remain poor. We assessed the activity and safety outcomes of primary tumour stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) followed by conventional chemoradiotherapy to the lymph nodes and consolidation immunotherapy in patients with unresectable locally advanced NSCLC. In this multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial, patients aged 18 years and older were enrolled at eight regional cancer centres in North Carolina and South Carolina, USA. Patients were eligible if they had stage II-III, unresectable, locally advanced NSCLC (any histology), with peripheral or central primary tumours that were 7 cm or smaller, excluding central tumours within 2 cm of involved nodal disease, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2. Patients who had previously received systemic therapy or radiotherapy were excluded. Participants received SBRT to the primary tumour (50-54 Gy in three to five fractions) followed by standard radiotherapy (planned up to 60 Gy in 30 2 Gy fractions) to the involved lymph nodes with concurrent platinum doublet chemotherapy (either paclitaxel 50 mg/m2 intravenously plus carboplatin area under the curve 2 mg/mL per min every 7 days for a total of six 1-week cycles or etoposide 50 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1-5 and days 29-33 plus cisplatin 50 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 8, 29, and 36 for two cycles of 4 weeks). An amendment to the protocol (Dec 11, 2017) permitted the administration of consolidation durvalumab at the discretion of the treating investigator. An additional protocol amendment on Jan 13, 2021, directed patients without disease progression after chemoradiotherapy to receive consolidation durvalumab (10 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 and day 15 of a 4-week cycle for up to 12 cycles or 1500 mg intravenously on day 1 of a 4-week cycle for up to 12 cycles). The primary endpoint was 1-year progression-free survival (per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1), assessed in all participants who received at least one fraction of SBRT and had radiological follow-up data up to 1 year. A 1-year progression-free survival rate of greater than 60% was required to reject the null hypothesis and show significant improvement in 1-year progression-free survival. One-sided exact binomial tests were used to compare the primary endpoint versus the historical control 1-year progression-free survival rate used to determine the sample size. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one fraction of SBRT. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03141359, and is closed to accrual. Between May 11, 2017, and June 27, 2022, 61 patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of fractionated SBRT, of whom 59 were evaluable for the primary endpoint. Median age was 67 years (IQR 61-72), 28 (46%) of 61 were female, 33 (54%) were male, 51 (84%) were White, seven (11%) were Black, and three (5%) were of other or unknown race. Of the 61 patients enrolled, 47 received at least one dose of consolidation durvalumab. As of data cutoff (July 12, 2023), median follow-up was 29·5 months (IQR 14·9-47·1). 1-year progression-free survival was 62·7% (90% CI 51·2-73·2; one-sided p=0·39, compared with the historical control rate), with 37 of 59 evaluable participants progression free and alive 1 year after enrolment (n=14 progressed, n=8 died). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were decreased neutrophil count (nine [15%] of 61 patients), decreased white blood cell count (five [8%]), and anaemia (four [7%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 11 (18%) of 61 patients, which included lung infection (three [5%]), pneumonitis (two [3%]), decreased neutrophil count (two [3%]), febrile neutropenia (two [3%]), and dyspnoea, hypoxia, respiratory failure, sinus tachycardia, bronchial infection, and acute kidney injury (each in one [2%] patient). Treatment-related deaths occurred in four (7%) of 61 patients (one each of respiratory failure, respiratory failure and dyspnoea, lung infection, and pneumonitis). Although this study did not meet the primary endpoint, activity and safety profiles of primary lung tumour SBRT followed by concurrent mediastinal chemoradiotherapy were favourable compared with other modern trials treating locally advanced NSCLC with chemoradiotherapy. These findings serve as the basis for the ongoing randomised phase 3 study NRG Oncology LU008 (NCT05624996). AstraZeneca and Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute.

Heinzerling JH ，Mileham KF ，Robinson MM ，Symanowski JT ，Induru RR ，Brouse GM ，Corso CD ，Prabhu RS ，Haggstrom DE ，Moeller BJ ，Bobo WE ，Fasola CE ，Thakkar VV ，Pal SE ，Gregory JM ，Norek SL ，Begic XJ ，Kesarwala AH ，Burri SH ，Simone CB 2nd ... -  《-》