The efficacy of oxaliplatin, surufatinib, and camrelizumab on neuroendocrine carcinoma: a case report and literature review.
Extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas (EP-NECs) are rare, accounting for ~1/100,000 of NECs, aggressive neoplasms and poor prognosis. Sometimes, a non-neuroendocrine component is also accompanying these EP-NECs. Curative surgery is suggested for early stage patients while system chemotherapy and locoregional radiotherapy are considered for advanced inoperable disease. Nonetheless, there was lack of standard second-line treatment strategy. Herein, we report a case of NEC involving a large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder treated with a surufatinib-containing regimen in the second-line treatment setting and establish the efficacy of this regimen in the treatment of EP-NECs.
A 58-year-old male presented with symptoms such as distension in the upper right abdomen and a palpable mass. The abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan showed a giant soft tissue mass in the left lobe of the liver, and liver biopsy suggested LCNEC with a non-neuroendocrine (NNE) component. Based on the available literature, a first-line therapy of oxaliplatin + gemcitabine + camrelizumab + apatinib was started initially; however, there was rapid tumor progression. Thus, a second line of treatment was started, where apatinib was replaced with surufatinib, which was given along with oxaliplatin and camrelizumab and continued for seven complete cycles. The patient was re-examined with MRI, which showed a significant decrease in tumor size. And a partial response was achieved. Main adverse events included hand and foot numbness, hypertension, proteinuria, hematuria, and hyperthyroidism. The patient underwent surgery after the second line of treatment and the post-operative pathology report revealed the presence of LCNEC and adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder. Two months later, re-examination result showed no tumor recurrence.
As yet, the criteria strategy for unresectable EP-NECs to improve survival outcomes is scarce. EP-NECs are badly in need of effective second-line therapy to carry out survival benefits after resistance to first-line regimen. The case report demonstrated that a surufatinib-containing regimen including oxaliplatin and camrelizumab could be an effective treatment strategy for the second-line treatment of EP-NECs. Furthermore, this strategy is well tolerated and treatment-related toxicity are manageable. More clinical trials are warranted to further confirm the efficacy.
Wang X
,Hu S
,Su F
,Lin J
,Duan J
,Tan H
,Tan H
... -
《-》
Assessing the effectiveness and safety of surufatinib versus everolimus or sunitinib in advanced neuroendocrine neoplasms: insights from a real-world, retrospective cohort study using propensity score and inverse probability treatment weighting analysis.
While surufatinib, sunitinib, and everolimus have shown efficacy for advanced neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), direct comparisons in a real-world setting remain unexplored. This gap highlights the clinical need to understand their comparative effectiveness and safety within the diverse Chinese population. Addressing this, our study provides insights into the real-world performance of these therapies, aiming to inform treatment selection and improve patient outcomes.
A retrospective, observational study was conducted at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, including patients with advanced NENs treated with surufatinib, sunitinib, or everolimus between July 2020 and April 2023. Eligibility criteria focused on histologically confirmed, locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic NENs, with patients having received at least one month of targeted therapy. We employed inverse probability weighting (IPW) with the propensity score (PS) matching to adjust for the bias of baseline characteristics. The assessment of covariates included age, sex, performance status, primary tumor site, functional status, genetic mutations, tumor differentiation, Ki67 index, tumor grade, metastasis site, and previous therapies. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs).
The study enrolled 123, 56, and 68 locally advanced or metastatic NEN patients treated with surufatinib, sunitinib, and everolimus, respectively. Before adjusting for confounding factors, surufatinib was used less frequently as a first-line treatment compared to sunitinib and everolimus in pancreatic NENs (pNENs) (11.1% vs. 22.1%, P=0.057). Significant differences were noted in prior treatments and tumor characteristics between surufatinib and everolimus groups in extrapancreatic NENs (epNENs) (P<0.05). Post-IPW, these disparities were resolved (P>0.05). Surufatinib demonstrated superior median PFS (mPFS) in both pancreatic [8.30 vs. 6.33 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.592, P<0.001] and epNENs (8.73 vs. 3.70 months, HR 0.608, P<0.001) compared to everolimus or sunitinib. Notably, male gender (HR 1.75, P=0.001), functional status (HR 2.09, P=0.01), Ki67 index >20% (HR 12.7, P=0.004), previous somatostatin analogue (SSA) treatment (HR 1.73, P=0.001), germline mutation (HR 5.62, P<0.001), poor differentiation (HR 7.45, P<0.001), liver metastasis (HR 1.72, P=0.001) and multiple treatment lines (HR 1.62 for 2nd line, P=0.04; HR 1.88 for ≥3rd line, P=0.01) were identified as negative prognostic factors for PFS. Conversely, dose adjustment (HR 0.63, P=0.009) and treatment with surufatinib (HR 0.58 for pNEN, P<0.001; HR 0.62 for epNEN, P=0.002) were correlated with longer PFS.
In a real-world Chinese cohort, surufatinib significantly outperformed sunitinib and everolimus in prolonging PFS among advanced NEN patients, with identifiable clinical features impacting survival, and conclusions regarding superiority should be interpreted with caution due to the retrospective design. Our findings underscore the need for prospective studies to further validate these results and explore additional predictive biomarkers for personalized treatment strategies.
Zhu L
,Ye X
,She Y
,Liu W
,Hasegawa K
,Rossi RE
,Du Q
,Zhai Q
... -
《-》