Prognostic Role of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
In oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system is a significant factor that influences prognosis and treatment decisions for OSCC patients. Unfortunately, TNM staging does not consistently predict patient prognosis and patients with identical clinicopathological characteristics may have vastly different survival outcomes. Host immunity plays an important role in tumor progression but is not included in the TNM staging system. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are part of the host immune response that recognizes tumor cells; and the presence of TILs has emerged as potential candidates for prognostic markers for many types of cancers. The present study aims to determine the association of T cell-specific markers (CD3, CD4, CD8, and FOXP3) with clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes in OSCC patients. The prognostic value of CD3, CD4, and CD8 will also be evaluated based on tumor stage.
Tissue microarrays were constructed containing 231 OSCC cases and analyzed by immunohistochemical staining for the expression of CD3, CD4, CD8, and FOXP3. The expression scores for each marker were correlated with clinicopathological parameters and survival outcomes. The prognostic impact of CD3, CD4 and CD8 were further analyzed based on tumor stage (early or advanced).
CD3, CD4, and CD8 were found to be significantly associated with both overall survival and progression-free survival using univariate analysis. However, none of these markers were found to independently predict the survival outcomes of OSCC using multivariate analysis. Only conventional factors such as nodal status, tumor differentiation and perineural invasion (PNI) were independent predictors of survival outcomes, with nodal status being the strongest independent predictor. Additionally, low CD4 (but not CD3 or CD8) expression was found to identify early-stage OSCC patients with exceptionally poor prognosis which was similar to that of advanced staged OSCC patients.
TIL markers such as CD3, CD4, CD8, and FOXP3 can predict the survival outcomes of OSCC patients, but do not serve as independent prognostic markers as found with conventional factors (i.e. nodal status, tumor differentiation and PNI). CD4 expression may assist with risk stratification in early-stage OSCC patients which may influence treatment planning and decision making for early-stage OSCC patients.
Wongpattaraworakul W
，Choi A
，Buchakjian MR
，Lanzel EA
，Kd AR
，Simons AL
... -
《BMC CANCER》
Does the Presence of Missing Data Affect the Performance of the SORG Machine-learning Algorithm for Patients With Spinal Metastasis? Development of an Internet Application Algorithm.
The Skeletal Oncology Research Group machine-learning algorithm (SORG-MLA) was developed to predict the survival of patients with spinal metastasis. The algorithm was successfully tested in five international institutions using 1101 patients from different continents. The incorporation of 18 prognostic factors strengthens its predictive ability but limits its clinical utility because some prognostic factors might not be clinically available when a clinician wishes to make a prediction.
We performed this study to (1) evaluate the SORG-MLA's performance with data and (2) develop an internet-based application to impute the missing data.
A total of 2768 patients were included in this study. The data of 617 patients who were treated surgically were intentionally erased, and the data of the other 2151 patients who were treated with radiotherapy and medical treatment were used to impute the artificially missing data. Compared with those who were treated nonsurgically, patients undergoing surgery were younger (median 59 years [IQR 51 to 67 years] versus median 62 years [IQR 53 to 71 years]) and had a higher proportion of patients with at least three spinal metastatic levels (77% [474 of 617] versus 72% [1547 of 2151]), more neurologic deficit (normal American Spinal Injury Association [E] 68% [301 of 443] versus 79% [1227 of 1561]), higher BMI (23 kg/m 2 [IQR 20 to 25 kg/m 2 ] versus 22 kg/m 2 [IQR 20 to 25 kg/m 2 ]), higher platelet count (240 × 10 3 /µL [IQR 173 to 327 × 10 3 /µL] versus 227 × 10 3 /µL [IQR 165 to 302 × 10 3 /µL], higher lymphocyte count (15 × 10 3 /µL [IQR 9 to 21× 10 3 /µL] versus 14 × 10 3 /µL [IQR 8 to 21 × 10 3 /µL]), lower serum creatinine level (0.7 mg/dL [IQR 0.6 to 0.9 mg/dL] versus 0.8 mg/dL [IQR 0.6 to 1.0 mg/dL]), less previous systemic therapy (19% [115 of 617] versus 24% [526 of 2151]), fewer Charlson comorbidities other than cancer (28% [170 of 617] versus 36% [770 of 2151]), and longer median survival. The two patient groups did not differ in other regards. These findings aligned with our institutional philosophy of selecting patients for surgical intervention based on their level of favorable prognostic factors such as BMI or lymphocyte counts and lower levels of unfavorable prognostic factors such as white blood cell counts or serum creatinine level, as well as the degree of spinal instability and severity of neurologic deficits. This approach aims to identify patients with better survival outcomes and prioritize their surgical intervention accordingly. Seven factors (serum albumin and alkaline phosphatase levels, international normalized ratio, lymphocyte and neutrophil counts, and the presence of visceral or brain metastases) were considered possible missing items based on five previous validation studies and clinical experience. Artificially missing data were imputed using the missForest imputation technique, which was previously applied and successfully tested to fit the SORG-MLA in validation studies. Discrimination, calibration, overall performance, and decision curve analysis were applied to evaluate the SORG-MLA's performance. The discrimination ability was measured with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. It ranges from 0.5 to 1.0, with 0.5 indicating the worst discrimination and 1.0 indicating perfect discrimination. An area under the curve of 0.7 is considered clinically acceptable discrimination. Calibration refers to the agreement between the predicted outcomes and actual outcomes. An ideal calibration model will yield predicted survival rates that are congruent with the observed survival rates. The Brier score measures the squared difference between the actual outcome and predicted probability, which captures calibration and discrimination ability simultaneously. A Brier score of 0 indicates perfect prediction, whereas a Brier score of 1 indicates the poorest prediction. A decision curve analysis was performed for the 6-week, 90-day, and 1-year prediction models to evaluate their net benefit across different threshold probabilities. Using the results from our analysis, we developed an internet-based application that facilitates real-time data imputation for clinical decision-making at the point of care. This tool allows healthcare professionals to efficiently and effectively address missing data, ensuring that patient care remains optimal at all times.
Generally, the SORG-MLA demonstrated good discriminatory ability, with areas under the curve greater than 0.7 in most cases, and good overall performance, with up to 25% improvement in Brier scores in the presence of one to three missing items. The only exceptions were albumin level and lymphocyte count, because the SORG-MLA's performance was reduced when these two items were missing, indicating that the SORG-MLA might be unreliable without these values. The model tended to underestimate the patient survival rate. As the number of missing items increased, the model's discriminatory ability was progressively impaired, and a marked underestimation of patient survival rates was observed. Specifically, when three items were missing, the number of actual survivors was up to 1.3 times greater than the number of expected survivors, while only 10% discrepancy was observed when only one item was missing. When either two or three items were omitted, the decision curves exhibited substantial overlap, indicating a lack of consistent disparities in performance. This finding suggests that the SORG-MLA consistently generates accurate predictions, regardless of the two or three items that are omitted. We developed an internet application ( https://sorg-spine-mets-missing-data-imputation.azurewebsites.net/ ) that allows the use of SORG-MLA with up to three missing items.
The SORG-MLA generally performed well in the presence of one to three missing items, except for serum albumin level and lymphocyte count (which are essential for adequate predictions, even using our modified version of the SORG-MLA). We recommend that future studies should develop prediction models that allow for their use when there are missing data, or provide a means to impute those missing data, because some data are not available at the time a clinical decision must be made.
The results suggested the algorithm could be helpful when a radiologic evaluation owing to a lengthy waiting period cannot be performed in time, especially in situations when an early operation could be beneficial. It could help orthopaedic surgeons to decide whether to intervene palliatively or extensively, even when the surgical indication is clear.
Huang CC
，Peng KP
，Hsieh HC
，Groot OQ
，Yen HK
，Tsai CC
，Karhade AV
，Lin YP
，Kao YT
，Yang JJ
，Dai SH
，Huang CC
，Chen CW
，Yen MH
，Xiao FR
，Lin WH
，Verlaan JJ
，Schwab JH
，Hsu FM
，Wong T
，Yang RS
，Yang SH
，Hu MH
... -
《-》
Challenges in the Assessment of Medullary Bone Invasion in Oral Cavity Cancers and Its Prognostic Significance.
As per AJCC 8th edition TNM staging system, bone invasion is a poor prognostic marker that upstages oral cavity squamous carcinoma (OSCC) to pT4a. Cortical erosion alone of bone or tooth socket by a gingival primary is not sufficient to upstage a tumour. The differentiation of cortical erosion from invasion through the cortical bone into the medulla is often challenging, limiting accurate staging. This review aims to assess the difficulties in differentiating cortical erosion from medullary invasion and evaluate the prognostic significance of different patterns of bone involvement.
A retrospective review of OSCC with primary curative surgery and bone resection treated at a single-center over 10 years, was performed to assess the prognostic significance of bone invasion. Hematoxylin-eosin stained slides of a subset of cases were re-reviewed in a planned manner to assess difficulties in precise categorization (no invasion/erosion/cortical invasion and medullary invasion), evaluate interobserver agreement, and correlate with clinical outcome.
Five hundred and ninety patients were included, with a median follow-up of 28 months. On univariate analysis, the 3-year local, nodal and distant metastasis control were not significantly different in the 3 groups of no invasion, erosion, and invasion (p = 0.43, 0.47, and 0.47, respectively). Overall survival (OS) at 3 years was 78.1% and disease-free-survival(DFS) was 63.7% in the entire cohort. On univariate analysis, there was significant difference in OS and DFS based on these groups. This did not translate into independent prognostic benefit on multivariable analysis (p = 0.75 and 0.19, respectively). The independent prognostic factors were margin positivity, tumor differentiation, perineural invasion and pathological nodal involvement. Planned re-review of a subset of 202 cases resulted in a change in bone involvement category in 26/202 cases, which was mainly due to difficulty in assessing cortico-medullary junction near the tooth socket and bone fragmentation. The assessment showed moderate to near complete agreement (kappa 0.59-0.82) between 2 observers.
Our study shows that bone involvement is not an independent prognostic marker and there is no specific correlation of medullary invasion with outcome over those that showed cortical erosion. Several factors contribute to difficulties and interobserver variability in assessing bone involvement.
Venkatesh B
，Roy P
，Bardia A
，Mallick I
，Chatterjee S
，Arun P
，Gehani A
... -
《-》
ResearchGate
(全网免费下载)
钛学术
(全网免费下载)
