A simple modified technique for screw fixation of displaced intra-articular calcaneus fracture through a sinus tarsi approach: a comparison with plate fixation.

Bahaeddini MR ，Konjkav AR ，Aminian A ，Tabrizian P ，Gravand SN ，Amiri S ，Mirjalily MS ，Tayyebi H ，Mazhar FN ... -  《BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS》

Comparing less invasive plate fixation versus screw fixation of displaced intra-articular calcaneus fracture via sinus tarsi approach.

The purpose of this study was to compare the post-operative radiographic and clinical outcomes of less invasive plate fixation versus screw fixation of displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures (DIACFs) via sinus tarsi approach. A total of 165 consecutive DIACFs that underwent open reduction internal fixation via sinus tarsi approach from 2013 to 2018 were reviewed at least a two year follow-up. The methods of fixation were divided into two groups: less invasive plate fixation versus screw fixation of calcaneus fracture (59 vs 106, respectively). The radiographic outcomes including pre- and post-operative Bohler's and Gissane's angles were evaluated. The post-operative function was evaluated using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score, the Olerud and Molander Scale and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The complications, the rates of implant removal and cost were also compared. The average follow-up was 44.2 months in the plate groups and 47.9 months in the screw groups (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the Bohler's angle and Gissane's angle between the plate group and screw group during the pre-operation and the last follow-up. There was no significant difference in the final AOFAS score, Olerud and Molander score and VAS score between the two groups (P > 0.05). The total incidence of complications was 6.7% in the plate group and 6.6% in the screw group (P > 0.05). The rates of implant removal and total cost during the hospitalization in the plate group were significantly higher compared with screws group (P < 0.05). The less invasive plate fixation versus screw fixation of DIACFs via sinus tarsi approach contributed comparable quality of reduction, complications and post-operative functional outcomes. The less invasive plate technique was significantly higher in terms of implant costs and the rate of implant removal.

Guo C ，Xu Y ，Li C ，Li X ，Wang Z ，Cai M ，Xu X ... -  《-》

Comparison between screw fixation and plate fixation via sinus tarsi approach for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Optimal surgical fixation for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACF) remains a subject of debate, particularly regarding the superiority between screw fixation and plate fixation via the sinus tarsi approach (STA). This review aims to determine the preferred treatment for DIACF and compare the outcomes of minimally invasive surgery options. Our study involved thorough searches across multiple electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science, to identify all relevant publications on distal intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus (DIACFs) that were fixed using cannulated screws or plates via STA. Through a comprehensive meta-analysis, we evaluated several outcomes, including post-operative function, radiological measurements, and complications. A total of 728 patients from 7 studies met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 435 patients underwent screw fixation via STA, and 373 patients underwent plate fixation via STA. The study found no statistically significant differences between the screw fixation and the plate fixation via sinus tarsi approach (STA) in terms of AOFAS scores, Bohler's angle, Gissane's angle, sural nerve injury, secondary subtalar arthrodesis and reoperation. Compared with screw fixation, plate fixation via STA can reduce reduction loss of Bohler's angle (WMD = - 1.64, 95% CI = [- 2.96, - 0.31], P = 0.06, I2 = 59%), lower the incidence of fixation failure (OR = 0.32, 95% CI = [0.13, 0.81], P = 0.78, I2 = 0%), and decrease intra-articular step-off (WMD = - 0.52, 95% CI = [- 0.87, - 0.17], P = 0.66, I2 = 0%). Plate fixation demonstrates superior capability in restoring calcaneal width, maintaining Bohler's angle, and minimizing intra-articular step-off, thereby maintaining better reduction of the subtalar articular surface. In addition, plate fixation exhibits the modest complication rate and a low incidence of fixation failure. Therefore, we recommend the use of plate fixation through the STA, especially for complex and comminuted intra-articular calcaneal fractures.

Zhao B ，Xu X ，Sun Q ，Liu Y ，Zhao Y ，Wang D ，Gao Y ，Zhou J ... -  《-》

Comparison between Percutaneous Screw Fixation and Plate Fixation via Sinus Tarsi Approach for Calcaneal Fractures: An 8-10-Year Follow-up Study.

To assess the long-term outcomes after percutaneous reduction (PR) and screw fixation versus plate fixation via the sinus tarsi approach (STA) for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACF). This retrospective study included a total of 150 patients (June 2008-August 2011), comprising 85 men and 65 women (mean age, 38.4 years), who were assigned to the PR group or the STA group. The inclusion criteria were DIACF (>2 mm) including Sanders type II and III, closed fracture, unilateral fracture, no history of smoking or no smoking during hospitalization and 3 months after surgery, and follow-up time not less than 8 years. The exclusion criteria were clear surgical contraindications (severe cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases), local or systemic infection symptoms, diagnosis with diabetes or lower extremity vascular disease, and Sanders type IV or open fractures. Outcomes were assessed by means of the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot scores, radiographic images, and postoperative complications. The mean follow-up period was 8.7 years (range, 8.0-10.0 years). The AOFAS scores in the PR group during the follow-up period were 54.2 ± 5.1, 85.8 ± 4.0, 88.1 ± 3.8, 87.9 ± 3.6, 87.8 ± 3.9, 86.9 ± 3.9, respectively, and in the STA group were 55.0 ± 5.6, 84.5 ± 5.2, 87.1 ± 3.8, 86.9 ± 3.8, 87.7 ± 3.3, and 87.6 ± 2.8, respectively. There was no significant difference in AOFAS scores, Bohler's angle, Gissane's angle, calcaneal length, and height between the two groups (P > 0.05). The good to excellent rate of the PR group (80.8%) was less than that of the STA group (91.7%) (P = 0.055). For Sanders III fractures, the good to excellent rate of the PR group (33.3%) was less than that of the STA group (76.9%) (P = 0.029). For calcaneal width recovery, the STA group performed better than the PR group (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the PR group (12.8%) was lower than that in the STA group (27.8%) (P = 0.026), of which the incidence of wound complications was 3.8% in the PR group and 13.9% in the STA group (P = 0.041). In addition, there was no significant difference in other postoperative complications such as sural nerve injury, peroneus longus and brevis muscle injury, calcaneal valgus symptoms, lateral impingement symptoms, and subtalar arthritis (P > 0.05). From the 8-10-year follow-up results of PR and STA as surgical procedures for the treatment of DIACF, it was found that there was no significant difference in the overall efficacy between them. STA was found to be superior to the PR in terms of the recovery of calcaneal width, providing more stable fixation for Sanders III fractures. PR was found to be more effective in reducing wound complications.

Weng QH ，Dai GL ，Tu QM ，Liu Y ，Lutchooman V ，Hong JJ ，Yu Y ... -  《-》

Cannulated screw fixation and plate fixation for displaced intra-articular calcaneus fracture: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures (DIACFs) are the most common type of calcaneus fracture. The differences in therapeutic effectiveness between cannulated screw fixation (CSF) and plate fixation are still unclear. Thus, in this meta-analysis, we evaluated the therapeutic effectiveness of these two fixation methods. We searched for all publications on DIACFs fixated with cannulated screws or plates in the following electronic databases: Pubmed, Cochrane, Embase and CNKI. Only randomized controlled studies were included. The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (version 5.1.0) was applied for analysis. The primary outcomes were American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society score (AOFAS), improvement of Bohler's angle, improvement of Gissane's angle and the width of the calcaneus. Outcomes were reported as the standard mean difference (SMD) or relative risk (RR) with the 95% confidence interval (CI). A random effects model was used to assess the pooled data. Five randomized controlled studies met our inclusion criteria, and a total of 707 patients were involved. There was no statistically significant difference between the cannulated screw fixation group and the plate fixation group in terms of excellent and good AOFAS scores (RR = 1.01, 95%CI 0.91 to 1.13, P = 0.79), improvement of Bohler's angle (SMD = 0.12, 95%CI -0.03 to 0.28, P = 0.12), improvement of Gissane's angle (SMD = 0.09, 95%CI -0.28 to 0.26, P = 0.30), or the width of the calcaneus (SMD = -0.07, 95%CI -0.24 to 0.10, p = 0.45). Compared with plate fixation, CSF showed a significant reduction in the duration of surgery (SMD = -1.74, 95%CI, -3.35 to -0.13, P = 0.03) and rate of complications (RR = 0.25, 95%CI, 0.15 to 0.44, P＜0.00001). Cannulated screw fixation and plate fixation have similar fixation effectiveness and functional outcomes in the treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures. Due to the shorter duration of surgery and low rate of complications, cannulated screw fixation is superior to plate fixation. However, further studies are needed to evaluate cannulated screw fixation for various Sanders types of calcaneus fractures.

Fan B ，Zhou X ，Wei Z ，Ren Y ，Lin W ，Hao Y ，Shi G ，Feng S ... -  《-》