Assessing pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions of the combination therapy of myelofibrosis with ruxolitinib and lenalidomide by a new eco-friendly HPLC method for their simultaneous determination in plasma.

Ruxolitinib (RUX), a Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitor, and lenalidomide (LEN), an immunomodulatory agent, have recently been proposed as a combined treatment for myelofibrosis (MF). This combination has demonstrated improved efficacy, safety, and tolerability compared to monotherapy. To further refine these findings, an efficient analytical tool is needed to simultaneously determine RUX and LEN concentrations in blood plasma. This tool would enable the study of their pharmacokinetics, drug-drug interactions, and therapeutic monitoring during MF therapy. Unfortunately, such a method has not been existed in the literature. This study presents the first HPLC method with UV detection for the simultaneous quantitation of RUX and LEN in plasma. The method was validated according to the ICH guidelines for bioanalytical method validation. It exhibited linearity in the concentration ranges of 10 to 3150 ng mL- 1 for RUX and 80 to 5200 ng mL- 1 for LEN. The limits of quantitation were determined to be 25 and 90 ng mL- 1 for RUX and LEN, respectively. All other validation parameters were satisfactory. The HPLC-UV method was successfully employed to study the pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions of RUX and LEN in rats following oral administration of single doses. The results demonstrated that the pharmacokinetics of both drugs were changed substantially by their coadministration. LEN exhibited synergistic effects on the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and total bioavailability of RUX, meanwhile it exhibited diminishing effect on the values of volume of distribution (Vd) and clearance (CL). Additionally, RUX decreased the Cmax and total bioavailability of LEN, meanwhile it increased its Vd and CL. These data suggest that the use of RUX, as a combination with LEN, is a better therapeutic approach for MF, compared with RUX as a monotherapy. The effects of LEN on the pharmacokinetics of RUX should be considered and can be useful in determining the appropriate RUX dosage and dosing regimen to achieve the desired therapeutic effect when used as a combination therapy with LEN. The method's environmental friendliness was confirmed through three comprehensive tools. This method represents a valuable tool for determining the appropriate dosage and dosing regimen of RUX in combination therapy with LEN to achieve the desired therapeutic effect. Furthermore, it can aid in predicting drug distribution in different patients and assessing the drug accumulation or insufficient drug levels in specific body compartments.

Herqash RN ，Alkathiri FA ，Darwish IA 《-》

A Phase I Trial Evaluating the Addition of Lenalidomide to Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Progressing on Ruxolitinib and Methylprednisolone.

Ruxolitinib (RUX), an orally administered selective Janus kinase 1/2 inhibitor, has received approval for the treatment of myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera, and graft-versus-host disease. We have previously demonstrated the anti-multiple myeloma effects of RUX alone and in combination with the immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide (LEN) and glucocorticosteroids both pre-clinically and clinically. This study aims to evaluate whether LEN can achieve clinical activity among patients with multiple myeloma progressing on the combination of RUX and methylprednisolone (MP). In this part of a phase I, multicenter, open-label study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of RUX and MP for patients with multiple myeloma with progressive disease who had previously received a proteasome inhibitor, LEN, glucocorticosteroids, and at least three prior regimens; we also determined the safety and efficacy of adding LEN at the time of disease progression from the initial doublet treatment. Initially, all subjects received oral RUX 15 mg twice daily and oral MP 40 mg every other day. Those patients who developed progressive disease according to the International Myeloma Working Group criteria then received LEN 10 mg once daily on days 1-21 within a 28-day cycle in addition to RUX and MP, which were administered at the same doses these patients were receiving at the time progressive disease developed. Twenty-nine subjects (median age 64 years; 18 [62%] male) were enrolled in this part of the study and initially received the two-drug combination of RUX and MP. The median number of prior therapies was six (range 3-12). The overall response rate from this two-drug combination was 31% and the clinical benefit rate was 34%. The best responses were 1 very good partial response, 8 partial responses, 1 minor response, 12 stable disease, and 7 progressive disease. The median progression-free survival was 3.5 months (range  0.5-36.2 months). The median time to response was 3.0 months. The median duration of response was 12.5 months (range 2.8-36.2 months). Twenty (69%) patients who showed progressive disease had LEN added to RUX and MP; all patients had prior exposure to LEN and all but one patient was refractory to their last LEN-containing regimen. After the addition of LEN, the overall response rate was 30% and the clinical benefit rate was 40%. The best responses of patients following the addition of LEN were 2 very good partial responses, 4 partial responses, 2 minor responses, 8 stable disease, and 4 progressive disease. The median time to response was 2.6 months (range 0.7-15.0 months). The median duration of response was not reached. The median progression-free survival following the addition of LEN was 3.5 months (range 0.3-25.9 months). For patients with multiple myeloma, treatment with RUX and MP is effective and well tolerated, and LEN can be used to extend the benefit of this RUX-based treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03110822, and is ongoing.

Berenson JR ，Limon A ，Rice S ，Safaie T ，Boccia R ，Yang H ，Moezi M ，Lim S ，Schwartz G ，Eshaghian S ，Brobeck M ，Swift R ，Eades BM ，Bujarski S ，Sebhat Y ，Ray R ，Kim S ，Del Dosso A ，Vescio R ... -  《-》

Light and shade of ruxolitinib: positive role of early treatment with ruxolitinib and ruxolitinib withdrawal syndrome in patients with myelofibrosis.

Baek DW ，Cho HJ ，Lee JM ，Kim J ，Moon JH ，Sohn SK ... -  《-》

Ruxolitinib exposure in patients with acute and chronic graft versus host disease in routine clinical practice-a prospective single-center trial.

Knowledge on Ruxolitinib exposure in patients with graft versus host disease (GvHD) is scarce. The purpose of this prospective study was to analyze Ruxolitinib concentrations of GvHD patients and to investigate effects of CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 inhibitors and other covariates as well as concentration-dependent effects. 262 blood samples of 29 patients with acute or chronic GvHD who were administered Ruxolitinib during clinical routine were analyzed. A population pharmacokinetic model obtained from myelofibrosis patients was adapted to our population and was used to identify relevant pharmacokinetic properties and covariates on drug exposure. Relationships between Ruxolitinib exposure and adverse events were assessed. Median of individual mean trough serum concentrations was 39.9 ng/mL at 10 mg twice daily (IQR 27.1 ng/mL, range 5.6-99.8 ng/mL). Applying a population pharmacokinetic model revealed that concentrations in our cohort were significantly higher compared to myelofibrosis patients receiving the same daily dose (p < 0.001). Increased Ruxolitinib exposure was caused by a significant reduction in Ruxolitinib clearance by approximately 50%. Additional comedication with at least one strong CYP3A4 or CYP2C9 inhibitor led to a further reduction by 15% (p < 0.05). No other covariate affected pharmacokinetics significantly. Mean trough concentrations of patients requiring dose reduction related to adverse events were significantly elevated (p < 0.05). Ruxolitinib exposure is increased in GvHD patients in comparison to myelofibrosis patients due to reduced clearance and comedication with CYP3A4 or CYP2C9 inhibitors. Elevated Ruxolitinib trough concentrations might be a surrogate for toxicity.

Isberner N ，Kraus S ，Grigoleit GU ，Aghai F ，Kurlbaum M ，Zimmermann S ，Klinker H ，Scherf-Clavel O ... -  《-》

[Ruxolitinib combined with prednisone, thalidomide and danazol for treatment of myelofibrosis: a pilot study].

Xu ZF ，Qin TJ ，Zhang HL ，Fang LW ，Pan LJ ，Hu NB ，Qu SQ ，Li B ，Xiao ZJ ... -  《-》