Macular neovascularization.

Neovascularization of the macula, a common complication of many chorioretinal diseases such as neovascular age-related macular degeneration, polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy, and pathologic myopia results from increased synthesis of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) by the retinal pigment epithelium and/or Müller cells because of localized ischemia and inflammation. The Consensus on Neovascular AMD Nomenclature (CONAN) study group acknowledged that these vessels may originate from either the choriocapillaris or the retinal microvasculature, prompting them to propose the term 'macular neovascularization' (MNV) to include intraretinal, subretinal, and sub-pigment epithelial neovascularization localized to the macula. MNV frequently appears as a grey-green macular lesion with overlying intraretinal thickening and/or subretinal exudation, causing metamorphopsia, reduced central vision, relative central scotoma, decreased reading speed, and problems with color recognition. Multimodal imaging with optical coherence tomography (OCT), OCT angiography, dye-based angiographies, fundus autofluorescence, and multiwavelength photography help establish the diagnosis and aid in selecting an appropriate treatment. The standard of care for MNV is usually intravitreal anti-VEGF injections, though thermal laser photocoagulation, verteporfin photodynamic therapy, and vitreoretinal surgery are occasionally used. This current review discusses the etiology and clinical features of MNV, the role of multimodal imaging in establishing the diagnosis, and the available therapeutic options.

Sheth JU ，Stewart MW ，Narayanan R ，Anantharaman G ，Chandran K ，Lai TYY ，Chakravarthy U ，Das T ... -  《-》

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor biosimilars for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a progressive eye disease characterized by choroidal neovascularization (CNV) and is a leading cause of vision loss and disability worldwide. Although intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is an effective treatment option that helps to prevent vision loss or to improve visual acuity in people with neovascular AMD, treatment imposes a significant financial burden on patients and healthcare systems. A biosimilar is a biological product that has been developed to be nearly identical to a previously approved biological product. The use of biosimilars may help reduce costs and so may increase patient access to effective biologic medicines with similar levels of safety to the drugs on which they are based. To assess the benefits and harms of anti-VEGF biosimilar agents compared with their corresponding anti-VEGF agents (i.e. the reference products) that have obtained regulatory approval for intravitreal injections in people with neovascular AMD. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, two other databases, and two trials registries together with reference checking and contact with study authors to identify studies that are included in the review. The latest search date was 2 June 2023. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared approved anti-VEGF biosimilars with their reference products for treating the eyes of adult participants (≥ 50 years) who had an active primary or recurrent choroidal neovascularization lesion secondary to neovascular AMD. Our outcomes were: best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), vision-related quality of life, serious ocular and non-ocular adverse events (AE), treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), and serum concentrations of biosimilars and reference drugs. We assessed the risk of bias (RoB) for seven outcomes reported in a summary of findings table by using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. We synthesized results for each outcome using meta-analysis, where possible, by calculating risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and continuous outcomes, respectively. Where this was not possible due to the nature of the data, we summarized the results narratively. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for prespecified outcomes. We included nine parallel-group multi-center RCTs that enrolled a total of 3814 participants (3814 participating eyes), with sample sizes that ranged from 160 to 705 participants per study. The mean age of the participants in these studies ranged from 67 to 76 years, and the proportion of women ranged from 26.5% to 58.7%. Ranibizumab (Lucentis) was the reference product in seven studies, and aflibercept (Eyelea) was the reference product in two others. All the included studies had been supported by industry. The follow-up periods ranged from 12 to 52 weeks (median 48 weeks). Five studies (56%) were conducted in multi-country settings across Europe, North America and Asia, two studies in India, and one each in Japan and the Republic of Korea. We judged all the included studies to have met high methodological standards. With regard to efficacy, our meta-analyses demonstrated that anti-VEGF biosimilars for neovascular AMD resulted in little to no difference compared with the reference products for BCVA change at 8 to 12 weeks (MD -0.55 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters, 95% CI -1.17 to 0.07; 8 studies, 3603 participants; high-certainty evidence) and the proportion of participants who lost fewer than 15 letters in BCVA at 24 to 48 weeks (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.01; 7 studies, 2658 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Almost all participants (96.6% in the biosimilar group and 97.0% in the reference product group) lost fewer than 15 letters in BCVA. The evidence from two studies suggested that there was no evidence of difference between biosimilars and reference products in vision-related quality of life measured by the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25) summary scores at 24 to 48 weeks (MD 0.82, 95% CI -0.70 to 2.35; 2 studies, 894 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). With regard to the safety profile, meta-analyses also revealed little to no difference between anti-VEGF biosimilars and the reference products for the proportion of participants who experienced serious ocular AEs (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.68 to 2.26; 7 studies, 3292 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and for TEAEs leading to investigational product discontinuation or death (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.46; 8 studies, 3497 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Overall, 1.4% of participants in the biosimilar group and 1.2% in the reference product group experienced serious ocular adverse events. The most frequently documented serious ocular AEs were retinal hemorrhage and endophthalmitis. Although the evidence is of low certainty due to imprecision, meta-analysis suggested that anti-VEGF biosimilars led to no difference compared with the reference products for cumulative incidence of ADAs (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.22; 8 studies, 3066 participants; low-certainty evidence) or mean maximum serum concentrations (MD 0.42 ng/mL, 95% CI -0.22 to 1.05; subgroup of 3 studies, 100 participants; low-certainty evidence). We judged the overall risk of bias to be low for all studies. In our review, low to high certainty evidence suggests that there is little to no difference, to date, between the anti-VEGF biosimilars approved for treating neovascular AMD and their reference products in terms of benefits and harms. While anti-VEGF biosimilars may be a viable alternative to reference products, current evidence for their use is based on a limited number of studies - particularly for comparison with aflibercept - with sparse long-term safety data, and infrequent assessment of quality of life outcomes. Our effect estimates and conclusions may be modified once findings have been reported from studies that are currently ongoing, and studies of biosimilar agents that are currently in development. Cochrane Eyes and Vision US Project is supported by grant UG1EY020522, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health. Takeshi Hasegawa and Hisashi Noma were supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Grant numbers: 22H03554, 19K03092, 24K06239). Protocol available via doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD015804.

Sunaga T ，Maeda M ，Saulle R ，Ng SM ，Sato MT ，Hasegawa T ，Mason AN ，Noma H ，Ota E ... -  《Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews》

To Treat or Not to Treat? Resolving the Question of Subretinal and Intraretinal Fluid in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Narrative Review.

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is associated with considerable quality of life and economic burden. nAMD is characterized by pathological neovascularization, leading to the accumulation of retinal fluid. Intraretinal fluid (IRF) is a major contributor to vision loss and may predict response to treatment. In contrast, the role of subretinal fluid (SRF) is less clear. Nevertheless, complete resolution of retinal fluid accumulation is often stated to be a key goal of therapy for nAMD, even though some eyes may never achieve a fluid-free macula despite regular anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment. In this article, we review the current literature regarding the role of retinal fluid in nAMD disease outcomes and assess whether and when it may be beneficial to leave retinal fluid untreated. In this context, we highlight the importance of correctly identifying retinal fluid types in nAMD and avoiding confusion with other optical coherence tomography signs that may respond differently to therapy, such as subretinal pseudocysts. Current evidence shows that IRF is associated with poor outcomes and an increased risk of developing atrophy and fibrosis; resolution of this retinal fluid type should remain a treatment target. However, the literature around SRF indicates that low levels of this fluid type, potentially up to 150-200 µm in thickness, may be tolerated with minimal impact on vision, and that SRF could be protective against the development and progression of macular atrophy and fibrosis. Although mild SRF may be protective in nAMD, cause and effect between SRF and reduced or slowed atrophy has not yet been proven and requires further research. Treatment should be given for the most aggressive component; when both IRF and SRF are present, treatment should be given for IRF.

Foss AJE ，Almeida D ，Cheung CMG ，Ogura Y ，de Cock E ，Empeslidis T ... -  《-》

Linking disease activity with optical coherence tomography angiography in neovascular age related macular degeneration using artificial intelligence.

To investigate quantitative associations between AI-assessed disease activity and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA)-derived parameters in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) undergoing anti-VEGF therapy. OCTA and SD-OCT images obtained from multicenter, randomized study data were evaluated. A deep learning algorithm (RetInSight) was used to detect and quantify macular fluid on SD-OCT. Mixed effects models were applied to evaluate correlations between fluid volumes, macular neovascularization (MNV)-type and OCTA-derived MNV parameters; lesion size (LS) and vessel area (NVA). 230 patients were included. A significant positive correlation was observed between SRF and NVA (estimate = 199.8 nl/mm2, p = 0.023), while a non-significant but negative correlation was found between SRF and LS (estimate = - 71.3 nl/mm2, p = 0.126). The presence of Type I and Type II MNV was associated with significantly less intraretinal fluid (IRF) compared to Type III MNV (estimate type I:- 52.1 nl, p = 0.019; estimate type II:- 51.7 nl, p = 0.021). A significant correlation was observed between pigment epithelial detachment (PED) and the interaction between NVA and LS (estimate:28.97 nl/mm2; p = 0.012). Residual IRF at week 12 significantly correlated to baseline NVA (estimate:38.1 nl/mm2; p = 0.015) and LS (estimate:- 22.6 nl/mm2; p = 0.012). Fluid in different compartments demonstrated disparate associations with MNV OCTA features. While IRF at baseline was most pronounced in type III MNV, residual IRF was driven by neovascular MNV characteristics. Greater NVA in proportion to LS was associated with higher amounts of SRF and PED. The correlation between these parameters may represent MNV maturation and can be used as a biomarker for resolution of disease activity. AI-based OCT analysis allows for a deeper understanding of neovascular disease in AMD and the potential to adjust therapeutic strategies to optimize outcomes through precision medicine.

Schranz M ，Bogunovic H ，Deak G ，Sadeghipour A ，Reiter GS ，Schmidt-Erfurth U ... -  《Scientific Reports》

Rediscovering Age-Related Macular Degeneration with Swept-Source OCT Imaging: The 2022 Charles L. Schepens, MD, Lecture.

Swept-source OCT angiography (SS-OCTA) scans of eyes with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) were used to replace color, autofluorescence, infrared reflectance, and dye-based fundus angiographic imaging for the diagnosis and staging of AMD. Through the use of different algorithms with the SS-OCTA scans, both structural and angiographic information can be viewed and assessed using both cross sectional and en face imaging strategies. Presented at the 2022 Charles L. Schepens, MD, Lecture at the American Academy of Ophthalmology Retina Subspecialty Day, Chicago, Illinois, on September 30, 2022. Patients with AMD. Review of published literature and ongoing clinical research using SS-OCTA imaging in AMD. Swept-source OCT angiography imaging of AMD at different stages of disease progression. Volumetric SS-OCTA dense raster scans were used to diagnose and stage both exudative and nonexudative AMD. In eyes with nonexudative AMD, a single SS-OCTA scan was used to detect and measure structural features in the macula such as the area and volume of both typical soft drusen and calcified drusen, the presence and location of hyperreflective foci, the presence of reticular pseudodrusen, also known as subretinal drusenoid deposits, the thickness of the outer retinal layer, the presence and thickness of basal laminar deposits, the presence and area of persistent choroidal hypertransmission defects, and the presence of treatment-naïve nonexudative macular neovascularization. In eyes with exudative AMD, the same SS-OCTA scan pattern was used to detect and measure the presence of macular fluid, the presence and type of macular neovascularization, and the response of exudation to treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors. In addition, the same scan pattern was used to quantitate choriocapillaris (CC) perfusion, CC thickness, choroidal thickness, and the vascularity of the choroid. Compared with using several different instruments to perform multimodal imaging, a single SS-OCTA scan provides a convenient, comfortable, and comprehensive approach for obtaining qualitative and quantitative anatomic and angiographic information to monitor the onset, progression, and response to therapies in both nonexudative and exudative AMD. Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Rosenfeld PJ ，Shen M ，Trivizki O ，Liu J ，Herrera G ，Hiya FE ，Li J ，Berni A ，Wang L ，El-Mulki OS ，Cheng Y ，Lu J ，Zhang Q ，O'Brien RC ，Gregori G ，Wang RK ... -  《-》