Feasibility of co-transplantation of umbilical cord blood and third-party mesenchymal stromal cells after (non)myeloablative conditioning in patients with hematological malignancies.

Umbilical cord blood (UCB) is an alternative source of stem cells for patients lacking a 9/10 or 10/10 HLA identical donor. However, after UCB transplantation, time to engraftment and immune recovery are prolonged, increasing the risk of fatal complications. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) can support hematopoietic engraftment and have immunosuppressive effects. The primary objective of this phase I/II multicenter study was to determine the feasibility and safety of UCB transplantation with co-infusion of third party MSC, as assessed by treatment related mortality (TRM) at day 100. Secondary objectives were engraftment, immune recovery, occurrence of graft versus host disease (GVHD), infections, disease free survival, relapse incidence and overall survival. Eleven patients were grafted according to this protocol. Allogeneic transplantation after co-infusion appears feasible with 18 % TRM at day 100. Engraftment data show a median time of 16 days to neutrophil and 27 days to platelet recovery, which is shorter than what is usually reported after UCB transplantation. Only 1 episode of acute GVHD was reported. In conclusion, MSC and UCB co-transplantation is feasible and might help overcome some of the drawbacks of UCB transplantation.

Planken S ，De Becker A ，Kerre T ，Schoemans H ，Baron F ，Graux C ，Van Riet I ，Lechanteur C ，Baudoux E ，Schots R ，Beguin Y ，Transplant Committee of the Belgian Hematology Society. ... -  《Current Research in Translational Medicine》

Bone marrow versus peripheral blood allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for haematological malignancies in adults.

Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is an established treatment option for many malignant and non-malignant haematological disorders. Peripheral blood stem cells represent the main stem cell source in malignant diseases due to faster engraftment and practicability issues compared with bone marrow stem cells. Since the early 2000s, there have been many developments in the clinical field. Allo-HSCT using haploidentical family donors (haplo-HSCT) has emerged as an alternative for people who do not have human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched siblings or unrelated donors. In addition, the introduction of new methods and strategies in allo-HSCT, such as the use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy), better donor selection, the more frequent administration of anti-thymocyte globulins (ATGs), but also improved management of side effects such as graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and infection, have impacted outcomes after allo-HSCT. In addition, as transplant indications and strategies continue to adapt in line with novel research findings, the effect of the stem cell source on post-transplant outcomes is unclear. For our analysis, we considered peripheral blood stem cells as the standard graft source for adults with haematological malignancies. This is an update of a review first published in 2014. To assess the effect of bone marrow transplantation versus peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in adults with haematological malignancies with regard to overall survival, disease-free survival, incidence of non-relapse or transplant-related mortality, incidence of extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), incidence of acute GvHD grades III to IV, incidence of overall chronic GvHD, and quality of life. For this update we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and two trials registries on 2 November 2022 with no language restrictions. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing bone marrow transplantation (BMT) with peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) in adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with haematological malignancies. Two review authors independently selected studies and extracted data. We evaluated risk of bias using the original Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 1), and we evaluated the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. The updated search identified no new studies for inclusion. We found two additional reports relating to a previously included study; they provided new data on quality of life and infection rates after transplantation. As these are clinically relevant outcomes, quality of life was added to the summary of findings table (replacing acute GvHD II to IV), and rate of infection was added to our list of secondary outcomes. We included nine RCTs with a total of 1521 participants. Overall, the risk of bias in the included studies was low. Median participant age across studies ranged from 21 to 45 years, and studies took place in Canada, the USA, New Zealand, Brazil, Australia, Egypt, and across Europe. Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) compared with peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) likely results in little to no difference in overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause death 1.07, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.25; 6 studies, 1330 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There may be little to no difference between BMT and PBSCT in terms of disease-free survival (HR for disease recurrence or all-cause death 1.04, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.21; 6 studies, 1225 participants; low-certainty evidence) and non-relapse or transplant-related mortality (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.28; 3 studies, 758 participants; low-certainty evidence). BMT compared with PBSCT likely results in lower rates of extensive chronic GvHD (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.90; 4 studies, 765 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and overall chronic GvHD (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.85; 4 studies, 1121 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). BMT compared with PBSCT may reduce the incidence of acute GvHD grades III to IV, although the 95% CI of the HR is also compatible with no effect (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.02; 3 studies, 925 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Evidence from two trials that used different quality of life assessment instruments suggests that BMT compared with PBSCT may be associated with higher quality of life five years after transplantation. Moderate-certainty evidence suggests little to no difference in overall survival following allo-HSCT using bone marrow versus peripheral blood stem cells (the current clinical standard stem cell source). Low-certainty evidence suggests little to no difference between the stem cell sources in terms of disease-free survival and non-relapse or transplant-related survival. BMT likely reduces the risk of extensive chronic GvHD and overall chronic GvHD compared with PBSCT. Evidence from two RCTs suggests that BMT compared with PBSCT may result in higher long-term quality of life, possibly due to the lower chronic GvHD incidence. With this update, we aimed to supply the most recent data on the choice of stem cell source for allo-HSCT in adults by including new evidence published up to November 2022. We identified no new ongoing studies and no new RCTs with published results. Further research in this field is warranted.

Kiene S ，Albrecht M ，Theurich S ，Scheid C ，Skoetz N ，Holtick U ... -  《Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews》

Efficacy and safety of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells versus placebo added to second-line therapy in patients with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease: a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial.

Failure of systemic corticosteroid therapy is common in patients with newly diagnosed acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) above grade II. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been used as a tolerable and potentially effective second-line therapy for steroid-refractory aGVHD (SR-aGVHD); however, well-designed, prospective, controlled studies are lacking. This multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, exploratory phase 2 study enrolled patients with SR-aGVHD above grade II from 7 centres. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive umbilical cord-derived MSCs or placebo added to one centre's choice of second-line agents (except for ruxolitinib). The agents were infused twice weekly. Patients with complete response (CR), no response (NR), or progression of disease (PD) at d28 received 8 infusions, and those with partial response (PR) received the above infusions for another 4 weeks. The per-protocol population consisted of patients who received ≥ 8 infusions. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR, CR + PR) at d28, analyzed in the per-protocol and intention-to-treat populations. Seventy-eight patients (median age 38, range 13-62) were enrolled: 40 in the MSC group and 38 in the control. Patients in the MSC group received a median of 8 doses, with a median response time of 14 days. In intention-to-treat analysis, ORR at d28 was 60% for MSC group and 50% for control group (p = 0.375). The 2-year cumulative incidence of moderate to severe cGVHD was marginally lower in the MSC group than in the control (13.8% vs. 39.8%, p = 0.067). The 2-year failure-free survival was similar between the MSC and control groups (52.5% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.43). In per-protocol analysis (n = 62), ORR at d28 was significantly greater in the MSC group than in the control group (71.9% vs. 46.7%, p = 0.043). Among patients with gut involvement, ORR at d28 was significantly greater in the MSC group than in the control (66.7% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.031). The adverse events incidences were similar between groups. In this exploratory study, there was no superior ORR at d28 demonstrated in the MSC group compared with the control. However, MSCs showed a gradual treatment effect at a median of 2 weeks. Patients who completed 8 infusions may benefit from adding MSCs to one conventional second-line agent, especially those with gut involvement. MSCs was well tolerated in patients with SR-aGVHD. chictr.org.cn ChiCTR2000035740.

Jiang E ，Qian K ，Wang L ，Yang D ，Shao Y ，Hu L ，Li Y ，Yao C ，Han M ，Hou X ，Liu D ... -  《BMC Medicine》

Co-infusion of mesenchymal stromal cells to prevent GVHD after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation from HLA-mismatched unrelated donors after reduced-intensity conditioning: a double-blind randomized study and literature review.

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) have immunomodulatory and hematopoiesis-supporting properties that could potentially benefit hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) engraftment and decrease the incidence and/or severity of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Based on our previous pilot study, we established a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind trial evaluating the efficacy of co-infusing third-party MSC (1.5-3 × 106/kg) versus placebo on the day of HSC transplantation (HCT) to prevent GVHD in recipients of HLA-mismatched unrelated donors after reduced-intensity conditioning. The study planned to include 120 patients to improve 1-year overall survival (OS) from 55 to 77% but was stopped after 9 years for low recruitment (n = 38). One-year OS was 74% in the MSC group and 80% in the placebo group. In multivariate analysis, the incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD was significantly lower in patients receiving MSC (HR 0.332, 95% CI 0.124-0.890, p = 0.0284). No difference was observed in the incidences of chronic GVHD, infection or relapse, overall or progression-free survival at 1 year or long-term, or hematopoietic and immune reconstitution. Despite premature study closure, the suggested beneficial effect of MSC co-transplantation for the prevention of acute GVHD in HLA-mismatched HCT warrants further investigation.

Lombardo G ，Lechanteur C ，Briquet A ，Seidel L ，Willems E ，Servais S ，Baudoux E ，Kerre T ，Zachee P ，Herman J ，Janssen A ，Muller J ，Baron F ，Beguin Y ... -  《Stem Cell Research & Therapy》

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant For Bone Marrow Failure or Myelodysplastic Syndrome in Dyskeratosis Congenita/Telomere Biology Disorders: Single-Center, Single-Arm, Open-Label Trial of Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Without Radiation.

Dyskeratosis congenita/telomere biology disorders (DC/TBD) often manifest as bone marrow failure (BMF) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT) rescues hematologic complications, but radiation and alkylator-based conditioning regimens cause diffuse whole-body toxicity and may expedite DC/TBD-specific non-hematopoietic complications. Optimization of conditioning intensity in DC/TBD to allow for donor hematopoietic cell engraftment with the least amount of toxicity remains a critical goal of the alloHCT field. We report prospectively collected standard alloHCT outcomes from a single-center, single-arm, open-label clinical trial of bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell alloHCT for DC/TBD-associated BMF or MDS. Conditioning was reduced intensity (RIC), including alemtuzumab 1 mg/kg, fludarabine 200 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg. A previous single-arm, open-label phase II clinical trial for the same patient population conducted at the same center, differing only by inclusion of 200 cGy of total body irradiation (TBI), served as a control cohort. The non-TBI cohort included 10 patients (ages 1.7-65.9 years, median follow-up of 3.9 years) compared with the control TBI cohort, which included 12 patients (ages 2.2-52.2 years, median follow-up of 10.5 years). Baseline characteristics differed only in total CD34+ cells received, with a median of 5.6 (non-TBI) compared with 2.6 (TBI) x 106/kg (P = .02; no difference in total nucleated cells). The cumulative incidence of day +100 grade II-IV acute and 4-year chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) were low at 0% and 10% (non-TBI) and 8% and 17% (TBI), respectively (acute, P = .36; chronic, P = .72). Primary graft failure was absent. Secondary non-neutropenic graft failure occurred in one (non-TBI cohort). The non-TBI cohort demonstrated delayed achievement of full donor chimerism but superior lymphocyte recovery. There was no difference in 4-year overall survival at 80% (non-TBI) and 75% (TBI; P = .78). MDS as an indication for alloHCT was uncommon but overall associated with poor outcomes. There were 3 MDS patients in the non-TBI cohort: 1 relapsed and died at day +387; 1 relapsed at day +500 and is alive 5.5 years later following salvage with a second alloHCT; 1 relapsed at day +1093 and is alive at day +100 after a second alloHCT. There was 1 MDS patient in the TBI cohort who achieved 100% donor myeloid engraftment without relapse but died at day +827 from a bacterial infection in the setting of immune-mediated cytopenia. Elimination of TBI from the RIC regimen for DC/TBD was not associated with significant changes in rates of graft failure, GvHD, and overall survival but was associated with delayed achievement of full donor chimerism and improved lymphocyte reconstitution. For DC/TBD-associated BMF, TBI appears to be dispensable. Optimal approaches to DC/TBD-associated MDS remain unclear. Larger cohorts are needed to better assess the unique contribution of TBI and donor CD34+ cell dose. Longer follow-up is required to assess differences in DC/TBD complications and late effects.

Dimitrov M ，Merkle S ，Cao Q ，Tryon RK ，Vercellotti GM ，Holtan SG ，Kao RL ，Srikanthan M ，Terezakis SA ，Tolar J ，Ebens CL ... -  《-》