Meaning in Measurement: Evaluating Young Autistic Adults' Active Engagement and Expressed Interest in Quality-of-Life Goals.
The need for support programs and meaningful measurement of outcomes with autistic adults is growing. To date, success in autism intervention has been defined based on changes in discretely defined, observable behaviors with limited consideration of the person's experience, motivations, or the complex contexts in which these skills are used. Behavioral skill-building interventions are effective at increasing or decreasing specific behaviors, but a purely behavioral focus is not enough for meaningful improvements in adult quality of life (QoL). To reflect real-life impact, intervention and measurement must go beyond quantitative estimates of changes in skills regardless of context of use and focus on enhancing and evaluating functional outcomes and adult QoL that includes active engagement with the adult and provides rigor in qualitative evaluation. This article reports on efforts to assess active engagement of verbally fluent young autistic adults in a supported university-based residential pilot program built around self-set wellness goals for healthy, engaged, responsible, and empowered adult living. Program evaluation used an exploratory process for evaluating QoL learning, while also being open to how future work can discern participant meanings in measurement. The pilot used a mixed-methods approach to measure entry skills and interests, codetermine personal wellness goals, inform program content with participants, and measure QoL learning in terms of active engagement, expressed interest, and changes in self-appraisal of competence, confidence, and identity. Participants' QoL learning, replication of QoL learning measurement methods, and further exploration of strategies to put participant meanings in QoL learning measurement are discussed.
Why was this study done?: This study piloted a measurement strategy for deciding what to measure and support in real-world contexts of independent living and on-campus experiences in a 3-week residential program for young autistic adults.What was the purpose of this study?: The study aimed to measure and support autistic adults' quality of life (QoL) learning in terms of the extent to which pursuing self-set wellness goals, with supports, positively impacted autistic adults' active engagement (e.g., participation in wellness activities), and expressed interest (e.g., willingness to participate).Why was this program developed?: The program was developed because more young adults on the spectrum are aging into adulthood without personalized, respectful, and meaningful supports to promote engaged adult living. We wanted to build on our experience and feedback from autistic adults, family, and partners who have engaged in weekly social engagement groups on a university campus and called for more comprehensive transition programs.What did the program do?: The project was a pilot of an on-campus program aimed at facilitating personally meaningful improvements in QoL through empowering autistic adults to act on their personal motivations, interests, and goals. It also emphasized learning through experiences in real-life contexts, in collaboration with other participants, campus resources, community members, and program staff.How did the researchers evaluate the new program?: The program team used both quantitative and qualitative methods. Quantitative methods included standard self-report tools that autistic adults used to rate their safety needs, adult self-direction skills, autism-related self-concept, priority of self-set wellness goals, and confidence in abilities to achieve and learn more about one's own wellness goals. Predetermined qualitative methods included analysis of themes from participants' narrative data from their wellness interviews with participants and open-response items from self-report tools. The program was also responsive through a preprogram wellness interview with parents, staff's field notes about of participants' behaviors, conversational interactions with participants, and team discussions. Researchers contextualized and synthesized the data into narrative case studies about each participant's wellness journey.What were the early findings and what do they add to what was already known?: Results showed that the program was able to facilitate participants' QoL learning in personal wellness goals in collaboration with campus and community resources. Participants expressed meaningful changes in their expressed interests, active engagement, and self-concept through participating in this brief residential on-campus program.What are potential weaknesses of this pilot?: Weaknesses included a short time period of 3 weeks, a small participant count of 5, and the resource-intense supports needed for the program.What are the next steps?: The next steps are to adjust the program based on participant feedback and pursue creation of a multiyear program to continue piloting the measurement and support strategies for facilitating autistic adults' active wellness engagement and self-determined independent living.How will these findings and this work help autistic adults now or in the future?: This work informs future wellness interventions for measuring and supporting autistic adults' efforts to self-determine meaningful changes to their QoL.
Bernhardt JB
，Lam GYH
，Thomas T
，Cubells JF
，Bohlke K
，Reid M
，Rice CE
... -
《-》
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.
This Campbell systematic review examines the effects of recovery schools on student behavioral and academic outcomes, compared to the effects of non-recovery schools. The review summarizes evidence from one quasi-experimental study (with a total of 194 participants) that had potential serious risk of bias due to confounding. Sizable portions of youth are in recovery from substance use disorders, and many youth will return to use after receiving substance use treatment. Youth spend most of their waking hours at school, and thus schools are important social environments for youth in recovery from substance use disorders. Recovery schools have been identified as educational programs that may help support youth in recovery from substance use disorders. This review focused on two types of recovery schools: RHSs, which are schools that award secondary school diplomas and offer a range of therapeutic services in addition to standard educational curricula; and CRCs, which offer therapeutic and sober support services on college campuses. This review looked at whether recovery schools (RHSs or CRCs) affect academic success and substance use outcomes among students, compared to similar students who are not enrolled in recovery schools.
Array
Array
Hennessy EA
，Tanner-Smith EE
，Finch AJ
，Sathe N
，Kugley S
... -
《-》
ResearchGate
(全网免费下载)
钛学术
(全网免费下载)
