Feasibility of Simultaneous Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation During Gait Training in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Randomized Double-Blind Pilot Clinical Trial.

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a therapeutic tool for improving post-stroke gait disturbances, with ongoing research focusing on specific protocols for its application. We evaluated the feasibility of a rehabilitation protocol that combines tDCS with conventional gait training. This was a randomized, double-blind, single-center pilot clinical trial. Patients with unilateral hemiplegia due to ischemic stroke were randomly assigned to either the tDCS with gait training group or the sham stimulation group. The anodal tDCS electrode was placed on the tibialis anterior area of the precentral gyrus while gait training proceeded. Interventions were administered 3 times weekly for 4 weeks. Outcome assessments, using the 10-meter walk test, Timed Up and Go test, Berg Balance Scale, Functional Ambulatory Scale, Modified Barthel Index, and European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 3 Level Version, were conducted before and after the intervention and again at the 8-week mark following its completion. Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for comparisons between and within groups. Twenty-six patients were assessed for eligibility, and 20 were enrolled and randomized. No significant differences were observed between the tDCS with gait training group and the sham stimulation group in gait speed after the intervention. However, the tDCS with gait training group showed significant improvement in balance performance in both within-group and between-group comparisons. In the subgroup analysis of patients with elicited motor-evoked potentials, comfortable pace gait speed improved in the tDCS with gait training group. No serious adverse events occurred throughout the study. Simultaneous anodal tDCS during gait training is a feasible rehabilitation protocol for chronic stroke patients with gait disturbances. URL: https://cris.nih.go.kr; Registration number: KCT0007601; Date of registration: 11 July 2022.

Kim HM ，Na JM ，Jo HS ，Kim KH ，Song MK ，Park HK ，Choi IS ，Yoon J ，Han JY ... -  《Journal of Integrative Neuroscience》

Erratum: Eyestalk Ablation to Increase Ovarian Maturation in Mud Crabs.

《Jove-Journal of Visualized Experiments》

Non-invasive brain stimulation enhances the effect of physiotherapy for balance and mobility impairment in people with Multiple Sclerosis.

Impairment of balance and gait is common in Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Non-invasive Brain Stimulation techniques are promising adjuncts to physical therapy to improve disability. To determine if combining transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with conventional exercise therapy enhances balance and mobility in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) compared to exercise alone. In a double-blind randomised controlled trial, PwMS were randomised into a real or sham tDCS group. All patients received individualized exercise treatment. Twelve sessions of real (intensity 2mA, bipolar) or sham tDCS was administered over the primary motor area for 20 minutes followed by one hour of physiotherapy focusing on balance, strength, and mobility, twice a week for six weeks. Outcome measures included balance (Berg Balance Score), mobility (10m Walk Test), fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale) and quality of life (Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life - 54) performed 1 week before intervention, at week 7 (1-week post-intervention), and at six months post-intervention. Falls questionnaire was completed 1 week before intervention and at 6 months post-intervention. Generalised linear mixed model analysis was used to compare outcomes at different time points within groups (before and after exercise treatment) and between groups (sham vs real stimulation groups). Forty participants (mean age 54 and mean EDSS 3.5) were randomly allocated to receive real (n=19) or sham (n=21) stimulation, with 36 completing the post-intervention (real 17, sham 19) and 32 completing the 6-month assessments (real 15, sham 17). All participants had significantly improved balance and mobility scores post exercise treatment (within groups comparison, p<0.05). Between groups comparison found a small but significant improvement in the Berg Balance Score (mean improvement 1.9 and 2 points, p <0.05) and 10-metre Walk Test (mean improvement of 0.09 and 0.11m/s, p <0.05) in the real tDCS group compared to the sham group after six weeks of training and at six months follow-up, respectively. There was no benefit in fatigue, falls and QOL scores in the real stimulation group compared to the control group. Our results suggest that the addition of tDCS prior to exercise treatment provides a significant improvement in walking speed and balance in people with MS which lasts longer, compared to exercise alone. Further study is needed to optimize the use of this relatively inexpensive and well tolerated device for rehabilitation. Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12628001836224).

Ghosh S ，Tucak C ，Eisenhauer J ，Jacques A ，Hathorn D ，Dixon J ，Cooper ID ... -  《-》

Non-pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia.

Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) accounts for approximately 43% of frontotemporal dementias and is mainly characterised by a progressive impairment of speech and communication abilities. Three clinical variants have been identified: (a) non-fluent/agrammatic, (b) semantic, and (c) logopenic/phonological PPA variants. There is currently no curative treatment for PPA, and the disease progresses inexorably over time, with devastating effects on speech and communication ability, functional status, and quality of life. Several non-pharmacological interventions that may improve symptoms (e.g. different forms of language training and non-invasive brain stimulation) have been investigated in people with PPA. To assess the effects of non-pharmacological interventions for people with PPA on word retrieval (our primary outcome), global language functions, cognition, quality of life, and adverse events. We searched the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group's trial register, MEDLINE (Ovid SP), Embase (Ovid SP), four other databases and two other trial registers. The latest searches were run on 26 January 2024. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of non-pharmacological interventions in people with PPA. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. There were insufficient data available to conduct the network meta-analyses that we had originally planned (due to trial data being insufficiently reported or not reported at all, as well as the heterogeneous content of the included interventions). Therefore, we provide a descriptive summary of the included studies and results. We included 10 studies, with a total of 132 participants, evaluating non-pharmacological interventions. These were: transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) or repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as stand-alone treatments (used by two and one studies, respectively); tDCS combined with semantic and phonological word-retrieval training (five studies); tDCS combined with semantic word-retrieval training (one study); and tDCS combined with phonological word-retrieval training (one study). Results for our primary outcome of word retrieval were mixed. For the two studies that investigated the effects of tDCS as stand-alone treatment compared to placebo ("sham") tDCS, we rated the results as having very low-certainty evidence. One study found a significant beneficial effect on word retrieval after active tDCS; one study did not report any significant effects in favour of the active tDCS group. Five studies investigated tDCS administered to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, inferior frontal cortex, left frontotemporal region, or the temporoparietal cortex, combined with semantic and phonological word-retrieval training. The most consistent finding was enhancement of word-retrieval ability for trained items immediately after the intervention, when behavioural training was combined with active tDCS compared to behavioural training plus sham tDCS. We found mixed effects for untrained items and maintenance of treatment effects during follow-up assessments. We rated the certainty of the evidence as very low in all studies. One study investigated tDCS combined with semantic word-retrieval training. Training was provided across 15 sessions with a frequency of three to five sessions per week, depending on the personal preferences of the participants. tDCS targeted the left frontotemporal region. The study included three participants: two received 1 mA stimulation and one received 2 mA stimulation. The study showed mixed results. We rated it as very low-certainty evidence. One study investigated tDCS combined with phonological word-retrieval training. Training was again provided across 15 sessions over a period of three weeks. tDCS targeted the left inferior frontal gyrus. This study showed a significantly more pronounced improvement for trained and untrained words in favour of the group that had received active tDCS, but we rated the certainty of the evidence as very low. One study compared active rTMS applied to an individually determined target site to active rTMS applied to a control site (vertex) for effects on participants' word retrieval. This study demonstrated better word retrieval for active rTMS administered to individually determined target brain regions than in the control intervention, but we rated the results as having a very low certainty of evidence. Four studies assessed overall language ability, three studies assessed cognition, five studies assessed potential adverse effects of brain stimulation, and one study investigated quality of life. There is currently no high-certainty evidence to inform clinical decision-making regarding non-pharmacological treatment selection for people with PPA. Preliminary evidence suggests that the combination of active tDCS with specific language therapy may improve impaired word retrieval for specifically trained items beyond the effects of behavioural treatment alone. However, more research is needed, including high-quality RCTs with detailed descriptions of participants and methods, and consideration of outcomes such as quality of life, depressive symptoms, and overall cognitive functioning. Moreover, studies assessing optimal treatments (i.e. behavioural interventions, brain stimulation interventions, and their combinations) for individual patients and PPA subtypes are needed. We were not able to conduct the planned (network) meta-analyses due to missing data that could not be obtained from most of the authors, a general lack of RCTs in the field, and heterogeneous interventions in eligible trials. Journals should implement a mandatory data-sharing requirement to assure transparency and accessibility of data from clinical trials.

Roheger M ，Riemann S ，Brauer A ，McGowan E ，Grittner U ，Flöel A ，Meinzer M ... -  《Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews》

Effectiveness of unilateral lower-limb exoskeleton robot on balance and gait recovery and neuroplasticity in patients with subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial.

Impaired balance and gait in stroke survivors are associated with decreased functional independence. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of unilateral lower-limb exoskeleton robot-assisted overground gait training compared with conventional treatment and to explore the relationship between neuroplastic changes and motor function recovery in subacute stroke patients. In this randomized, single-blind clinical trial, 40 patients with subacute stroke were recruited and randomly assigned to either a robot-assisted training (RT) group or a conventional training (CT) group. All outcome measures were assessed at the enrollment baseline (T0), 2nd week (T1) and 4th week (T2) of the treatment. The primary outcome was the between-group difference in the change in the Berg balance scale (BBS) score from baseline to T2. The secondary measures included longitudinal changes in the Fugl-Meyer assessment of the lower limb (FMA-LE), modified Barthel index (mBI), functional ambulation category (FAC), and locomotion assessment with gait analysis. In addition, the cortical activation pattern related to robot-assisted training was measured before and after intervention via functional near-infrared spectroscopy. A total of 30 patients with complete data were included in this study. Clinical outcomes improved after 4 weeks of training in both groups, with significantly better BBS (F = 6.341, p = 0.018, partial η2 = 0.185), FMA-LE (F = 5.979, p = 0.021, partial η2 = 0.176), FAC (F = 7.692, p = 0.010, partial η2 = 0.216), and mBI scores (F = 7.255, p = 0.042, partial η2 = 0.140) in the RT group than in the CT group. Both groups showed significant improvement in gait speed and stride cadence on the locomotion assessment. Only the RT group presented a significantly increased stride length (F = 4.913, p = 0.015, partial η2 = 0.267), support phase (F = 5.335, p = 0.011, partial η2 = 0.283), and toe-off angle (F = 3.829, p = 0.035, partial η2 = 0.228) on the affected side after the intervention. The RT group also showed increased neural activity response over the ipsilesional motor area and bilateral prefrontal cortex during robot-assisted weight-shift and gait training following 4 weeks of treatment. Overground gait training with a unilateral exoskeleton robot showed improvements in balance and gait functions, resulting in better gait patterns and increased gait stability for stroke patients. The increased cortical response related to the ipsilesional motor areas and their related functional network is crucial in the rehabilitation of lower limb gait in post-stroke patients.

Huo C ，Shao G ，Chen T ，Li W ，Wang J ，Xie H ，Wang Y ，Li Z ，Zheng P ，Li L ，Li L ... -  《Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation》