Improving Lung Cancer Screening at an Academic Medical Center.

Lung cancer ranks as the third most prevalent cancer in the United States. The use of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening significantly reduces mortality from this disease. Unfortunately, Texas lags in completing lung cancer screening (LCS) for high-risk patients, ranking 48th among all states. It is crucial to implement quality improvement (QI) initiatives in Texas. In collaboration with the American Cancer Society, the primary care center (PCC) at our institution led a multidisciplinary QI project aimed at enhancing LCS through LDCT for eligible PCC patients. The study included patients eligible for screening and who fall into the following categories: established patients with Medicaid, low-income or uninsured established patients, and established patients with either Medicare or commercial insurance. Enhancements to electronic medical records, education for clinical staff and patients, and a coordinated, multidisciplinary effort were implemented. The study revealed a substantial 40.2% improvement in LCS rates. The US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines rely on an accurate history of patient's tobacco use to identify patients eligible for LCS. This QI project achieved success in improving the thoroughness of tobacco use history documentation and surpassed our target for increasing LCS by more than 10%.

Cantu C ，Jones R ，Garcia D ，Reyes A ，Cancino RS ... -  《-》

Augmented meaningful use criteria to identify patients eligible for lung cancer screening.

Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose-radiation (low-dose computed tomography [LDCT]) saves lives. Despite recent US Preventive Services Task Force (USPTF) draft endorsement of LCS, a minority of eligible patients get screened. Meaningful use is a set of standards for electronic health records (EHR) established by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and includes reporting of smoking status. We sought to improve rates of LCS among patients treated at our institution by identifying eligible patients using augmented smoking-related meaningful use criteria. We launched an LCS program at our institution, a National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) cancer center, in January 2013. We developed a "tobacco screen," administered by clinic staff to all adult outpatients every 6 months and entered into the EHR. This contained smoking-related meaningful use criteria as well as a pack-year calculation and quit date if applicable. Weekly electronic reports of patients who met eligibility criteria for LCS were generated, and EHR review excluded patients who had had chest computed tomography (CT) within 12 months or who were undergoing cancer treatment. We then contacted eligible patients to review eligibility for LCS and communicated with the primary treating physician regarding the plan for LCS. During the first 3 months of the program, 4 patients were enrolled, 2 by physician referral and 2 by self-referral. We then began to use the tobacco screen reports and identified 418 patients potentially eligible for LCS. Over the next 7 months, we enrolled a total of 110 patients. Fifty-eight (53%) were identified from the tobacco screen, 32 (29%) were self-referred, and 20 (18%) were physician referrals. Three stage I lung cancers were detected and treated. The tobacco screen was easily implemented by clinic staff and took a median time of 2 minutes to enter for current and former smokers. Lack of response to attempts at telephone contact and objection to paying out-of-pocket costs were the most common reasons for failing to screen eligible patients. Use of augmented meaningful use criteria containing detailed tobacco exposure history is feasible and allows for identification of patients eligible for LCS in a medical center. Barriers to LCS include lack of insurance coverage and lack of systematic referral of patients at high risk.

Raz DJ ，Dunham R ，Tiep B ，Sandoval A ，Grannis F ，Rotter A ，Kim JY ... -  《-》

Improving the Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines at an Academic Primary Care Practice.

Brenner AT ，Cubillos L ，Birchard K ，Doyle-Burr C ，Eick J ，Henderson L ，Jones L ，Massaro M ，Minish B ，Molina P ，Pignone M ，Ratner S ，Rivera MP ，Reuland DS ... -  《-》

The 10 Pillars of Lung Cancer Screening: Rationale and Logistics of a Lung Cancer Screening Program.

On the basis of the National Lung Screening Trial data released in 2011, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force made lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography (CT) a public health recommendation in 2013. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) currently reimburse LCS for asymptomatic individuals aged 55-77 years who have a tobacco smoking history of at least 30 pack-years and who are either currently smoking or had quit less than 15 years earlier. Commercial insurers reimburse the cost of LCS for individuals aged 55-80 years with the same smoking history. Effective care for the millions of Americans who qualify for LCS requires an organized step-wise approach. The 10-pillar model reflects the elements required to support a successful LCS program: eligibility, education, examination ordering, image acquisition, image review, communication, referral network, quality improvement, reimbursement, and research frontiers. Examination ordering can be coupled with decision support to ensure that only eligible individuals undergo LCS. Communication of results revolves around the Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) from the American College of Radiology. Lung-RADS is a structured decision-oriented reporting system designed to minimize the rate of false-positive screening examination results. With nodule size and morphology as discriminators, Lung-RADS links nodule management pathways to the variety of nodules present on LCS CT studies. Tracking of patient outcomes is facilitated by a CMS-approved national registry maintained by the American College of Radiology. Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Fintelmann FJ ，Bernheim A ，Digumarthy SR ，Lennes IT ，Kalra MK ，Gilman MD ，Sharma A ，Flores EJ ，Muse VV ，Shepard JA ... -  《-》

Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening in the Veterans Health Administration.

Kinsinger LS ，Anderson C ，Kim J ，Larson M ，Chan SH ，King HA ，Rice KL ，Slatore CG ，Tanner NT ，Pittman K ，Monte RJ ，McNeil RB ，Grubber JM ，Kelley MJ ，Provenzale D ，Datta SK ，Sperber NS ，Barnes LK ，Abbott DH ，Sims KJ ，Whitley RL ，Wu RR ，Jackson GL ... -  《-》