Enucleation for Sporadic Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Larger than 2 Centimeters Is Associated with Equivalent Morbidity and Survival Compared to Smaller Tumors: A Multi-Institutional Study.

Nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (NF-PanNET) ≤2 cm can be observed or resected. Surgery remains recommended for NF-PanNET >2 cm but its extent, enucleation (EN) versus formal resection, remains controversial. Multicentric retrospective cohort of sporadic NF-PanNET patients treated with EN. Short- and long-term outcomes were compared according to tumor size on imaging ≤2 cm versus >2 cm. 131 patients underwent EN for NF-PanNET, including 103 (79.0%) ≤2 cm and 28 (21.0%) >2 cm (extremes, 4-55 mm). Patients' characteristics were comparable, and tumor characteristics only differed in their diameter. Clavien III-IV complications were similar (18.4% vs. 17.9%, p = 1.00) with one death in NF-PanNET ≤2 cm. Grade B/C pancreatic fistula were comparable (16.5% vs. 10.7%, p = 0.850). In NF-PanNET >2 cm there were more pT2/3 stage tumors (85.7% vs. 21.4%, p < 0.001), similar rates of grade G2/3 tumors (25% vs. 16.5%, p = 0.408) with a median Ki67 of 2 (interquartile range: 1-3), and of lymphovascular and perineural invasions. Lymph node picking was done in 46 (35.1%) patients, with a higher median number of harvested lymph nodes in NF-PanNET >2 cm (4 vs. 3, p = 0.01). All were pN0. R0 resection rate (78.6% vs. 82.5%, respectively; p = 0.670) was equivalent. Five-year overall (100% vs. 99%, p = 0.602) and 10-year disease-free (96% vs. 92%, respectively; p = 0.532) survivals were comparable. EN for selected NF-PanNET >2 cm carries equivalent morbidity, overall and disease-free survivals compared to those observed with NF-PanNET ≤2 cm.

Karam E ，Nassar A ，Elkurdi S ，Péré G ，Freville T ，Wasielewski E ，Palen A ，Périnel J ，Lifante JC ，Lermite E ，Marchese U ，Adham M ，Turrini O ，Sulpice L ，Régenet N ，Carrère N ，Gaujoux S ，Pattou F ，Sauvanet A ... -  《-》

Erratum: Eyestalk Ablation to Increase Ovarian Maturation in Mud Crabs.

《Jove-Journal of Visualized Experiments》

Early-Onset Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Clinical Presentation, Pathology Features, and Oncological Outcomes.

Early-Onset (EO) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PanNET) is a rare disease, but whether it is clinically different from late-onset (LO) PanNET is unknown. Our study aimed to evaluate clinical differences and disease outcomes between EO-PanNET and LO-PanNET and to compare sporadic EO-PanNET with those with a hereditary syndrome. Patients with localized PanNET who underwent pancreatectomy at Memorial Sloan Kettering between 2000 and 2017 were identified. Those with metastatic disease and poorly differentiated tumors were excluded. EO-PanNET was defined as <50 and LO-PanNET >50 years of age at the time of diagnosis. Family history and clinical and pathology characteristics were recorded. Overall 383 patients were included, 107 (27.9%) with EO-PanNET. Compared with LO-PanNET, EO-PanNET were more likely to have a hereditary syndrome (2.2% vs. 16%, P <0.001) but had similar pathology features such as tumor grade ( P =0.6), size (2.2 Vs. 2.3 cm, P =0.5) and stageof disease ( P =0.8). Among patients with EO-PanNET, those with hereditary syndrome had more frequently a multifocal disease (65% vs. 3.3%, P <0.001). With a median follow-up of 70 months (range 0-238), the 5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence after curative surgery was 19% (95% CI 12%-28%) and 17% (95% CI 13%-23%), in EO-PanNET and LO-PanNET ( P =0.3). Five-year disease-specific survival was 99% (95% CI 98%-100%) with no difference with respect to PanNET onset time ( P =0.26). In this surgical cohort, we found that EO-PanNET is associated with hereditary syndromes but has pathologic characteristics and oncological outcomes similar to LO-PanNET. These findings suggest that patients with EO-PanNET can be managed similarly to those with LO-PanNET.

Pulvirenti A ，Hauser HF ，Fiedler LM ，McIntyre CA ，Le T ，Reidy-Lagunes DL ，Soares KC ，Balachandran VP ，Kingham TP ，D'Angelica MI ，Drebin JA ，Jarnagin WR ，Raj N ，Wei AC ... -  《-》

Neoadjuvant 177Lu-DOTATATE for non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NEOLUPANET): multicentre phase II study.

Resection of non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NF-PanNETs) is curative in most patients. The potential benefits of neoadjuvant treatments have, however, never been explored. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of neoadjuvant 177Lu-labelled DOTA0-octreotate (177Lu-DOTATATE) followed by surgery in patients with NF-PanNETs. NEOLUPANET was a multicentre, single-arm, phase II trial of patients with sporadic, resectable or potentially resectable NF-PanNETs at high-risk of recurrence; those with positive 68Ga-labelled DOTA PET were eligible. All patients were candidates for neoadjuvant 177Lu-DOTATATE followed by surgery. A sample size of 30 patients was calculated to test postoperative complication rates against predefined cut-offs. The primary endpoint was safety, reflected by postoperative morbidity and mortality within 90 days. Secondary endpoints included rate of objective radiological response and quality of life. From March 2020 to February 2023, 31 patients were enrolled, of whom 26 completed 4 cycles of 177Lu-DOTATATE. A partial radiological response was observed in 18 of 31 patients, and 13 patients had stable disease. Disease progression was not observed. Twenty-four R0 resections and 4 R1 resections were performed in 29 patients who underwent surgery. One tumour was unresectable owing to vascular involvement. There was no postoperative death. Postoperative complications occurred in 21 of 29 patients. Severe complications were observed in seven patients. Quality of life remained stable after 177Lu-DOTATATE and decreased after surgery. Neoadjuvant treatment with 177Lu-DOTATATE is safe and effective for patients with NF-PanNETs.

Partelli S ，Landoni L ，Bartolomei M ，Zerbi A ，Grana CM ，Boggi U ，Butturini G ，Casadei R ，Salvia R ，Falconi M ... -  《-》

Clinicopathological Characteristics and Long-Term Outcomes of Cystic vs. Solid Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Multi-Institutional Experience with 1727 Patients.

To investigate the clinicopathological features and long-term outcomes of cystic and solid pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs). PanNETs uncommonly present as cystic lesions. Whether cystic PanNETs represent a distinct clinical entity compared to solid PanNETs is controversial. Clinicopathologic data of patients with resected PanNETs were collected from 4 high-volume centers between 2000-2019. Clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of patients with cystic and solid PanNETs were compared based on a 3 cm tumor size cut-off using the Chi-squared test and Mann-Whitney U test. Survival estimates were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test and multivariable analysis using a Cox proportional hazard model. Of the 1727 patients undergoing pancreatectomy for PanNET, the median age was 58.1 years (IQR, 18.4), and 53.3% were male. Of these, 177 (10.3%) were cystic and 1550 (89.7%) solid. Cystic PanNETs were more prevalent in patients with hereditary syndromes, less frequently functional, and more often located in the body/tail of the pancreas. After the exclusion of patients with functional tumors, WHO G3 tumors, hereditary syndromes, neoadjuvant treatment, and metastatic stage, 145 cystic PanNETs were compared to 1059 solid PanNETs, and the median follow-up period of the cohort was 64 months. Cystic PanNETs demonstrated significantly fewer high-risk histopathological features, lymph node metastases (5.5% vs. 24.0%, P<0.001), and distant recurrence (4.1% vs. 14.4%; P<0.001). Among tumors ≤3 cm, cystic PanNETs had a low rate of lymph node metastases (3.9% vs. 17.8%; P<0.001), recurrence (3.1% vs. 8.4%; P=0.041), and low propensity to recur distantly. Cystic PanNETs had favorable long-term survival regardless of tumor size. Cystic PanNETs have a more benign course than their solid counterparts and conservative management can be considered for EUS-FNA-proven cystic PanNETs ≤3 cm. Parenchyma and lymph-node sparing resections are warranted in patients with cystic PanNETs>3 cm. Patients with poor baseline performance status may forego cystic PanNET resection and not affect their overall survival.

Ventin M ，Arya S ，Cattaneo G ，Fernandez-Del Castillo C ，Wei AC ，Zureikat AH ，Alvikas J ，Javed AA ，Campbell BA ，Sekigami Y ，Zheng J ，Qadan M ，Lillemoe KD ，He J ，Ferrone CR ，PAncreatic Neuroendocrine Disease Alliance (PANDA) ... -  《-》