Comparison between Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Node Biopsy and Transbronchial Needle Aspiration: A Meta-Analysis.

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) can be limited by the inadequacy of intact tissues, especially in patients with lymphoma, sarcoidosis, and lymph node tuberculosis. A novel technique called transbronchial node biopsy (TBNB) by forceps or cryoprobe has been proposed and studied to improve specimen quality and diagnostic yield. We performed a systematic review of studies describing the safety and sensitivity of EBUS-TBNB versus EBUS-TBNA in diagnosing intrathoracic lymphadenopathy/masses. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure to identify studies focusing on the application of EBUS-TBNB for diagnosis of intrathoracic lymphadenopathy. The quality of each study was evaluated using the QUADAS-2 tool. Using inverse-variance (I-V) weighting, we performed a meta-analysis of diagnostic yield estimations. We also reviewed the complications related to the procedure. Thirteen studies were included in the final analysis. The meta-analysis yielded a pooled overall diagnostic yield of 77.80% (939/1,207) for EBUS-TBNA and 86.01% (834/958) for EBUS-TBNB, with an inverse-variance-weighted odds ratio of 3.13 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.61-6.01; p = 0.0008) and I2 of 82%. The pooled diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNB versus EBUS-TBNA for the diagnosis of malignancy (including primary lung cancer and extrapulmonary malignancy) was 84.53% (590/698) for EBUS-TBNA and 90.84% (476/524) for EBUS-TBNB, with an I-V-weighted OR of 2.33 (95% CI, 1.15-4.74; p = 0.02) and I2 of 64%. The pooled diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNB versus EBUS-TBNA for the diagnosis of benignancy was 71.19% (252/354) for EBUS-TBNA and 86.62% (233/269) for EBUS-TBNB, with an I-V-weighted OR of 4.39 (95% CI, 2.00-9.65; p = 0.002) and I2 of 59%. The overall complications included bleeding (n = 11, 0.90%), pneumomediastinum (n = 6, 0.49%), pneumothorax (n = 6, 0.49%), pneumonia (n = 4, 0.33%), respiratory failure (n = 1, 0.08%), and haemoptysis (n = 1, 0.08%). The funnel plot analysis illustrated no major publication bias. EBUS-TBNB improves the overall diagnostic yield of sampling intrathoracic lymphadenopathy and mass lesions relative to EBUS-TBNA. The complication rate of EBUS-TBNB is higher than that of EBUS-TBNA but reportedly lower than that of surgical biopsies.

Yang W ，Yang H ，Zhang Q ，Herth FJF ，Zhang X ... -  《-》

Ultrasound-guided transbronchial cryobiopsy of mediastinal and hilar lesions: a multicenter pragmatic cohort study with real-world evidence.

Limited data exist on the reliability, efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided transbronchial cryobiopsy for suspicious mediastinal and hilar lesions. This study shares findings from implementing this method and compares the results with those of the standard endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA). Patients undergoing diagnostic bronchoscopy for mediastinal or hilar lesions in four Swiss centres were included. The study aims to assess the diagnostic yield and safety of EBUS-guided cryobiopsy compared with EBUS-TBNA. Tunnelling to the target lesion was performed using an electric needle knife (70.8%), a 19 G- (12.4%) or a 22 G needle (16.8%). Cryobiopsies were obtained with a freezing time of 4-7 s (18.2% with a 1.7 mm probe) or 6-10 s (81.8% with a 1.1 mm probe). Altogether, 137 patients were enrolled with a median follow-up of 89 days. The overall diagnostic yield was 56.2% for EBUS-TBNA and 91.2% for cryobiopsies (p<0.001). Cryobiopsies increased the diagnostic yield for benign disorders (+28.5%), uncommon tumours (+5.9%) and other metastatic cancer (+0.6%), but not for lung cancer (+0%). For lung cancer (n=27), immunohistochemistry was obtainable in 40.7% of EBUS-TBNA (median of 3 probes [IQR 3 to 3]), significantly lower than cryobiopsy's 88.9% yield (median of 4 probes [IQR 3 to 5]) (p<0.001). Adverse events were found in 23.4% of participants; 10.2% had mild to moderate bleeding, 0.7% had pneumonia, and 0.7% (one) of patients had pneumothorax following pneumomediastinum. No deaths or mediastinum infections were observed. Cryobiopsy of mediastinal and hilar lesions improves the diagnostic yield compared with EBUS-TBNA while maintaining a favourable safety profile.

Mangold MS ，Franzen DP ，Hetzel J ，Latshang TD ，Roeder M ，Vesenbeckh SM ，Ulrich S ，Gaisl T ，Steinack C ... -  《BMJ Open Respiratory Research》

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration validated with video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy in the mediastinal restaging of patients with stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer after induction therapy.

García-Cabo B ，Reig N ，Rami-Porta R ，Call S ，Esteban L ，Barreiro B ，Reyes E ，Obiols C ，Ochoa JM ，Morlius X ，Tarroch X ，Serra M ，Sanz-Santos J ... -  《-》

Antioxidants for female subfertility.

M.G. Showell, R. Mackenzie‐Proctor, V. Jordan, and R.J. Hart, “Antioxidants for Female Subfertility,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 8 (2020): CD007807, https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007807.pub4 This Editorial Note is for the above article, published online on August 27, 2020, in Cochrane Library (cochranelibrary.com), and has been issued by the Publisher, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, in agreement with Cochrane. The Editorial note has been agreed due to concerns discovered by the Cochrane managing editor regarding the retraction of six studies in the Review (Badawy et al. 2006, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.02.097; El Refaeey et al. 2014, 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.03.011; El Sharkwy & Abd El Aziz 2019a, https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12902; Gerli et al. 2007, https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202309_33752, full text: https://europepmc.org/article/MED/18074942; Ismail et al. 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.06.008; Hashemi et al. 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1372413). In addition, expressions of concern have been published for two studies (Jamilian et al. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-017-1236-3; Zadeh Modarres 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-017-1148-2). The retracted studies will be moved to the Excluded Studies table, and their impact on the review findings will be investigated and acted on accordingly in a future update. Initial checks indicate that removal of the six retracted studies did not make an appreciable difference to the results. Likewise, the studies for which Expressions of Concern were issued will be moved to the Awaiting classification table; they did not report any review outcomes, so removal will have no impact on the review findings. A couple may be considered to have fertility problems if they have been trying to conceive for over a year with no success. This may affect up to a quarter of all couples planning a child. It is estimated that for 40% to 50% of couples, subfertility may result from factors affecting women. Antioxidants are thought to reduce the oxidative stress brought on by these conditions. Currently, limited evidence suggests that antioxidants improve fertility, and trials have explored this area with varied results. This review assesses the evidence for the effectiveness of different antioxidants in female subfertility. To determine whether supplementary oral antioxidants compared with placebo, no treatment/standard treatment or another antioxidant improve fertility outcomes for subfertile women. We searched the following databases (from their inception to September 2019), with no language or date restriction: Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group (CGFG) specialised register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and AMED. We checked reference lists of relevant studies and searched the trial registers. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared any type, dose or combination of oral antioxidant supplement with placebo, no treatment or treatment with another antioxidant, among women attending a reproductive clinic. We excluded trials comparing antioxidants with fertility drugs alone and trials that only included fertile women attending a fertility clinic because of male partner infertility. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. The primary review outcome was live birth; secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancy rates and adverse events. We included 63 trials involving 7760 women. Investigators compared oral antioxidants, including: combinations of antioxidants, N-acetylcysteine, melatonin, L-arginine, myo-inositol, carnitine, selenium, vitamin E, vitamin B complex, vitamin C, vitamin D+calcium, CoQ10, and omega-3-polyunsaturated fatty acids versus placebo, no treatment/standard treatment or another antioxidant. Only 27 of the 63 included trials reported funding sources. Due to the very low-quality of the evidence we are uncertain whether antioxidants improve live birth rate compared with placebo or no treatment/standard treatment (odds ratio (OR) 1.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.36 to 2.43; P < 0.001, I2 = 29%; 13 RCTs, 1227 women). This suggests that among subfertile women with an expected live birth rate of 19%, the rate among women using antioxidants would be between 24% and 36%. Low-quality evidence suggests that antioxidants may improve clinical pregnancy rate compared with placebo or no treatment/standard treatment (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.43 to 1.89; P < 0.001, I2 = 63%; 35 RCTs, 5165 women). This suggests that among subfertile women with an expected clinical pregnancy rate of 19%, the rate among women using antioxidants would be between 25% and 30%. Heterogeneity was moderately high. Overall 28 trials reported on various adverse events in the meta-analysis. The evidence suggests that the use of antioxidants makes no difference between the groups in rates of miscarriage (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.55; P = 0.46, I2 = 0%; 24 RCTs, 3229 women; low-quality evidence). There was also no evidence of a difference between the groups in rates of multiple pregnancy (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.56; P = 0.99, I2 = 0%; 9 RCTs, 1886 women; low-quality evidence). There was also no evidence of a difference between the groups in rates of gastrointestinal disturbances (OR 1.55, 95% CI 0.47 to 5.10; P = 0.47, I2 = 0%; 3 RCTs, 343 women; low-quality evidence). Low-quality evidence showed that there was also no difference between the groups in rates of ectopic pregnancy (OR 1.40, 95% CI 0.27 to 7.20; P = 0.69, I2 = 0%; 4 RCTs, 404 women). In the antioxidant versus antioxidant comparison, low-quality evidence shows no difference in a lower dose of melatonin being associated with an increased live-birth rate compared with higher-dose melatonin (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.41 to 2.15; P = 0.89, I2 = 0%; 2 RCTs, 140 women). This suggests that among subfertile women with an expected live-birth rate of 24%, the rate among women using a lower dose of melatonin compared to a higher dose would be between 12% and 40%. Similarly with clinical pregnancy, there was no evidence of a difference between the groups in rates between a lower and a higher dose of melatonin (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.41 to 2.15; P = 0.89, I2 = 0%; 2 RCTs, 140 women). Three trials reported on miscarriage in the antioxidant versus antioxidant comparison (two used doses of melatonin and one compared N-acetylcysteine versus L-carnitine). There were no miscarriages in either melatonin trial. Multiple pregnancy and gastrointestinal disturbances were not reported, and ectopic pregnancy was reported by only one trial, with no events. The study comparing N-acetylcysteine with L-carnitine did not report live birth rate. Very low-quality evidence shows no evidence of a difference in clinical pregnancy (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.33 to 2.00; 1 RCT, 164 women; low-quality evidence). Low quality evidence shows no difference in miscarriage (OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.42 to 5.67; 1 RCT, 164 women; low-quality evidence). The study did not report multiple pregnancy, gastrointestinal disturbances or ectopic pregnancy. The overall quality of evidence was limited by serious risk of bias associated with poor reporting of methods, imprecision and inconsistency. In this review, there was low- to very low-quality evidence to show that taking an antioxidant may benefit subfertile women. Overall, there is no evidence of increased risk of miscarriage, multiple births, gastrointestinal effects or ectopic pregnancies, but evidence was of very low quality. At this time, there is limited evidence in support of supplemental oral antioxidants for subfertile women.

Showell MG ，Mackenzie-Proctor R ，Jordan V ，Hart RJ ... -  《Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews》

Utility of Acquire 22G-fine needle biopsy (FNB) needle vs the standard 22G needle during Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA): A Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT).

Madan K ，Mittal S ，Shankar SH ，Nambirajan A ，Jain D ，Tiwari P ，Hadda V ，Mohan A ，Guleria R ... -  《-》