Subcutaneous vs intravenous abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis-interstitial lung disease. National multicentre study of 397 patients.

Evidence on abatacept (ABA) utility for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) - associated interstitial lung disease (ILD) is growing. Clinical trials have shown equivalence in subcutaneous (SC) and intravenous (IV) administration of ABA for articular manifestations. However, this has not been studied in respiratory outcomes. To compare the effectiveness of ABA in RA-ILD patients according to the route of administration. National retrospective multicentre study of RA-ILD patients on treatment with ABA. They were divided into 2 groups: a) IV, and b) SC. The following outcomes were analysed from baseline to final follow-up using linear mixed models: a) forced vital capacity (FVC), b) diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO), c) chest high resolution computed tomography (HRCT), d) dyspnoea, e) RA activity, and f) sparing corticosteroids effect. A total of 397 patients were included (94 IV-ABA and 303 SC-ABA), median follow-up of 24 [10-48] months. After adjustment for possible confounders, FVC and DLCO remained stable during the first 24 months without differences between IV-ABA and SC-ABA (p = 0.6304 and 0.5337). Improvement/ stability of lung lesions in HRCT was observed in 67 % of patients (75 % IV-ABA, 64 % SC-ABA; p = 0.07). Dyspnoea stabilized/ improved in 84 % of patients (90 % IV-ABA, 82 % SC-ABA; p = 0.09). RA - disease activity improved in both groups. No statistically significant differences regarding any of the variables studied between the two groups were found. ABA was withdrawn in 87 patients (21.9 %), 45 % IV-ABA and 37 % SC-ABA (p = 0.29). ILD worsening and articular inefficacy were the most common reasons for ABA discontinuation. In patients with RA-ILD, ABA seems to be equally effective regardless of the route of administration.

López-Maraver M ，Serrano-Combarro A ，Atienza-Mateo B ，Del Val N ，Casafont-Solé I ，Melero-Gonzalez RB ，Pérez-Linaza A ，Calvo Gutiérrez J ，Mena-Vázquez N ，Vegas-Revenga N ，Domínguez-Casas L ，Loarce Martos J ，Peralta Ginés CA ，Diez Morrondo C ，Pérez Albaladejo L ，López Sánchez R ，Manzano Canabal MG ，Brandy-García AM ，López Viejo P ，Bonilla G ，Maiz-Alonso O ，Carrasco-Cubero C ，Garijo Bufort M ，Moreno M ，Urruticoechea-Arana A ，Ordóñez-Palau S ，González-Montagut C ，Giner Serret E ，De Dios Jiménez De Aberasturi JR ，Lozano Morillo F ，Vázquez Rodríguez T ，Carreira PE ，Blanco Madrigal JM ，Miguel Ibáñez B ，Rodríguez López M ，Fernández-Díaz C ，Loricera J ，Ferraz-Amaro I ，Ferrer-Pargada D ，Castañeda S ，Blanco R ，Spanish Collaborative Group of Abatacept in Interstitial Lung Disease Associated with Rheumatoid Arthritis ... -  《-》

Erratum: Eyestalk Ablation to Increase Ovarian Maturation in Mud Crabs.

《Jove-Journal of Visualized Experiments》

Abatacept versus tumor necrosis factor inhibitors on mortality and medical utilizations in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis associated interstitial lung disease: a large-scale real-world retrospective cohort study.

Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory disease, and interstitial lung disease is one of the important extra-articular manifestations. There is limited evidence comparing abatacept (ABA) and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) regarding the risk of mortality among patients with rheumatoid arthritis associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). The aim of this study is to investigate the risk of mortality in patients with RA-ILD treated with ABA compared to TNFi. This retrospective cohort study utilized TriNetX electronic health record database. We enrolled patients who were diagnosed with RA-ILD and had received a new prescription for either ABA or TNFi. Patients were categorized into two cohorts based on their initial prescription. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary outcomes were healthcare utilizations, including hospitalization, critical care services, and mechanical ventilation. Subgroup analyses were performed on age, presence of anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA), and cardiovascular risk. Among 34,388 RA-ILD patients, 895 were selected for each group (ABA and TNFi) following propensity score matching. The ABA group exhibited a higher all-cause mortality risk. (HR 1.296, 95% CI 1.006-1.671). Subgroup analysis showed a heightened risk of receiving mechanical ventilation in ABA-treated patients aged 18-64 years old (HR 1.853, 95% CI 1.002-3.426), and those with cardiovascular risk factors (HR 2.015, 95% CI 1.118-3.630). Another subgroup analysis indicated a higher risk of mortality among ABA-treated patients with positive-ACPA. (HR 4.138 95% CI 1.343-12.75). This real-world data research demonstrated a higher risk of all-cause mortality in RA-ILD patients treated with ABA compared to TNFi, particularly those aged 18-64 years, lacking cardiovascular risk factors, and positive-ACPA. ABA was associated with an increased risk of mechanical ventilation in patients aged 18-64 years and those with cardiovascular risk factors.

Shih PC ，Lai CC ，Zou QH ，Wang SI ，Huang XY ，Wei JCC ... -  《-》

Evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease in patients treated with JAK inhibitors: a MAJIK-SFR cohort study.

To examine the course of interstitial lung disease associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA-ILD) in France on treatment with Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) using the MAJIK-SFR registry. Prospective national multicentre observational study identifying patients with RA-ILD from the MAJIK-SFR registry. Pulmonary assessment data were collected at JAKi initiation and follow-up visits (6 months, 12 months and a median of 21 months postinclusion), including chest high-resolution CT (HRCT), pulmonary function tests (forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO)), acute exacerbations of ILD, respiratory infections and lung cancers. We enrolled 42 patients (26 women, 62%) with RA-ILD with a mean age of 61±13 years and a mean disease duration of 16±10 years. Compared with the 778 RA patients without ILD from the MAJIK registry, RA-ILD patients were older, displayed more severe and active disease and had more prevalent comorbidities. Non-specific interstitial pneumonia and usual interstitial pneumonia accounted for 46% and 43% of the chest HRCT ILD patterns, respectively. No significant changes in FVC and DLCO were observed during the follow-up period. Chest HRCT lesions remained stable in 69% of patients. Progressive ILD was identified in 8 patients (19%). 16 (38%) respiratory tract infections were observed. Only one acute regressive exacerbation of ILD was noted, and no lung cancer was diagnosed. No deaths occurred. JAKi was discontinued in 17 patients including 8 for inefficacy on joint involvement and 5 for intolerance. The analysis indicates stability of RA-ILD in patients treated with JAKi. The tolerance profile of JAKi in this higher risk population did not reveal new safety signal.

Triboulet F ，Juge PA ，Truchetet ME ，Pham T ，Roux N ，Flipo RM ，Leské C ，Roux CH ，Seror R ，Basch A ，Brocq O ，Chazerain P ，Coury-Lucas F ，Damade R ，Dernis E ，Gottenberg JE ，Ramon A ，Ruyssen-Witrand A ，Salmon JH ，Shipley É ，Tournadre A ，Prati C ，Dieudé P ，Avouac J ... -  《-》

Intravenous antibiotics for pulmonary exacerbations in people with cystic fibrosis.

Cystic fibrosis is a multisystem disease characterised by the production of thick secretions causing recurrent pulmonary infection, often with unusual bacteria. Intravenous (IV) antibiotics are commonly used in the treatment of acute deteriorations in symptoms (pulmonary exacerbations); however, recently the assumption that exacerbations are due to increases in bacterial burden has been questioned. This is an update of a previously published review. To establish whether IV antibiotics for the treatment of pulmonary exacerbations in people with cystic fibrosis improve short-term and long-term clinical outcomes. We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, compiled from electronic database searches and handsearching of journals and conference abstract books. We also searched the reference lists of relevant articles and reviews and ongoing trials registers. Date of last search of Cochrane Trials Register: 19 June 2024. Randomised controlled trials and the first treatment cycle of cross-over studies comparing IV antibiotics (given alone or in an antibiotic combination) with placebo, or inhaled or oral antibiotics for people with cystic fibrosis experiencing a pulmonary exacerbation. Studies comparing different IV antibiotic regimens were also eligible. We assessed studies for eligibility and risk of bias, and extracted data. Using GRADE, we assessed the certainty of the evidence for the outcomes lung function % predicted (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC)), time to next exacerbation and quality of life. We included 45 studies involving 2810 participants. The included studies were mostly small, and inadequately reported, many of which were quite old. The certainty of the evidence was mostly low. Combined intravenous antibiotics versus placebo Data reported for absolute change in % predicted FEV1 and FVC suggested a possible improvement in favour of IV antibiotics, but the evidence is very uncertain (1 study, 12 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The study did not measure time to next exacerbation or quality of life. Intravenous versus nebulised antibiotics Five studies (122 participants) reported FEV1, with analysable data only from one study (16 participants). We found no difference between groups (moderate-certainty evidence). Three studies (91 participants) reported on FVC, with analysable data from only one study (54 participants). We are very uncertain on the effect of nebulised antibiotics (very low-certainty evidence). In one study, the 16 participants on nebulised plus IV antibiotics had a lower mean number of days to next exacerbation than those on combined IV antibiotics (low-certainty evidence), but we found no difference in quality of life between groups (low-certainty evidence). Intravenous versus oral antibiotics Three studies (172 participants) reported no difference in different measures of lung function. We found no difference in analysable data between IV and oral antibiotic regimens in either FEV1 % predicted or FVC % predicted (1 study, 24 participants; low-certainty evidence) or in the time to the next exacerbation (1 study, 108 participants; very low-certainty evidence). No study measured quality of life. Intravenous antibiotic regimens compared One study (analysed as two data sets) compared the duration of IV antibiotic regimens between two groups (split according to initial antibiotic response). The first part was a non-inferiority study in 214 early treatment responders to establish whether 10 days of IV antibiotic treatment was as effective as 14 days. Second, investigators looked at whether 14 or 21 days of IV antibiotics were more effective in 705 participants who did not respond early to treatment. We found no difference in FEV1 % predicted with any duration of treatment (919 participants; high-certainty evidence) or the time to next exacerbation (information later taken from registry data). Investigators did not report FVC or quality of life. Other comparisons We also found little or no difference in lung function when comparing single IV antibiotic regimens to placebo (2 studies, 70 participants), or in lung function and time to next exacerbation when comparing different single antibiotic regimens (2 studies, 95 participants). There may be a greater improvement in lung function in participants receiving combined IV antibiotics compared to single IV antibiotics (6 studies, 265 participants; low- to very low-certainty evidence), but probably no difference in the time to next exacerbation (1 study, 34 participants; low-certainty evidence). Four studies compared a single IV antibiotic plus placebo to a combined IV antibiotic regimen with high levels of heterogeneity in the results. We are very uncertain if there is any difference between groups in lung function (4 studies, 214 participants) and there may be little or no difference to being re-admitted to hospital for an exacerbation (2 studies, 104 participants). Nine studies (417 participants) compared combined IV antibiotic regimens with a great variation in drugs. We identified no differences in any measure of lung function or the time to next exacerbation between different regimens (low- to very low-certainty evidence). There were mixed results for adverse events across all comparisons; common adverse effects included elevated liver function tests, gastrointestinal events and haematological abnormalities. There were limited data for other secondary outcomes, such as weight, and there was no evidence of treatment effect. The evidence of benefit from administering IV antibiotics for pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis is often poor, especially in terms of size of studies and risk of bias, particularly in older studies. We are not certain whether there is any difference between specific antibiotic combinations, and neither is there evidence of a difference between the IV route and the inhaled or oral routes. There is limited evidence that shorter antibiotic duration in adults who respond early to treatment is not different to a longer period of treatment. There remain several unanswered questions regarding optimal IV antibiotic treatment regimens.

Hurley MN ，Smith S ，Flume P ，Jahnke N ，Prayle AP ... -  《Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews》