Cryopreservation of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells using a DMSO-free solution is comparable to DMSO-containing cryoprotectants: results of an international multicenter PACT/BEST collaborative study.
An essential aspect of ensuring availability and stability of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) products for clinical use is that these cells are cryopreserved before individual infusion into patients. Currently, cryopreservation of MSCs involves use of a cryoprotectant solution containing dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). However, it is recognized that DMSO may be toxic for both the patient and the MSC product. In this Production Assistance for Cellular Therapies (PACT) and Biomedical Excellence for Safer Transfusion (BEST) Collaborative study, we compared a novel DMSO-free solution with DMSO containing cryoprotectant solutions for freezing MSCs.
A DMSO-free cryoprotectant solution containing sucrose, glycerol, and isoleucine (SGI) in a base of Plasmalyte A was prepared at the University of Minnesota. Cryoprotectant solutions containing 5-10% DMSO (in-house) were prepared at seven participating centers (five from USA, one each from Australia and Germany). The MSCs were isolated from bone marrow or adipose tissue and cultured ex vivo per local protocols at each center. The cells in suspension were frozen by aliquoting into vials/bags. For six out of the seven centers, the vials/bags were placed in a controlled rate freezer (one center placed them at -80°C freezer overnight) before transferring to liquid nitrogen. The cells were kept frozen for at least one week before thawing and testing. Pre- and post-thaw assessment included cell viability and recovery, immunophenotype as well as transcriptional and gene expression profiles. Linear regression, mixed effects models and two-sided t-tests were applied for statistical analysis.
MSCs had an average viability of 94.3% (95% CI: 87.2-100%) before cryopreservation, decreasing by 4.5% (95% CI: 0.03-9.0%; P: 0.049) and 11.4% (95% CI: 6.9-15.8%; P< 0.001), for MSCs cryopreserved in the in-house and SGI solutions, respectively. The average recovery of viable MSCs cryopreserved in the SGI was 92.9% (95% CI: 85.7-100.0%), and it was lower by 5.6% (95% CI: 1.3-9.8%, P < 0.013) for the in-house solution. Additionally, MSCs cryopreserved in the two solutions had expected level of expressions for CD45, CD73, CD90, and CD105 with no significant difference in global gene expression profiles.
MSCs cryopreserved in a DMSO-free solution containing sucrose, glycerol, and isoleucine in a base of Plasmalyte A had slightly lower cell viability, better recovery, and comparable immunophenotype and global gene expression profiles compared to MSCs cryopreserved in DMSO containing solutions. The average viability of MSCs in the novel solution was above 80% and, thus, likely clinically acceptable. Future studies are suggested to test the post-thaw functions of MSCs cryopreserved in the novel DMSO-free solution.
Mamo T
,Cox CA
,Demorest C
,Fontaine MJ
,Hubel A
,Kelley L
,Khan A
,Marks DC
,Pati S
,Reems JA
,Spohn G
,Schäfer R
,Shi R
,Shao L
,Stroncek D
,McKenna DH
,Biomedical Excellence for Safer Transfusion (BEST) Collaborative
... -
《-》
Single-cell analysis comparing early-stage oocytes from fresh and slow-frozen/thawed human ovarian cortex reveals minimal impact of cryopreservation on the oocyte transcriptome.
Does the slow-freezing and thawing process have a negative impact on the transcriptome of oocytes isolated from early-stage human follicles compared to fresh controls?
The transcriptional profiles of fresh and frozen/thawed oocytes did not cluster separately, indicating undetectable differences between the two groups when compared to within-donor heterogeneity.
Previous studies using histological analysis of follicle morphology, density, and stage distribution in slow-frozen/thawed human ovarian cortex compared to fresh controls showed no differences between the two groups. Clinical cases reported in the past 10 years have demonstrated that transplanted slow-frozen/thawed and fresh ovarian cortex restored normal serum FSH levels and regular menstrual cycles by 5 months. However, the slow-frozen and thawed tissue resulted in lower rates of pregnancies and live births, albeit not statistically significant.
We utilized single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNAseq) of 144 human oocytes isolated from cadaver ovaries obtained from three donors.
Human ovarian cortex from three healthy premenopausal donors 16, 18, and 27 years old was cut into squares measuring 10 × 10 × 1 mm3 and either slow-frozen and thawed or processed fresh. First, using a novel method for isolating live oocytes from primordial and primary follicles, the ovarian cortex squares were fragmented with a McIlwain tissue chopper and enzymatically digested. Next, oocytes were mechanically denuded under a dissection microscope and placed individually into wells containing lysis buffer for scRNAseq. Lysed single oocytes were subjected to library prep using the seqWell PlexWell rapid single-cell RNA protocol. Pooled libraries were subjected to 150-bp paired-end sequencing on the NovaSeq6000 Illumina platform. In total, we sequenced 144 oocytes-24 oocytes isolated fresh and 24 oocytes isolated after slow-freezing and thawing from each of the three donors. Additionally, we performed histological analysis of fresh and frozen/thawed ovarian cortex tissue from all three donors using hematoxylin and eosin staining and analyzed morphology, follicle density, and follicle stage distribution differences between fresh and cryopreserved ovarian cortex.
The histological analysis revealed no differences in follicle stage distribution or follicle morphology between conditions, with the percentage of normal follicles in fresh and frozen/thawed tissue, respectively, as 86.7% and 91.0% for Donor 1, 91.7% and 92.5% for Donor 2, and 96.1% and 91.1% for Donor 3. The follicle density per mm3 in fresh and frozen/thawed tissue, respectively, was 279.4 and 235.8 for Donor 1, 662.2 and 553.5 for Donor 2, and 55.8 and 71.4 for Donor 3. The difference in follicle density was not statistically significant between fresh and frozen/thawed conditions for Donors 2 and 3, and significant (P = 0.017) for Donor 1. The stromal cell densities in fresh and frozen/thawed tissue, respectively, were 0.014 in both conditions for Donor 1, 0.014 and 0.016 for Donor 2, and 0.013 and 0.014 for Donor 3. There was no statistically significant difference in stromal cell density between conditions in Donor 1 and Donor 3, though it was statistically significant (P ≤ 0.001) for Donor 2. The transcriptional profiles of fresh and frozen/thawed oocytes did not cluster separately, suggesting insignificant differences between the two groups. However, at the group mean level, there was a small shift between the fresh and frozen/thawed oocytes and the shifts were parallel across the three donors. In this comparison, fresh oocytes were enriched for gene ontology terms related to chromosome segregation and mitosis, whereas frozen/thawed oocytes were enriched for terms related to wound response, cAMP signaling, and extracellular matrix organization.
Datasets available on Zenodo.org. DOI: https://zenodo.org/records/13224872.
In this study, we only sequenced the oocytes isolated from early-stage follicles due to technical challenges collecting and sequencing the somatic cells surrounding the oocytes. Investigating the transcriptomic changes after freezing and thawing in the somatic cells would need to be studied in the future. Additionally, we built RNAseq libraries immediately after thawing focusing on the immediate changes. Investigation of the effects that manifest at later timepoints, either in culture or upon implantation in an animal model, may reveal additional effects of the freeze/thaw process on the transcriptome.
The only clinically approved method of fertility preservation for prepubertal cancer patients and adult patients who cannot delay cancer treatment is ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Investigation of cryopreservation-induced changes in follicles at all stages is critical to further our understanding of the safety and efficacy of using these tissues for fertility preservation in the clinic. Our study is the first to analyze transcriptomic changes between individual fresh and slow-frozen/thawed human oocytes collected from early-stage follicles. To accomplish this, we developed a novel method for dissociating both fresh and frozen/thawed human ovarian cortex to obtain live denuded oocytes from early-stage follicles. Our findings provide insights into the use of cryopreserved tissue and follicles for fertility preservation efforts.
This work was funded by National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01HD099402, Career Training in Reproductive Biology (CTRB) Training Grant National Institutes of Health (NIH) T32 to Jordan Machlin, National Institutes of Health (NIH) F31-HD106626 and National Institutes of Health (NIH) T31H-D079342 to Andrea Jones, National Institutes of Health (NIH) T32-GM70449 to D. Ford Hannum, and The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Grant CZF2019-002428. We have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Machlin JH
,Hannum DF
,Jones ASK
,Schissel T
,Potocsky K
,Marsh EE
,Hammoud S
,Padmanabhan V
,Li JZ
,Shikanov A
... -
《-》
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.
Survival estimation for patients with symptomatic skeletal metastases ideally should be made before a type of local treatment has already been determined. Currently available survival prediction tools, however, were generated using data from patients treated either operatively or with local radiation alone, raising concerns about whether they would generalize well to all patients presenting for assessment. The Skeletal Oncology Research Group machine-learning algorithm (SORG-MLA), trained with institution-based data of surgically treated patients, and the Metastases location, Elderly, Tumor primary, Sex, Sickness/comorbidity, and Site of radiotherapy model (METSSS), trained with registry-based data of patients treated with radiotherapy alone, are two of the most recently developed survival prediction models, but they have not been tested on patients whose local treatment strategy is not yet decided.
(1) Which of these two survival prediction models performed better in a mixed cohort made up both of patients who received local treatment with surgery followed by radiotherapy and who had radiation alone for symptomatic bone metastases? (2) Which model performed better among patients whose local treatment consisted of only palliative radiotherapy? (3) Are laboratory values used by SORG-MLA, which are not included in METSSS, independently associated with survival after controlling for predictions made by METSSS?
Between 2010 and 2018, we provided local treatment for 2113 adult patients with skeletal metastases in the extremities at an urban tertiary referral academic medical center using one of two strategies: (1) surgery followed by postoperative radiotherapy or (2) palliative radiotherapy alone. Every patient's survivorship status was ascertained either by their medical records or the national death registry from the Taiwanese National Health Insurance Administration. After applying a priori designated exclusion criteria, 91% (1920) were analyzed here. Among them, 48% (920) of the patients were female, and the median (IQR) age was 62 years (53 to 70 years). Lung was the most common primary tumor site (41% [782]), and 59% (1128) of patients had other skeletal metastases in addition to the treated lesion(s). In general, the indications for surgery were the presence of a complete pathologic fracture or an impending pathologic fracture, defined as having a Mirels score of ≥ 9, in patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification of less than or equal to IV and who were considered fit for surgery. The indications for radiotherapy were relief of pain, local tumor control, prevention of skeletal-related events, and any combination of the above. In all, 84% (1610) of the patients received palliative radiotherapy alone as local treatment for the target lesion(s), and 16% (310) underwent surgery followed by postoperative radiotherapy. Neither METSSS nor SORG-MLA was used at the point of care to aid clinical decision-making during the treatment period. Survival was retrospectively estimated by these two models to test their potential for providing survival probabilities. We first compared SORG to METSSS in the entire population. Then, we repeated the comparison in patients who received local treatment with palliative radiation alone. We assessed model performance by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), calibration analysis, Brier score, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The AUROC measures discrimination, which is the ability to distinguish patients with the event of interest (such as death at a particular time point) from those without. AUROC typically ranges from 0.5 to 1.0, with 0.5 indicating random guessing and 1.0 a perfect prediction, and in general, an AUROC of ≥ 0.7 indicates adequate discrimination for clinical use. Calibration refers to the agreement between the predicted outcomes (in this case, survival probabilities) and the actual outcomes, with a perfect calibration curve having an intercept of 0 and a slope of 1. A positive intercept indicates that the actual survival is generally underestimated by the prediction model, and a negative intercept suggests the opposite (overestimation). When comparing models, an intercept closer to 0 typically indicates better calibration. Calibration can also be summarized as log(O:E), the logarithm scale of the ratio of observed (O) to expected (E) survivors. A log(O:E) > 0 signals an underestimation (the observed survival is greater than the predicted survival); and a log(O:E) < 0 indicates the opposite (the observed survival is lower than the predicted survival). A model with a log(O:E) closer to 0 is generally considered better calibrated. The Brier score is the mean squared difference between the model predictions and the observed outcomes, and it ranges from 0 (best prediction) to 1 (worst prediction). The Brier score captures both discrimination and calibration, and it is considered a measure of overall model performance. In Brier score analysis, the "null model" assigns a predicted probability equal to the prevalence of the outcome and represents a model that adds no new information. A prediction model should achieve a Brier score at least lower than the null-model Brier score to be considered as useful. The DCA was developed as a method to determine whether using a model to inform treatment decisions would do more good than harm. It plots the net benefit of making decisions based on the model's predictions across all possible risk thresholds (or cost-to-benefit ratios) in relation to the two default strategies of treating all or no patients. The care provider can decide on an acceptable risk threshold for the proposed treatment in an individual and assess the corresponding net benefit to determine whether consulting with the model is superior to adopting the default strategies. Finally, we examined whether laboratory data, which were not included in the METSSS model, would have been independently associated with survival after controlling for the METSSS model's predictions by using the multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses.
Between the two models, only SORG-MLA achieved adequate discrimination (an AUROC of > 0.7) in the entire cohort (of patients treated operatively or with radiation alone) and in the subgroup of patients treated with palliative radiotherapy alone. SORG-MLA outperformed METSSS by a wide margin on discrimination, calibration, and Brier score analyses in not only the entire cohort but also the subgroup of patients whose local treatment consisted of radiotherapy alone. In both the entire cohort and the subgroup, DCA demonstrated that SORG-MLA provided more net benefit compared with the two default strategies (of treating all or no patients) and compared with METSSS when risk thresholds ranged from 0.2 to 0.9 at both 90 days and 1 year, indicating that using SORG-MLA as a decision-making aid was beneficial when a patient's individualized risk threshold for opting for treatment was 0.2 to 0.9. Higher albumin, lower alkaline phosphatase, lower calcium, higher hemoglobin, lower international normalized ratio, higher lymphocytes, lower neutrophils, lower neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, lower platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, higher sodium, and lower white blood cells were independently associated with better 1-year and overall survival after adjusting for the predictions made by METSSS.
Based on these discoveries, clinicians might choose to consult SORG-MLA instead of METSSS for survival estimation in patients with long-bone metastases presenting for evaluation of local treatment. Basing a treatment decision on the predictions of SORG-MLA could be beneficial when a patient's individualized risk threshold for opting to undergo a particular treatment strategy ranged from 0.2 to 0.9. Future studies might investigate relevant laboratory items when constructing or refining a survival estimation model because these data demonstrated prognostic value independent of the predictions of the METSSS model, and future studies might also seek to keep these models up to date using data from diverse, contemporary patients undergoing both modern operative and nonoperative treatments.
Level III, diagnostic study.
Lee CC
,Chen CW
,Yen HK
,Lin YP
,Lai CY
,Wang JL
,Groot OQ
,Janssen SJ
,Schwab JH
,Hsu FM
,Lin WH
... -
《-》