Twice-Yearly Lenacapavir or Daily F/TAF for HIV Prevention in Cisgender Women.

There are gaps in uptake of, adherence to, and persistence in the use of preexposure prophylaxis for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention among cisgender women. We conducted a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial involving adolescent girls and young women in South Africa and Uganda. Participants were assigned in a 2:2:1 ratio to receive subcutaneous lenacapavir every 26 weeks, daily oral emtricitabine-tenofovir alafenamide (F/TAF), or daily oral emtricitabine-tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (F/TDF; active control); all participants also received the alternate subcutaneous or oral placebo. We assessed the efficacy of lenacapavir and F/TAF by comparing the incidence of HIV infection with the estimated background incidence in the screened population and evaluated relative efficacy as compared with F/TDF. Among 5338 participants who were initially HIV-negative, 55 incident HIV infections were observed: 0 infections among 2134 participants in the lenacapavir group (0 per 100 person-years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.00 to 0.19), 39 infections among 2136 participants in the F/TAF group (2.02 per 100 person-years; 95% CI, 1.44 to 2.76), and 16 infections among 1068 participants in the F/TDF group (1.69 per 100 person-years; 95% CI, 0.96 to 2.74). Background HIV incidence in the screened population (8094 participants) was 2.41 per 100 person-years (95% CI, 1.82 to 3.19). HIV incidence with lenacapavir was significantly lower than background HIV incidence (incidence rate ratio, 0.00; 95% CI, 0.00 to 0.04; P<0.001) and than HIV incidence with F/TDF (incidence rate ratio, 0.00; 95% CI, 0.00 to 0.10; P<0.001). HIV incidence with F/TAF did not differ significantly from background HIV incidence (incidence rate ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.28; P = 0.21), and no evidence of a meaningful difference in HIV incidence was observed between F/TAF and F/TDF (incidence rate ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.67 to 2.14). Adherence to F/TAF and F/TDF was low. No safety concerns were found. Injection-site reactions were more common in the lenacapavir group (68.8%) than in the placebo injection group (F/TAF and F/TDF combined) (34.9%); 4 participants in the lenacapavir group (0.2%) discontinued the trial regimen owing to injection-site reactions. No participants receiving twice-yearly lenacapavir acquired HIV infection. HIV incidence with lenacapavir was significantly lower than background HIV incidence and HIV incidence with F/TDF. (Funded by Gilead Sciences; PURPOSE 1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04994509.).

Bekker LG ，Das M ，Abdool Karim Q ，Ahmed K ，Batting J ，Brumskine W ，Gill K ，Harkoo I ，Jaggernath M ，Kigozi G ，Kiwanuka N ，Kotze P ，Lebina L ，Louw CE ，Malahleha M ，Manentsa M ，Mansoor LE ，Moodley D ，Naicker V ，Naidoo L ，Naidoo M ，Nair G ，Ndlovu N ，Palanee-Phillips T ，Panchia R ，Pillay S ，Potloane D ，Selepe P ，Singh N ，Singh Y ，Spooner E ，Ward AM ，Zwane Z ，Ebrahimi R ，Zhao Y ，Kintu A ，Deaton C ，Carter CC ，Baeten JM ，Matovu Kiweewa F ，PURPOSE 1 Study Team ... -  《-》

Twice-Yearly Lenacapavir for HIV Prevention in Men and Gender-Diverse Persons.

Twice-yearly subcutaneous lenacapavir has been shown to be efficacious for prevention of HIV infection in cisgender women. The efficacy of lenacapavir for preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in cisgender men, transgender women, transgender men, and gender-nonbinary persons is unclear. In this phase 3, double-blind, randomized, active-controlled trial, we randomly assigned participants in a 2:1 ratio to receive subcutaneous lenacapavir every 26 weeks or daily oral emtricitabine-tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (F/TDF). The primary efficacy analysis compared the incidence of HIV infection in the lenacapavir group with the background HIV incidence in the screened population. The secondary efficacy analysis compared the incidence of HIV infection in the lenacapavir group with that in the F/TDF group. Among 3265 participants who were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis, HIV infections occurred in 2 participants in the lenacapavir group (0.10 per 100 person-years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01 to 0.37) and in 9 participants in the F/TDF group (0.93 per 100 person-years; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.77). The background HIV incidence in the screened population (4634 participants) was 2.37 per 100 person-years (95% CI, 1.65 to 3.42). The incidence of HIV infection in the lenacapavir group was significantly lower than both the background incidence (incidence rate ratio, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.18; P<0.001) and the incidence in the F/TDF group (incidence rate ratio, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.51; P = 0.002). No safety concerns were identified. A total of 26 of 2183 participants (1.2%) in the lenacapavir group and 3 of 1088 (0.3%) in the F/TDF group discontinued the trial regimen because of injection-site reactions. The HIV incidence with twice-yearly lenacapavir was significantly lower than the background incidence and the incidence with F/TDF. (Funded by Gilead Sciences; PURPOSE 2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04925752.).

Kelley CF ，Acevedo-Quiñones M ，Agwu AL ，Avihingsanon A ，Benson P ，Blumenthal J ，Brinson C ，Brites C ，Cahn P ，Cantos VD ，Clark J ，Clement M ，Creticos C ，Crofoot G ，Diaz RS ，Doblecki-Lewis S ，Gallardo-Cartagena JA ，Gaur A ，Grinsztejn B ，Hassler S ，Hinojosa JC ，Hodge T ，Kaplan R ，Lacerda M ，LaMarca A ，Losso MH ，Valdez Madruga J ，Mayer KH ，Mills A ，Mounzer K ，Ndlovu N ，Novak RM ，Perez Rios A ，Phanuphak N ，Ramgopal M ，Ruane PJ ，Sánchez J ，Santos B ，Schine P ，Schreibman T ，Spencer LY ，Van Gerwen OT ，Vasconcelos R ，Vasquez JG ，Zwane Z ，Cox S ，Deaton C ，Ebrahimi R ，Wong P ，Singh R ，Brown LB ，Carter CC ，Das M ，Baeten JM ，Ogbuagu O ，PURPOSE 2 Study Team ... -  《-》

Adherence, safety, and choice of the monthly dapivirine vaginal ring or oral emtricitabine plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among African adolescent girls and young women: a randomised, open-label, crossover trial.

Half of new HIV acquisitions in Africa occur in adolescent girls and young women. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine or the monthly dapivirine vaginal ring is efficacious but has lower adherence and effectiveness among adolescent girls and young women. We aimed to assess product adherence, safety, and choice of oral PrEP compared with the dapivirine ring among African adolescent girls and young women. MTN-034/REACH was a randomised, open-label, phase 2a crossover trial among HIV-seronegative, non-pregnant adolescent girls and young women aged 16-21 years at four clinical research sites in South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the dapivirine ring or daily oral PrEP (200 mg of emtricitabine and 300 mg of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) for 6 months, then switched to the other product option for 6 months, followed by a third 6-month period in which participants were given a choice of oral PrEP, the dapivirine ring, or neither. Fixed block randomisation was used, stratified by site. The primary adherence endpoint was use of each product during the randomised periods, with high use defined as tenofovir-diphosphate concentrations greater than or equal to 700 fmol/punch (associated with taking an average of four or more tablets per week in the previous month) and greater than or equal to 4 mg dapivirine released from the returned ring (continuous use for 28 days in the previous month) based on residual drug concentrations. The primary safety endpoint was grade 2 or higher adverse events during each randomised period of 24 weeks of ring and oral PrEP. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03593655. From Feb 6, 2019 to Sept 9, 2021, 396 adolescent girls and young women were screened, 247 of whom were enrolled and randomly assigned (6 months of the ring followed by 6 months of oral PrEP n=124; 6 months of oral PrEP followed by 6 months of the ring n=123). Median age was 18 years (IQR 17-19). 54 grade 2 or higher product-related adverse events were reported during oral PrEP and five during dapivirine ring use, with no product-related serious adverse events. High adherence was observed in 753 (57%) of the 1316 oral PrEP visits and 806 (57%) of the 1407 dapivirine ring visits. Four women acquired HIV during follow-up. Adherence was moderately high and similar between oral PrEP and the dapivirine ring with favourable safety and tolerability. Oral PrEP and the dapivirine ring are effective, safe, and well tolerated HIV prevention options for adolescent girls and young women who would benefit from a choice of PrEP formulations to meet their needs and preferences. National Institutes of Health.

Nair G ，Celum C ，Szydlo D ，Brown ER ，Akello CA ，Nakalega R ，Macdonald P ，Milan G ，Palanee-Phillips T ，Reddy K ，Tahuringana E ，Muhlanga F ，Nakabiito C ，Bekker LG ，Siziba B ，Hillier SL ，Baeten JM ，Garcia M ，Johnson S ，McClure T ，Levy L ，Livant E ，Jacobson C ，Soto-Torres L ，van der Straten A ，Hosek S ，Rooney JF ，Steytler J ，Bunge K ，Parikh U ，Hendrix C ，Anderson P ，Ngure K ，REACH Protocol Team ... -  《Lancet HIV》

Antioxidants for female subfertility.

M.G. Showell, R. Mackenzie‐Proctor, V. Jordan, and R.J. Hart, “Antioxidants for Female Subfertility,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 8 (2020): CD007807, https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007807.pub4 This Editorial Note is for the above article, published online on August 27, 2020, in Cochrane Library (cochranelibrary.com), and has been issued by the Publisher, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, in agreement with Cochrane. The Editorial note has been agreed due to concerns discovered by the Cochrane managing editor regarding the retraction of six studies in the Review (Badawy et al. 2006, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.02.097; El Refaeey et al. 2014, 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.03.011; El Sharkwy & Abd El Aziz 2019a, https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12902; Gerli et al. 2007, https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202309_33752, full text: https://europepmc.org/article/MED/18074942; Ismail et al. 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.06.008; Hashemi et al. 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1372413). In addition, expressions of concern have been published for two studies (Jamilian et al. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-017-1236-3; Zadeh Modarres 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-017-1148-2). The retracted studies will be moved to the Excluded Studies table, and their impact on the review findings will be investigated and acted on accordingly in a future update. Initial checks indicate that removal of the six retracted studies did not make an appreciable difference to the results. Likewise, the studies for which Expressions of Concern were issued will be moved to the Awaiting classification table; they did not report any review outcomes, so removal will have no impact on the review findings. A couple may be considered to have fertility problems if they have been trying to conceive for over a year with no success. This may affect up to a quarter of all couples planning a child. It is estimated that for 40% to 50% of couples, subfertility may result from factors affecting women. Antioxidants are thought to reduce the oxidative stress brought on by these conditions. Currently, limited evidence suggests that antioxidants improve fertility, and trials have explored this area with varied results. This review assesses the evidence for the effectiveness of different antioxidants in female subfertility. To determine whether supplementary oral antioxidants compared with placebo, no treatment/standard treatment or another antioxidant improve fertility outcomes for subfertile women. We searched the following databases (from their inception to September 2019), with no language or date restriction: Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group (CGFG) specialised register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and AMED. We checked reference lists of relevant studies and searched the trial registers. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared any type, dose or combination of oral antioxidant supplement with placebo, no treatment or treatment with another antioxidant, among women attending a reproductive clinic. We excluded trials comparing antioxidants with fertility drugs alone and trials that only included fertile women attending a fertility clinic because of male partner infertility. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. The primary review outcome was live birth; secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancy rates and adverse events. We included 63 trials involving 7760 women. Investigators compared oral antioxidants, including: combinations of antioxidants, N-acetylcysteine, melatonin, L-arginine, myo-inositol, carnitine, selenium, vitamin E, vitamin B complex, vitamin C, vitamin D+calcium, CoQ10, and omega-3-polyunsaturated fatty acids versus placebo, no treatment/standard treatment or another antioxidant. Only 27 of the 63 included trials reported funding sources. Due to the very low-quality of the evidence we are uncertain whether antioxidants improve live birth rate compared with placebo or no treatment/standard treatment (odds ratio (OR) 1.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.36 to 2.43; P < 0.001, I2 = 29%; 13 RCTs, 1227 women). This suggests that among subfertile women with an expected live birth rate of 19%, the rate among women using antioxidants would be between 24% and 36%. Low-quality evidence suggests that antioxidants may improve clinical pregnancy rate compared with placebo or no treatment/standard treatment (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.43 to 1.89; P < 0.001, I2 = 63%; 35 RCTs, 5165 women). This suggests that among subfertile women with an expected clinical pregnancy rate of 19%, the rate among women using antioxidants would be between 25% and 30%. Heterogeneity was moderately high. Overall 28 trials reported on various adverse events in the meta-analysis. The evidence suggests that the use of antioxidants makes no difference between the groups in rates of miscarriage (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.55; P = 0.46, I2 = 0%; 24 RCTs, 3229 women; low-quality evidence). There was also no evidence of a difference between the groups in rates of multiple pregnancy (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.56; P = 0.99, I2 = 0%; 9 RCTs, 1886 women; low-quality evidence). There was also no evidence of a difference between the groups in rates of gastrointestinal disturbances (OR 1.55, 95% CI 0.47 to 5.10; P = 0.47, I2 = 0%; 3 RCTs, 343 women; low-quality evidence). Low-quality evidence showed that there was also no difference between the groups in rates of ectopic pregnancy (OR 1.40, 95% CI 0.27 to 7.20; P = 0.69, I2 = 0%; 4 RCTs, 404 women). In the antioxidant versus antioxidant comparison, low-quality evidence shows no difference in a lower dose of melatonin being associated with an increased live-birth rate compared with higher-dose melatonin (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.41 to 2.15; P = 0.89, I2 = 0%; 2 RCTs, 140 women). This suggests that among subfertile women with an expected live-birth rate of 24%, the rate among women using a lower dose of melatonin compared to a higher dose would be between 12% and 40%. Similarly with clinical pregnancy, there was no evidence of a difference between the groups in rates between a lower and a higher dose of melatonin (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.41 to 2.15; P = 0.89, I2 = 0%; 2 RCTs, 140 women). Three trials reported on miscarriage in the antioxidant versus antioxidant comparison (two used doses of melatonin and one compared N-acetylcysteine versus L-carnitine). There were no miscarriages in either melatonin trial. Multiple pregnancy and gastrointestinal disturbances were not reported, and ectopic pregnancy was reported by only one trial, with no events. The study comparing N-acetylcysteine with L-carnitine did not report live birth rate. Very low-quality evidence shows no evidence of a difference in clinical pregnancy (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.33 to 2.00; 1 RCT, 164 women; low-quality evidence). Low quality evidence shows no difference in miscarriage (OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.42 to 5.67; 1 RCT, 164 women; low-quality evidence). The study did not report multiple pregnancy, gastrointestinal disturbances or ectopic pregnancy. The overall quality of evidence was limited by serious risk of bias associated with poor reporting of methods, imprecision and inconsistency. In this review, there was low- to very low-quality evidence to show that taking an antioxidant may benefit subfertile women. Overall, there is no evidence of increased risk of miscarriage, multiple births, gastrointestinal effects or ectopic pregnancies, but evidence was of very low quality. At this time, there is limited evidence in support of supplemental oral antioxidants for subfertile women.

Showell MG ，Mackenzie-Proctor R ，Jordan V ，Hart RJ ... -  《Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews》

In-utero exposure to tenofovir-containing pre-exposure prophylaxis and bone mineral content in HIV-unexposed infants in South Africa.

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is a common drug of choice for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) or as a combination HIV treatment for pregnant women. In-utero exposure to TDF was found to be associated with lower bone mineral content (BMC) in HIV-exposed uninfected neonates. Data for infants born to women taking TDF-PrEP are lacking. The CAP016 randomized control trial was conducted in South Africa between September 2017 and August 2021 and pregnant women either initiated TDF/FTC PrEP in pregnancy (Immediate PrEP arm-IP) or at cessation of breastfeeding (Deferred PrEP arm-DP). In a secondary data analysis, we evaluated BMC in HIV-unexposed infants in the CAP016 trial in the first 18 months of life in association with maternal TDF-PrEP use during pregnancy. Infants born to women randomized to the IP arm or DP arm in the CAP016 clinical trial had BMC measurements of the whole body with head (WBH) and lumbar spine (LS) by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at 6, 26, 50 and 74 weeks. Of 481 infants born to women enrolled in the CAP016 clinical trial, 335 (69.6%) infants had a minimum of one DXA scan of the WBH and LS between 6 and 74 weeks of age (168 IP and 167 DP). Women in the IP arm received TDF-FTC PreP for a median of 19 weeks between initiation in pregnancy and delivery. Using a mixed linear regression model and adjusted for gestational age, sex and ever-breastfed, the mean difference (95% CI) for BMC of the WBH between IP and DP arms were -0.74 (-8.69 to 7.20), -1.26 (-10.75 to 8.23), -9.17 (-20.02 to 1.69) and 5.02 (-6.74 to 16.78) g at 6, 26, 50 and 74 weeks (p = 0.283). Mean differences in BMC of the LS were 0.07 (-0.10 to 0.23), 0.02 (-0.18 to 0.22), -0.14 (-0.36 to 0.09) and 0.14 (-0.11 to 0.38) g at 6, 26, 50 and 74 weeks, respectively (p = 0.329). In a randomized controlled trial, there were no differences in BMC of the WBH and LS between infants exposed to in-utero TDF-FTC PrEP and unexposed infants in the first 18 months of life.

Reddy K ，Naidoo KL ，Lombard C ，Godlwana Z ，Desmond AC ，Clark R ，Rooney JF ，Gray G ，Moodley D ... -  《Journal of the International AIDS Society》